Maximum-Size Properly Colored Forest
- Maximum-size properly colored forest is defined as the largest acyclic subgraph in an edge-colored graph that meets local color constraints by ensuring no two adjacent edges share the same color.
- It is analyzed using matroid theory and hypergraph frameworks, leading to approximation algorithms like the DBMIS technique with a 2/3 - ε guarantee.
- The problem bridges combinatorial optimization and classical spanning tree and matching issues, highlighting NP-hardness and sharp inapproximability boundaries in various graph classes.
A maximum-size properly colored forest is a largest (by edge count) acyclic subgraph of an edge-colored undirected graph such that no two adjacent edges share the same color. This fundamental combinatorial optimization problem, termed Max-PF in recent literature, generalizes several classical matching and spanning tree notions, intertwining constraints from graph acyclicity with local color exclusion properties. The study of Max-PF illuminates algorithmic interfaces between matroid theory, hypergraph degree constraints, and combinatorial local improvement frameworks (Bai et al., 23 Nov 2025, Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
1. Problem Definition and Mathematical Formulation
Let be an undirected loopless multigraph with edge-coloring , where . A subgraph , with , is a properly colored forest if:
- is acyclic (i.e., a forest),
- At every vertex and for every color , at most one incident edge of color is present.
Equivalently, no pair of adjacent edges in have the same color. The Maximum-size Properly Colored Forest problem (Max-PF) seeks to maximize over all properly colored forests in . The weighted version (Max-WPF) asks for maximizing for edge weights (Bai et al., 23 Nov 2025, Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
2. Structural Properties and Matroidal Viewpoint
Properly colored forests exhibit a deep connection to matroid theory. Any such forest can be decomposed so that for each color , is a matching. This yields an intersection property: is simultaneously independent in the cycle matroid (acyclic) and respects partition-matroid-like local color constraints.
A key structural lemma asserts: if is a largest subset covered by matching in each (color class), then any maximum-size properly colored forest covers exactly . Thus, finding a maximum matching-coverable set of vertices, via the sum of matching matroids and Edmonds–Fulkerson’s matroid-union theorem, forms a foundational preprocessing for Max-PF algorithms (Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
3. Approximation Algorithms
Max-PF is NP-hard; approximations are thus essential.
Algorithmic Approaches and Performance Guarantees
| Algorithm/Framework | Approximation Ratio | Applicable Graph Class |
|---|---|---|
| Trivial union-of-matchings | $1/2$ | Arbitrary |
| Local-exchange (Algorithm A, Bai et al.) | $5/9$ [see below] | Multigraphs, all |
| Degree Bounded Matroid Ind. Set (DBMIS) | Multigraphs, all | |
| Special cases (simple graphs, ) | $3/4$ | Simple graphs, |
| Special cases (multigraphs, ) | $3/5$ | Multigraphs, |
| Special cases (simple or ) | $4/7$ | , no parallel edges |
| Complete multigraph, | Exact (polytime) | Complete multigraph, |
Local-Exchange: The $5/9$-Approximation
Bai, Bérczi, Csáji, and Schwarcz [Eur. J. Comb. 132 (2026)] proved that, by repeated local "2-for-3" edge exchanges, one can improve on the naïve $1/2$-approximation and extract a properly colored forest with size at least $5/9$ of the optimum.
Degree Bounded Matroid Independent Set (DBMIS) and the $2/3$-Approximation
Embedding Max-PF as a Max-DBMIS instance, where:
- The ground set is edges ,
- The matroid is the graphic matroid (cycle-free sets),
- For each vertex-color pair , a hyperedge consists of all edges of color incident to , and .
Each edge lies in at most hyperedges; thus, the DBMIS instance has . The reduction to a matroid -parity instance and application of Lee–Sviridenko–Vondrák’s approximation for matroid -parity yields a polynomial-time approximation for Max-PF (Bai et al., 23 Nov 2025). This strictly improves the previous $5/9$ guarantee.
Special and Exact Cases
For complete multigraphs with , an exact polynomial-time solution is achievable via contraction and application of the 2-color Hamiltonian-path result of Bang–Jensen & Gutin. For simple graphs or small , refined decomposition and coloring arguments provide stronger ratios (Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
4. Hardness and Inapproximability
Hardness of approximation results for Max-PF, via -reductions from MAX-SNP-hard problems (Longest Path, -TSP, Maximum Linear Forest), are as follows:
- For in simple graphs, Max-PF is MAX-SNP-hard; NP-hard to approximate within any factor even when a properly colored spanning tree exists.
- For in complete simple graphs, NP-hard to approximate within $1-1/3204$.
- For in (noncomplete) multigraphs, NP-hard to approximate within $533/534$.
- For Max-PT (maximum-size properly colored tree), inapproximability is significantly stronger: in simple or multigraphs, hard to approximate within for any (Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
5. Extensions and Generalizations
The DBMIS framework generalizes Max-PF: Given a matroid , a hypergraph of maximum degree , bounds on hyperedges, the goal is to maximize for with for all . The central result (Bai et al., 23 Nov 2025) provides a -approximation for this problem.
For Max-PF, embedding with yields the $2/3$-approximation. The reduction maps feasible solutions between Max-DBMIS and matroid -parity bijectively, preserving size and weight.
Weighted versions (Max-WPF, Max-WDBMIS) can be approximated via the guarantee for .
6. Algorithmic Complexity and Empirical Status
All methods described operate in polynomial time. For fixed and , both the reduction to matroid parity and the parity-approximation subroutine require time polynomial in , , and . Space usage is also polynomial. No empirical or experimental evaluations of the algorithms are reported; all results are worst-case theoretical guarantees (Bai et al., 23 Nov 2025, Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).
7. Comparison with Properly Colored Tree and Related Problems
The corresponding tree version (Max-PT), seeking the largest properly colored tree (not necessarily spanning), is much harder, exhibiting polylogarithmic or worse inapproximability barriers even in highly structured graphs. By contrast, Max-PF admits constant-factor approximations strictly exceeding $1/2$. The connection to Degree Bounded Spanning Tree, -TSP, and matroid union/matching covers further situates Max-PF within the landscape of combinatorial optimization and coloring (Bai et al., 1 Feb 2024).