Multi-Spectral Topography Maps

• Multi-Spectral Topography Maps are multidimensional spatial representations enriched with multi-channel spectral data to capture both geometry and material properties.
• They integrate methodologies such as EEG-based analysis, stereo imaging, and remote sensing to facilitate applications in neuroimaging, environmental monitoring, and nanometrology.
• These maps enable simultaneous spatial and spectral data fusion, enhancing accuracy in surface characterization and supporting advanced quantitative studies.

Multi-spectral topography maps are multidimensional representations of surfaces or spatial domains in which each spatial point is annotated not only with its topographic (geometric or height) information but also with a multi-spectral (i.e., multi-band or multi-feature) profile. These maps are central to quantitative studies in geospatial analysis, medical imaging, surface metrology, environmental modeling, and neuroimaging, where the integration of spectral and spatial structure enables simultaneous morphometry and material or functional characterization.

1. Fundamental Concepts and Definitions

A multi-spectral topography map associates, for each location in a spatial domain (e.g., a 2D grid, 2.5D surface, or 3D mesh), a spectral vector spanning multiple channels. The definition of “spectral” is domain-dependent: it may refer to electromagnetic wavelengths (optical, infrared, etc.), functional frequency bands (as in EEG), or other quantitative features (reflectances, chemical maps).

Formally, for a surface parameterized by coordinates $(x, y, z)$ or discrete indices $(i, j, k)$, the multi-spectral topography is a tensor-valued field $T(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^d$, where $d$ is the number of spectral channels. Typical topography types include:

Modality	Geometry	Spectral Vector
Hyperspectral imaging	$(u, v, Z(u, v))$	$H(u, v, \lambda_1), ..., H(u, v, \lambda_d)$
EEG scalp map	$(x, y)$ grid	$[\tilde P_b(x, y)]$, $b=1...5$ (frequency)
Bathymetry	$(x, y, H(x, y))$	$[R_{rs}(\lambda_i)]$, $i=1...n$
Nanotopography	$(x, y, h(x, y))$	$I(x, y, \lambda_j)$, $j=$R,G,B

2. Construction Methodologies

Multi-spectral topography maps are synthesized by integrating spatial topography acquisition with multi-band signal analysis. Exemplary workflows by domain:

2.1 EEG-Based Multi-Spectral Topographies

The procedure in ["Multi-Domain EEG Representation Learning with Orthogonal Mapping and Attention-based Fusion for Cognitive Load Classification"] involves the following explicit stages (Angkan et al., 16 Nov 2025):

1. Preprocessing: Raw EEG from 4 channels is bandpass (1–75 Hz) and notch filtered (60 Hz, $Q=30$), then segmented into non-overlapping 10 s windows ($2560$ samples at $256$ Hz).
2. Spectral Estimation: Welch’s method computes the power spectral density (PSD) per segment per channel:

$$\hat P_{xx}(f_k) = \frac{1}{KMU} \sum_{m=0}^{M-1} |X_m(f_k)|^2$$

1. Bandpower Extraction: For delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma bands (with exact frequency ranges), integrate the PSD per channel using Simpson’s rule to obtain $P_{c, b}$.
2. Z-score Normalization: Channel/band powers are standardized across all data,

$$\tilde P_{c, b} = \frac{P_{c, b} - \mu_{c, b}}{\sigma_{c, b}}$$

1. Spatial Interpolation: The four electrode values per band are mapped to 2D scalp coordinates and interpolated onto a $32 \times 32$ grid via Gaussian RBF interpolation:

$$T_b(x, y) = \sum_{i=1}^4 \alpha_i \exp\left(-\frac{\|(x, y)-(x_i, y_i)\|^2}{2\sigma^2}\right)$$

2. Colormapping and Stacking: Each $T_b(x, y)$ is mapped to RGB (via the Jet colormap with symmetric scaling) and all five band images are concatenated to produce a $32 \times 32 \times 15$ multi-spectral tensor.

2.2 Stereo-Based Multispectral Scene Mapping

["Multispectral Stereo-Image Fusion for 3D Hyperspectral Scene Reconstruction"] fuses stereo geometry with multi-band reflectance (Wisotzky et al., 2023):

1. System Calibration: Both multispectral snapshot cameras are calibrated for intrinsic (matrix $\mathbf{K}$, distortion) and extrinsic parameters (relative pose).
2. Demosaicking: Raw images from mosaic sensors are demosaicked to full multispectral cubes $I(x, y, \lambda)$ using learned 3D CNNs, recovering full spatial and spectral dimension.
3. Stereo Reconstruction: Disparity is estimated (e.g., via RAFT CNN), mapping pixels to depth using $Z = fB/d$.
4. Spectral Registration and Fusion: Spectral cubes from both views are rectified and warped into a common (e.g., left) spatial frame, then band-concatenated.
5. Topography Map Output: For each pixel, the fused cube $H(u, v, \lambda)$ and $Z(u, v)$ together define a map where each 3D point is annotated with a high-dimensional spectrum.

2.3 Additional Methodologies

• Hyperspectral 3D underwater mapping combines RGB-based SLAM, dense multi-view stereo, and ray-casting hyperspectral lines onto 3D meshes, resulting in geo-referenced meshes with per-point spectral vectors (Ferrera et al., 2021).
• Semi-analytical bathymetric modeling uses multi-temporal, multi-pixel stacks of surface reflectances and physical radiative-transfer inversion, stacking bands and spatial/temporal neighborhoods for robust depth retrieval and bottom composition mapping (Blake, 2020).
• Single-shot, wide-field topography is achieved by space-domain Kramers–Kronig reflection intensity holography: three spectrally-multiplexed off-axis intensities are used to reconstruct the phase (height) field per spectral channel, and then synthesized, enabling nanometer-scale surface mapping (Lee et al., 2021).

3. Mathematical Formulation and Processing Steps

For each application, core mathematical operations define the structure of multi-spectral topography maps:

Table: Mathematical Primitives

Step	Domain	Key Equation/Operation
Spectral Estimation (PSD)	EEG, Imaging	Welch’s method, $\hat P_{xx}(f_k)$
Band/Feature Integration	EEG, Bathymetry	Simpson’s/Trapezoidal integration, physical inversion
Spatial Interpolation	EEG, Imaging	RBF/Gaussian interpolation, spatial registration, demosaicking
Surface Reconstruction	Imaging	Stereo disparity & depth: $Z = fB/d$, multi-view fusion
Fusion Across Bands	All	Stacking along spectral axis, band-concatenation, joint filtering
Colormapping/Visualization	EEG, Imaging	Mapping $T_b(x, y)$ to RGB (Jet, true color, etc.)

Notably, in image-based topography, the geometric model (point cloud or mesh) is often linked to the spectral cube by registration or projection, while functional data (as in EEG) use interpolation over known sensor locations.

4. Applications and Use Cases

Applications span a broad range of scientific, medical, and industrial domains:

• Neuroimaging and Cognitive State Analysis: EEG-derived multi-spectral topographies provide spatially resolved bandpower maps for cognitive load classification and other tasks, with tensors input into CNNs for representation learning (Angkan et al., 16 Nov 2025).
• Surgical Assistance and Medical Imaging: Real-time multispectral stereo enables instrument navigation, perfusion monitoring, and tissue classification with sub-millimeter depth and hyperspectral reflectance at each surface point (Wisotzky et al., 2023).
• Environmental Mapping and Remote Sensing: Multi-spectral bathymetry recovers water depth, turbidity, bottom type, and generates quantitative geospatial products validated against sonar data (Blake, 2020).
• Underwater Surveying: Hyperspectral 3D mapping integrates SLAM, multi-view stereo, and ray-casting of hyperspectral pixels onto reconstructed surfaces, overcoming the limitations of classical photo-mosaics (Ferrera et al., 2021).
• Surface Metrology and Nanoscience: Spectrally multiplexed Kramers–Kronig holography achieves nanometer-resolved single-shot topography under multiplexed wavelength illumination, validated against AFM (Lee et al., 2021).

5. Accuracy, Resolution, and Limitations

Reported performance and constraints are highly task- and modality-dependent:

• EEG: 32×32×15 topographies are resolution- and channel-limited by electrode count; RBF interpolation and fixed colormap scaling enable comparability but the method is constrained by spatial under-sampling and interpolation artifacts (Angkan et al., 16 Nov 2025).
• Multispectral Imaging: 41-band 3D maps processed at video rates (10–30 Hz), with spatial resolutions ~2000×1000 px and depth errors ≲1.5 px; real-time, sub-millimeter geometric accuracy can be achieved with CNN-based demosaicking and stereo (Wisotzky et al., 2023).
• Bathymetric Modeling: Multi-scene fusion yields R²=0.77, MAE=1.17 m vs. sonar on LANDSAT-8 data; stability is dependent on appropriate spectral libraries, scene selection, and model parameterization (Blake, 2020).
• Nano-topography: Kramers–Kronig multiplexed holography yields lateral resolution up to $0.61\lambda/(2 NA)$, axial resolution $\lambda/(2 NA^2)$, with rms height noise below $2 nm$; outputs are validated to within $1 nm$ of AFM (Lee et al., 2021).

Common limitations include sensor under-sampling, depth ambiguity in low-texture regions, the need for precise calibration, and physical model dependence. Some methods assume weak scattering, specular reflection, or require atmospheric/spectral correction.

6. Visualization and Export

Visualization strategies are tailored to the spectral dimension and end use:

• Analytical Rendering: RGB composites, spectral signature plots, per-pixel spectra, and depth-mapped models.
• 3D Export: Point clouds or meshes with per-vertex spectral vectors (e.g., PLY/OBJ/PNTS), supporting external analysis and rendering (Wisotzky et al., 2023, Ferrera et al., 2021).
• Grid-Based Maps: Tensors ($w \times h \times d$) visualized as pseudo-color images per band or as input to machine learning pipelines (Angkan et al., 16 Nov 2025).
• Specialized Viewers: CloudCompare, MeshLab, ParaView, or custom shaders for interactive exploration; stacks of scene maps for geospatial or temporal analysis (Wisotzky et al., 2023, Ferrera et al., 2021).

7. Perspectives and Extensions

Multi-spectral topography mapping continues to expand with sensor advances, increased computational capabilities, and improved algorithms for spectral unmixing, spatial regularization, and domain-specific fusion. Multimodal integration (e.g., fusing functional, structural, and chemical features) is increasingly viable, with frameworks capable of supporting not only real-time guidance but also high-fidelity scientific analysis across diverse fields such as neuroscience, robotics, environmental monitoring, and nanometrology. Further advances in model inversion, spectral library construction, and uncertainty quantification will enable broader uptake and standardization across applications.

---

References:

• "Multi-Domain EEG Representation Learning with Orthogonal Mapping and Attention-based Fusion for Cognitive Load Classification" (Angkan et al., 16 Nov 2025)
• "Multispectral Stereo-Image Fusion for 3D Hyperspectral Scene Reconstruction" (Wisotzky et al., 2023)
• "Hyperspectral 3D Mapping of Underwater Environments" (Ferrera et al., 2021)
• "A Multi-Spatial, Multi-Temporal, Semi-Analytical Model for Bathymetry, Water Turbidity and Bottom Composition using Multispectral Imagery" (Blake, 2020)
• "Single-shot wide-field topography measurement using spectrally multiplexed reflection intensity holography via space-domain Kramers-Kronig relations" (Lee et al., 2021)