Mirror Dark Matter
- Mirror dark matter is a hidden duplicate of the Standard Model featuring mirror copies of all particles that interact via gravity and minimal kinetic mixing.
- It explains cosmological relics and structure formation with distinct thermal evolution, modified BBN, and dissipative dynamics in galaxy halos.
- Experimental strategies focus on kinetic mixing effects in direct detection, while astrophysical observations constrain mirror baryon properties in galaxies and compact objects.
Mirror dark matter posits the existence of a hidden sector exactly isomorphic to the Standard Model (SM), comprised of mirror copies of all SM particles and forces. This sector interacts with the visible sector through gravity and potentially via extremely weak portal interactions—most notably kinetic mixing between the ordinary and mirror photons. Mirror dark matter is thereby a multi-component, self-interacting, dissipative baryonic framework that systematically addresses a wide range of experimental, observational, and theoretical requirements for a viable dark matter candidate, with significant implications for cosmology, galaxy structure, direct detection, and compact object astrophysics (Foot, 2014, Ciarcelluti, 2011).
1. Gauge and Symmetry Structure of the Mirror Sector
The defining feature of mirror dark matter is the full duplication of the Standard Model gauge structure:
- Gauge group: , and its mirror counterpart (Cerulli et al., 2017, Foot, 2014).
- Particle content: For every visible fermion, gauge boson, and Higgs, a distinct mirror twin exists with identical mass and couplings (modulo soft breaking in generalized scenarios) (Cerulli et al., 2017). Mirror weak interactions are right-handed.
- Parity symmetry: An exact (or softly broken) discrete parity, , exchanges each SM field with its mirror field, ensuring mass degeneracy and dynamical equivalence at Lagrangian level (Cui et al., 2012, Foot, 2014).
- Portal interactions: The only renormalizable connector, in the minimal setting, is photon–mirror-photon kinetic mixing, parameterized by :
where are (mirror) photon field strengths (Cerulli et al., 2017, Foot, 2014).
2. Cosmological Evolution: Thermal History and Mirror BBN
Cosmological viability is a stringent test for the mirror sector:
- Temperature ratio: Homogenous initial conditions following inflation generically yield in the mirror sector, essential to pass bounds from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) on extra radiation () (Ciarcelluti et al., 2012, Ciarcelluti, 2011). Typically, (pure mirror) or (mixed models) (Roux et al., 2020).
- Light element abundances: Mirror BBN proceeds with earlier neutron–proton freezeout and shorter neutron lifetimes, resulting in a primordial mirror helium mass fraction for (Ciarcelluti, 2011). Mirror hydrogen is subdominant except at .
- Relic density: The present mirror baryon relic density is for parameter regions consistent with CMB and large scale structure (Ciarcelluti et al., 2012).
3. Structure Formation and Large-Scale Signatures
Mirror dark matter possesses distinctive signatures on cosmic structure and observables:
- Linear perturbations: With microphysical equivalence but colder initial conditions, mirror baryons behave as pressureless cold dark matter (CDM) at large scales for .
- Silk damping and acoustic oscillations: If is too large (), acoustic oscillations in the tightly-coupled mirror photon–baryon fluid suppress small-scale power and introduce features (oscillations, damping) into the linear matter power spectrum (Ciarcelluti, 2011).
- CMB imprints: Kinetic mixing populates the mirror sector during annihilation, modulating as a function of . The most prominent observable is suppression of the third and higher-odd acoustic peaks in the CMB power spectrum, with percent-level amplitudes for (Foot, 2012).
- Current constraints: Planck and large-scale structure yield , corresponding to (Ciarcelluti et al., 2012, Foot, 2012, Roux et al., 2020).
4. Dissipative Galaxy Halos and Astrophysical Scenarios
Mirror dark matter is fundamentally a dissipative, self-interacting, multi-component plasma in galactic halos:
- Energy loss: Mirror baryons (primarily , , , plus heavier nuclei) cool via bremsstrahlung and recombination, potentially causing catastrophic collapse without an external heat source (Foot, 2013, Foot, 2013, Foot, 2014).
- Supernova heating: Kinetic mixing enables ordinary core-collapse supernovae to transfer energy (via and plasmon decay) into the mirror sector, heating the halo (Foot, 2014, Foot, 2013). Approximately of the SN core's energy is converted to light mirror species for (Foot, 2013).
- Empirical consequences: Energy balance (heating vs. radiative loss) leads to empirically observed halo scaling relations:
- Surface density: constant across spiral galaxies.
- Core scaling: (disk scale length).
- SN rate: , reproducing galactic disk and core luminosity relations (Foot, 2013).
- Halo composition: Heavily enriched in ; fractions of , , and other metals from mirror star nucleosynthesis. Three benchmark mass fraction scenarios are tabulated in (Cerulli et al., 2017).
5. Direct Detection and Experimental Constraints
Detection strategies for mirror dark matter are predicated on the kinetic mixing portal:
- Nuclear recoils: Mirror nuclei scatter elastically on target nuclei via photon exchange with a Rutherford-like cross section:
with recoil energies and minimal velocities set by the kinematics of the dual Maxwellian velocity distributions (Cerulli et al., 2017, Tousif, 2 Sep 2024).
- Electron recoils: Mirror electrons can scatter off ordinary electrons, leading to low-energy events. The current upper limit from Ge and Xe experiments is for keV (Tousif, 2 Sep 2024).
- Annual modulation and spectral features: The differential event rate exhibits annual modulation (from Earth's velocity) and a recoil spectrum scaling like , with modulation amplitude and phase matching the DAMA observations for depending on halo composition and astrophysical parameters (Cerulli et al., 2017, Foot, 2012, Foot, 2013).
- Parameter constraints: For mirror nuclei (e.g., ), viable is for $11$–$20$ GeV mass range at 95% C.L. (Tousif, 2 Sep 2024). Astrophysical energy balance and cosmic constraints further confine allowed values (Clarke et al., 2016).
- Future prospects: Ton-scale Xe detectors (XENONnT, LZ, PandaX-4T) will reach for GeV, probing the full parameter space. Low-threshold Ge detectors (LEGEND, CDEX) target electron-scattering (Tousif, 2 Sep 2024, Clarke et al., 2016).
6. Theoretical Extensions, Asymmetry, and Compact Objects
Mirror dark matter admits several theoretical elaborations:
- Asymmetric mirror dark matter: Models with baryogenesis linked between the sectors naturally explain the observed ratio, with DM as either mirror baryons () or mirror electrons in certain parameter regimes (Mohapatra et al., 20 Feb 2025, Cui et al., 2012). The Affleck-Dine mechanism efficiently implements this with asymmetric reheating.
- Mirror neutron stars and compact object signatures: Compact objects may accrete or be composed of mirror baryons, leading to modifications in mass–radius relations, maximum mass, and tidal deformability, which are in principle observable via gravitational wave signatures (Hippert et al., 2021, Ciancarella et al., 2020, 0809.2942). A mixed neutron star containing mirror baryons exhibits non-unique, history-dependent mass–radius sequences.
- Portal ultraviolet completions: String-theoretic embeddings (e.g., heterotic compactification) predict mirror and visible U(1) factors, with kinetic mixing arising only at loop- or higher-dimensional (gravity-induced) level, justifying the minute observed (Alizzi et al., 2021).
7. Open Questions, Challenges, and Future Directions
While mirror dark matter is a predictive and testable framework, several challenges and directions remain:
- Cosmological constraints: Observational sensitivity to extra radiation () and small-scale structure limits the allowed temperature and density ratios between sectors. Future CMB-S4 and related probes may decisively confirm or rule out the minimal scenario (Mohapatra et al., 20 Feb 2025, Ciarcelluti et al., 2012).
- Galaxy halo and satellites: Mirror matter-induced dissipation potentially creates a disk or bulge in galaxies; constraints from Gaia, bulge mass, and thin-disk measurements bound the allowed mirror baryon density (Roux et al., 2020).
- Direct detection null results: Some tension with null results in high-threshold detectors may persist and can be addressed by improved calibration, energy threshold understanding, or by probing lighter or heavier mirror elements in multi-component halos (Foot, 2014, Cerulli et al., 2017).
- Astrophysical diversity: The role of mirror dark matter in non-spirals, ellipticals, clusters, and small-scale structure demands expanded simulation and theoretical modeling (Foot, 2014, Roux et al., 2020).
- Discovery signatures: Smoking-gun signals include Coulomb-like spectral features, sign-changing annual modulation below threshold energies, diurnal modulation, and gravitational wave signals from mirror compact object mergers (Foot, 2013, Foot, 2012, Hippert et al., 2021).
Mirror dark matter thus provides a uniquely constrained, theoretically motivated scenario for the dark sector, characterized by predictive links among cosmology, galaxy structure, direct detection phenomenology, and particle physics (Foot, 2014, Ciarcelluti et al., 2012, Foot, 2013, Cerulli et al., 2017).