Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

OmniSense: Unified Multimodal Sensing

Updated 9 July 2026
  • OmniSense is a unified sensing paradigm that converts heterogeneous multimodal signals into a common representation for downstream reasoning.
  • It employs edge-assisted frameworks and sensor-aligned interfaces to enable efficient 360° video analytics, autonomous driving, and tactile robotics.
  • Empirical results demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy and latency, though challenges persist in calibration, bandwidth, and real-world scaling.

to=arxiv_search.search 天天中彩票开奖 json {"10query10 OR ti:OmniSense10", "10max_results10 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10query10, "10sort_by10 to=arxiv_search.search 天天中彩票这个 json {"10query10 OR 10ti:\10 OR 10ti:\10 OR 10ti:\10 and Learn\"", "10max_results10 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10query10, "10sort_by10 OmniSense is a research term used in two closely related senses. In the narrow sense, it names an edge-assisted framework for online analytics on PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10^ video that predicts spherical regions of interest, projects them to perspective images, and allocates vision models under latency and bandwidth constraints (&&&10query10&&&). In the broader sense that has emerged across recent arXiv work, it denotes an omni-modality or omnidirectional sensing paradigm in which heterogeneous signals are converted into a common representation for downstream reasoning, control, or generation; this broader usage appears explicitly in work on vision-language-action, autonomous driving, unified audio-video encoders, cross-lingual and cross-modal embeddings, self-supervised IoT learning, omnidirectional tactile sensing, raw-LiDAR locomotion, and electro-mechano-optic neural interfaces (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&, &&&10max_results10&&&, &&&10sort_by10&&&, &&&10relevance10&&&, &&&10query10&&&, &&&10ti:\10&&&, &&&10 OR ti:\10&&&, &&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). Taken together, these works suggest that OmniSense is best understood not as a single architecture but as a family of designs for unified sensing under severe geometric, statistical, and systems constraints.

10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10. Conceptual scope and recurring design goals

Across domains, OmniSense systems pursue the same cluster of objectives: preserve compatibility with strong pretrained backbones, scale across heterogeneous hardware, remain data-efficient despite limited multimodal supervision, and keep sensing physically or semantically grounded. In robotic manipulation, this appears as the requirement that thermal, mmWave, and acoustic measurements become “first-class citizens” in VLA models while staying aligned with RGB-centric foundation models (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). In autonomous driving, the analogous target is “human-like 10relevance10D scene understanding,” where geometry, semantics, and temporal reasoning are fused into a representation aligned with downstream planning (&&&10max_results10&&&). In multimodal foundation models, the same target appears as a single backbone that can ingest text, images, video, and native audio, or as a single encoder that can co-embed audio and vision at symmetrical temporal resolution rather than through late fusion of modality-specific towers (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&, &&&10sort_by10&&&).

The term also extends beyond conventional camera-language settings. In IoT and pervasive sensing, OmniSense refers to learning “general-purpose representations from multisensor data produced by the omnipresent sensing systems,” with an explicit emphasis on continual learning from unlabeled streams and on-device feasibility (&&&10query10&&&). In tactile robotics, it points to dense three-dimensional contact sensing over a curved fingertip with a lighting and calibration strategy designed to generalize across geometries (&&&10ti:\10&&&). In neural interfaces, it denotes “all-optical, massively multiplexed electrophysiology,” where many recording sites are read out through photonic carriers rather than large electrical headstages (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). The common denominator is the replacement of modality-specific, task-specific pipelines by a shared sensing layer that can be reused across tasks.

10max_results10. Unified representations and interfaces

A central OmniSense pattern is representation unification: raw modalities are mapped into an interface already well matched to existing models. OmniVLA exemplifies this with the sensor-masked image, a representation that overlays calibrated, task-relevant thermal, mmWave, or acoustic masks onto RGB. Thermal is already rasterized; mmWave radar and microphone arrays are converted into azimuth-elevation heatmaps by delay-and-sum beamforming; GPT-10relevance10o produces a task-specific segmentation prompt once per task; Grounded SAM 10max_results10^ then returns a mask; and calibrated sensor images are blended into the masked RGB region with PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ in experiments (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). The point is not merely fusion but image-native fusion: every non-RGB stream is turned into “just another image,” allowing a frozen RGB-pretrained encoder plus lightweight per-sensor MLP projectors to absorb new sensing modalities.

OmniEncoder applies the same principle in time-synchronized audiovisual encoding. Instead of a visual tower at PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10–PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10^ fps plus a denser audio tower, it uses a single Transformer backbone operating at symmetrical PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10^ fps. Each timestep contains audio tokens PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10, visual continuous tokens PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10, and visual base tokens PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10 OR ti:\10; a token sparsifier keeps audio and motion-centric visual tokens dense while downsampling static visual base tokens to PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10 OR ti:\10^ fps, thereby matching the LLM decoder’s input budget without discarding continuous motion structure (&&&10sort_by10&&&). Omni-RoPE assigns audio, motion, and spatial patch tokens distinct positions in a shared 10sort_by10D rotary coordinate system, and Temporal Window Shifting constrains attention to shifted temporal groups of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10 OR ti:\10^ frames to control complexity (&&&10sort_by10&&&).

OmniSONAR generalizes unification from sensor geometry to semantic space. It embeds text, speech, code, and mathematical expressions into one PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10query10-dimensional space spanning 10relevance10,10max_results10query10query10 language varieties and 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10 OR ti:\10 OR ti:\10^ spoken languages, while Spectrum treats sequences of those sentence embeddings as the input substrate for downstream reasoning and generation (&&&10relevance10&&&). “Sense and Learn” provides an earlier but conceptually similar template for raw multisensor streams: modality-specific encoders PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10, a shared encoder PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10max_results10, and a suite of auxiliary tasks designed to induce high-level features without labels, so that downstream models can consume a stable, reusable representation rather than raw time-series data (&&&10query10&&&). This suggests that an OmniSense interface may be image-native, token-native, or embedding-native, provided it preserves enough structure for downstream inference.

10sort_by10. Geometric and physical grounding

OmniSense systems typically impose a strong grounding constraint: sensor values must correspond to identifiable spatial, temporal, or physical locations. In OmniVLA, beamforming geometry and calibration map mmWave and acoustic heatmaps into approximate RGB coordinates, after which overlaying a segmentation mask ties thermal intensity, RF reflection, or sound-source direction to specific pixels and objects. That makes occlusion robustness, sound localization, and material discrimination directly actionable in manipulation: radar can indicate which opaque box contains an object, microphone arrays can localize a hidden ringing phone, and thermal overlays can distinguish cold from warm drinks even when RGB appearance is identical (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&).

OmniScene extends grounding to egocentric 10relevance10D scene representation. It uses six cameras, a 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ s history, and a 10max_results10^ s prediction horizon; projects sparse 10sort_by10D queries into multi-view image features; and updates those instance features with temporal decoupled cross-attention and spatial self-attention. The sparse 10sort_by10D representation covers PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10sort_by10^ at PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10relevance10^ discretization, while the Hierarchical Fusion Strategy injects text-derived semantics into 10sort_by10D instances through a learned gate PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10query10^ during text conditional aggregation (&&&10max_results10&&&). Here grounding is not pixel alignment but the coupling of geometry, temporal evolution, and language-derived attentional semantics inside an instance-centric 10relevance10D world model.

In locomotion, Omni-Perception grounds risk directly in raw LiDAR point clouds. PD-RiskNet partitions each scan history into proximal and distal subsets, processes them with separate GRUs, and feeds those embeddings to a policy together with proprioception and command inputs. The avoidance term divides the PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10ti:\10^ horizontal plane into PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10 OR ti:\10^ sectors, computes sectorwise minimum obstacle distances, and generates an avoidance velocity field that is added to the commanded base velocity (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). In this formulation, OmniSense is not a scene graph but a risk-aware control prior over omnidirectional range measurements.

At the sensor front-end level, GelSight10sort_by10ti:\10query10^ and NEMO show that physical grounding can be built into the transducer itself. GelSight10sort_by10ti:\10query10^ uses a fully curved fingertip, a PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10 OR ti:\10^ FOV camera, a cross-LED lighting geometry, semi-specular coating, CNC calibration at PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10 OR ti:\10^ probe locations, and an MLP mapping PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10query10^ to PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ before Poisson reconstruction of depth; the tactile field is therefore a calibrated 10sort_by10D deformation map of the fingertip surface, although about PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10max_results10^ of visible pixels are occluded by the LED fins (&&&10ti:\10&&&). NEMO converts neural voltages into optical modulation through an electrostatic NEMS actuator coupled to a silicon photonic microdisk resonator, so the sensed quantity is grounded in a physical transduction chain PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10sort_by10^ rather than in post hoc feature fusion (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&).

10relevance10. Training paradigms, distillation, and systems efficiency

OmniSense architectures rely heavily on staged learning because multimodal data are either scarce, highly imbalanced, or both. “Sense and Learn” is entirely self-supervised at the representation stage: blend detection, fusion magnitude prediction, masked-window feature prediction, transformation recognition, temporal shift prediction, modality denoising, odd segment recognition, and symmetric triplet loss all derive pseudo-labels from raw sensor streams, after which a frozen or lightly fine-tuned encoder supports linear evaluation, few-shot learning, and transfer (&&&10query10&&&). The reported motivation is continual, potentially on-device learning from unlabeled multisensor data rather than one-off supervised training.

OmniSONAR adopts a more elaborate progressive curriculum. It begins with LLM-initialized encoder-decoder sequence-to-sequence pretraining, then adds a pooled sentence bottleneck with joint token-level translation and contrastive learning, then replaces ordinary InfoNCE with a split-softmax contrastive loss that combines additive-margin in-batch discrimination, false-negative filtering, and synthetic hard negatives, and finally expands to several thousands of language varieties by teacher-student distillation with a mixture of MSE and bidirectional or unidirectional contrastive losses depending on whether the language is foundational or newly added (&&&10relevance10&&&). The speech extension distills Omni-ASR wav10max_results10vec 10max_results10.10query10^ encoders into the same text-centered semantic space using pure MSE (&&&10relevance10&&&). The explicit objective is scale without representation collapse.

OmniScene uses a teacher-student OmniVLM configuration of the same general kind. A Qwen10max_results10.10query10 10 OR ti:\10max_results10B-based teacher is fine-tuned on nuScenes and Bench10max_results10Drive with driving-centric texts; a lightweight Qwen10max_results10.10query10 10 OR ti:\10B or 10sort_by10B student learns to reproduce those descriptions; CLIP text embeddings derived from the student’s outputs are then injected into the 10sort_by10D driving stack through the Hierarchical Fusion Strategy (&&&10max_results10&&&). OmniVLA is more parameter-frugal: it freezes the RGB-pretrained vision and language encoders and finetunes only sensor-specific MLP projectors, the diffusion-based action expert, and optionally part of the LLM, with MLPs initialized from the RGB projection layer of the base VLA (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). In both cases, reuse of pretrained unimodal structure is the key efficiency device.

Nemotron 10sort_by10^ Nano Omni shows the same principle at foundation-model scale. Its training is split into seven SFT stages followed by multimodal RL; total SFT volume is 10relevance10sort_by10relevance10.10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10M samples and 10relevance10ti:\10ti:\10.10 OR ti:\10B tokens; context length is extended to 10max_results10ti:\10max_results10,10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10relevance10relevance10; and efficiency comes from dynamic image resolution, Conv10sort_by10D tubelets, Efficient Video Sampling, three stride-10max_results10^ audio subsampling layers, and deployment formats in BF10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10ti:\10, FP10 OR ti:\10, and NVFP10relevance10^ (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). This is an OmniSense interpretation centered on throughput and latency: multimodal unification is only practical if token growth is aggressively controlled.

10query10. Reported empirical capabilities

The named PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10relevance10^ video framework “OmniSense” reports two complementary outcomes. Relative to resource-agnostic baselines, it improves accuracy by PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10query10–PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10ti:\10^ with similar end-to-end latencies; alternatively, it achieves PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10 OR ti:\10–PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10 OR ti:\10^ speedups while keeping accuracy on par with the highest accuracy of baselines (&&&10query10&&&). Those gains are attributed to SRoI prediction, content-specific model performance estimation, and latency-constrained model allocation over projected perspective images rather than full ERP or CubeMap processing.

Embodied-sensing instantiations report similarly strong task-level benefits. OmniVLA achieves an average task success rate of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10max_results10 OR ti:\10, improving over RGB-only and raw-sensor baselines by PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10query10^ and PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ percentage points respectively, with an average task score of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10max_results10; it also reaches high success on the thermal task with roughly PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10sort_by10^ fewer episodes than the raw-sensor baseline (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). Omni-Perception reports real-world success rates of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10relevance10^ on aerial obstacles and PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10query10^ on moving humans, versus PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10ti:\10^ and PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10 OR ti:\10^ for the native Unitree controller, while also handling static obstacles at PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10 OR ti:\10^ success (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). NEMO reports a limit of detection down to PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10sort_by10 OR ti:\10^ microvolts and stimulation-artifact decay of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10query10^ ms versus PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ ms for a conventional Intan amplifier, with the implication that optical multiplexing and ultra-high input impedance can coexist with neural-scale sensitivity (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&).

Scene-level and foundation-model instantiations show gains over broader benchmark suites. OmniScene reports on nuScenes a detection mAP of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10max_results10, NDS of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10sort_by10, planning L10max_results10^ average error of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10relevance10^ m, and collision rate of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10query10; its OmniVLM 10 OR ti:\10B also reaches CI-r PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10ti:\10^ on NuScenes-QA (&&&10max_results10&&&). OmniEncoder, under the same LLM input token budget as Qwen10max_results10.10query10 reports PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10 OR ti:\10^ on Diving10relevance10 OR ti:\10, PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10 OR ti:\10^ on SLR10query10query10query10, PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10relevance10 OR ti:\10^ on NationalCSL10ti:\10 OR ti:\10query10 OR ti:\10, PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10query10^ on AVQA, speaker identification of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10, and AVSR WER of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10max_results10^ on LRS10max_results10^ (&&&10sort_by10&&&). Nemotron 10sort_by10^ Nano Omni reports OpenASR average WER PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10sort_by10, VoiceBench average PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10relevance10, OSWorld PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10query10^ with reasoning on, and up to PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10ti:\10^ throughput increase for NVFP10relevance10^ versus BF10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10ti:\10^ at iso-interactivity on a single-image reasoning case (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). OmniSONAR halves cross-lingual similarity-search error on FLORES, reduces error by a factor of PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10 OR ti:\10^ on the 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10,10query10ti:\10query10-language BIBLE benchmark, exceeds prior systems by PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10 OR ti:\10^ chrF++ points on 10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10,10query10ti:\10query10^ languages into English BIBLE translation, achieves a PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10query10 OR ti:\10^ lower speech similarity-search error, and reaches PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10query10^ of SeamlessM10relevance10T speech-to-text quality despite zero-shot translation (&&&10relevance10&&&). “Sense and Learn” reports that self-supervised initialization can significantly boost low-data performance with as few as PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10^ labeled instances per class and that its learned representations are competitive with supervised approaches across activity recognition, sleep staging, stress detection, and WiFi sensing (&&&10query10&&&).

10ti:\10. Limitations, tensions, and likely trajectories

The main limitations recur across otherwise dissimilar systems. Alignment and calibration remain fragile: OmniVLA explicitly notes coarse sensor-RGB calibration, domain gaps between thermal/radar/audio heatmaps and natural images, task coverage limited to three sensor-dependent tasks, segmentation errors from the VLM-plus-SAM pipeline, and a real-time operating point of about PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10max_results10^ Hz on an RTX 10relevance10query10 OR ti:\10query10^ (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). The PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10sort_by10^ video OmniSense framework depends on historical detections for SRoI prediction, assumes a fixed PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10relevance10^ FoV for standard SRoIs, and is evaluated only for object detection in a single-camera, single-edge-server setting, with performance sensitive to compression level and network variability (&&&10query10&&&).

Several systems also expose a tension between generality and modality depth. OmniScene is still primarily camera-based, with LiDAR, radar, and HD maps treated more as extension points than as native modalities (&&&10max_results10&&&). OmniEncoder handles vision and audio but not touch, IMU, or depth, and acknowledges the computational cost of dense PRESERVED_PLACEHOLDER_10ti:\10query10^ fps joint encoding (&&&10sort_by10&&&). Nemotron 10sort_by10^ Nano Omni improves document understanding, long audio-video comprehension, and agentic computer use, but pure audio understanding on MMAU remains below the best closed models and some text benchmarks regress relative to the pure LLM backbone (&&&10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10all:OmniSense OR ti:OmniSense10&&&). OmniSONAR scales impressively, but performance still depends strongly on tokenizer fertility and the amount of data in the language and its family, particularly for extremely low-resource varieties (&&&10relevance10&&&).

Physical deployments reveal another set of constraints. Omni-Perception can overestimate risk in dense grass and may miss very small distal obstacles because distal point clouds are average-downsampled (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). GelSight10sort_by10ti:\10query10^ still has blind spots, nonuniform lighting near the fingertip apex, and a calibration pipeline that is cumbersome to scale across many geometries or many modules (&&&10ti:\10&&&). NEMO has so far demonstrated benchtop and ex-vivo performance rather than chronic in-vivo operation, and future scaling must address quality factor, spectral crowding, optical loss, and integrated probe packaging (&&&10 OR ti:\10&&&). In IoT self-supervision, shortcut learning, non-curated real-world data, and interpretability remain open issues even when label efficiency is strong (&&&10query10&&&).

These recurring limitations suggest that the next stage of OmniSense research will likely focus on three coupled problems. First, representation alignment must become more robust: better 10sort_by10D calibration, improved grounded segmentation, stronger cross-modal distillation, and self-supervised correlations across sensors. Second, the sensing layer must scale without collapsing under bandwidth, token-count, or power constraints, which is why token reduction, lightweight projectors, quantization, and hierarchical risk encoders already appear across otherwise unrelated systems. Third, OmniSense will likely remain plural rather than singular: image-native overlays, sparse 10relevance10D instance graphs, sentence-embedding spaces, tactile depth maps, raw point-cloud encoders, and electro-optic transducers all instantiate the same ambition from different physical and computational starting points.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to OmniSense.