Parametric E-Machine: Neural & Smart Material Control

• Parametric E-Machine (PEM) is a dual-domain paradigm featuring neural-symbolic computation for working memory and context-dependent processing.
• It employs dynamic, parametric modulation of static memory via E-states, enabling nonclassical symbolic processing and Turing universality.
• In engineered systems, PEM plates use mechanical-electrical coupling with passive networks for targeted vibration damping and efficient energy transfer.

A Parametric E-Machine (PEM) is a formal and physical system paradigm that manifests in two profoundly distinct domains: as a neural-symbolic architecture for nonclassical symbolic computation in cognitive systems, and as a physically realizable smart structure for electromechanical vibration control in engineered materials. In both cases, the PEM concept centers on parametric modulation and state-dependent reconfiguration, but the mathematical and physical instantiations differ fundamentally between cognitive/neural and continuum mechanics contexts (0901.1152, dell'Isola et al., 2010).

1. Nonclassical Symbolic PEM: Definitions and Mathematical Framework

The neural-symbolic Parametric E-Machine formalism arises from the postulate that the human neocortex manipulates the states of a dynamical memory—rather than addressable read/write buffers—labeling immovable symbolic structures in long-term memory, in contrast to classical symbolic architectures. A primitive E-Machine is defined as the septuple:

$\text{PEM} = (X, Y, E, G, f_y, f_e, f_g)$

where:

• $X$, $Y$ are finite input/output symbol alphabets.
• $G$ is the set of G-states encoding long-term memory (LTM).
• $E$ is the set of E-states, representing reconfiguration parameters as $\mathbb{R}_+^n$ vectors.
• $f_y$ is the interpretation map: $X \times E \times G \rightarrow Y$.
• $f_e$ is the E-state update (dynamic reconfiguration) map: $X \times E \times G \rightarrow E$.
• $f_g$ is the G-state update (incremental, tape-recording) map: $X \times E \times G \rightarrow G$.

At discrete time $\nu$ the evolution is governed by:

1. $y(\nu) = f_y\big(x(\nu),e(\nu),g(\nu)\big)$
2. $e(\nu+1) = f_e\big(x(\nu),e(\nu),g(\nu)\big)$
3. $g(\nu+1) = f_g\big(x(\nu),e(\nu),g(\nu)\big)$

The G-layer comprises a fixed (or slowly growing) table of associations indexed by pointers $i \in I$, while the E-layer forms a dynamical parametric vector $e(i)$ biasing, selecting, or pre-activating subsets of G entries, thus enabling context-dependent re-mapping of the static LTM without explicit pointer operations (0901.1152).

2. Parametric Extension and Algorithmic Details

The parametric extension, PEM(5.2), explicitly formulates the system operations as follows:

• Decoding (similarity-based match): For input $x(\nu) \in X^m$ and stored pattern $gx(:,i)$,

$$s(i) = \sum_{j=1}^m wx(j) \cdot T[x(j) = gx(j,i) \neq \varepsilon]$$

where $wx(j)$ are input weights, $T(\cdot)$ is the logical indicator.

• Parametric Modulation: Each similarity score is modulated by E-state,

$se(i) = s(i)\cdot(1 + a \cdot e(i))$

with gain parameter $a < 0.5$.

• Choice (WTA): Index $$i_\text{win} \in \{i \mid se(i) = \max_j se(j) > 0\}$$ is selected, resolving ties uniformly.
• Encoding: Output $y(\nu) = gy(:,i_\text{win})$.
• E-state Update:

$$e(i;\nu+1) = \begin{cases} s(i) & \text{if } s(i) > e(i;\nu) \ c \cdot e(i;\nu) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$

$c < 1$ sets decay time constant $\tau = 1/(1-c)$.

• G-state Update: With $wen(\nu)=1$, store new input/output pair into G, increment pointer.

Parameter choices $(wx(j), a, c, n, m)$ define a family of PEMs. The modulation law and decay mechanism enable E-states to transiently reconfigure the static memory for context- and set-dependent mapping (0901.1152).

3. PEM as a Model for Working Memory and Computation

The neural PEM architecture unifies nonclassical symbolic processing, working memory, and Turing universality without addressable read/write buffers. The G-layer holds a complete, incrementally tape-recorded store of associations; E-states dynamically gate retrieval and context. Notably:

• The instantaneous symbolic content of working memory is defined as the characteristic function $\chi_{WM}(i;\nu) = T(e(i;\nu)>e_{loss})$.
• Queries and context-dependent lookups are performed by E-modulated content-based selection, not explicit addressing.
• The dual-PEM model (one for sensory associative simulation of a generalized RAM, another for finite state control) with pure tape-recording and parametric reconfiguration attains Turing universality as shown constructively in (0901.1152).

Distinct from both traditional symbolic systems and statistical neural nets, PEM learning is lossless and incremental ("dumb" storage), but supports "smart" working memory operations via dynamic E-state programming.

4. PEM in Physical Systems: Electromechanical Plates

A physically distinct realization of the PEM principle arises in smart structure design. Here, a PEM plate is a thin Kirchhoff–Love elastic plate densely covered by piezoelectric patches interconnected into a two-dimensional electrical continuum (transmission line). The essential feature is the co-evolution of mechanical and electrical fields under coupled PDEs—no digital controller or software acts, only passive network elements (inductors, resistors) realizing parametric feedback (dell'Isola et al., 2010).

Strong-form governing equations:

$$\begin{align*} D\nabla^4 w(x,t) + M_m \ddot{w}(x,t) - \eta \psi(x,t) &= 0 \ L_N \nabla^2 \ddot{\psi}(x,t) + R_N \nabla^2 \dot{\psi}(x,t) + C_N \nabla^2 \psi(x,t) + \eta \nabla^2 \ddot{w}(x,t) &= 0 \end{align*}$$

where $w(x,t)$ is transverse deflection, $\psi(x,t)$ the electric potential integral, and the constants $(D, M_m, \eta, L_N, R_N, C_N)$ define mechanical, electrical, and coupling properties.

No external control is required: mechanical waves parameterically excite electrical standing waves and vice versa, allowing passive damping of mechanical vibrations by tuning (through $L_N$ and $R_N$) the electrical continuum to match target vibration modes (dell'Isola et al., 2010).

5. Numerical Solution and Optimization of PEM Plates

Numerical analysis employs a mixed non-conforming finite element method (FEM) for spatial discretization and classical Runge–Kutta integration in time. Distinctive steps:

• Mesh and Elements: Automatic triangulation; Specht non-conforming triangular elements for fourth-order mechanical field ($w$); linear triangles for second-order electrical field ($\psi$).
• Assembly: On each triangle, constitutive sub-blocks assemble global mass ($M$), damping/coupling ($C$), and stiffness ($K$) matrices.
• Modal Truncation: Eigen-decomposition of undamped system $(K-\omega^2 M)\phi=0$; solution projected onto reduced modal subspace.
• Integration: Reduced system $M_r \ddot{z} + C_r \dot{z} + K_r z = 0$ solved via fourth-order Runge–Kutta; physical fields reconstructed from modal amplitudes (dell'Isola et al., 2010).

Electrical network synthesis first tunes inductance ($L_N$) to match a mechanical eigenmode ($\omega_{e,1} = \omega_m$), then optimizes resistance ($R_N$) to maximize the damping ratio $\zeta_m$. Homogenization of patch arrays yields continuous parameters for the electrical continuum.

6. PEM Capabilities and Comparative Insights

Nonclassical Symbolic PEMs

• Efficiently learn to simulate arbitrary fixed and variable-addressed rules (as generalized RAMs) through pure tape-recording in the G-layer, with parametric retrieval by decay and activation of E-states.
• Attain Turing universality when deployed as interacting dual PEMs for associative and finite-state computation, obviating explicit RAM or pointer manipulation.
• Support combinatorial mental set switching and context-dependent behaviors by parametrically reconfiguring the effective mapping of the G-layer with only $O(2^{2^k})$ memory operations for Boolean function realization.
• Robustly contrast with both classical symbolic computing (no read/write buffer, context via E-state) and standard neural networks (no gradient-descent, E-states as distinct parametric gating) (0901.1152).

PEM Plates

• Achieve passive, frequency-targeted vibration damping—performance quantified via modal coupling coefficients ($c_{ij}$), energy exchange curves, and modal damping ratios ($\zeta_m$).
• Optimal electrical network design is grounded in maximizing energy transfer from mechanical to electrical modes at chosen frequencies; the band-limited passive nature is empirically validated.
• Numerical examples demonstrate energy transfer up to 100% coupling in the best-tuned modes, and decay ratios $\zeta \approx 0.12$–$0.15$ in practical scenarios, with higher modes minimally affected as desired (dell'Isola et al., 2010).

7. Applications and Theoretical Significance

Parametric E-Machines bridge computational neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and smart material design through a unified mechanism: context- and parameter-driven state reconfiguration over static memory or structure, rather than explicit, mutable storage or external control laws. In neural and cognitive science, PEMs model core substrates of working memory, flexible computation, and context-dependent behavior. In engineering and physics, PEM plate realizations enable robust, passive vibration control in complex geometries, marking a departure from traditional digital or active feedback control approaches.

Both forms illuminate alternative computational and control paradigms: nonclassical symbolic PEMs demonstrate how context and working memory may emerge from dynamical biases rather than addressable storage, while physical PEMs show that parametric feedback and modal targeting can be harnessed entirely within the domain of material physics and passive networks.

---

Relevant references:

(0901.1152, dell'Isola et al., 2010)