Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Online Dispatch Algorithm

Updated 27 December 2025
  • Online dispatch algorithm is a real-time decision system that dynamically assigns resources to tasks based solely on current and past data.
  • It integrates methods like reinforcement learning, online convex optimization, and approximate dynamic programming to effectively handle non-stationary and uncertain environments.
  • This approach is applied in ride-hailing, edge computing, and power grid management, providing scalable and adaptive solutions for dynamic resource allocation.

Online Dispatch Algorithm

An online dispatch algorithm is a real-time decision system that dynamically assigns discrete resources (drivers, couriers, jobs, vehicles, power generation units, etc.) to tasks or requests under uncertainty, leveraging only current and past information without anticipation of future realizations. This paradigm is essential in environments where demand, system state, and exogenous factors (weather, traffic, network failures) are non-stationary and unpredictable, requiring adaptive policies capable of operating over large-scale, distributed, or partially observed systems. Online dispatch encompasses a broad spectrum of methodologies including reinforcement learning (RL), convex optimization, approximate dynamic programming (ADP), combinatorial matching, and distributed control.

1. General Frameworks and Problem Formulations

Online dispatch problems are typically modeled as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), Semi-Markov Decision Processes (SMDPs), Partially Observable MDPs (POMDPs), or their multi-agent variants. At each decision epoch, the algorithm observes the current system state (or a partial/local view), selects resource-task assignments, and incurs instant/discounted rewards based on a prescribed objective (e.g., maximizing cumulative income (Eshkevari et al., 2022), minimizing regret (Zhou et al., 18 Dec 2025), reducing unmet demand (Li et al., 21 Dec 2025), or balancing response time and cost (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2019)).

Key formulations include:

The online regime mandates that algorithms operate sequentially, exploiting statistical learning or optimization over streaming data rather than relying on batch/foreknowledge.

2. Algorithmic Strategies and Solution Methodologies

Several algorithmic archetypes have emerged across online dispatch domains:

a. Reinforcement Learning-based Dispatch

Large-scale RL methods optimize dispatch policies via value functions or actor-critic mechanisms:

  • Tabular/Deep RL: Tabular value updating with temporal-difference (TD) learning, and deep RL actor-critic architectures are used for state/action-spaces with high cardinaility or complex spatial correlations. The ride-hailing marketplace RLW system extends on-policy expected TD to model trip completion uncertainty, enabling immediate value backup without delayed feedback (Eshkevari et al., 2022). Multi-agent RL approaches further decentralize control to each vehicle or zone (Zhou et al., 2019, Chen et al., 2019).
  • Custom Utility and Matching: The dispatch decision is framed as an edge-weighted bipartite matching, where edge utilities encode a mix of expected immediate reward, value-lifts (spatial repositioning), completion probability, and penalties (e.g., pickup distance). Standardization and Bayesian optimization of utility weights promote transferability across markets (Eshkevari et al., 2022, Zhou et al., 2019).

b. Online Convex Optimization and Primal-Dual Methods

Online convex optimization (OCO) and primal-dual controllers address dispatch in energy and microgrid systems with time-varying cost and constraints:

  • Distributed Primal-Dual: Each agent solves a local gradient step based on a locally observed objective and a constraint-tracking dual variable, updated via neighborhood consensus to maintain global feasibility. Theoretical guarantees of sublinear regret and constraint violation are established under time-varying disturbances (Zhou et al., 18 Dec 2025).
  • Virtual Queue and Expert Tracking: Adaptive OCO approaches maintain virtual queues (dual proxies) to penalize constraint violations and aggregate multiple step-size “experts” to achieve dynamic regret minimization and strict feasibility, even under high volatility or absent forecasts (Huang et al., 4 Jul 2024, Qi et al., 3 Jul 2025).

c. Approximate Dynamic Programming/ADP

For ultra-fast or high-dimensional dispatch tasks (e.g., batched courier assignment under tight deadlines), exact DP is infeasible. Neural ADP methods leverage deep value-function approximators to encapsulate high-dimensional state dynamics, often decomposed across agents or units (e.g., post-decision courier states (Dehghan et al., 2023)). Assignment at each epoch is formulated as a tractable matching IP, integrating learned value estimates.

d. Online Matching and Competitive Algorithms

Assignment under i.i.d. arrivals is addressed via optimally competitive online algorithms (e.g., DISPATCH), using fractional transportation LPs to direct probabilistic matching. Uniform-availability and assignment invariants guarantee at least ½ of offline optimal utility on expectation—provably tight (Chang et al., 2018).

e. Simulation-based Online Dynamic Programming

For scenarios with rare or extreme uncertainty (distribution network restoration after disasters), simulation-based online DP employs index-based priority base policies to generate candidate actions, then uses fast rollout simulation to select the action minimizing expected cumulative loss, without reliance on historical data or large-scale MIP solves (Li et al., 21 Dec 2025).

3. Adaptive Mechanisms and Uncertainty Management

Online dispatch algorithms integrate several adaptive mechanisms to cope with uncertainty and nonstationarity:

  • Expected TD Updates and Reward Smoothing: Modelling outcome randomness (e.g., trip cancellations) and denoising dynamic pricing signals via exponential moving averages (Eshkevari et al., 2022).
  • Adaptive Graph Pruning and Bandit Methods: Dynamic thresholding on edge inclusion in the matching graph via limited-memory multi-armed bandit selection to minimize cancellation and adapt to non-stationary environments (Eshkevari et al., 2022).
  • Online Data Augmentation and Fine-tuning: Real-time retraining or fine-tuning of forecasting models and decision policies as new data becomes available, crucial for robustness to distribution shift or system drift (Jiang et al., 2023).
  • Rolling Horizon and Kernel Reference Updating: Reference trajectories for state-of-charge (SoC) or grid import are synthesized via online kernel regression on historical optimal scenarios, with rolling-horizon re-optimization applied at every step (Qi et al., 3 Jul 2025, Huang et al., 4 Jul 2024).

4. Deployment Architectures and Real-World Implementation

Scalable online dispatch architectures frequently decouple high-frequency, low-latency matching from slower policy updating and statistics aggregation:

  • Two-Tier Service: Low-latency (2 sec) matching for order assignment, maintained separately from high-throughput (10 sec) value table and statistics updates (Eshkevari et al., 2022). All parameters (Q-networks, value tables) are stored centrally, ensuring sub-100 ms dispatch decisions.
  • Distributed Control: Each agent (vehicle, generator) maintains only local state and communicates dual estimates and constraint trackers over a sparse, time-varying communication graph (Zhou et al., 18 Dec 2025).
  • Engineering and Scalability: Neural matching, batched assignment, and parameter sharing enable operation over fleets with 100k vehicles in real time, with typical policy evaluations per dispatch round in the sub-200 ms range (Zhou et al., 2019, Eshkevari et al., 2022).
  • Simulation and Rollout Parallelization: Scenario-based dynamic programming for bus or repair crew dispatch leverages root-parallel rollouts, exploiting GPU or multicore architectures to solve for thousands of candidate trajectories per decision epoch (Li et al., 21 Dec 2025, Talusan et al., 5 Mar 2024).

5. Theoretical Guarantees and Empirical Performance

Many online dispatch algorithms are equipped with formal performance analyses and empirical validation:

  • Regret and Constraint Violation Bounds: Sublinear dynamic regret and cumulative constraint violation (e.g., RT=O(T3/4+T1/4PT)R_T = O(T^{3/4} + T^{1/4}P_T) under pathwise variability) are proven for online convex/distributed primal-dual frameworks (Zhou et al., 18 Dec 2025, Huang et al., 4 Jul 2024, Qi et al., 3 Jul 2025).
  • Competitive Ratio and Matching Guarantees: The $0.5$-competitive ratio for online maximum weighted bipartite matching with i.i.d. arrivals is tight and achieved by DISPATCH—no online policy can improve this on expectation (Chang et al., 2018).
  • Empirical Uplift Metrics: RL-based ride-hailing dispatch demonstrates 1.3%1.3\%–5.3%5.3\% causal income and metric improvement at scale (Eshkevari et al., 2022). Spatio-temporal adaptive strategies yield $8$–15%15\% profit uplift over uniform-interval baselines under real-world order flows (Liu et al., 2020).
  • Efficiency under Partial/Delayed Observation: Distributed job dispatch under POMDP yields 20.67%20.67\% response-time reduction and robust outperformance of heuristic or outdated-information baselines (Hong et al., 2020).
  • Resiliency and Adaptability: Simulation-based ODP for power network restoration achieves $20$–30%30\% lower load-shedding versus MPC and 2-stage SP, and maintains sub-5 min per decision scalability on 8,500-bus systems (Li et al., 21 Dec 2025).
  • Domain Adaptability: Online MDP/ADP pipelines generalize to diverse domains (emergency response, delivery, public transit, energy), with data-driven predictors and policy modules modularly replaced for context-specific optimization (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2019, Talusan et al., 5 Mar 2024).

6. Limitations and Domain-Specific Considerations

  • Forecasting and Data Requirements: Some methods (RL, rolling horizon, neural ADP) may require voluminous historical or streaming data for effective learning and adaptation. Kernel reference and empirical approaches can reduce forecasting needs (Huang et al., 4 Jul 2024).
  • Information Delays and Partial Observation: Distributed systems operating under outdated or local observation require additional belief/tracking mechanisms and asymptotic performance is inherently limited by coordination delays (Hong et al., 2020).
  • Computational Bottlenecks: Large-scale combinatorial matching and rerouting are bottlenecked by assignment subproblems; surrogates (greedy heuristics, bipartite matching reductions, local utility offers) are needed for system-level scalability (Zhou et al., 2019, Liu et al., 2020).
  • Optimality Gaps and Adversarial Regimes: No constant competitive ratio is possible for online adaptive interval dispatch under bounded waiting (Yao's minimax), and worst-case adversarial inputs limit the approximation factors achievable (Liu et al., 2020, Chang et al., 2018).

7. Cross-Domain Impact and Research Directions

Online dispatch algorithms are foundational to digital platform economies, critical infrastructure management, and real-time logistics. Cutting-edge deployments in ride-hailing (Eshkevari et al., 2022), power grid management (Zhou et al., 18 Dec 2025), disaster recovery (Li et al., 21 Dec 2025), same-day delivery (Dehghan et al., 2023), and public transit (Talusan et al., 5 Mar 2024) demonstrate their field readiness and substantial impact. Methodological advances such as expectation-based TD learning, kernel SoC reference updating, simulation-based rollout, and adaptive multi-agent coordination have generalized applicability.

Research challenges remain in integrating richer multi-objective criteria, scaling learning under incomplete or drifting environments, achieving robust competitive performance under varying adversary models, and unifying insights between RL, OCO, and simulation-based planning communities. Ongoing advances in distributed computation, data-driven forecasting, and adaptive control will further elevate the efficiency and resilience of online dispatch solutions.

References (by arXiv id):

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Online Dispatch Algorithm.

Add Bell Notification Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Follow Topic by Email