Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Mean-Field Theory of DNLS

Updated 13 November 2025
  • Mean-Field Theory of DNLS is a framework that decouples a one-dimensional quantum lattice model into site-level problems, capturing energy and mass conservation.
  • It employs a grand-canonical partition function and small-w expansions to provide precise predictions of phase transitions between homogeneous positive-temperature and localized negative-temperature regimes.
  • Comparisons with Monte Carlo and transfer-operator simulations validate the theory's asymptotically exact predictions and its ability to describe metastable states near critical manifolds.

The mean-field (MF) theory of the Discrete Nonlinear Schrödinger (DNLS) equation provides a comprehensive equilibrium description of a one-dimensional quantum lattice model characterized by both energy and norm (mass) conservation. The DNLS exhibits an equilibrium transition between homogeneous states at positive absolute temperatures and localized, negative absolute temperature regimes, a phenomenon enabled by the model's dual conservation laws. MF theory furnishes explicit, semiquantitative predictions throughout the (a,h)(a, h) phase diagram—where aa and hh denote mass and energy densities, respectively—and attains asymptotic exactness near the critical manifold separating the two thermal regimes.

1. Microscopic Hamiltonian and Conserved Quantities

The DNLS model is defined on a one-dimensional lattice of NN sites, with each site nn assigned a nonnegative amplitude (“mass”) cn0c_n \ge 0 and a phase ϕn[0,2π)\phi_n \in [0,2\pi). The Hamiltonian is given by

H=n=1N[cn2+2Jcncn+1cos(ϕnϕn+1)]Nh,H = \sum_{n=1}^N \left[ c_n^2 + 2J \sqrt{c_n c_{n+1}} \cos(\phi_n - \phi_{n+1}) \right] \equiv N h,

where JJ is the hopping strength (one often sets J=1J=1 by rescaling), and hh is the energy density. The total mass (or norm) is

A=n=1NcnNa,A = \sum_{n=1}^N c_n \equiv N a,

with aa the mass density. Both HH and AA are conserved under DNLS dynamics. The ground state (zero temperature) features uniform amplitudes and alternating phases, with energy density

hGS(a)=a22Ja.h_{\rm GS}(a) = a^2 - 2J a.

The critical line (“infinite temperature,” β=0\beta=0) identifying the boundary between positive and negative absolute temperatures is given by

hc(a)=2a2.h_c(a) = 2 a^2.

Below hc(a)h_c(a), the equilibrium state is homogeneous with T>0T>0; above, the state is localized with T<0T<0.

2. Mean-Field Grand-Canonical Partition Function

The grand-canonical partition function in the DNLS context reads

Z(β,μ)=0ndcn02πndϕnexp[β(H+μA)],Z(\beta, \mu) = \int_{0}^{\infty} \prod_n dc_n \int_{0}^{2\pi} \prod_n d\phi_n\, \exp[-\beta (H + \mu A)],

with inverse temperature β=1/T\beta=1/T and chemical potential μ\mu. The tight coupling between lattice sites precludes factorization of ZZ in the full model.

Applying a mean-field decoupling

cncn+1qcn,whereq=cn,\sqrt{c_n c_{n+1}} \rightarrow q \sqrt{c_n}, \quad \text{where} \quad q = \langle \sqrt{c_n} \rangle,

yields a site-factorizable Hamiltonian: HMF=n=1N[cn2+2Jqcncos(ϕnϕn+1)].H_{\rm MF} = \sum_{n=1}^N \left[ c_n^2 + 2J q \sqrt{c_n} \cos(\phi_n - \phi_{n+1}) \right]. Without loss of generality, J=1J=1 is adopted. The reduced single-site partition function becomes

z(β,μ;q)=0dc02πdφeβ[c2+2qccosφ]+βμc,z(\beta,\mu; q) = \int_{0}^{\infty} dc \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\varphi\, e^{-\beta [c^2 + 2q \sqrt{c} \cos\varphi] + \beta\mu c},

where φ=ϕn+1ϕn\varphi = \phi_{n+1} - \phi_n. The angular integral produces a modified Bessel function I0I_0: z=2π0dcexp(βc2+mc)I0(2βqc),mβμ.z = 2\pi \int_0^\infty dc\, \exp(-\beta c^2 + m c) I_0(2\beta q \sqrt{c}), \qquad m \equiv \beta\mu. The MF grand-canonical partition function becomes

ZMF(β,μ)=zN,FMF(T,μ)=1βlnz.Z_{\rm MF}(\beta, \mu) = z^N, \qquad F_{\rm MF}(T,\mu) = -\frac{1}{\beta} \ln z.

MF thus yields an explicit (but integral) formula for the grand-potential and all thermodynamic observables.

3. Free Energy and Thermodynamic Observables

The per-site MF free energy is

F(T,μ)=1βlnz(β,μ;q),F(T, \mu) = -\frac{1}{\beta} \ln z(\beta, \mu; q),

with zz as above. Systematic expansions are feasible in the small parameter

w1βμ2=βm2,w \equiv \frac{1}{\beta\mu^2} = \frac{\beta}{m^2},

valid for w1|w| \ll 1. Explicitly,

z=2πm4πmw+π(24+2m3q2)mw2+O(w3),z = \frac{2\pi}{|m|} - \frac{4\pi}{|m|}w + \frac{\pi (24 + 2|m|^3 q^2)}{|m|} w^2 + O(w^3),

F=1β[ln2πm4w2π/m+O(w2)].F = -\frac{1}{\beta} \left[ \ln \frac{2\pi}{|m|} - \frac{4w}{2\pi/|m|} + O(w^2) \right].

Thermodynamic observables—including a=ca = \langle c \rangle, hnl=c2h_{nl} = \langle c^2 \rangle, hint=2qccosφh_{int} = \langle 2q\sqrt{c}\cos\varphi \rangle—are computed by differentiating FF or evaluating moments: cα=1zdcdφcαeβ(c2+2qccosφ)+mc.\langle c^\alpha \rangle = \frac{1}{z} \int dc\, d\varphi\, c^\alpha e^{-\beta(c^2 + 2q \sqrt{c} \cos\varphi) + m c}. This framework allows one to recover all critical manifolds, T=0T=0 and T=±T = \pm\infty lines, and to approximate the limit of metastability on the negative-TT side.

4. Self-Consistency and Leading-Order Expansions

The MF parameter qq is determined by the self-consistency equation

q=c=1z0dc02πdφceβ(c2+2qccosφ)+mc,q = \langle \sqrt{c} \rangle = \frac{1}{z} \int_0^\infty dc \int_0^{2\pi} d\varphi\, \sqrt{c}\, e^{-\beta (c^2 + 2q\sqrt{c}\cos\varphi) + m c},

which in closed form becomes

q=2πz0dccexp(βc2+mc)I0(2βqc).q = \frac{2\pi}{z} \int_0^\infty dc\, \sqrt{c}\, \exp(-\beta c^2 + m c) I_0(2\beta q \sqrt{c}).

Other quantities are similarly expressed: a=c,hnl=c2,hint=4πqz0dcceβc2+mcI1(2βqc).a = \langle c \rangle, \quad h_{nl} = \langle c^2 \rangle, \quad h_{int} = -\frac{4\pi q}{z} \int_0^\infty dc\, \sqrt{c}\, e^{-\beta c^2 + m c} I_1(2\beta q \sqrt{c}). Solving these equations order-by-order in ww, the leading-order expansions (with m<0m<0 along the critical line) are: q=π2m7π8mw+O(w2), a=1m4wm+O(w2), hnl=2m220wm2+O(w2), hint=π2w+O(w2), h=hnl+hint=2m2(π2+20m2)w+O(w2).\begin{aligned} q &= \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2\sqrt{|m|}} - \frac{7\sqrt{\pi}}{8\sqrt{|m|}}w + O(w^2), \ a &= \frac{1}{|m|} - \frac{4 w}{|m|} + O(w^2), \ h_{nl} &= \frac{2}{m^2} - \frac{20 w}{m^2} + O(w^2), \ h_{int} &= -\frac{\pi}{2} w + O(w^2), \ h &= h_{nl} + h_{int} = \frac{2}{m^2} - \left( \frac{\pi}{2} + \frac{20}{m^2} \right)w + O(w^2). \end{aligned} These formulae are valid for both signs of β\beta, applying on both sides of the infinite-temperature line.

5. Critical Manifolds and Phase Structure

The (a,h)(a,h) thermodynamic plane forms the natural backdrop for the DNLS phase diagram. The critical separation between positive- and negative-TT states occurs at

hc(a)=2a2,β0,  m=1/a.h_c(a) = 2 a^2, \qquad \beta \to 0, \; m= -1/a.

For h<hc(a)h < h_c(a), the system is homogeneous with T>0T > 0; for h>hc(a)h > h_c(a), the system enters the T<0T < 0 (formally negative temperature) regime, which is localized. The T=0T = 0 ground-state line is h=a22ah = a^2 - 2a.

Within the MF formalism, the region of metastability on the negative-TT side (homogeneous states persisting above the infinite temperature line) is identified by examining the MF potential for local minima at c=0c=0: βa4/3.|\beta| \lesssim a^{-4/3}. Translated to the (a,h)(a, h) plane,

hhc<(π2+20a2)a2/3.h - h_c < \left( \frac{\pi}{2} + 20a^2 \right) a^{2/3}.

This demarcates the regime of long-lived homogeneous negative-TT states.

A schematic phase diagram is:

Region (a,h)(a, h) constraint Description
hom. T>0T>0 a22ah<2a2a^2 - 2a \leq h < 2a^2 Homogeneous phase
localized T<0T<0 h>2a2h > 2a^2 Localized (negative-TT) phase
ground state h=a22ah = a^2 - 2a Zero-temperature boundary

6. Smooth Transition Across the Critical Line

A defining feature of the MF theory for DNLS is the smooth crossover from thermodynamically stable positive-TT to metastable negative-TT states at β=0\beta = 0:

  • All macroscopic observables, including a,h,q,hnl,hinta, h, q, h_{nl}, h_{int}, remain continuous at the critical line.
  • The small-ww expansions for key quantities are identical for β0+\beta \to 0^+ and β0\beta \to 0^-, with only exponentially small cutoff corrections for β<0\beta < 0.
  • Near the critical manifold, spatial correlations vanish, hint0h_{int} \to 0, and MF theory becomes asymptotically exact.

A plausible implication is that MF theory fully captures the leading approach to the infinite-temperature transition despite the underlying microcanonical requirements for true negative-TT equilibrium (i.e., breather formation).

7. Comparison with Exact and Numerical Results

Extensive heat-bath and Monte Carlo simulations of the full DNLS model (e.g., N=100N=100, 102β1010^{-2} \leq \beta \leq 10) demonstrate:

  • In the (a,h)(a, h) plane, MF isotherms h(a;T)h(a; T) almost coincide with simulation data for all TT.
  • In (μ,a)(\mu, a) and (μ,h)(\mu, h) representations, MF correctly reproduces the curves’ shapes at high TT; at low TT a near-constant shift μexactμMF1\mu_{\rm exact} \approx \mu_{\rm MF} - 1 is present, which vanishes as β0\beta \to 0.
  • Approaching h2a2h \to 2a^2 (the critical line), the MF prediction becomes essentially exact: hint0h_{int} \to 0, spatial correlations vanish, and the solution matches the factorized site-level case.
  • The small-ww expansion for the single-site partition function reproduces numerical integrals to within 10410^{-4} for w<0.1|w| < 0.1, regardless of the sign of β\beta.

These facts confirm that MF provides explicit, integral-based thermodynamics and a quantitatively faithful account of the DNLS equilibrium structure across both positive and negative absolute temperature regimes. The mean-field approach smoothly interpolates across the infinite-temperature transition and matches transfer-operator and Monte Carlo results in all qualitative and semi-quantitative respects.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Mean-Field Theory of DNLS.