National AI Roadmap 2021-2025

• National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021-2025 is a comprehensive strategy integrating policy, education, and infrastructure to advance responsible AI nationwide.
• It emphasizes the EPIC framework to balance innovation with ethical governance, fostering cross-sector collaboration and public trust.
• Key initiatives include curriculum reform, robust public–private partnerships, and continuous benchmarking for adaptive and transparent AI progress.

The National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021–2025 delineates a comprehensive, multi-faceted strategy for the advancement, governance, and deployment of AI at the national scale. Reflecting lessons from global policy and research, the roadmap aims to ensure robust technological innovation, foster public trust, and secure societal benefit through responsible, inclusive, and sustainable AI practices. Its initiatives are structured to align technological progress with ethical stewardship, competitive capacity, and long-term societal impacts, supported by multiperspective frameworks and rigorous, iterative evaluation.

1. Strategic Policy Frameworks and Governance Models

Leading national AI strategies, as synthesized in "Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations" (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024), converge on several foundational principles. Governments serve both as catalysts for innovation and as regulatory anchors, collaborating intensively with industry, academia, and civil society. Most roadmaps emphasize a whole-of-government approach, aiming to balance swift innovation with strong data governance and ethical oversight. Competitive leadership is prioritized in the United States and China via high R&D investments, while European strategies foreground ethical use, transparency, and data privacy.

A unifying governance metamodel, the EPIC Framework (Education, Partnership, Infrastructure, Community), is widely referenced for mapping AI implementation requirements to societal impacts. This stratified model targets distinct policy levers at each level:

• Education: Establishing foundational AI literacy and continual skills development;
• Partnership: Enabling cross-sector, interdisciplinary collaboration;
• Infrastructure: Investing in secure, scalable digital and data systems;
• Community: Ensuring AI deployments contribute measurably to public good and sustainability.

The pyramid structure—expressed formally as:

$$\begin{array}{c} \textbf{Community Impact (C)} \ \uparrow \ \textbf{Infrastructure (I)} \ \uparrow \ \textbf{Partnership (P)} \ \uparrow \ \textbf{Education (E)} \end{array}$$

underscores education as the essential base for long-term AI maturity (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024).

2. Strategic Themes, Enablers, and Best Practices

Strategic themes identified in national AI roadmaps include curriculum and workforce reform for AI literacy, large-scale public–private research partnerships, infrastructure modernization (notably in computing, data sharing, and cybersecurity), and structured policies for inclusive community impact. Essential enablers span the adoption of robust data governance (e.g., FAIR principles—Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), centralized digital oversight bodies, and regulatory agility to accommodate technological advances and evolving societal needs.

Comparative review highlights best practices:

• Establishing trusted public–private partnerships for rapid AI deployment,
• Creating unified, secure data governance and high-performance infrastructure,
• Periodic, transparent updates to regulatory frameworks,
• Interdisciplinary ecosystems that tightly integrate ethical, policy, and technical considerations (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024).

Global benchmarking tools such as the AGILE Index (Zeng et al., 10 Jul 2025), with its four-pillar structure (AI Development Level, AI Governance Environment, AI Governance Instruments, AI Governance Effectiveness), enable continuous national-level assessment and cross-border learning.

3. Addressing Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges

Contemporary roadmaps place significant emphasis on ethical, social, and technical risks. Critical challenges include:

• Data privacy and security,
• Fragmented (siloed) policy initiatives,
• Persistent algorithmic bias,
• Workforce readiness gaps,
• Public mistrust in AI-driven decision making (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024Maslej et al., 8 Apr 2025).

Recommended mitigation strategies encompass:

• Regular privacy law reviews aligned with frameworks such as GDPR,
• Centralized digital/data offices for quality assurance and infrastructure planning,
• Targeted investments in cybersecurity and digital inclusion (particularly to bridge urban–rural divides),
• Public engagement to demystify AI systems and increase trust,
• Dynamic, adaptive governance models capable of evolving as AI technologies and societal expectations change.

Sectoral case studies, such as Malaysia’s AI Roadmap for education (Jamaluddin et al., 26 Sep 2025), showcase specific responses: the establishment of a National AI Office for ethical oversight, comprehensive teacher training programs, and targeted infrastructure investment to address regional digital divides.

4. National and Sectoral Implementation Strategies

Practical implementation in the 2021–2025 period is characterized by:

• Large-scale curriculum reforms and lifelong learning initiatives (Education pillar),
• Incentivization of multi-sector research collaborations and regulatory “sandboxes” (Partnership pillar),
• Sustained investment in advanced digital and computing infrastructure, alongside cybersecurity protocols (Infrastructure pillar),
• Community-driven pilot programs, regular metric reporting, and dynamic policy feedback loops (Community pillar) (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024).

Tables of initiatives and their mapping to EPIC pillars (examples from (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024, Zeng et al., 10 Jul 2025)):

Initiative	EPIC Pillar	Example Outcome
National curriculum overhaul for AI	Education	AI literacy, workforce preparedness
AI research centers with PPP collaboration	Partnership	Innovation acceleration
Investment in HPC/data centers	Infrastructure	R&D scalability, trust in data systems
Public–private digital inclusion programs	Community	Equitable access to AI benefits

This stratification enables modular, measurable progression toward roadmap goals.

5. Evaluation, Benchmarking, and Continuous Improvement

Monitoring and benchmarking are central to contemporary AI roadmaps. Multisource indices such as the AGILE Index (Zeng et al., 10 Jul 2025) track national progress across a spectrum of indicators: research output, patent counts, digital infrastructure, legal frameworks, and public risk perception. Methodological advances—such as robust normalization and dynamic composite score computation—permit tiered global comparison, highlighting specific deficiencies (e.g., technical capacity vs. legislative maturity) and enabling evidence-driven policy adjustment.

Continuous policy feedback via annual performance reports and international comparative studies allows national strategies to remain agile and responsive to both internal developments and global trends.

6. Anticipated Impacts and Future Work

The 2021–2025 national roadmap is projected to deliver:

• Accelerated technological advancement via harmonized education, R&D, and infrastructure initiatives;
• Enhanced societal wellbeing and trust through embedded ethical and regulatory constraints;
• Improved global AI governance maturity and cross-border best practice transfer;
• Reduced national and sectoral disparities in AI preparedness and social uptake (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024Zeng et al., 10 Jul 2025).

Future work calls for:

• Expanding analytic frameworks to encompass developing-world contexts,
• Sector-specific tailors of EPIC/AGILE-aligned policies (healthcare, agriculture, government),
• Ongoing collection and integration of quantitative and qualitative outcome data,
• Longitudinal studies to track net societal and economic impacts,
• Iterative stakeholder consultation to recalibrate national priorities as the landscape evolves.

---

The National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap 2021–2025 thus embodies a multi-level, cross-sectoral, and ethically foregrounded policy synthesis. Through structured frameworks such as EPIC, evidence-based benchmarking, and international best practice alignment, it is designed to ensure that national AI deployment is at once innovative, trustworthy, and societally beneficial (Tjondronegoro, 16 Sep 2024Zeng et al., 10 Jul 2025).