Mass-to-Light Ratios in Astrophysics

• Mass-to-Light Ratios are defined as the ratio between a system's mass (stellar, baryonic, or dynamical) and its luminosity, expressed in solar units.
• Empirical studies reveal that M/L gradients vary spatially in galaxies, reflecting changes in stellar age, metallicity, and dark matter distribution.
• Robust calibration using spectral and photometric data enables M/L estimates to inform analyses of galaxy assembly, cluster dynamics, and cosmological mass distribution.

Mass-to-light ratios ($M/L$) quantify the amount of mass present in an astrophysical system relative to its emitted luminosity; these ratios are foundational tools in studies of stellar populations, galaxy structure, dark matter content, and cosmology. In practice, $M/L$ is measured in solar units—$M_\odot/L_\odot$—and can be computed for stellar, baryonic, or dynamical mass, and in various passbands. The spatial and population dependence of $M/L$ encodes fundamental information on star formation history, stellar evolution, galaxy assembly, feedback processes, and the distribution of dark matter. Modern surveys have enabled statistically robust, multidimensional mappings of $M/L$ across galaxy parameter spaces, clusters, and cosmic structure.

1. Physical Basis and Decomposition of $M/L$

$M/L$ encapsulates the ratio between the mass $M$—which could be "stellar" ($M_*$), "dynamical" ($M_{\mathrm{dyn}}$), or "total"—and the luminosity $L$ measured in a specified bandpass (e.g., $L_r$, $L_i$, $L_K$). In galaxies, the total $M/L$ is not determined by stellar populations alone: it also integrates over possible variations in the stellar initial mass function (IMF) and the dark matter (DM) fraction within the chosen aperture (frequently within one effective radius, $R_e$).

A key formalism, established in early-type galaxy studies (Graves et al., 2010), is the decomposition:

$$\frac{M_{\mathrm{dyn}}}{L} = \frac{M_{\mathrm{dyn}}}{M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}} \times \frac{M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}}{L}$$

where $M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}/L$ describes the stellar population term under an assumed IMF and $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$ captures excess mass from dark matter or deviations in the true IMF relative to the assumed one.

The dynamical (total) $M/L$ variation among early-type galaxies is thus a compound effect:

• The stellar population term $M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}/L$ traces systematic changes with stellar age and metallicity, generally increasing with velocity dispersion ($\sigma$), and can be calibrated via spectral absorption features.
• The "non-stellar" component $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$ traces mass not accounted for by a standard-IMF stellar population: primarily dark matter, and/or true IMF departures.

The scaling relations derived empirically are:

$M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}/L \propto \sigma^{0.30}$

$$M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}} \propto M_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{0.24} \quad \text{with} \quad M_{\mathrm{dyn}} \propto \sigma^2 R_e$$

(Graves et al., 2010), indicating a strong, but sublinear, dependence on galaxy dynamical mass.

2. $M/L$ Variations in the Fundamental Plane and Early-Type Galaxies

The Fundamental Plane (FP) of early-type galaxies exhibits both a "tilt" relative to the virial plane and "thickness" (scatter), both attributable to $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$ variations. Major results include:

• Only $\sim$30% of the FP tilt (change in $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$ with $\sigma$) is attributable to stellar population effects; the remainder is due to variations in $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$, i.e., varying dark matter fractions or IMF.
• The FP thickness (scatter in $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$ at fixed $\sigma$ and $R_e$) is dominated ($\sim$78%) by $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$ variations, not stellar fading.
• The two terms "rotate" the FP about different axes in $(\sigma, R_e, I_e)$ space, generating the observed structure in FP mappings.

Chemical abundance and age studies reveal galaxies with high $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$ also show systematically older stellar ages, enhanced $\alpha$-element ratios ([Mg/Fe]), and lower overall metallicities. This suggests that galaxies with high $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}$ (and thus high $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$) have undergone shorter, earlier star formation histories and/or assembled with lower central stellar mass surface densities, consistent with "premature truncation" of star formation or low baryonic conversion efficiencies—i.e., baryons did not efficiently become stars within $R_e$ (Graves et al., 2010).

Pure IMF variation is not a sufficient explanation: models with bottom- or top-heavy IMFs struggle to simultaneously reproduce observed metallicities and $\alpha$-abundances coupled to the $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$ residuals.

3. $M/L$ Gradients and Spatial Variation within Galaxies

Spatially resolved surveys have established that $M/L$ varies systematically as a function of radius, galaxy type, and mass (Tortora et al., 2011, García-Benito et al., 2018). The mean trends are:

• Late-type galaxies: negative $M/L$ gradients (higher in the center, lower at large radii), steepening with galaxy mass. This is attributable to older, more metal-rich central populations.
• Early-type galaxies: more complex ("two-fold") gradients, steeper for $M_* < 10^{10.3} M_\odot$, flattening or reversing for higher masses, with transitions paralleling those seen in color and metallicity gradients. For massive early types, radial $M/L$ variation over one $R_e$ is modest but non-negligible for dark matter inference in the inner regions.

Wavelength dependence is critical: $M/L$ gradients are more pronounced in blue (optical) bands, but flatten in the near-infrared, where chemical and age sensitivity is reduced (Tortora et al., 2011).

Integral field spectroscopy (IFS) shows that $M/L$ generally decreases with radius and that the MLCRs (mass-to-light vs. color relations) exhibit small ($\sim$0.1 dex) scatter, with variations driven by morphology, extinction, and IMF (García-Benito et al., 2018).

4. Empirical MLCRs, Bandpass Dependence, and Calibration

Empirical relations of the form

$$\log(M/L_\lambda) = a_\lambda + b_\lambda \cdot (\mathrm{color})$$

are now standard for estimating stellar $M/L$ from readily observed broadband colors (García-Benito et al., 2018, Herrmann et al., 2016, Du et al., 2020).

Key results include:

• MLCRs are generally linear, with redder colors mapping to higher $M/L$. The precise slope and zero-point depend heavily on SFH, metallicity, and the IMF.
• In disk and late-type galaxies, $M/L$ at 3.6$\mu$m is nearly constant ($\sim$0.5--0.55 $M_\odot/L_\odot$), supporting the calibration from the Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation (BTF) (McGaugh et al., 2013, Schombert et al., 2018)
• For dwarf irregulars, the MLCR slopes are shallower than in spirals, with metallicity driving a steepening via line blanketing (Herrmann et al., 2016).
• Recalibration is essential: discrepancies of 0.1–0.3 dex arise when the same CMLR is applied in different bands due to uncertain stellar population synthesis (SPS) modeling, notably the TP-AGB phase (Du et al., 2020). With careful recalibration, especially in NIR bands, robust, self-consistent $M/L$ estimates are attainable.

Composite bulge+disk prescriptions—assigning distinct SFH and color to each galaxy component—significantly improve the stellar mass estimates and the linearity of the BTF (Schombert et al., 2022).

5. Star Clusters and Globular Cluster $M/L$: Empirical and Dynamical Constraints

In star clusters, $M/L$ provides stringent tests of stellar population models and dynamical evolution:

• For Galactic globulars, dynamical modeling and resolved photometry yield global $M/L_V$ in the range 1.4–2.5 $M_\odot/L_\odot$, in excellent agreement with theoretical isochrones using a canonical IMF (Baumgardt et al., 2020, Baumgardt, 2016).
• $M/L_V$ increases systematically with cluster age, as expected from the loss of massive stars and the build-up of faint, long-lived remnants.
• No significant trend with metallicity is observed (Baumgardt, 2016), contrasting earlier claims from M31 clusters.
• For Magellanic Cloud clusters spanning a wide range of age and metallicity, $M/L_V$ runs $\sim$40% below simple SSP predictions assuming no dynamical evolution. This offset is explained by internal dynamical effects (mass segregation, multi-mass dynamics) and external tidal evolution; a bottom-heavy IMF is ruled out, while a bottom-light IMF or models incorporating dissolution and mass-loss restore agreement with observed values (Song et al., 2021).
• Directly measured dynamical $M/L$ in Magellanic intermediate-age clusters (e.g., NGC 419: $0.22^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$; NGC 1846: $0.32^{+0.11}_{-0.11}$ in $M_\odot/L_\odot$) are lower than those for old Galactic globulars (Song et al., 2019).

6. Environmental and Cosmological $M/L$: Groups, Clusters, and Large Scales

At group and cluster scales, $M/L$ probes the baryonic and dark matter content as a function of system mass and environment:

• Stellar $M_*/L$ in galaxy clusters, determined via galaxy-by-galaxy SED fitting or CMLR transformations, shows no convincing correlation with total cluster mass ($M_{500}$) across $10^{14}$–$10^{15} M_\odot$ (Shan et al., 2014). The preferred value is $M_*/L_i = 1.7 \pm 0.2$ ($M_\odot/L_\odot$) with a Chabrier IMF, increasing by $\sim$60% for a Salpeter IMF.
• Total (dynamical) $M/L$ ratios in fossil groups are up to three times higher than normal clusters, not due to overly luminous BCGs, but to low richness and overall low integrated satellite luminosity. These systems are "cluster-mass, group-light" and challenge canonical models of formation via merging/cannibalism alone (Proctor et al., 2011).
• Weak lensing of clusters and large-scale structure reveals that the cumulative $M/L$ profile rapidly rises on small scales (BCG-dominated), flattens above 300 $h^{-1}$ kpc, and remains nearly universal beyond this scale (Bahcall et al., 2013). This flattening, and the uniformity of $M_*/M_{tot} \simeq 1\%$ beyond $\sim$300 kpc, indicates that most dark matter resides in the extended halos of individual galaxies, not in an additional diffuse component at larger radii.
• The empirical $M/L$ measured at the largest scales enables an independent determination of the universal matter density, $\Omega_m = 0.26 \pm 0.02$, in agreement with other cosmological probes (Bahcall et al., 2013).

7. Theoretical Implications and Cosmological Context

The physical drivers of $M/L$ variations connect to stellar population synthesis, IMF universality, dark matter halo assembly, and feedback-regulated star formation efficiency:

• Strong $M/L$ gradients and central enhancements in massive galaxies—potentially indicating heavy IMFs or closely coupled dark/luminous matter—produce degeneracies in dynamical decompositions (Corsini et al., 2012, Loubser et al., 2020).
• The central regions of clusters and BCGs exhibit diversity in $M/L$ and velocity anisotropy—a result confirmed with orbit-based and anisotropic Jeans models incorporating weak lensing prior dark halos (Loubser et al., 2020).
• In superfluid dark matter frameworks, inferred stellar $M/L$ ratios show nonphysical trends, with massive galaxies requiring systematically lower $M/L$ than dwarfs, violating population synthesis expectations; enforcing a tight MOND-like scaling further exacerbates issues with total dark halo mass and lensing constraints (Mistele et al., 2022).
• Across all system scales, the baryonic conversion efficiency, as traced by $M_*/L$ and $M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/L$, emerges as a fundamental determiner of observed scaling relations and cosmic structure.

Table: Representative $M/L$ Values and Scaling Relations

System / Regime	$M/L$ Value or Scaling	Notes
Early-type galaxy FP, stellar pop	$M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}}/L \propto \sigma^{0.30}$	Stellar ages/metallicity drive variation
Early-type FP, DM/IMF term	$$M_{\mathrm{dyn}}/M_{*,\mathrm{IMF}} \propto M_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{0.24}$$	Dominates FP tilt and thickness
Disk galaxies (Spitzer 3.6$\mu$m)	$M_*/L_{3.6\mu m} \simeq 0.5$	Weak color dependence, Kroupa IMF
Galactic globular clusters	$1.4 < M/L_V < 2.5$	Tight distribution, matches isochrones
Galaxy clusters (stellar, $i$-band, Chabrier)	$M_*/L_i \simeq 1.7$	Little dependence on cluster mass
Milky Way solar cylinder (K-band)	$0.34$	Stellar volume density

• (Graves et al., 2010, Tortora et al., 2011, Proctor et al., 2011, Corsini et al., 2012, McGaugh et al., 2013, Bahcall et al., 2013, Shan et al., 2014, Just et al., 2015, Baumgardt, 2016, Herrmann et al., 2016, García-Benito et al., 2018, Schombert et al., 2018, Song et al., 2019, Telford et al., 2020, Loubser et al., 2020, Du et al., 2020, Baumgardt et al., 2020, Song et al., 2021, Mistele et al., 2022, Schombert et al., 2022).

---

In summary, mass-to-light ratios provide a quantitative bridge between observed light and gravitating mass on all cosmic scales. Their precise interpretation demands careful decomposition of stellar, IMF, and dark matter contributions, calibration against stellar population and dynamical models, and acute attention to spatial, spectral, and environmental dependencies. Recent studies, leveraging large multiwavelength surveys, integral field spectroscopy, detailed star cluster spectroscopy, and weak lensing mapping, have enabled the disentangling of competing effects, challenging naive models of galaxy and cluster formation, and constraining the cosmic distribution of both baryons and dark matter.