Optimized Model Assignment

• Optimized Model Assignment is a framework integrating combinatorial and learning-based methods to allocate models efficiently across tasks and scenarios.
• It combines classical algorithms, like the Hungarian algorithm, with modern approaches such as multiobjective and resource-aware optimization.
• Empirical benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements in cost reduction, accuracy, and performance across various application domains.

Optimized model assignment refers to a broad class of mathematical formulations, algorithms, and frameworks for allocating decision, computational, or data-driven models to specific tasks, scenarios, or clients so as to maximize efficacy, efficiency, or multi-objective utility. This paradigm encompasses classical combinatorial assignment (e.g., Hungarian algorithm for job allocation), high-dimensional scenario-dependent model selection, federated tuning with resource constraints, and end-to-end learned assignments in both tabular and deep learning contexts. Modern advances extend the classic assignment problem to integrate learning, uncertainty quantification, multiobjective tradeoffs, and scenario-specific constraints across applications in natural language processing, industrial scheduling, real-time embedded systems, workforce optimization, and more.

1. Formal Structure of Model Assignment Problems

Formally, an optimized model assignment problem is specified by a set of models $\mathcal{M}$, a set of tasks/queries/scenarios $\mathcal{T}$, and an objective function (often multi-objective) over the assignment matrix $X \in \{0,1\}^{|\mathcal{T}| \times |\mathcal{M}|}$ where $x_{i,j}=1$ iff model $j$ is assigned to task $i$. Key formulations include:

• Linear assignment: Maximizing total utility (or minimizing cost) subject to each task being assigned exactly one model and vice versa, often with additional constraints (Chen et al., 2019).
• Scenario- and data-aware assignment: Integrating scenario metadata, model capabilities, dataset compatibility, and application constraints into an assignment, as in the SOMA/SMAP framework (Qiu et al., 2023).
• Model performance and cost tradeoff: Assigning queries/tasks to models with differing predicted performance and costs, subject to accuracy or budget constraints, yielding Pareto-optimal frontiers (Liu et al., 24 May 2024).
• Resource-constrained assignment: E.g., per-client LoRA adapter selection in federated tuning as a knapsack problem under GPU memory limitations (Zhang et al., 14 Oct 2024).
• Multi-period, dynamic, or decision-aware setups: Model choices, assignments, and predictive surrogates are optimized jointly with assignment variables, as in workforce allocation (Stratman et al., 10 Oct 2024).

Across these frameworks, assignment variables capture joint combinatorial and learning-theoretic aspects, and models may be predictive surrogates, learned modules, or even entire pipelines.

2. Classical Foundations and Evolution

The classic assignment problem is a combinatorial optimization over bipartite graphs, seeking the maximum-weight matching. For $n$ workers and $n$ jobs, the canonical integer program is:

$$\max_{x \in \{0,1\}^{n \times n}} \sum_{i=1}^n \sum_{j=1}^n w_{ij} x_{ij}$$

subject to $\sum_j x_{ij}=1$, $\sum_i x_{ij}=1$ ($x_{ij}$ binary) (Chen et al., 2019).

The Ultimate Hungarian Algorithm (Kuhn-Munkres) efficiently finds an optimal matching in $O(n^3)$ time via dual labeling and augmenting path search, and underpins numerous real-world assignment use cases.

Higher-order extensions include multi-dimensional assignment for object tracking (e.g., multi-frame or multi-modality association in FAMNet) and NP-hard variants such as quadratic/cubic assignment and ATSP-based reviewer assignment (Chu et al., 2019, Wang et al., 2014). Linear programming, network-flow, and mixed-integer programming generalizations allow for richer constraints and dynamic assignment structures (Diaby, 2016).

3. Scenario- and Context-Aware Model Assignment

Scenario-based model assignment introduces heterogeneity both in tasks (scenarios), data (datasets), and models. The SOMA problem, formalized by Qiu et al., seeks assignments

$$\max \sum_{s \in \mathcal{S}} \sum_{d \in \mathcal{D}} \sum_{m \in \mathcal{M}} y_{s,d,m}\ \text{score}_{(s,d,m)}$$

subject to feasibility constraints (one model per scenario, dataset/model type matches, binary eligibility by requirements) (Qiu et al., 2023). The SMAP framework integrates:

• Heterogeneous information fusion: Encoding scenario, model, and dataset features as composite inputs for a universal scoring function.
• Multi-head attention scoring: Aggregating multiple performance, compatibility, and soft signals through a multi-head neural scorer.
• Mnemonic center: A domain-specific memory mechanism to cache and re-use previous assignments in recurring scenarios.

Greedy or combinatorial algorithms then select model-dataset-scenario triples to maximize cumulative utility, supporting rapid deployment across dynamic scenarios.

4. Multiobjective Assignments and Uncertainty Modeling

Modern assignment frameworks optimize trade-offs between conflicting objectives (e.g., cost, accuracy, latency). OptLLM formalizes the per-query-per-model assignment as a bi-objective problem: $$\text{minimize}\ [\sum_{ij} c_j x_{ij},\quad -\sum_{ij} p_j(q_i) x_{ij}]$$ with Pareto-optimal assignments constructed via destruction–reconstruction heuristics (Liu et al., 24 May 2024).

Prediction of success probabilities $p_j(q_i)$ is achieved using multi-label ensemble classifiers with robust (uncertainty-aware) aggregation. The overall assignment exploits these probabilistic estimates to dynamically trade expected cost against accuracy, generating solution sets strictly dominant to evolutionary baselines across diverse benchmarks.

Uncertainty–aware and decision–aware optimization further allows the predictive surrogate itself to be chosen jointly with assignments, as in DAO for workforce allocation. Here, both assignment variables and indicator variables for model selection per worker are optimized together under capacity and one-model-per-worker constraints (Stratman et al., 10 Oct 2024).

5. Resource-Constrained and Federated Model Assignment

Heterogeneous platforms and resource limitations introduce additional layers of complexity. Fed-pilot casts the allocation of LoRA modules to memory-limited clients as a knapsack problem per round: $$\max_{m_{i,(j)}} \sum_j m_{i,(j)} \Gamma_{i,(j)}\quad\text{subject to}\ \mathcal{C}_i(m_i) \leq \mathcal{K}_i$$ where $\Gamma_{i,(j)}$ is an information-gain score and $\mathcal{C}_i(m_i)$ is client memory usage (Zhang et al., 14 Oct 2024). Greedy approximation efficiently selects modules, and dynamic aggregation rules (temporal-spatial averaging) counteract update imbalance and non-IID data.

Embedded/real-time task assignment expands this framework with multi-objective MILPs jointly optimizing mapping, offloading, and priorities, leveraging modern scheduling-theoretic response-time constraints (Casini et al., 2022). These techniques yield provably optimal deployments on SoCs under platform-specific latency, preemption, and hardware acceleration constraints.

6. Algorithmic Approaches and Solution Methods

Optimized model assignment employs a diverse set of algorithmic tools:

• Exact combinatorial algorithms: Hungarian algorithm, integer/linear programming, ATSP-based assignment with subtour elimination (Chen et al., 2019, Wang et al., 2014).
• Metaheuristics and hybrid search: Destruction–reconstruction loops, evolutionary multiobjective optimizers, greedy approximation for knapsack variants (Liu et al., 24 May 2024, Zhang et al., 14 Oct 2024).
• Stochastic dynamic programming: Coupled MDPs for systems with sequential/uncertain behavior in machine health and task queues (Nasir et al., 20 Jan 2024).
• Learned differentiable assignment: End-to-end tensor approximation, $\ell_1$ normalization, and in-network training of assignment in deep object tracking (Chu et al., 2019).
• Neural-combinatorial scoring: Multi-head attention mechanisms capturing nuanced feature compatibilities in heterogeneous matching (Qiu et al., 2023).

Each approach is tailored to structural properties of the problem—size, objective landscape, resource and feasibility constraints, and the extent of required personalization.

7. Empirical Benchmarks and Practical Impact

Empirical validation demonstrates significant improvements in diverse operational settings:

• LLM query allocation: OptLLM achieved cost reductions of 2.40% to 49.18% at best-LLM-matched accuracy and up to 95.87% cost savings relative to multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (Liu et al., 24 May 2024).
• Resource-limited federated tuning: Fed-pilot outperformed random-dropping and uniform-saver baselines by up to 11 percentage points in accuracy under real distributional and memory constraints (Zhang et al., 14 Oct 2024).
• Workforce assignment: Decision-aware optimization yielded a further 0.8% profit improvement over the best uncertainty-aware method, with pronounced gains on high-value/risk tasks and data-scarce workers (Stratman et al., 10 Oct 2024).
• Reviewer assignment: Preference–matrix guided ATSP reduced aggregate “distance” by 39–70% over random in software peer review (Wang et al., 2014).
• Scenario-aware matching: SMAP’s multi-head attention achieved top-1 hit rates of 0.81, outperforming conventional recommendation and matrix factorization techniques (Qiu et al., 2023).

These results underline the operational benefits of incorporating scenario, data, model, and resource heterogeneity directly into assignment—not merely as post hoc selection, but as a tightly integrated optimization.

---

References

• "The Application of Bipartite Matching in Assignment Problem" (Chen et al., 2019)
• "SMAP: A Novel Heterogeneous Information Framework for Scenario-based Optimal Model Assignment" (Qiu et al., 2023)
• "OptLLM: Optimal Assignment of Queries to LLMs" (Liu et al., 24 May 2024)
• "Fed-pilot: Optimizing LoRA Allocation for Efficient Federated Fine-Tuning with Heterogeneous Clients" (Zhang et al., 14 Oct 2024)
• "Decision-Aware Predictive Model Selection for Workforce Allocation" (Stratman et al., 10 Oct 2024)
• "Solving reviewer assignment problem in software peer review: An approach based on preference matrix and asymmetric TSP model" (Wang et al., 2014)
• "Optimized Partitioning and Priority Assignment of Real-Time Applications on Heterogeneous Platforms with Hardware Acceleration" (Casini et al., 2022)
• "FAMNet: Joint Learning of Feature, Affinity and Multi-dimensional Assignment for Online Multiple Object Tracking" (Chu et al., 2019)
• "Optimized Task Assignment and Predictive Maintenance for Industrial Machines using Markov Decision Process" (Nasir et al., 20 Jan 2024)