Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

One-Parameter Deformation of Starobinsky Model

Updated 22 August 2025
  • The paper shows that introducing a deformation parameter n in the Starobinsky model adjusts the auxiliary scalar coupling, recovering various successful inflationary models.
  • It details how the modified kinetic sector affects the UV cutoff, with n=1 restoring the Planck scale, while higher values yield lower cutoffs during inflation.
  • The analysis connects nearly universal slow-roll predictions with small higher-order corrections, ensuring consistent alignment with current CMB observations.

A one-parameter deformation of the Starobinsky model refers to a controlled modification of the original R + R² inflationary action through the introduction of a single continuous parameter that changes the functional structure of the model, thereby modifying both its ultraviolet structure and its cosmological predictions. This mechanism subsumes many phenomenologically successful inflationary models as descendants of the Starobinsky model, distinguished by their kinetic sector, UV cut-off, and minor variations in slow-roll predictions, and, in special cases, alters the effective field theory's domain of validity.

1. Mathematical Formulation and Deformation Parameterization

The original Starobinsky model is based on a gravitational action of the form

SS=12d4x g (MP2R+16M2R2)S_{\mathrm{S}} = \frac{1}{2} \int d^4x\ \sqrt{-g}\ \left( M_P^2 R + \frac{1}{6M^2} R^2 \right)

where MPM_P is the reduced Planck mass and MM is set by CMB normalization. By introducing an auxiliary scalar and transforming to the Einstein frame, the theory becomes equivalent to canonical gravity plus a scalar field ϕ\phi with the potential

VS(ϕ)=34MP2M2(1e2/3ϕ/MP)2V_S(\phi) = \frac{3}{4} M_P^2 M^2 \left(1 - e^{-\sqrt{2/3}\,\phi/M_P}\right)^2

which supports slow-roll inflation on a plateau at large field values.

A generic one-parameter deformation is introduced via a modification of the function f(ϕ)f(\phi) that replaces the auxiliary coupling in the Jordan frame. In universal attractor-type models, the deformation is characterized by an exponent nn in

f(ϕ)ϕnMPn2f(\phi) \sim \frac{\phi^n}{M_P^{n-2}}

with the Jordan frame potential VJ(ϕ)f(ϕ)2V_J(\phi) \sim f(\phi)^2. The parameter nn serves as the deformation parameter; n=1n=1 recovers non-minimally coupled quadratic chaotic inflation and n=2n=2 corresponds to Higgs inflation.

This class of action generalizes as: S=d4xg[MP22R+f(ϕ)RVJ(ϕ)]S = \int d^4x\, \sqrt{-g}\, \left[\frac{M_P^2}{2} R + f(\phi)\, R - V_J(\phi) \right] During the inflationary regime, the kinetic term is negligible, ϕ\phi becomes auxiliary and can be integrated out, yielding an effective R+R2R + R^2 action with corrections set by nn.

2. Role of the Deformation in Inflationary Dynamics

For large ϕ\phi, all models with VJ(ϕ)f(ϕ)2V_J(\phi) \sim f(\phi)^2 and f(ϕ)ϕnf(\phi) \sim \phi^n collapse to an effective R+R2R + R^2 theory whose Einstein-frame potential asymptotes to the Starobinsky form. The inflationary predictions—scalar spectral index nsn_s and tensor-to-scalar ratio rr—are nearly universal at leading order: ns12N,r12N2n_s \approx 1 - \frac{2}{N}, \quad r \approx \frac{12}{N^2} where NN is the number of e-folds. The differences between descendants and the Starobinsky model appear in higher-order corrections (10310^{-3}10510^{-5}) to nsn_s and rr, determined by the precise kinetic structure in the Jordan frame. These differences are observationally insignificant with current data, but may be relevant for future high-precision measurements.

3. Deformation and UV Cutoff: Effective Field Theory Implications

The kinetic term structure imposed by the deformation parameter nn controls the UV cutoff scale AA of the effective field theory. For universal attractor models,

  • If n<7/3n < 7/3 (including the Higgs inflation case n=2n=2), the UV cutoff is lower than the inflationary energy, AV1/4A \lesssim V^{1/4}.
  • If n=1n=1 (non-minimally coupled quadratic chaotic inflation), the UV cutoff is restored to the Planck scale, A=MPA = M_P.

This distinction is rooted in whether the inflaton is an auxiliary field (as in Starobinsky, implying no kinetic term and high cutoff) or a true propagating field (as in general attractor models, lowering the cutoff). As a result, only specific deformations (notably n=1n=1) provide a radiatively stable inflationary sector valid up to Planckian scales, crucial for the reliability of any inflationary effective theory.

4. Special Case: Non-Minimally Coupled Quadratic Chaotic Inflation

The non-minimally coupled quadratic chaotic inflation model has the action

S=d4xg[(MP22+ξϕ2)R12(ϕ)212m2ϕ2]S = \int d^4x\, \sqrt{-g}\, \left[\left(\frac{M_P^2}{2} + \xi\phi^2\right) R - \frac{1}{2}(\partial\phi)^2 - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2\right]

During inflation, integrating out ϕ\phi leads to an effective

Seff=12d4xg[MP2R+16Meff2R2]S_{\mathrm{eff}} = \frac{1}{2} \int d^4x\, \sqrt{-g}\, \left[ M_P^2 R + \frac{1}{6M_{\mathrm{eff}}^2} R^2 \right]

with Meff2/(12MP2)=g(ξ,m)M_{\mathrm{eff}}^2/(12M_P^2) = g(\xi,m). This mapping ensures matching slow-roll observables with the Starobinsky predictions, while the cutoff A=MPA = M_P ensures theoretical consistency. Unlike the minimally coupled quadratic model (ruled out by the large predicted rr), this non-minimal version (with n=1n=1) supports inflation in agreement with Planck data and is valid up to the Planck scale.

5. Comparison of Descendant Models and UV Consistency

The following table summarizes the main features for different values of the deformation parameter nn:

Model nn value UV Cutoff AA Inflationary Observables
Starobinsky MPM_P ns12/Nn_s \simeq 1-2/N, r12/N2r\simeq12/N^2
Higgs inflation 2 A<V1/4A < V^{1/4} As Starobinsky (small corrections)
Universal attractor (gen) <7/3<7/3 A<V1/4A < V^{1/4} As Starobinsky (small corrections)
Non-min. quadratic chaos 1 MPM_P As Starobinsky

For n<7/3n < 7/3 (Higgs inflation, generic attractors), the UV cutoff can be below the energy scale of inflation, potentially invalidating the effective theory during observable inflationary evolution. For n=1n=1, both the inflationary predictions and the UV consistency of the theory are maintained.

6. Data Compatibility and Theoretical Selectivity

Planck (and subsequent) observations support a scalar tilt ns0.96n_s \sim 0.96 and a low tensor-to-scalar ratio r0.01r \lesssim 0.01. All models reducing to the Starobinsky dynamics for large-field inflation—regardless of the detailed value of nn—fit these observables up to negligible corrections for slow-roll parameters, as slow-roll dynamics erases dependence on nonleading kinetic terms. However, only certain one-parameter deformations (specifically, those with UV-safe cutoff, i.e., n=1n=1) possess the theoretical consistency required of a robust inflationary setup, in particular regarding the validity of the effective field theory throughout the inflationary regime.

7. Implications and Theoretical Significance

The idea that a one-parameter deformation (encoded by nn) governs both inflationary observables and the theory's ultraviolet cutoff links cosmological predictions to underlying high-energy theory structure. While a broad class of universal attractor models and their variants can fit CMB observations, theoretical viability requires attention to the UV cutoff set by the kinetic sector. In this framework, only specific deformations (notably, the non-minimally coupled quadratic chaotic inflation with n=1n=1) remain viable: they reproduce Starobinsky-like inflation, comply with Planckian cutoff requirements, and avoid inconsistency with the anticipated energy scales during the early universe.

This synthesis clarifies the internal structure of the Starobinsky model and its deformations and demonstrates how a one-parameter deformation, controlled by the exponent nn, maps out the space of inflationary models that both match observation and maintain theoretical consistency (Kehagias et al., 2013).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)