Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

NTK Eigenfunctions in Deep Learning

Updated 17 April 2026
  • NTK eigenfunctions are the spectral modes that decompose neural network training and generalization, illuminating the basis of shortcut learning.
  • They are defined as eigenfunctions of the NTK-induced integral operator, with derivations validated in both linear and nonlinear architectures.
  • Imbalanced input clusters and nonzero variances amplify shortcut eigenfunctions, causing them to dominate training even under strong regularization.

Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) eigenfunctions are the spectral modes of the integral operator induced by the NTK, providing a functional basis in which the inductive biases and learning dynamics of infinite-width neural networks can be analyzed. These eigenfunctions underpin the spectral decomposition of training dynamics and generalization, and play a central role in understanding phenomena such as shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Theoretical analysis, especially in the case where input distributions are clustered or imbalanced, reveals how shortcut features emerge as top NTK eigenfunctions, with large eigenvalues and disproportionate influence over function fitting—even after the application of regularization techniques aimed at margin control (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

1. Formal Definition of NTK Eigenfunctions

Let ρ\rho be a probability measure on the input space XX. In the infinite-width (lazy training) limit, a neural network’s NTK becomes a fixed, positive semi-definite kernel function K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}. This kernel induces a compact Hilbert-Schmidt integral operator,

TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').

An NTK eigenfunction (or feature) is defined as any function ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho) that satisfies

XK(x,x)ϕi(x)dρ(x)=λiϕi(x),\int_X K(x, x') \,\phi_i(x')\,d\rho(x') = \lambda_i\, \phi_i(x),

where λi0\lambda_i \geq 0 is the corresponding NTK eigenvalue and ϕi2=ϕi2dρ=1\|\phi_i\|^2 = \int\phi_i^2\,d\rho = 1. Under mean squared error (MSE) loss, the solution after infinite time admits a decomposition in the NTK eigenbasis:

f(x)=i1λiϕi,yϕi(x).f_\infty(x) = \sum_{i} \frac{1}{\lambda_i}\langle\phi_i, y\rangle\,\phi_i(x).

Each NTK feature ϕi\phi_i acts as a coordinate axis in function space, weighted by both label signal and the inverse NTK eigenvalue (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

2. Closed-Form Eigenfunctions for Linear Networks

For a linear network, the NTK simplifies to XX0. Consider the input distribution XX1, a Gaussian mixture with cluster weights XX2. Seeking eigenfunctions linear in XX3, i.e., XX4 for unit vector XX5, the action of the NTK operator is:

XX6

By setting XX7 and XX8, one establishes that XX9 must be an eigenvector of K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}0 with eigenvalue K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}1, and the associated NTK eigenvalue is K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}2.

The normalized eigenfunctions are

K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}3

If one mixture component dominates (large K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}4), the corresponding K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}5 has the largest K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}6 and thus K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}7, marking it as a “shortcut” direction (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

3. Influence of Cluster Imbalance and Variance

When the cluster weights K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}8 are imbalanced, shortcut eigenfunctions arise. Spectral bias implies that, during gradient flow, modes with large K:X×XRK : X \times X \to \mathbb{R}9 are learned fastest, so shortcut-aligned features associated with large TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').0 emerge early. At convergence, the solution for linear MSE-regression has the form:

TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').1

with

TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').2

If the cluster means TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').3 are orthogonal, this simplifies to

TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').4

The weight TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').5 grows monotonically in TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').6. The denominator TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').7 depends on within-cluster variance: nonzero variances amplify the dominance of shortcut features, whereas if TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').8 all weights share a denominator, suppressing shortcut amplification (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

4. Robustness of NTK Spectral Bias to Margin Control

Previous work suggested that maximal TK[g](x):=XK(x,x)g(x)dρ(x).T_K[g](x) := \int_X K(x, x')\,g(x')\,d\rho(x').9 margin bias (the result of cross-entropy optimization on separable data) is responsible for shortcut learning. Introducing an SD regularization term, ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)0, controls the margin, shifting solutions toward ridge regression. However, both cross-entropy with SD and MSE with SD approach the same optimal ratios of feature weights ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)1 as ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)2, matching the MSE solution. Thus, shortcut bias, favored by high ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)3 clusters, persists even under aggressive margin control; it is an intrinsic property of the NTK spectrum, not merely a consequence of margin-seeking dynamics (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

5. Empirical Observations in Nonlinear Architectures

The dominance of shortcut NTK eigenfunctions extends beyond linear models. Two-layer ReLU networks, trained on synthetic Patched-MNIST and Colored-MNIST datasets, exhibit top empirical NTK eigenfunctions that align with spurious features (patch or color), verified via saliency maps of ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)4. Lower-order eigenfunctions correspond to semantically meaningful digit shapes.

A metric termed “availability,” ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)5, quantifies NTK alignment; shortcut labels typically have much higher availability than core labels throughout training, reflecting their spectral accessibility.

For pretrained ResNet-18 on Waterbirds, CelebA, and Dogs-vs-Cats, empirical NTK analysis confirms that shortcut labels maintain higher NTK availability regardless of the loss function (cross-entropy, MSE, SD). Notably, altering the shortcut-strength (e.g., patch size in Patched-MNIST) scales shortcut availability. Pretraining (e.g., on ImageNet) can sometimes invert these spectral relationships, making core-label features easier to access and revealing the role of initialization (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

6. Summary and Implications

The spectral decomposition of the NTK, and the resulting dominance of shortcut-aligned eigenfunctions, offers a unifying mechanism for shortcut learning across architectures and datasets. Primary determinants are the presence of high-mixing-weight (large ϕiL2(X,ρ)\phi_i \in L^2(X, \rho)6) clusters and nonzero within-cluster variances. Neural networks preferentially fit the highest-eigenvalue NTK features early and retain them after training, even in the presence of strong regularization or margin controls. These findings, established analytically for linear Gaussian mixtures and empirically validated in complex networks, underscore the robustness of NTK-based spectral bias as an explanatory paradigm for shortcut learning in deep learning (Lim et al., 3 Feb 2026).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to NTK Eigenfunctions.