pFedBayesPT: Bayesian Instance-wise Federated Learning

• pFedBayesPT is a personalized federated learning framework that employs a semi-implicit Bayesian approach to generate instance-specific prompts for visual classification.
• It uses latent variable sampling and prompt concatenation with a frozen backbone to enhance accuracy in scenarios with both inter-client and intra-client heterogeneity.
• Empirical evaluations indicate approximately 1% accuracy improvement over baselines, demonstrating its robustness and efficacy in handling diverse data sources.

pFedBayesPT is an instance-wise personalized federated learning (pFL) framework designed to address both inter-client and intra-client heterogeneity in federated visual classification tasks. It introduces a probabilistic mechanism for instance-dependent prompt generation via a semi-implicit Bayesian approach, allowing the generation of adaptive prompts for each individual data instance rather than maintaining a sole personalized model per client. The technique leverages Bayesian uncertainty modeling over prompting mechanisms and a semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) framework, notably improving the fidelity and robustness of federated learning in highly heterogeneous environments (Ye et al., 27 Aug 2025).

1. Motivation and Conceptual Background

Traditional personalized federated learning typically learns a distinct model or a parameter-efficient adaptation (e.g., head or prompt) for each client, implicitly assuming that all data on a client are drawn from a single distribution. However, in practice, a client’s data may originate from multiple sources or domains, resulting in pronounced intra-client heterogeneity and reduced model performance. pFedBayesPT addresses this limitation by learning instance-specific prompts that augment a shared, typically frozen, backbone (such as a Vision Transformer, or ViT) with adaptive representations tailored per input (Ye et al., 27 Aug 2025).

The Bayesian perspective is central: prompts are treated as random variables with implicit posterior distributions, capturing uncertainty and diversity in visual semantics across both clients and instances.

2. Instance-wise Bayesian Prompt Generation

pFedBayesPT’s prompt generation module employs a two-phase sampling process for each input instance:

• Latent Variable Sampling: For input image features $x$, a latent code $\psi$ is sampled from a parameterized distribution $q_\phi(\psi|x)$. Binary masking of feature vectors introduces randomness and ensures that the subsequent prompt depends on instance-specific information.
• Prompt Sampling: The prompt $p$ is drawn from an isotropic Gaussian distribution conditioned on $\psi$:

$$p \sim q(p|\psi) = \mathcal{N}(\mu(\psi), \Sigma(\psi))$$

with $\mu(\psi)$ and $\Sigma(\psi)$ parameterized neural functions of the masked feature.

The generated prompt $p$ is concatenated with a global prompt (shared across clients) and inserted into multiple layers of a frozen ViT backbone. This procedure injects instance-dependent semantic bias across the model’s representational hierarchy. The use of a probabilistic (Bayesian) posterior for $p$ enables the model to draw diverse samples, inherently modeling ambiguity and visual variability at the instance level.

3. Semi-Implicit Variational Inference Formulation

The framework formulates prompt generation as a semi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) problem. The goal is to approximate the true, intractable posterior $p(p|x, y)$ by a hierarchically defined variational family: $p \sim q(p|\psi),\quad \psi \sim q_\phi(\psi|x)$ The marginal prompt distribution is thus:

$h_\phi(p) = \int q(p|\psi) q_\phi(\psi|x) d\psi$

Training maximizes the evidence lower bound (ELBO): $$\mathcal{L} = \mathbb{E}_{h_\phi(p|x)} \left[ \log \frac{p(y, p|x)}{h_\phi(p|x)} \right]$$ which, after expansion and marginalization, yields: $$\mathcal{L} = \mathbb{E}_{\psi \sim q_\phi(\psi|x),\, p \sim q(p|\psi)} [\log p(y|p, x)] - \mathbb{E}_{\psi \sim q_\phi(\psi|x)} \mathrm{KL}(q(p|\psi) \| p(p|x))$$ Additional regularization is applied to avoid degenerate solutions (such as collapse of $q_\phi(\psi|x)$), employing importance weighting over samples and mixing distributions. The final surrogate variational objective is: $$\mathcal{L}_S^J = \mathbb{E}_{(p^j,\, \psi^j)_{j=1}^J \sim q(p|\psi)q_\phi(\psi|x)} \mathbb{E}_{\{\tilde\psi^s\}_{s=1}^S \sim q_\phi(\psi|x)} \left[ \log \left(\frac{1}{J} \sum_{j=1}^J \frac{p(y, p^j|x)}{\Omega^j}\right) \right]$$ where $\Omega^j$ combines density estimates aiding in variational expressivity.

4. Experimental Evaluation

pFedBayesPT demonstrates strong performance across diverse types of heterogeneity:

• Feature Heterogeneity (DomainNet): Clients are assigned a variable number of domains (from 1 to 6). pFedBayesPT achieves both higher average test accuracy and improved worst-case client accuracy compared to Head-Tune, FedVPT/FedVPT-D, pFedPG, FedPR, and SGPT across all tested configurations.
• Label Heterogeneity (CIFAR-100): Clients hold varying numbers of classes ($s$ from 5 to 50). The method provides more robust instance-level adaptation, outperforming existing pFL baselines, especially for high levels of label heterogeneity.
• Ablation Analysis: Both the Bayesian formulation (implicit prompt posterior) and the stochastic prompt generation are essential for the observed improvements. Substituting an implicit distribution with a standard Gaussian one yields inferior results.

Empirically, pFedBayesPT achieves approximately 1% higher accuracy over the strongest existing baseline under both feature and label heterogeneous settings.

5. Applications and Breadth of Impact

Typical applications include settings characterized by distributed data with significant within-client diversity:

• Medical Imaging: Intra-client variation is common due to equipment, protocols, and populations. Instance-wise prompt adaptation enables the model to handle image-specific properties without data sharing.
• Mobile and Personalized AI: On-device inference for recommendation or classification benefits from adaptive prompts that reflect user- or context-specific specifics locally.
• Finance and Risk Assessment: Multiple data domains per client (user, institution) can be handled with fine-grained personalization, minimizing overfitting to idiosyncratic data subsets within each client.

From a methodological standpoint, pFedBayesPT exemplifies the synergy between uncertainty modeling and efficient parameterization. A plausible implication is that such frameworks can extend beyond visual classification, including sequential or multi-modal federated learning.

6. Integration with Bayesian and Federated Methodologies

pFedBayesPT brings together advances from federated learning, Bayesian modeling, and prompt tuning:

• Federated Learning: The procedure preserves client data privacy and allows for federated aggregation while performing fine-grained adaptation.
• Bayesian Modeling: By treating prompts as latent variables with implicit distributions, uncertainty in optimal adaptations is directly encoded and managed.
• Prompt Tuning: Inserted prompts do not require updating the backbone, allowing efficient adaptation even in resource-constrained federated environments (e.g., mobile or edge devices).

This approach underscores a methodological shift from client-centric to instance-centric personalization in FL, where both global and local uncertainties are modeled hierarchically.

7. Future Directions

The integration of semi-implicit variational inference with prompt-based personalization suggests several research extensions:

• Refinement of variational bounds and exploration of alternative, more complex implicit distributions for greater representational power.
• Scaling prompt generation to larger, more diverse federations or multimodal settings (e.g., vision-LLMs, sequential data).
• Investigation of communication–computation tradeoffs, as more expressive prompt models may require increased federated bandwidth or local computation.
• Application to other FL modalities, such as natural language or graph-structured data, by adapting the prompt-generation mechanism and hierarchy accordingly.

A plausible implication is that instance-wise Bayesian prompt tuning could act as a generalizable paradigm for parameter-efficient, uncertainty-aware personalization across federated learning domains.

---

pFedBayesPT thus provides a principled, probabilistically grounded framework for instance-level personalization in FL, demonstrating considerable improvements over prior methods in heterogenous data regimes via Bayesian semi-implicit prompt generation and variational inference (Ye et al., 27 Aug 2025).