Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
123 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
51 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Modified Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Models

Updated 1 August 2025
  • Modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity models are higher-curvature theories that extend General Relativity by incorporating nonlinear functions of the Gauss-Bonnet invariant, G.
  • They produce fourth-order field equations that require fine-tuning to replicate standard cosmic expansion and ensure perturbative stability.
  • These models find applications in modeling bouncing cosmologies, structure formation, modified stellar equilibria, and black hole thermodynamics.

Modified Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Models represent a class of higher-curvature gravitational theories in which the Einstein-Hilbert action is extended by a nonlinear function of the Gauss-Bonnet invariant, GG. These models are motivated both by phenomenological attempts to explain late-time cosmic acceleration and by theoretical considerations from string/M-theory, where curvature-squared corrections including the Gauss-Bonnet term are generic. The resulting field equations are generally of fourth order and extend the vacuum and cosmological dynamics beyond those of General Relativity, with rich implications for background evolution, perturbative stability, cosmic structure formation, and relativistic astrophysical systems.

1. Theoretical Foundations and Action Structure

The action for modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity is typically written

S=d4xg[R+f(G)2κ+Lm],S = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \left[ \frac{R + f(G)}{2\kappa} + \mathcal{L}_m \right],

where RR is the Ricci scalar, Lm\mathcal{L}_m is the matter Lagrangian, and

G=R24RabRab+RabcdRabcdG = R^2 - 4 R^{ab} R_{ab} + R^{abcd} R_{abcd}

is the Gauss-Bonnet invariant. In four dimensions, the term linear in GG does not contribute to the classical field equations due to its topological character, but a nonlinear function f(G)f(G) introduces new dynamics.

In the cosmological context, the Friedmann equations acquire additional "curvature fluid" terms. For spherically symmetric or astrophysical contexts, similar higher-derivative modifications appear in the metric field equations, influencing the equilibrium structure of relativistic stars.

2. Cosmological Background Evolution and Model Constraints

Unlike f(R)f(R) models, where the flexibility in the function ff enables one to reconstruct nearly any background cosmic history, modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity is subject to significant constraints on allowed cosmic evolutions. If f(G)f(G) is not nearly constant, standard ΛCDM expansion with, e.g., ΩDE0.76\Omega_{DE} \approx 0.76 cannot be exactly reproduced except in the trivial limit where f(G)f(G) is a cosmological constant (0705.3795). The exclusionary constraint arises because cosmic background histories such as ΛCDM or those with transitions in G˙\dot{G} uniquely determine f(G)f(G) over ranges of GG, leaving little functional freedom for model-building unless f(G)f(G) essentially reduces to a constant.

Parametric models of the form f1(G)=a1Gn+b1a2Gn+b2f_1(G) = \frac{a_1 G^n + b_1}{a_2 G^n + b_2} or f2(G)=a3Gn(1+b3Gm)f_2(G) = a_3 G^n (1 + b_3 G^m) can account for late-time acceleration and avoid finite-time future singularities, but their coefficients must be finely tuned to avoid conflict with cosmological observations and energy condition constraints (1011.4159).

3. Perturbations, Structure Formation, and Stability Criteria

First-order cosmological perturbation theory in modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity exhibits several distinctive features. Using covariant and gauge-invariant methods, one derives an evolution equation for the gradient of F=df/dGF = d f/dG, which, through harmonic decomposition, introduces a new perturbation variable ϵ\epsilon that satisfies

ϵ¨+(θ+2F˙θθ)ϵ˙+[2716(143F˙θ)θ4FG]ϵ=S,\ddot{\epsilon} + \left(\theta + \frac{2\dot{F}\theta}{\theta}\right)\dot{\epsilon} + \left[ \ldots - \frac{27}{16} \frac{(1 - \frac{4}{3} \dot{F} \theta)}{\theta^4 F_G} \right]\epsilon = S,

with FG=d2f/dG2F_G = d^2 f/dG^2 (0705.3795). The key requirements for stability are:

  • FG<0F_G < 0 (i.e., the second derivative of ff with respect to GG must be negative), or instabilities in the effective degree of freedom cause rapid growth of matter and metric perturbations.
  • Even if FG<0F_G < 0, the combination FGH6|F_G| H^6 must remain small. Otherwise, scale-dependent corrections in the evolution equations for the CDM contrast and Weyl potential lead to significant deviations from ΛCDM at high wavenumber kk (small scales).
  • Viability thus requires that f(G)f(G) does not deviate significantly from a constant over the observationally relevant background.

Numerical analysis using modified Boltzmann codes (CAMB) confirms that non-negligible deviations from a constant f(G)f(G) produce large departures from standard structure growth and gravitational potentials, resulting in strong constraints from CMB, ISW, and galaxy power spectrum data (0705.3795).

4. Realizations of Bouncing and Emergent Cosmologies

Modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity admits explicit reconstruction for nonsingular bouncing or emergent universe scenarios. The action

S=12κ2d4xg[R+F(G)],S = \frac{1}{2\kappa^2} \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}[R + F(G)],

is compatible with exponential, power-law, ekpyrotic, and unified bounce/acceleration scale factors (Bamba et al., 2014). The methodology involves introducing time-dependent auxiliary functions such as

F(G)=P(t)G+Q(t),F(G) = P(t) G + Q(t),

with P(t)P(t) and Q(t)Q(t) satisfying specific ODEs depending on the Hubble rate H(t)H(t). Substituting desired scale factors (e.g., a(t)=eα~t2,a(t)=βt2na(t) = e^{\tilde{\alpha} t^2},\, a(t) = \beta t^{2n}) yields closed-form or series solutions for F(G)F(G), with stability conditions given by positivity of certain coefficient ratios (J2/J1,J3/J1\mathcal{J}_2/\mathcal{J}_1,\, \mathcal{J}_3/\mathcal{J}_1) in the perturbed Friedmann equation. Unified models constructed as a sum of exponentials can realize both a bounce and late cosmic acceleration, while mimetic extensions with a Lagrange multiplier further enhance model flexibility by introducing an effective dust-like component (Bamba et al., 2014, Paul et al., 2020, Astashenok et al., 2015).

5. Astrophysical and Relativistic Stellar Structures

The extension of Gauss-Bonnet gravity to the static, spherically symmetric case modifies classic equations for stellar equilibrium (Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff, or TOV equations). The hydrostatic equilibrium equation retains the form

dpdr=(p+ρc2)ϕ,\frac{dp}{dr} = - (p + \rho c^2) \phi',

but the dynamical equations for the metric functions (e.g., λ(r)\lambda(r) in the metric ds2=c2e2ϕdt2e2λdr2r2dΩ2ds^2 = c^2 e^{2\phi} dt^2 - e^{2\lambda} dr^2 - r^2 d\Omega^2) acquire new curvature corrections from f(G)f(G) and its derivatives (Momeni et al., 2014). Specific functional choices, such as f(G)=βG2f(G) = \beta G^2 or f(G)=δ1Gx(δ2Gy+1)f(G) = \delta_1 G^x (\delta_2 G^y + 1), allow for physically viable quark star models, subject to energy condition satisfaction, sustained anisotropy, and a sufficiently large adiabatic index to prevent instability (Hassan et al., 2 Nov 2024). The junction conditions with the Schwarzschild exterior are essential in determining interior metric parameters and ensuring smooth matching at the stellar surface.

6. Static Spherically Symmetric Solutions and Black Hole Thermodynamics

Static black hole solutions in F(G) gravity are constructed using Lagrange multipliers to enforce functional relations for the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in the action. Two branches manifest:

  • Schwarzschild-de Sitter (anti–de Sitter) solutions for constant GG, with

B(r)=1Λ3r2,Λ=4A,G0=2A2,B(r) = 1 - \frac{\Lambda}{3} r^2, \quad \Lambda = 4A, \quad G_0 = 2A^2,

where A=(G0F(G0))/FG(G0)A = (G_0 - F(G_0))/F_G(G_0) (Mohammadipour, 12 Jul 2025).

  • Novel solutions with X(r)=constX(r) = \textrm{const}, with metric

B(r)=1±r4a,FG=ar+b,F(G)=G2+F0,B(r) = -1 \pm \frac{r}{4a}, \quad F_G = ar + b, \quad F(G) = G^2 + F_0,

admitting event horizons at r+=4ar_+ = 4a.

Thermodynamic properties are modified: the Hawking temperature is

TH=14πdBdrr=r+,T_H = \frac{1}{4\pi} \left. \frac{dB}{dr} \right|_{r = r_+},

and the entropy receives corrections,

SH=AH(1+FG),S_H = A_H (1 + F_G) ,

where AHA_H is the horizon area (Mohammadipour, 12 Jul 2025). The generalized second law is affected by these higher-curvature contributions, directly linking microphysical entropy to geometric modifications.

7. Energy Conditions and Physical Admissibility

The effective stress-energy arising from f(G)f(G) corrections can be recast into inequalities corresponding to the null, weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions: ρeff0,ρeff+peff0,\rho_{\rm eff} \geq 0, \qquad \rho_{\rm eff} + p_{\rm eff} \geq 0, where all quantities are computed using the reconstructed cosmographic parameters

$q = -\frac{1}{H^2} \frac{\ddot{a}}{a}, \qquad j = \frac{1}{H^3} \frac{\dddot{a}}{a},\qquad s = \frac{1}{H^4} \frac{a^{(4)}}{a}.$

Representative models pass the WEC in vacuum and can be extended to include matter/radiation contributions while remaining viable. This constrains the free parameters in specific f(G)f(G) forms and is essential for their acceptance as physically meaningful gravity theories (1011.4159).

8. Outlook and Implications

Modified Gauss–Bonnet models, whether pure f(G)f(G), coupled scalar extensions, or generalizations such as f(R,G)f(R, G), form a central testing ground for higher-curvature corrections relevant to both high-energy and cosmological phenomena. Their predictions are subject to stringent constraints from background evolution, linear perturbation stability, astrophysical viability, and gravitational thermodynamics. While these models can unify epochs of cosmic history (bounce, inflation, dark energy) and support novel relativistic structures (wormholes, strange stars), their allowed parameter space is tightly constrained by the requirement of matching observed expansion, structure growth, and energy condition satisfaction. In practice, cosmological data drives viable f(G)f(G) models close to the cosmological constant, relegating large departures to be observationally untenable under current constraints (0705.3795, 1011.4159, Bamba et al., 2014, Momeni et al., 2014, Hassan et al., 2 Nov 2024, Mohammadipour, 12 Jul 2025).