Plan-First Orchestration: Methods & Benefits

• Plan-first orchestration is a strategy that synthesizes a full execution plan before runtime, detailing all control flows, data dependencies, and resource needs.
• It applies techniques like DAG partitioning, placement optimization, and heuristic scheduling to enhance scalability, throughput, and overall system efficiency.
• The methodology supports human oversight and safety-critical operations through pre-execution reviews that enable error mitigation and robust planning.

Plan-first orchestration is an architectural and methodological paradigm in workflow and service automation in which a complete, dependency-explicit execution plan is synthesized a priori—prior to runtime execution—rather than relying on reactive, ad hoc, or step-wise invocation patterns. The approach explicitly separates the phases of planning (where the entire workflow structure, control/data dependencies, placements, and QoS/resource requirements are established) and execution (where the computed plan is enacted by the orchestration system). This design principle is increasingly adopted in contexts ranging from distributed scientific workflows and enterprise automation to edge computing, serverless environments, and agentic systems.

1. Conceptual Foundations of Plan-First Orchestration

Plan-first orchestration contrasts with reactive or event-driven (choreography) systems by centralizing explicit planning: an orchestrator synthesizes a detailed, executable workflow or control plan that includes all constituent steps, dependencies, data paths, and optional operator approval checkpoints prior to enactment. This is typified in frameworks that serialize multi-step execution sequences, define input/output mappings for all steps, and interleave human-in-the-loop review before execution (Hellert et al., 20 Aug 2025).

A key feature is explicit modeling of execution dependencies—intermediate outputs of one operation serve as inputs for subsequent steps, with all data/control flows determined before any component is triggered. This separation supports comprehensive validation, dependency tracking, and error mitigation prior to potentially irreversible or safety-critical actions.

2. Methods and Architectural Realizations

Multiple research efforts and production frameworks exemplify plan-first orchestration, each tailored to the demands of their respective domains:

• Distributed Scientific and Data Workflows: The Circulate architecture (0901.4762) and Orchestra-based workflow partitioning (Jaradat et al., 2014) delineate orchestration engines or workflow compilers that, upon receiving the overall workflow description (often as a DAG over service invocations), first partition and optimize sub-workflows, perform placement analysis, and synthesize deployment mappings. These plans are constructed with explicit knowledge of network topology, data dependencies, and minimize anticipated bottlenecks.
• Agentic and Multi-Agent Systems: SOAN formalizes the process of recursively decomposing complex workflow goals into a structured network of atomic agents (Xiong et al., 19 Aug 2025). Each agent is an encapsulated, reusable subflow, and workflows are incrementally constructed through feedback-driven structural operations (e.g., linear insertion, branching, and nesting). Alpha Berkeley defines a process in which all capabilities/tools are classified for relevance and only those crucial to the current task are included in the plan, which is then subject to operator review (Hellert et al., 20 Aug 2025).
• Edge/Continuum Resource Orchestration: Plan-first orchestration in the cloud-edge continuum leverages multi-agent or hierarchical planning agents (e.g., via Markov games or cost-minimizing distributed control) to pre-compute allocation, offloading, and migration strategies (Kokkonen et al., 2022). The planning phase models the anticipated dynamics, optimizing not only for immediate requirements but for predicted future system states.
• Microservices and CI/CD Workflows: Orchestration platforms like Temporal (Nadeem et al., 2022) or Docker-based FogArm (Bisicchia et al., 2023) interpret an explicit workflow specification, check service/state requirements, and plan the entire execution graph before enacting it. The plan encodes activities, sequenced calls, error handling, and placement.

Table: Core Elements of Plan-First Orchestration in Representative Frameworks

Framework/Model	Planning Outputs	Execution Input
Circulate, Orchestra	Partitioned execution plan (DAG, placement map)	Sub-workflow deployments
SOAN	Agent network (atomic agents, composition)	Composed multi-agent workflow
Alpha Berkeley	Explicit step-wise plan with dependencies	Approved plan, tool selection
FogArm	Updated service placements, migration plans	Incremental container deployment
OrchestRAN (Open RAN)	Model-to-node assignments (BILP solution)	Containerized ML/AI dispatch

All approaches front-load planning—producing executable representations, placement and dependency mappings prior to runtime workflow instantiation.

3. Workflow Partitioning, Placement, and Optimization

Partitioning of workflows and strategic computation of placement is a haLLMark of plan-first orchestration. In systems like Orchestra (Jaradat et al., 2014), a recursive descent compiler converts workflow specifications into graph structures, which are decomposed into sub-workflows. Placement analysis uses QoS metrics (latency, bandwidth), cluster analysis (e.g., k-means), and capacity constraints to determine optimal deployment nodes, minimizing end-to-end cost: $$T = L_{\text{e-s}} + \frac{S_{\text{input}}}{B_{\text{e-s}}}$$ where $T$ is estimated transmission time, $L_{\text{e-s}}$ the latency between engine and service, $S_{\text{input}}$ the service input size, and $B_{\text{e-s}}$ the bandwidth.

Other systems, such as OrchestRAN (D'Oro et al., 2022), formulate binary integer programs (BILP) to select model placements over the network tree structure, reducing solution space with variable pruning and tree-cluster branching. Resource constraints and input–output connectivity are pre-checked, and conflict mitigation (e.g., ensuring functional uniqueness per assignment) is enforced in the planning phase.

PlanDQ (Chen et al., 10 Jun 2024), in the offline RL domain, exemplifies hierarchical plan-first orchestration: it separates long-horizon sub-goal planning (via a diffusion model) from low-level execution (via Q-learning). The plan—the sub-goal sequence—is established before any low-level policy action, a structure that is broadly applicable wherever coarse-to-fine planning is needed.

4. Performance, Scalability, and Efficiency

Performance benefits of plan-first orchestration have been repeatedly established:

• Reduced Communication Overhead: In Circulate (0901.4762), direct data flow between proxies rather than central engines reduced execution times by 2–4× for common patterns and 8× in end-to-end composite workflows.
• Throughput and Latency Gains: Dirigent (Cvetković et al., 25 Apr 2024), a clean-slate FaaS orchestrator, achieves up to 2,500 sandbox instantiations per second (1,250× Knative), and slashes 99th percentile scheduling latency by 2.79× compared to AWS Lambda, through precomputed in-memory state and monolithic plan execution.
• Minimized Migrations: In FogArm (Bisicchia et al., 2023), an incremental difference-based planning engine led to a 33% reduction in unnecessary service migrations and a 15% decrease in adaptation overhead under dynamic network conditions.
• Adaptability and Fault Tolerance: SOAN (Xiong et al., 19 Aug 2025) demonstrated high success rates in executing deeply nested real-world workflows, outperforming prior agentic systems as workflow complexity scaled.

Proactive planning also supports predictable resource utilization, scalable parallel execution (through sub-workflow parallelism), and safeguards against bottlenecks and capacity overruns.

5. Human Oversight and Safety-Critical Operations

Plan-first orchestration is especially advantageous in safety-critical or high-stakes domains. The Alpha Berkeley Framework (Hellert et al., 20 Aug 2025) explicitly separates planning and execution, enabling operators to review, modify, and approve intricate multi-step control plans before action. Artifact management, checkpointing, and modular deployment ensure reproducibility, rollback, and post-hoc analysis.

Such systematic planning and approval are vital in domains like accelerator control, wind farm optimization, and industrial automation, where ad hoc or reactive actions could result in unanticipated outcomes or unsafe states.

6. Extensions: Edge AI, Intent-Based and Multi-Agent Orchestration

Recent research extends plan-first orchestration to distributed, heterogeneous, and multi-agent settings. In the device–edge–cloud continuum, orchestration agents embed ML inference (nowcasting, forecasting) into the planning stage, anticipating future load and connectivity for proactive scheduling (Kokkonen et al., 2022). Intent-based orchestration frameworks in 5G (Barrachina-Muñoz et al., 2022)—and softwarized RAN (D'Oro et al., 2022)—rely on an initial transformation of stakeholder intents into validated plans, with tight integration of monitoring feedback to trigger adaptation.

In LLM-powered workflow automation (Xiong et al., 19 Aug 2025), structural plan-first approaches (via agent networks and modular decomposition) provide a means to control reasoning chains, state space expansion, and tool invocation, achieving improved scalability and robustness.

7. Limitations, Open Challenges, and Future Directions

Despite its effectiveness, plan-first orchestration faces challenges. Dynamic network or infrastructure conditions may invalidate initial plans, necessitating online adaptation or continuous re-planning (Jaradat et al., 2014, Bisicchia et al., 2023). The computational burden of large-scale plan synthesis (e.g., BILP or multi-criteria approximations) requires heuristics, pruning, and parallelization to avoid bottlenecks (D'Oro et al., 2022, Mauro et al., 11 Jul 2024). In highly dynamic agentic or edge environments, striking a balance between local autonomy and global coordination remains an active area of research (Kokkonen et al., 2022).

A plausible implication is that future orchestration platforms will further blend plan-first methodologies with adaptive, learning-enabled, and decentralized control structures, embodying proactive resilience, intent-awareness, and continuous optimization.

---

In summary, plan-first orchestration is characterized by a comprehensive pre-execution planning phase that explicitly structures all workflow steps, resource allocations, and execution order. It is realized in domains ranging from distributed scientific workflows, agentic system automation, and serverless platforms to edge AI and safety-critical industrial controls. This paradigm supports scalability, performance predictability, auditable operations, and robust adaptation in complex and dynamic environments, with empirical evidence across numerous contemporary research frameworks.