Multimodal Foundation Models

• Multimodal foundation models are defined by dual-stream architectures that jointly embed visual and linguistic data through contrastive learning.
• They leverage massive, diverse pretraining corpora to enhance generalization and mitigate bias while simulating neural multisensory integration.
• These models outperform unimodal approaches by producing high-level, cross-modal representations that align closely with human brain activity.

A multimodal foundation model approach refers to the development and pretraining of large-scale machine learning models that jointly process and align multiple data modalities—typically vision and language, but also audio and other structured or unstructured signals—within a unified architecture and embedding space. These models aim to capture the complementary semantic and contextual information inherent in heterogeneous data, enabling superior generalization, interpretability, and transfer to downstream cognitive and neuroscientific tasks. The following sections synthesize key principles, scientific findings, and technical strategies as established in the literature, with a central focus on the dual-encoder, contrastive pretraining paradigm exemplified by the BriVL model (Lu et al., 2022).

1. Model Architectures and Training Paradigms

Multimodal foundation models typically adopt a dual-stream (or multi-stream) architecture, where each modality—such as images and text—is processed independently by a dedicated encoder. For instance, in the BriVL architecture, the visual pathway is implemented as a Vision Transformer (ViT) and the linguistic pathway as a BERT-based transformer, with both projecting their modality-specific features into a shared semantic space. The model's objective is to maximize the semantic alignment between modalities while preserving the richness of each.

A central training method is contrastive learning using the InfoNCE loss. For a batch $\mathcal{B}$ of paired image–text samples $(V_i,L_i)$, the visual and lingual encoders produce embeddings $\mathbf{f}^v_i$ and $\mathbf{f}^l_i$, respectively. BriVL adopts a momentum-based memory queue—a strategy inspired by MoCo—to maintain large sets of negative samples and address mini-batch limitations. The momentum update for encoder parameters is formalized as

$$\hat{\theta}^v = m \cdot \hat{\theta}^v + (1 - m) \cdot \theta^v, \quad \hat{\theta}^l = m \cdot \hat{\theta}^l + (1 - m) \cdot \theta^l$$

where $m$ is the momentum coefficient.

The InfoNCE loss for image-to-text (I2T) alignment is defined as

$$\mathcal{L}_{\text{I2T}} = -\frac{1}{N_b} \sum_{(V_i, L_i) \in \mathcal{B}} \log \frac{\exp(\cos(\mathbf{f}^v_i, \hat{\mathbf{f}}^l_i)/\tau)}{\exp(\cos(\mathbf{f}^v_i, \hat{\mathbf{f}}^l_i)/\tau) + \sum_{\hat{q}_j^l \in \mathcal{Q}^l} \exp(\cos(\mathbf{f}^v_i, \hat{q}_j^l)/\tau)}$$

and a symmetric loss applies to text-to-image (T2I) contrast.

2. Large-scale, Diverse Pretraining Corpora

Robust performance and generalizability in multimodal foundation models depend fundamentally on the breadth and diversity of pretraining data. BriVL, for example, is pretrained on 15 million image–text pairs drawn from Conceptual Captions 12M/3M, SBU, Visual Genome, MSCOCO, and Flickr30k. This extensive paired corpus ensures that learned representations are not only effective for traditional cross-modal tasks (retrieval, captioning, text-to-image generation), but also encode robust associations that more closely match the complex, integrated sensory processing of the human brain.

Data diversity mitigates bias and overfitting, while large scale supports abstraction and transfer beyond the source distribution—a prerequisite for both cognitive modeling and real-world deployment.

3. Neural Encoding: Brain-Like and Multisensory Integration

A defining claim of the multimodal foundation model approach is its capacity to develop “brain-like” representations when compared with unimodal models. Empirical validation is achieved by mapping model activations to neural imaging recordings (e.g., fMRI) of human subjects exposed to matched visual or linguistic stimuli.

Key findings from the BriVL paper include:

• Multimodally trained encoders exhibit superior prediction of fMRI activity relative to unimodal ViT (for vision) or BERT (for language).
• Enhanced performance holds across visual regions (FFA, EBA, V1–V4), multimodal association areas (pSTS), and higher-order language centers (temporal lobe, frontal cortex).
• Notably, these “brain-like” effects are observed not only in canonical multisensory brain regions but also in areas previously considered unisensory—suggesting that the multimodal pretraining process infuses encoders with cross-modal semantics that reflect real neural integration.

This convergence of artificial and biological representation substantiates the hypothesis that large-scale contrastive multimodal pretraining induces richly abstract, semantically coherent embeddings analogous to those produced by multisensory integration mechanisms in the cortex.

4. Comparative Analysis: Multimodal vs. Unimodal Encoders

Direct experimental comparisons demonstrate that both visual and lingual encoders trained in a multimodal paradigm outperform their unimodal counterparts on neural encoding tasks. The critical distinction is that multimodal pretraining enables encoders to abstract away from purely stimulus-driven, low-level features and instead embed high-level, multisensory semantics—resulting in latent spaces that better map onto distributed brain activity.

Unimodal models, by contrast, tend to produce representations restricted to narrow domains of sensory experience (text-only or image-only), leading to suboptimal alignment with the integrated, context-rich nature of human cognition. This suggests that cross-modal contrastive learning is essential for building AI models that accurately simulate or decode complex brain responses.

5. Implications for Neuroscience: Computational Simulators and Hypothesis Testing

A major outcome of these developments is the emergence of multimodal foundation models as practical tools for neuroscientific research. Because their encoder activations track neural responses with high fidelity, these models can be used as computational proxies or “in silico brains” to:

• Probe hypotheses about multisensory integration and the hierarchical organization of perception,
• Identify candidate brain regions involved in integrating visual and linguistic inputs,
• Design stimuli or closed-loop experiments where model-based and biological predictions can be systematically contrasted,
• Simulate or predict the effects of cross-modal disruption or rehabilitation in clinical settings.

A plausible implication is the accelerating convergence of AI-for-brain (using models to paper biological cognition) and brain-for-AI (deriving machine architectures from neural principles).

6. Theoretical and Practical Impact on AI: Toward Brain-Inspired Model Design

The demonstration that multimodal foundation models yield more brain-like latent spaces motivates a paradigm shift in AI architecture design. By explicitly adopting principles characteristic of biological information processing—such as multisensory integration, abstraction via shared semantic embedding spaces, and contrastive learning across modalities—future AI models could realize new levels of generalization, sample efficiency, and interpretability.

From the neuroscience perspective, such models also offer interpretable, testable hypotheses for the mechanisms underpinning human cognition, with potential extensions to therapeutic or assistive technologies that capitalize on model–brain correspondences.

Table: Contrasts Between Unimodal and Multimodal Foundation Models in Neural Encoding

Model Type	Brain Region Encoding Accuracy	Semantic Abstraction	Multisensory Integration
Unimodal ViT	Lower in FFA/EBA, V1–V4	Limited	Absent
Unimodal BERT	Lower in temporal/frontal	Limited	Absent
Multimodal BriVL	Higher across all regions	High	Present

7. Methodological Advancements and Future Research Directions

The momentum-based contrastive framework with large memory queues, as employed in BriVL, addresses several scalability and stability issues in large-scale multimodal pretraining. This methodology has become a reference point for subsequent developments in both foundational AI and computational neuroscience.

Challenges remain, including:

• Elucidating the precise conditions under which cross-modal pretraining maximally enhances interpretability and transferability,
• Extending the approach to accommodate additional modalities (audio, sensory-motor, etc.) and complex, hierarchical task structures,
• Scaling neural encoding validation to more ecologically valid and temporally resolved neural data (e.g., MEG, ECoG).

Subsequent research directions include optimizing architectures for real-time computational neuroscience applications, refining interpretability tools for model–brain alignment, and integrating causal inference to bridge from correlational findings to mechanistic understanding in both artificial and biological systems.

---

In conclusion, the multimodal foundation model approach—exemplified by the BriVL model—combines dual-stream encoder architectures, massive paired data pretraining, and momentum-based contrastive learning to yield semantic representations that are both high-performing and strikingly consonant with experimental signatures of neural multisensory integration. This strategy establishes a robust empirical and theoretical bridge between state-of-the-art AI and the biological complexity of human cognition, with far-reaching implications for the advancement of both fields (Lu et al., 2022).