Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Non-Relativistic QCD Hamiltonian

Updated 10 November 2025
  • Non-relativistic QCD Hamiltonian is a framework that integrates out high-energy QCD modes to focus on low-energy dynamics of heavy quarks, like bottomonium and charmonium.
  • It employs a systematic operator expansion including terms up to O(p^6) and one-loop radiative corrections to improve dispersion matching and mass renormalisation.
  • Key lattice techniques such as Fat³ smearing and stability parameter tuning reduce discretisation errors, enabling precise quarkonium spectroscopy and decay prediction.

Non-relativistic QCD (NRQCD) Hamiltonians provide a systematic framework for describing low-energy dynamics of heavy quarks, notably bottomonium and charmonium states, within both continuum and lattice approaches. Central aspects include operator expansions in powers of momentum and velocity, accurate matching of lattice and continuum dispersion relations, and operator improvement through radiative corrections and lattice stabilisation techniques. These structures underpin quantitative predictions in heavy quark physics at the percent-level and are foundational for calculations of quarkonium spectra, transition rates, and non-perturbative QCD phenomena.

1. Hamiltonian Structure and Operator Expansion

The NRQCD Hamiltonian is constructed by integrating out hard QCD modes above the heavy quark mass scale, leading to a non-relativistic theory with quark fields that evolve under an effective Hamiltonian: H=H0+ΓHkin+ΓHradH = H_0 + \delta H_{\text{kin}} + \delta H_{\text{rad}} where H0H_0 contains the leading kinetic term, ΓHkin\delta H_{\text{kin}} incorporates higher-order corrections in the operator expansion up to O(p6)\mathcal{O}(p^6), and ΓHrad\delta H_{\text{rad}} includes radiative (loop-level) shifts (Davies et al., 2018).

Leading and Subleading Operators

  • Leading kinetic: aH0=āˆ’Ī”(2)/(2amb)aH_0 = -\Delta^{(2)} / (2 a m_b), where Ī”(2)\Delta^{(2)} is the lattice Laplacian with link-pair cancellations to suppress tadpoles.
  • O(v4)\mathcal{O}(v^4) corrections: Operators such as (Ī”(2))2(\Delta^{(2)})^2, i[āˆ‡ā‹…E~āˆ’E~ā‹…āˆ‡]i[\nabla \cdot \tilde{E} - \tilde{E} \cdot \nabla], Ļƒā‹…(āˆ‡Ć—E~āˆ’E~Ć—āˆ‡)\sigma \cdot (\nabla \times \tilde{E} - \tilde{E} \times \nabla), Ļƒā‹…B~\sigma \cdot \tilde{B}, and Ī”(4)\Delta^{(4)} are included with matching coefficients cic_i.
  • O(p6)\mathcal{O}(p^6) corrections: Operators like (Ī”(2))3(\Delta^{(2)})^3, Ī”(6)\Delta^{(6)}, and (Ī”(2)Ī”(4))(\Delta^{(2)} \Delta^{(4)}) provide further discretisation error reduction.

2. Radiative Improvement and Dispersion-Relation Matching

One-loop radiative corrections renormalise the heavy quark mass and introduce zero-point energy shifts:

  • Mass renormalisation mb→Zmmbm_b \to Z_m m_b affects the dispersion relation.
  • Zero-point energy shift W0=Ī£0(0)W_0 = \Sigma_0^{(0)} enters additively.
  • Matching to continuum NRQCD is realized via the on-shell energy expansion: ω0(p)=p22mbāˆ’(p2)28mb3+(p2)316mb5\omega_{0}(p) = \frac{p^2}{2m_b} - \frac{(p^2)^2}{8m_b^3} + \frac{(p^2)^3}{16m_b^5} and at one-loop,

ω(p)=ω0(p)āˆ’Ī±s[W0+W1(p2)28mb2+W2p4]+O(αs2)\omega(p) = \omega_0(p) - \alpha_s \left[W_0 + W_1 \frac{(p^2)^2}{8 m_b^2} + W_2 p^4\right] + \mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^2)

yielding kinetic matching coefficients c1(1)=āˆ’W1/(1/mb+1/2n)c_1^{(1)} = -W_1/ (1/m_b + 1/2n) and c5(1)=24mbW2c_5^{(1)} = 24 m_b W_2, so all O(αsp4)\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s p^4) mismatches between lattice and continuum are eliminated (Davies et al., 2018).

3. Lattice Stabilisation and Operator Improvement Techniques

Stability Parameter nn and Fat3^3 Smearing

  • The evolution operator eāˆ’aH0/2ne^{-aH_0/2n} requires p2<4nambp^2 < 4n a m_b for stability, with n=4n=4 the typical choice.
  • Fat3^3 smearing replaces every thin gauge link by a locally averaged link, projected back to U(3)U(3), nearly eliminating unphysical tadpole contributions. This permits setting u0→1u_0 \to 1 and reduces the magnitude of radiative corrections, making expansion truncations reliable (Davies et al., 2018).

Tadpole Improvement and Matching Scale

Radiative coefficients are either tadpole-improved via mean-field rescaling (u0=⟨Tr U⟩/3u_0 = \langle \mathrm{Tr}\,U \rangle / 3 in Landau gauge) or, equivalently, Fat3^3 smearing can be used (where all mean-field counterterms vanish). The αs\alpha_s coupling is evaluated at a process-dependent BLM scale qāˆ—q^*, with qāˆ—ā€‰a∼2.0q^*\,a \sim 2.0–$3.0$ for c1c_1, c5c_5 and qāˆ—ā€‰a∼1q^*\,a \sim 1–$1.5$ for ZmZ_m, W0W_0 (Davies et al., 2018). This ensures perturbative control and correct matching of kinetic terms.

4. Fully Improved Lattice NRQCD Hamiltonian

Integrating all components, the improved Hamiltonian used in simulations is: aH=āˆ’(1+αsZm(1)) Δ(2)2 ambāˆ’(1+αsc1(1)) (Ī”(2))28(amb)3+i(1+αsc2(1))ā€‰āˆ‡ā‹…E~āˆ’E~ā‹…āˆ‡8(amb)2Ā āˆ’(1+αsc3(1))ā€‰Ļƒā‹…(āˆ‡Ć—E~āˆ’E~Ć—āˆ‡)8(amb)2āˆ’(1+αsc4(1))ā€‰Ļƒā‹…B~2amb+(1+αsc5(1)) Δ(4)24ambĀ āˆ’(1+αsc6(1)) (Ī”(2))216n(amb)2āˆ’(1+αsc(p2)3(1)) [1āˆ’(amb)2/(6n2)](Ī”(2))316(amb)5Ā āˆ’(1+αscp6(1)) Δ(6)180amb+(1+αscp2p4(1)) Δ(2)Ī”(4)48(amb)3+αsW0(1) 1+⋯\begin{aligned} aH =& -(1+\alpha_s Z_m^{(1)})\,\frac{\Delta^{(2)}}{2\, a m_b} -(1+\alpha_s c_1^{(1)})\,\frac{(\Delta^{(2)})^2}{8 (a m_b)^3} +i(1+\alpha_s c_2^{(1)})\,\frac{\nabla \cdot \tilde{E} - \tilde{E} \cdot \nabla}{8 (a m_b)^2} \ & -(1+\alpha_s c_3^{(1)})\,\frac{\sigma \cdot (\nabla \times \tilde{E} - \tilde{E} \times \nabla)}{8 (a m_b)^2} -(1+\alpha_s c_4^{(1)})\,\frac{\sigma \cdot \tilde{B}}{2 a m_b} +(1+\alpha_s c_5^{(1)})\,\frac{\Delta^{(4)}}{24 a m_b} \ & -(1+\alpha_s c_6^{(1)})\,\frac{(\Delta^{(2)})^2}{16 n (a m_b)^2} -(1+\alpha_s c_{(p^2)^3}^{(1)})\, \frac{[1-(a m_b)^2/(6n^2)] (\Delta^{(2)})^3}{16 (a m_b)^5} \ & -(1+\alpha_s c_{p^6}^{(1)})\,\frac{\Delta^{(6)}}{180 a m_b} +(1+\alpha_s c_{p^2 p^4}^{(1)})\, \frac{\Delta^{(2)} \Delta^{(4)}}{48 (a m_b)^3} +\alpha_s W_0^{(1)}\, \mathbf{1} + \cdots \end{aligned} where each coefficient cic_i is expanded as 1+αs(qāˆ—)ci(1)1 + \alpha_s(q^*) c_i^{(1)}, with all operators discretised on the lattice. Annotations indicate mapping to continuum terms and stabilization mechanisms (Davies et al., 2018).

5. Implications for Spectroscopy and Precision Calculations

By systematically including radiative corrections and higher-order momentum operators, discrete errors are reduced to O((pa)6)\mathcal{O}((pa)^6), rotational symmetry is restored (as confirmed through momentum tests), and the precision of quarkonium mass predictions is improved to the 1–2% regime (Davies et al., 2018). Mass renormalisation and zero-point energy shifts allow conversion between lattice results and continuum pole masses, crucial for physical observables.

Lattice ensembles incorporating uu, dd, ss, and cc vacuum polarisation are used to non-perturbatively determine states such as Ī„(1S)\Upsilon(1S), Ī·b(1S)\eta_b(1S), and to tune the bb-quark mass. Improvements in action further stabilise time-evolution algorithms and correct for high-momentum artefacts.

6. Relation to Continuum and Effective Field Theory Approaches

The NRQCD Hamiltonian is tightly connected with pNRQCD and continuum effective descriptions. In pNRQCD, the Hamiltonian incorporates matched potentials (static, $1/m$, 1/m21/m^2, spin-dependent) with coefficients determined up to two-loop order (Mishima et al., 2024, Segovia et al., 2017), using either two-step or single-step matching procedures, IBP reduction to master integrals, and differential equations in the velocity expansion parameter. These ensure that all heavy-quarkonium binding energies and transitions can be consistently computed up to N4^4LO in the weak-coupling regime. The approach also provides a basis for further extensions, such as BCS quasiparticle formation in non-perturbative QCD Hamiltonians (Yepez-Martinez et al., 2021), supporting dynamical generation of constituent quark masses and correlations in low-energy hadron spectra.

7. Summary Table: Key Features of Improved Lattice NRQCD Hamiltonian

Feature Description Impact
Operator Expansion Includes terms up to O(p6)\mathcal{O}(p^6) O((pa)6)\mathcal{O}((pa)^6) error control
Radiative Corrections One-loop matching for mass and kinetic terms 1–2% level mass accuracy
Fat3^3 Smearing Removes unphysical tadpoles, sets u0→1u_0 \to 1 Perturbative convergence, stable fits
Stability Parameter nn Ensures p2<4nambp^2 < 4n a m_b for stable evolution No transfer-matrix sign flips
Matching Scale qāˆ—q^* BLM scale-setting for αs\alpha_s in VV-scheme Reliable coefficient expansion

The non-relativistic QCD Hamiltonian, in both lattice and continuum forms, is now a rigorously improved tool for heavy quark physics. Its comprehensive operator content, precise radiative matching, and stabilization techniques enable systematic reduction of discretisation and perturbative errors, supporting high-precision spectroscopy, decay, and transition predictions for quarkonium systems.

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Non-Relativistic QCD Hamiltonian.