Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT-4o
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
o3 Pro
GPT-4.1 Pro
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
2000 character limit reached

Many-Body Tiling Scheme in Infinite Dimensions

Updated 28 July 2025
  • Many-body tiling schemes are mathematical frameworks that cover infinite-dimensional Banach and Hilbert spaces using translated convex bodies and discrete subgroup structures.
  • The methodology employs transfinite induction to construct 1-dense, well-separated subgroups and associated Voronoi cells that guarantee measurable overlap and lattice invariance.
  • This construction advances our understanding of periodic structures in high dimensions, impacting discretization techniques, operator approximations, and applications in quantum physics.

A many-body tiling scheme is a mathematical framework for covering a space—such as a Euclidean space or an infinite-dimensional Banach or Hilbert space—with translated copies of a single convex body, typically achieving global regularity from the local interaction of "tiles." Such schemes extend classical tiling notions by embracing the combinatorial and functional-analytic complexity inherent in infinite-dimensional or many-body contexts. The paradigm is especially prominent in recent work constructing lattice tilings of Hilbert spaces using Voronoi cells associated to discrete subgroups, yielding new examples of periodic coverings in infinite dimensions (Bernardi et al., 7 May 2025).

1. Construction of the Many-Body Tiling

The basic construction selects a bounded, symmetric convex body (often a ball for some equivalent norm), then tiles the space by translating this body using elements of a discrete subgroup DD of the ambient vector space. The general procedure is as follows:

  • In spaces like p(I)\ell_p(I), with a possibly uncountable index set II, one constructs a discrete subgroup DD that is both 1-dense (every point of the space lies within distance 1 of some member of DD) and well separated (distinct points in DD have pairwise distance greater than a fixed r>1r > 1).
  • The construction typically employs transfinite induction to build DD so that for every xXx \in X, there exists dDd \in D with xd<1\|x - d\| < 1, while ensuring dh>r\|d - h\| > r for all dhd \neq h.
  • After establishing DD, one defines the associated family of Voronoi cells:

Vd={xX:xd<xh for all hD,hd}.V_d = \{ x \in X : \|x - d\| < \|x - h\| \text{ for all } h \in D, h \neq d \}.

  • When XX is a Hilbert space, the Voronoi cells are convex bodies. In more general p\ell_p spaces, cells can be star-shaped but always have measurable, geometric regularity.
  • The translates {d+B:dD}\{d + B : d \in D\} with BB the unit ball (or another suitable convex body) cover the space in a lattice-like arrangement.

This method produces a lattice tilingEditor's term for a covering by subgroup translates, ensuring a global periodic structure analogous to periodic tilings in finite-dimensional Euclidean spaces.

2. Geometric and Combinatorial Properties

The many-body tiling schemes arising from this construction possess several mathematically significant features:

  • The translation vectors DD form a subgroup, imparting the tiling with lattice periodicity and facilitating the paper of dynamical and spectral properties of the covering.
  • In 2(I)\ell_2(I) (infinite-dimensional Hilbert space), the Voronoi cells are convex; in 1(I)\ell_1(I), cells may be more general but still support the following pointwise finiteness properties:
    • Point-countable in 2(I)\ell_2(I): Every point lies in at most countably many tiles.
    • Point-2-finite in 1(I)\ell_1(I): Each point belongs to at most two tiles, matching the sharp bound from [Klee's construction] but with subgroup invariance.
  • It is rigorously demonstrated that no lattice tiling by balls can be disjoint: though Klee's construction achieved disjointness in 1\ell_1 without translational invariance, any lattice (i.e., subgroup) tiling must allow controlled, measurable overlap (often only at extreme points of the cells).
  • Each tile in the lattice intersects as many other tiles as the cardinality of the tiling itself, yielding a structure with both strong local finiteness and global combinatorial richness.

These properties distinguish lattice tilings in infinite dimensions from more pathological coverings or mere partitions of the space.

3. Relationship to Classical and Modern Constructions

Classically, Klee constructed tilings of 1(I)\ell_1(I) using cleverly chosen centers to achieve disjointness, but without the subgroup (lattice) invariance. In contrast:

  • The many-body tiling scheme constructs a discrete, 1-dense, and well-separated subgroup using transfinite induction, emphasizing regularity through algebraic structure.
  • The use of Voronoi cells ensures that each cell is a translate of the others by subgroup elements, guaranteeing lattice invariance rather than merely covering property.
  • In 1\ell_1, the new tiling is point–2-finite and lattice, achieving "almost disjointness" while preserving translation symmetry.

This approach provides the first instance of a lattice tiling by balls in an infinite-dimensional reflexive Banach space (specifically a suitably renormed 2(I)\ell_2(I)), answering longstanding questions about the existence of such structures in Hilbert spaces (Bernardi et al., 7 May 2025).

4. Implications for Infinite-Dimensional and Reflexive Spaces

The presented methodology yields new insights into the geometry and topology of infinite-dimensional Banach and Hilbert spaces:

  • It supplies the first example of a tiling by balls of radius 1 in an infinite-dimensional reflexive Banach space, expanding the family of spaces known to admit such decompositions beyond the non-reflexive cases (like c0c_0 or 1\ell_1).
  • The construction of a subgroup that is $1$-separated and (1+ε)(1+\varepsilon)-dense, with generators of controlled norm, has foundational implications for discretization, approximation, and the paper of quasi-crystals or periodic structures in high-dimensional analysis.
  • The duality exhibited—local pointwise finiteness (point-countable, point–2-finite) coexisting with global maximal overlap—reflects the subtle geometric constraints present in infinite-dimensional settings and connects to the theory of free discrete subgroups in normed spaces.

5. Connections to Many-Body Physics and Functional Analysis

Although developed within functional analysis, the underlying principles of the many-body tiling scheme resonate with concepts in many-body quantum physics and statistical mechanics:

  • The partitioning of configuration or state space into regular, overlapping "tiles" tied to subgroup symmetries mimics methods of discretizing Fock space or many-body Hilbert space for variational, numerical, or renormalization purposes.
  • The subgroup invariance ensures periodicity under translation, aiding the analysis of translationally invariant Hamiltonians and the construction of manageable bases for infinite systems.
  • The delicate balance between separation and density of the tiling subgroup informs sampling strategies and operator approximation in high-dimensional quantum or statistical models.
  • The applicability to reflexive spaces, especially Hilbert spaces, aligns with the foundational architecture of quantum mechanics, suggesting potential utility in quantum algorithms, simulation, and mathematical formulation of complex many-body phenomena.

A plausible implication is that such lattice tiling structures could inspire new approaches to the decomposition of operator algebras, construction of tight frames, or "cellularization" of quantum systems in mathematical physics.

6. Summary Table: Main Features of the Many-Body Tiling Scheme in Infinite Dimensions

Feature ℓ₁(I) ℓ₂(I) (Hilbert space)
Tiling by balls Yes Yes
Disjointness possible Only non-lattice (Klee) No (proved impossible)
Lattice (subgroup) tiling Yes (point–2-finite) Yes (point-countable)
Local overlap per point At most 2 Countably many
Global overlap per tile Maximal (cardinality of D) Maximal (cardinality of D)
Reflexive Banach admitted No Yes

This synthesis captures the architecture, properties, comparative context, infinite-dimensional implications, and connections to many-body theory of contemporary many-body tiling schemes, as developed in (Bernardi et al., 7 May 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)