Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 437 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Online Two-Stage Submodular Maximization (O2SSM)

Updated 29 October 2025
  • O2SSM is a framework that preselects a restricted ground set and then optimizes revealed submodular functions online, blending combinatorial techniques with online learning.
  • It employs LP-based rounding and online convex optimization to achieve competitive regret guarantees under various combinatorial constraints such as matroids.
  • The approach enhances applications like influence maximization, data summarization, and ad allocation by enabling scalable and adaptive decision-making in dynamic environments.

Online Two‐Stage Submodular Maximization (O2SSM) addresses decision problems in which a restricted ground set is first selected in advance and then, as new submodular objectives are revealed online, a final output is obtained by optimizing these objectives on the restricted set. In many real-world applications—including influence maximization, data summarization, and ad allocation—this two‐stage structure captures both the need to reduce the data size (often under complex combinatorial constraints) and to adapt decisions as utility functions change over time. The models and algorithms for O2SSM blend classical submodular maximization theory with online learning and combinatorial design, thereby achieving competitive guarantees despite limited information and dynamic environments.

1. Model Formulation and Problem Structure

O2SSM operates in rounds. In each round, an algorithm must choose a restricted subset from a large ground set before observing the actual submodular function that will determine reward. Formally, let V=[n]V = [n] be the ground set. At each round t=1,,Tt=1,\dots,T:

  • First, the algorithm selects a binary vector xtX{0,1}nx_t \in X_\ell \subseteq \{0,1\}^n representing a restricted set of up to \ell elements.
  • Then a monotone submodular reward function ft:2VR+f_t: 2^V\to\mathbb{R}_+ is revealed, and the reward is defined as Ft(xt)=maxytYM(xt)ft(yt),F_t(x_t) = \max_{y_t \in Y_M(x_t)} f_t(y_t), where YM(xt)={y{0,1}n:yxt,yI}Y_M(x_t) = \{y \in \{0,1\}^n: y \le x_t,\, y \in \mathcal{I}\} and I\mathcal{I} could be, for example, the independent sets of a matroid (or a uniform matroid modeling a cardinality constraint).

The goal is to develop an online selection policy that minimizes the regret relative to the best fixed restricted subset in hindsight, often measured as an alpha-regret in which the offline optimum is discounted by the approximation barrier inherent in submodular maximization (typically $1-1/e$). This formulation lies at the intersection of two-stage stochastic programming and online submodular maximization.

2. Algorithmic Frameworks

The algorithmic strategies for O2SSM typically decompose decisions into two layers. In the first stage, a restricted ground set is computed using combinatorial or LP-based techniques. In the second stage, as each monotone submodular function is revealed online, the algorithm optimizes over the preselected subset. Two major frameworks emerge:

  • LP-based Rounding Methods: These approaches relax the combinatorial selection problem into a linear program (or configuration LP) and then apply dependent rounding algorithms that preserve marginal probabilities and capacity constraints. Techniques such as multi‐color greedy assignments enhance offline performance and are extended to the online setting via no-regret subroutines per “color” or position.
  • Online Convex Optimization (OCO) Reductions: For a class of submodular functions, such as weighted threshold potential (WTP) functions, a concave relaxation is available. OCO algorithms (e.g., Online Mirror Descent, Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader) are used to update fractional solutions over the matroid polytope. Subsequent randomized pipage or swap rounding yields an integral solution while transferring regret bounds from the convex domain to the original combinatorial problem.

In both cases, the two-stage structure is reflected in the decoupling of ground set selection (stage one) and online function optimization (stage two).

3. Theoretical Guarantees

The key theoretical results for O2SSM balance optimal approximation factors with sublinear regret. For instance, when the second-stage functions belong to the WTP class:

  • Under general matroid constraints, one obtains a sublinear (11/e)2(1-1/e)^2-regret guarantee, meaning that over TT rounds the cumulative reward satisfies

t=1TFt(xt)(11/e)2maxxXt=1TFt(x)o(T).\sum_{t=1}^T F_t(x_t) \geq (1-1/e)^2\max_{x\in X_\ell}\sum_{t=1}^T F_t(x) - o(T).

  • In the special case of uniform matroids of rank kk, a refined bound of

(11/e)(1ekkkk!)(1-1/e)\Big(1-e^{-k}\frac{k^k}{k!}\Big)

is achieved, which for large kk converges to the optimal $1-1/e$ factor.

The analysis frequently employs techniques such as balls‐and‐bins probability, concentration bounds in dependent rounding, and dual-fitting using the Lovász extension. In the reduction to OCO, the “sandwich” property of the concave relaxation guarantees that optimizing over the fractional space incurs only a multiplicative loss (typically approaching $1-1/e$), which is then preserved after rounding.

4. Practical Applications and Impact

O2SSM captures numerous applications where both data reduction and sequential decision making are critical. Key application domains include:

  • Influence Maximization: In social networks, the algorithm adaptively selects a small seed set in the first stage so that when influence propagation models (such as Independent Cascade or Linear Threshold) are revealed, the eventual spread of influence is nearly optimal.
  • Data Summarization: By restricting the ground set to a manageable “summary” set, subsequent summarization or clustering functions applied online can closely approximate the utility of processing the full dataset.
  • Ad Allocation and Ranking: In online advertising or information ranking, where positions or slots must be filled and submodular utility functions capture diversity or diminishing returns, O2SSM algorithms yield near-optimal cumulative reward while adapting to user feedback.

The use of LP-guided dependent rounding and OCO-based updates not only improves competitive ratios compared to natural greedy methods but also ensures that these techniques scale to large datasets and support adversarial inputs.

O2SSM stands as a natural generalization of earlier online submodular maximization problems. In classical online models, a set (or assignment) is selected in each round and the reward (a monotone submodular function) is subsequently observed. Extensions to O2SSM add a first-stage selection, which narrows the search space for subsequent online optimization. Techniques developed in works on online submodular maximization under matroid constraints (such as those using multi-color greedy algorithms, continuous greedy methods, and online learning with bandit feedback) directly inform the design and analysis of O2SSM algorithms. Furthermore, methods from robust submodular maximization and two-stage stochastic programming—where delayed constraint generation or sampling from scenarios is employed—provide additional insights into building practical O2SSM solutions.

6. Future Directions

Current O2SSM research motivates several potential extensions:

  • Advancing techniques to handle non-monotone submodular functions in the two-stage setting, for example through sampling with trimming or non-oblivious boosting frameworks.
  • Extending the range of applicable combinatorial constraints to include knapsack or intersection of matroids while retaining competitive regret guarantees.
  • Integrating adaptive or robust optimization strategies to better handle adversarial environments, for example by considering adversarial delays or bandit feedback in the OCO reduction.
  • Applying the framework to emerging applications such as personalized recommendation systems and adaptive sensor placement, where rapid adaptation and reduced complexity are essential.

By advancing theoretical tools and algorithmic strategies, O2SSM continues to bridge combinatorial optimization with online learning, promising both stronger guarantees and practical scalability.

Online Two‐Stage Submodular Maximization thus represents a sophisticated yet versatile framework for modern online decision problems that combine data reduction with dynamic, submodular reward optimization under combinatorial constraints.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Online Two-Stage Submodular Maximization (O2SSM).