Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

p-adic Qubit Composition

Updated 22 January 2026
  • p-adic qubit composition is a framework that models quantum bits using non-Archimedean fields, ultrametric norms, and tensor products of p-adic Hilbert spaces.
  • Its representation theory leverages compact p-adic Lie groups and Clebsch–Gordan decompositions to construct composite systems and simulate Bell-type entanglement.
  • The approach enables novel quantum gate operations and protocols with unique error correction and cryptographic potential in quantum information theory.

A pp-adic qubit is a mathematical abstraction of quantum information in the setting of non-Archimedean local fields, most commonly $\Q_p$ or a finite extension, equipped with ultrametric norms and inner products. The formalism of pp-adic qubit composition draws upon the representation theory of compact pp-adic Lie groups, tensor products of pp-adic Hilbert spaces, and ultrametric functional analysis. This framework enables one to define multi-qubit systems, gates, entanglement, and universal logic operations, providing a foundation for pp-adic quantum information theory distinct from its complex counterpart.

1. pp-adic Qubit Fundamentals

A single pp-adic qubit is realized as a two-dimensional irreducible representation (irrep) of the compact pp-adic rotation group SO(3)pSO(3)_p. Explicitly, SO(3)pSO(3)_p is the subgroup of 3×33\times3 matrices over $\Q_p$ preserving a non-degenerate quadratic form A+A_+ (depending on pp) and with determinant one. The representation theory of SO(3)pSO(3)_p is profinite: every finite-dimensional irrep factors through a quotient SO(3)pmodpkSO(3)_p \bmod p^k for some k1k\geq1. All two-dimensional irreps arise from Gp=SO(3)pmodpG_p=SO(3)_p \bmod p and are indexed by j=1,,(p1)/2j=1,\dots,(p-1)/2 when p>2p>2 (Svampa et al., 20 Jan 2026).

In standard vector space language, the state space of a pp-adic qubit is Hp=Qp0+Qp1H_p=Q_p|0\rangle + Q_p|1\rangle with orthonormal computational basis vectors 0=(1,0)T|0\rangle=(1,0)^T, 1=(0,1)T|1\rangle=(0,1)^T (Weng, 2021). The pp-adic inner product is given as a $\Q_p$-valued dot product. The norm is the non-Archimedean sup-norm on coordinates: ψp=maxxψxp\|\psi\|_p = \max_x |\psi_x|_p.

2. Tensor Products of pp-adic Hilbert Spaces

Composite pp-adic systems are constructed via tensor products of pp-adic Hilbert spaces. Let H1,H2H_1,H_2 be vector spaces over a quadratic extension $Q/\Q_p$, each with ultrametric norm and pp-adic inner product (Aniello et al., 8 Oct 2025). The algebraic tensor product H1algH2H_1 \otimes_{\mathrm{alg}} H_2 is defined by the standard universal property: every bilinear map H1×H2ZH_1\times H_2 \to Z factors through the tensor product. The natural norm on this product is the pp-adic projective norm, a seminorm defined for u=i=1nxiyiu=\sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i\otimes y_i as

uπ=inf{max1inxiyi:u=i=1nxiyi}\|u\|_\pi = \inf\left\{ \max_{1\leq i\leq n}\|x_i\|\|y_i\|\,:\,u=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i\otimes y_i \right\}

reflecting the ultrametric triangle law; for a simple tensor, xyπ=xy\|x\otimes y\|_\pi = \|x\|\|y\|.

The completion of the quotient by the zero-norm subspace yields a pp-adic Banach space denoted H1^πH2H_1\widehat{\otimes}_\pi H_2. On simple tensors, the inner product is defined by x1y1,x2y2=x1,x2H1y1,y2H2\langle x_1\otimes y_1, x_2\otimes y_2\rangle_\otimes = \langle x_1,x_2\rangle_{H_1}\,\langle y_1, y_2\rangle_{H_2}, extended by bilinearity and continuity. The orthonormal basis of H1^πH2H_1\widehat{\otimes}_\pi H_2 is given by {ϕiψj}\{\phi_i\otimes \psi_j\} if {ϕi}\{\phi_i\} and {ψj}\{\psi_j\} are ON bases of H1H_1 and H2H_2.

3. Representation-Theoretic Composition and Clebsch–Gordan Decomposition

The composition of pp-adic qubits is governed by the tensor product of irreps. For qubit irreps ρA,ρB:GpO(2)\rho_A,\rho_B:G_p\to O(2), the composite system is the tensor-product representation ρAρB:GpU(4)\rho_A\otimes \rho_B:G_p\to U(4). The Clebsch–Gordan problem over GpG_p (a semidirect product Cp2Dp+1C_p^2\rtimes D_{p+1}) reduces decomposition to its Dp+1D_{p+1} subquotient:

  • If j=j=\ell, then σ(j)σ(j)χtrivχ(1)σ(2j)\sigma^{(j)}\otimes\sigma^{(j)} \cong \chi^{\rm triv} \oplus \chi^{(1)} \oplus \sigma^{(2j)}.
  • If j+p+1(mod2(p+1))j+\ell\equiv p+1\pmod{2(p+1)}, then σ(j)σ(p+1j)χ(2)χ(3)σ(p+12j)\sigma^{(j)}\otimes\sigma^{(p+1-j)} \cong \chi^{(2)} \oplus \chi^{(3)} \oplus \sigma^{(p+1-2j)}.
  • Otherwise, σ(j)σ()σ(r)σ(s)\sigma^{(j)}\otimes\sigma^{(\ell)} \cong \sigma^{(r)}\oplus\sigma^{(s)} for suitable r,sr,s.

Explicit coupled bases for small pp coincide with relabelings of the familiar Bell states.

4. Entanglement and Ultrametric Features

A state in a pp-adic tensor-product space is entangled iff it cannot be written as xyx\otimes y. The projective norm and orthonormal basis facilitate definitions of analogues of density matrices, partial trace, and Schmidt rank. The ultrametric norm precludes the cancellation effects found in the complex case—interference is "maximal," with x+ypmax(xp,yp)|x+y|_p \leq \max(|x|_p,|y|_p). The structure of entangled states is distinctive: Proposition 5.1 of (Svampa et al., 20 Jan 2026) demonstrates that every one-dimensional subrepresentation corresponds to a maximally entangled Bell-type state, while higher-dimensional stable subspaces are separable according to the Peres–Horodecki (PPT) criterion. This stands in contrast to the standard complex setting, where entanglement may occur in multi-dimensional subspaces.

5. pp-adic Quantum Gates and Universal Computation

Local pp-adic gates are elements of GL2n(Zp)GL_{2^n}(Z_p) preserving the sup-norm and the pp-adic inner product. For a single-qubit, gates are 2×22\times2 matrices with ZpZ_p entries and determinant in Zp×Z_p^\times. Composition of qubit gates is realized as matrix multiplication and, in the quaternionic formulation, corresponds exactly to quaternion multiplication—thus gate composition reflects group composition in the noncommutative pp-adic quaternion algebra H(A,B)H(A,B) over QpQ_p. Haar measure on the analytic group of unit quaternions U(H)U(H) provides the natural probability measure for random gate ensembles (Aniello et al., 2023).

For two-qubit gates, tensor product constructions yield 4×44\times4 matrices in GL4(Zp)GL_4(Z_p), and in the p=3p=3 case, G3=SO(3)3mod3G_3=SO(3)_3\bmod3 admits four inequivalent 4-dimensional irreps which generate gate sets dense in O(4)O(4), proving universality. These gates split into tensor-factorizing and genuinely entangling cosets; adjoining further ancilla qubits and encoding complex gates as real orthogonal matrices supplies an approximately universal set for any nn (Svampa et al., 20 Jan 2026).

6. Extensions: Adelic Constructions and Multi-Qubit Systems

The adelic framework generalizes pp-adic qubit composition to global fields FF and their ring of adeles AA. The global nn-qubit space $H_A^{(n)}=A\otimes_{\Q} H_{\Q}^{(n)}\cong A^{2^n}$ integrates local pp-adic and Archimedean factors, with constrained support conditions ensuring almost all local coordinates lie in maximal compact subrings (Weng, 2021). Adelic gates form the product K=vfiniteGL2n(Ov)×oU(2n)K=\prod_{v\,\mathrm{finite}}GL_{2^n}(O_v) \times \prod_{o\,|\,\infty}U(2^n), where each local gate can be embedded as the pp-component of an adele. Tensor-product rules and norm-preservation are formally identical to the purely local theory.

7. Structural Comparison and Implications for Quantum Information Theory

The pp-adic tensor product of Hilbert spaces deviates from complex quantum information in several major aspects. The ultrametric norm, manifest as a max-norm, enforces non-Archimedean orthogonality (Birkhoff–James) and blocks standard cancellation-based interference. Subspace structure and closure must be handled carefully, as direct-sum decompositions do not necessarily behave as expected under the ultrametric topology. Nonetheless, the algebraic and representation-theoretic underpinnings permit rigorous analogues of composite systems, entangled states, and universal gate sets, laying the foundations for the study of pp-adic quantum information and possibly cryptographic applications. The explicit isomorphism between completed pp-adic tensor products and Hilbert–Schmidt operator classes (Aniello et al., 8 Oct 2025) suggests potentially tractable operator-theoretic characterizations of pp-adic quantum circuits.


Table: Key Constructs in pp-adic Qubit Composition

Construct Complex Case Analog pp-adic Feature
State space $\C^2$ $\Q_p^2$, sup-norm
Composite system Tensor product Hilbert space pp-adic tensor product, max-norm
Gate group U(2)U(2), U(2n)U(2^n) GL2n(Zp)GL_{2^n}(Z_p), SO(3)pSO(3)_p, U(H)U(H)
Entanglement criterion Schmidt rank Non-factorizable in tensor product
Universal gate set Dense subset of SU(4)SU(4) Dense subset of O(4)O(4) (p=3p=3)
Haar measure (gate ensemble) Unitary group measure Product measure on unit quaternions

A plausible implication is that pp-adic quantum information theory can exploit ultrametric phenomena for novel protocols, including error correction adapted to non-Archimedean metrics and representation-theoretic gate synthesis in finite quotient rotation groups. The non-Archimedean algebraic structure offers rich future directions in arithmetic quantum information, cryptography, and pp-adic harmonic analysis.

Topic to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to $p$-adic Qubit Composition.