Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Makani Galaxy: Extreme Starburst Winds

Updated 5 July 2026
  • Makani Galaxy is a compact, massive post-starburst system exhibiting a 100 kpc-scale, starburst-driven multiphase wind.
  • It features two distinct outflow episodes: an older, slower outer wind and a recent, fast inner wind reaching speeds up to 2000 km/s.
  • Multiwavelength studies reveal shock-dominated ionization, active mass and momentum transport, and PAH-bearing dust survival in the CGM.

Makani Galaxy, SDSS J211824.06+001729.4, is a compact, massive galaxy at z=0.459z = 0.459 whose defining property is a starburst-driven galactic wind extending from the interstellar medium into the circumgalactic medium on 100\sim 100 kpc scales. It is described as a compact, massive post-starburst galaxy and as a compact merger remnant undergoing an extreme starburst, with stellar mass M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot, an effective radius reported as re=2.3r_e = 2.3 kpc or re2.5r_e \approx 2.5 kpc, and a central starburst of radius 400\approx 400 pc that is consistent with being Eddington-limited. Makani is a benchmark system because its outflow can be decomposed into two star-formation and wind episodes separated in space and time, and because warm ionized gas, molecular gas, neutral gas, O VI/Lyα\alpha-emitting coronal interfaces, and PAH-bearing warm dust have all been traced across the inner halo and CGM (Rupke et al., 2023, Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025, Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

1. Host galaxy and star-formation history

Makani lies at a physical scale of $6.02$ kpc per arcsecond for a flat Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology with Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.315 and 100\sim 1000. It is massive, compact, and centrally concentrated. The central starburst is extremely compact, intense, and consistent with being Eddington-limited, while the broader system is identified as post-starburst and merger-remnant-like. These descriptions frame Makani as a transition object in which a recent or ongoing starburst coexists with evidence for rapid structural and gaseous transformation (Rupke et al., 2023, Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025, Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

The star-formation rate depends strongly on tracer. Radio and infrared indicators give 100\sim 1001–100\sim 1002, whereas H100\sim 1003 from the nuclear star-forming component gives a much smaller 100\sim 1004. The optical study explicitly interprets this discrepancy as suggesting very recent quenching and/or LyC leakage and/or heavy obscuration. A plausible implication is that Makani is being observed during a short-lived stage in which feedback has already altered the observable star-forming signatures without erasing the energetic imprint of the recent burst (Rupke et al., 2023).

The temporal structure inferred for the central activity consists of two episodes: Episode I, approximately 100\sim 1005 Gyr ago, and Episode II, approximately 100\sim 1006 Myr ago. The wind properties strongly track this history, so the star-formation chronology is not merely a stellar-population inference but the organizing principle for the gaseous phenomenology seen from the nucleus to the halo (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

2. Two-episode outflow architecture and phase structure

Makani’s outflow is explicitly resolved into two episodes. Episode I is the outer, older component, with age 100\sim 1007 Myr and radial range 100\sim 1008–100\sim 1009 kpc. It has slowed substantially: projected speeds are M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot0, the linewidth is M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot1, and the mean bulk motion is consistent with ballistic travel over M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot2 Myr, M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot3. Episode II is the inner, recent component, with age M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot4 Myr and radial range M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot5–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot6 kpc, although faint [O II] reaches M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot7 kpc; its maximum speeds exceed M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot8, and M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot9 (Rupke et al., 2023).

The phase structure is strongly stratified with radius. Warm ionized gas is detected to re=2.3r_e = 2.30–re=2.3r_e = 2.31 kpc in Balmer lines and to re=2.3r_e = 2.32 kpc in [O II]. Neutral and molecular gas, together with dust traced by Balmer decrements, Na I D, Mg II, and CO, are prominent within re=2.3r_e = 2.33–re=2.3r_e = 2.34 kpc and are not detected beyond re=2.3r_e = 2.35 kpc in the optical/near-UV studies. The wind-to-galaxy size ratio re=2.3r_e = 2.36 proves that the outflow extends into the CGM, not merely the stellar body or a local superbubble environment (Rupke et al., 2023).

Subsequent ultraviolet and infrared observations broadened this phase inventory. Deep HST imaging detects O VI and Lyre=2.3r_e = 2.37 emission across the [O II] nebula with similar morphology and extent, out to re=2.3r_e = 2.38 kpc, while JWST detects PAH-bearing warm dust to re=2.3r_e = 2.39 kpc. These later data show that the outer halo is not only ionized but also hosts coronal cooling interfaces and dust-bearing material, even where earlier slit-based reddening estimates suggested little or no extinction (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025, Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The resulting picture is a temporally resolved, multiphase, CGM-scale wind. Episode II is fast, dusty, neutral, molecular, and strongly multiphase in the inner halo. Episode I is older, slower, and dominated observationally by warm ionized gas and coronal/interface tracers at larger radii. This suggests radial and temporal evolution in which a recently launched compact-starburst wind transitions into a more diffuse and CGM-coupled structure.

3. Optical spectroscopy, ionization state, and shocks

The foundational spectroscopic analysis used Keck II/ESI echellette observations with a re2.5r_e \approx 2.50 slit, re2.5r_e \approx 2.51, and simultaneous rest-frame optical coverage from [O II] re2.5r_e \approx 2.52 through [S II] re2.5r_e \approx 2.53. Balmer lines were detected across the nebula, together with numerous collisionally excited lines including [O III] and its auroral re2.5r_e \approx 2.54 Å line, [O I] re2.5r_e \approx 2.55 Å, [N II] re2.5r_e \approx 2.56 Å, [S II], [Ne III], and [Ne V]. These line detections enabled extinction, density, temperature, and excitation diagnostics across both wind episodes (Rupke et al., 2023).

The extinction profile is radially structured. Assuming Case B and re2.5r_e \approx 2.57, re2.5r_e \approx 2.58 peaks at re2.5r_e \approx 2.59 around 400\approx 4000 kpc and declines to 400\approx 4001 by 400\approx 4002 kpc. Electron densities derived from [S II] 400\approx 4003 and [O II] 400\approx 4004 vary strongly with position: in the inner fast wind, 400\approx 4005 with a 400\approx 4006 range of 400\approx 4007–400\approx 4008, whereas outer apertures have 400\approx 4009, weakly constrained below α\alpha0. Auroral-line ratios, specifically [O III] α\alpha1 dex and [N II] α\alpha2 to α\alpha3 dex, imply α\alpha4 K in the shocked gas (Rupke et al., 2023).

Line ratios were interpreted with MAPPINGS shock models, using Solar-metallicity fast-shock grids with α\alpha5 for the outer wind and α\alpha6 for the inner wind, at low magnetic parameter α\alpha7. Both shock-only and shock+precursor cases were considered, with precursor pre-ionization especially important in the inner wind. In diagnostic diagrams outside the nucleus, apertures lie in composite/LINER regions characterized by high [O I]/Hα\alpha8 and [S II]/Hα\alpha9, modest [O III]/H$6.02$0, and low [O III]/[O II]. The broad nuclear component falls in the AGN region, but Makani shows no multiwavelength AGN signatures; in this system, the AGN-like optical ratios and [Ne V] are explained by fast shocks rather than by a luminous AGN (Rupke et al., 2023).

The shock speeds inferred from the optical line ratios track the kinematics. Episode II requires $6.02$1–$6.02$2, consistent with $6.02$3, together with a hard radiation field and shock+precursor emission. Episode I requires $6.02$4, consistent with $6.02$5, with lower ionization parameter and weaker precursor contribution. The empirical relation $6.02$6 in both episodes is one of the clearest arguments that shocks, rather than stellar photoionization, dominate the ionization of the extended nebula (Rupke et al., 2023).

4. Mass, momentum, energy, and wind driving

For case B recombination and uniform density, the ionized-gas mass was estimated from the H$6.02$7 luminosity as

$6.02$8

In Makani, the H$6.02$9 luminosity was apportioned between shock precursor and post-shock regions using MAPPINGS guidance, with representative densities of Λ\Lambda0 and Λ\Lambda1 for Episode I and Λ\Lambda2 and Λ\Lambda3 for Episode II. This procedure weights the mass toward the lower-density precursor component. The outflow rate was then bracketed with Λ\Lambda4 and Λ\Lambda5, using deprojected velocities, characteristic radii Λ\Lambda6 kpc and Λ\Lambda7 kpc, and both Λ\Lambda8 and Λ\Lambda9 to span the dynamics (Rupke et al., 2023).

The total nebular luminosity is Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3150, bootstrapped from ESI HΩm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3151 and KCWI [O II]. The star-forming component accounts for Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3152–Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3153, with an adopted value of Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3154. For the inner fast wind, the preferred estimates give Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3155–Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3156 and Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3157–Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3158, comparable to the molecular phase with Ωm=0.315\Omega_m = 0.3159 and 100\sim 10000. Representative kinematics are 100\sim 10001–100\sim 10002; for the ionized component alone, 100\sim 10003 and 100\sim 10004 (Rupke et al., 2023).

For the outer slow wind, the preferred estimates give 100\sim 10005 and 100\sim 10006–100\sim 10007, with representative kinematics 100\sim 10008–100\sim 10009. The corresponding rates are much smaller than in Episode II: 100\sim 10010 and 100\sim 10011. Makani therefore combines a very massive outer ionized reservoir with a relatively small present-day outer-wind mass flux (Rupke et al., 2023).

The shock-radiated power was estimated from

100\sim 10012

with 100\sim 10013. For Episode II, 100\sim 10014 implies 100\sim 10015, while the mechanical power in the ionized+molecular wind, 100\sim 10016, is sufficient to power the observed line emission. For Episode I, 100\sim 10017 implies 100\sim 10018, whereas 100\sim 10019. The optical analysis therefore concludes that much of the energy driving Episode I shocks must reside in an unseen hotter phase or has propagated to larger CGM radii (Rupke et al., 2023).

The driving mechanism is cast in terms of the momentum boost,

100\sim 10020

Using 100\sim 10021, so that 100\sim 10022, the inner outflow has a momentum boost of 100\sim 10023. The interpretation advanced for Makani is a momentum-driven flow supplied jointly by hot ejecta and radiation pressure from the compact Eddington-limited starburst, without requiring a clear AGN (Rupke et al., 2023).

5. Ultraviolet line emission and coronal cooling in the CGM

Deep HST/ACS-SBC imaging with the F150LP and F165LP long-pass filters provided a differential narrow-band method for separating O VI from Ly100\sim 10024. At Makani’s redshift, O VI 100\sim 10025 shifts to 100\sim 10026 and 100\sim 10027 Å and is included in F150LP but excluded from F165LP, whereas Ly100\sim 10028 at 100\sim 10029 Å lies in both filters. The critical practical result is that F150LP traces O VI+Ly100\sim 10030, F165LP traces Ly100\sim 10031, and the filter difference isolates O VI with minimal Ly100\sim 10032 leakage. After dark-current control, background modeling, drizzling to the KCWI scale, and Voronoi binning, O VI and Ly100\sim 10033 emission were detected across the [O II] nebula with similar morphology and extent, out to 100\sim 10034 kpc (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

The morphology is highly constraining. The F150LP emission reproduces the [O II] hourglass, including four lobes and the northern cavity, to 100\sim 10035–100\sim 10036, or 100\sim 10037–100\sim 10038 kpc. The inner 100\sim 10039–100\sim 10040 region is dominated by continuum and/or Ly100\sim 10041 from the compact starburst, but beyond 100\sim 10042 the emission is line-dominated. In the extended nebula the measured count-rate ratio is 100\sim 10043 at 100\sim 10044–100\sim 10045 and 100\sim 10046 at 100\sim 10047–100\sim 10048, implying that O VI contributes 100\sim 10049–100\sim 10050 of F150LP counts in the inner extended zone and 100\sim 10051–100\sim 10052 in the outer zone (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

The adopted line-separation relations are

100\sim 10053

with

100\sim 10054

100\sim 10055

and

100\sim 10056

After correction for Milky Way extinction with 100\sim 10057, the extended-nebula ratios are 100\sim 10058 at 100\sim 10059–100\sim 10060 and 100\sim 10061 at 100\sim 10062–100\sim 10063. Summing the detected bins gives 100\sim 10064, while model extrapolation gives 100\sim 10065 integrated to 100\sim 10066 kpc and 100\sim 10067 integrated to infinity; the adopted value is 100\sim 10068. This is comparable to 100\sim 10069 (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

The radial surface brightness of O VI is well described by

100\sim 10070

with 100\sim 10071 (fixed), 100\sim 10072 kpc, 100\sim 10073, and 100\sim 10074 kpc. The O VI half-light radius is 100\sim 10075–100\sim 10076 kpc, similar to [O II] at 100\sim 10077 kpc. Only 100\sim 10078 of the total O VI flux lies within the compact central 100\sim 10079 aperture, while the remaining 100\sim 10080 is extended, which the UV study takes as evidence for in-situ O VI excitation rather than dominant resonant scattering of nuclear light (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

Physically, O VI is interpreted as tracing radiative cooling at 100\sim 10081 K in hot-cold interfaces, where the 100\sim 10082 K CGM or hot wind exchanges mass with 100\sim 10083 K clouds. Using a metal-line cooling coefficient 100\sim 10084 and

100\sim 10085

the paper notes that 100\sim 10086 and 100\sim 10087 imply 100\sim 10088 if the O VI mass equals the ensemble halo O VI mass of 100\sim 10089. With 100\sim 10090 Myr for O VI-bearing coronal gas, the resulting oxygen-phase cooling rate is 100\sim 10091, and scaling to total gas gives 100\sim 10092 for 100\sim 10093. This suggests very strong mass exchange and cloud growth in the outer wind (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

6. Warm dust, PAHs, and dust survival to tens of kiloparsecs

JWST NIRCam and MIRI imaging exploited a coincidental redshift match between Makani’s PAH features and standard imaging filters. At 100\sim 10094, PAH 100\sim 10095m falls in NIRCam F480M, PAH 100\sim 10096m in MIRI F1130W, PAH 100\sim 10097m in MIRI F1800W, H100\sim 10098 100\sim 10099–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot00 S(1) M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot01m in MIRI F2550W, and PaM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot02 in NIRCam F187N. “Off-band” continuum windows were provided by MIRI F770W and F2100W. After PSF subtraction with STPSF and photutils PSFPhotometry, PAH M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot03m was detected to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot04 kpc, PAH M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot05m to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot06 kpc, and PAH M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot07m to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot08 kpc (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The spatial relation to other phases is important. Warm dust extends well beyond the inner CO(2–1) and Mg II emission at M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot09 kpc, but does not reach as far as the outer [O II] nebula at up to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot10 kpc. Within M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot11 kpc, the flux ratios F1130W/CO(2–1), F1800W/CO(2–1), F1130W/Mg II, and F1800W/Mg II remain roughly constant, suggesting co-spatial dust with cool gas in the inner wind at similar relative strengths. Beyond M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot12 kpc, PAHs persist where CO and Mg II are not detected in the current ALMA/KCWI data. A NW halo cloud complex is evident in F1130W and F1800W out to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot13–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot14 kpc, and the extended emission is clumpy and asymmetric (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The primary quantitative dust diagnostic is

M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot15

Measured values are M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot16 in the nucleus, M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot17 in the inner halo at M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot18–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot19 kpc, M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot20 in the outer halo cloud CGM-E, and M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot21 in CGM-W. Because the M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot22 and M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot23m bands are stronger in neutral and larger PAHs, whereas M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot24m strengthens in ionized or smaller PAHs under harder radiation fields, the observed radial decline in M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot25 was modeled as indicating decreasing starlight intensity, decreasing PAH sizes, and increasing PAH ionization fractions with increasing distance from the nucleus (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The modeling compared measured filter ratios to the PAH+dust spectral library of Draine (2021), redshifted to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot26 and convolved with the exact JWST throughputs, across starlight intensity M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot27, PAH size distribution M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot28, and PAH ionization fraction M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot29. In the nucleus, high M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot30 and elevated continuum ratios are consistent with large M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot31, larger grains, and lower PAH ionization fractions. In the inner and outer halo, lower M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot32 values require lower M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot33 with M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot34, smaller average PAH sizes than the standard distribution, and elevated PAH ionization fractions relative to the nucleus. No dust temperatures or masses were reported (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The dust-survival problem is acute. For representative values M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot35 kpc and M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot36, the travel time is M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot37 Gyr, consistent with M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot38 yr. By contrast, the adopted thermal sputtering time,

M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot39

with M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot40, gives M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot41–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot42 yr for PAH-sized grains with M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot43–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot44m under the densities and temperatures adopted for the hot phase, far shorter than the travel time. The observed radial decline in M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot45, reduced F480M detections, and low halo continuum are therefore interpreted as evidence that PAHs survive to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot46–M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot47 kpc but are eroded and processed during transport. A possible survival mechanism proposed in the JWST study is shielding in cloud-wind mixing layers, where dust can survive for M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot48 if condensation and cooling are efficient (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

The JWST detections also revise the earlier radial dust picture. Optical slit data had found M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot49 by M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot50 kpc along the slit, but the PAH maps directly reveal dust in the outer warm-ionized wind and note that the slit may have missed parts of the NW PAH clouds. This is not a contradiction in the strict sense; it is a demonstration that slit-based extinction measurements did not fully sample the three-dimensional dust distribution (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

7. Uncertainties, interpretive limits, and broader significance

Each observational window carries substantial systematics. In the optical, uncertainties arise from extinction corrections, especially at large radius, from the M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot51 dex RMS scatter in the HM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot52–[O II] bootstrap, from difficult low-S/N density measurements in the outer wind, from the adopted two-phase precursor/post-shock density model, from shock-model degeneracies involving precursor fractions and magnetic parameter, and from the geometry and deprojection assumptions used to derive M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot53, M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot54, and M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot55. Flux calibration differences between ESI and SDSS/KCWI and the assumed M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot56 subtraction of star-forming HM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot57 in the inner nebula are additional systematic terms (Rupke et al., 2023).

In the ultraviolet, the main limitations are internal dust attenuation, which is poorly constrained spatially in the UV; LyM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot58 radiative transfer, which can depress intrinsic O VI/LyM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot59 ratios by adding scattered LyM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot60; the noise-dominated nature of the pure F150LP–F165LP difference image beyond M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot61; residual dark-current gradients in ACS-SBC at extremely low surface brightness; and the possibility that up to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot62 of the total O VI light could arise from dust-scattered UV continuum if the entire inner exponential were due to scattering. The UV analysis therefore treats shock ionization as plausible rather than uniquely established, with the favored shock parameters depending sensitively on extinction and LyM1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot63 transport (Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025).

In the infrared, the dominant issues are PSF-subtraction residuals, especially at long wavelength; lower-than-expected F2550W sensitivity; the fact that filters integrate across broad PAH features and were analyzed without explicit continuum subtraction; and the possibility that current ALMA/KCWI limits are too shallow to exclude co-spatial cool gas beyond M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot64 kpc. The JWST study also notes that radial M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot65 trends, while favoring erosion and increased ionization, could be influenced by varying radiation hardness or local shock conditions (Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

Despite these caveats, Makani occupies an unusual position in feedback studies. The optical work describes it as the poster child of a galactic wind on scales of the circumgalactic medium; the UV work presents the first imaging detection of spatially extended O VI emission coextensive with a M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot66 kpc wind in a massive galaxy’s CGM and only the second resolved O VI emission halo imaged for any galaxy; and the JWST work reports direct PAH detections to M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot67 kpc, providing strong evidence that ejected dust can survive to CGM scales while being processed in transit (Rupke et al., 2023, Ha et al., 25 Mar 2025, Veilleux et al., 10 Jul 2025).

Taken together, the Makani data define a physically coherent but still incomplete feedback case study. Episode II is a fast, massive, dusty, multiphase inner-halo wind whose warm ionized mass and outflow rate are comparable to those of the molecular phase and whose momentum budget is consistent with a momentum-driven flow from a compact Eddington-limited starburst. Episode I is an older, slower CGM-scale outflow containing a large ionized reservoir, coronal O VI interfaces, and PAH-bearing dust, but with evidence that much of its energy and momentum reside in a hotter phase or at still larger radii. This suggests that Makani is best understood not as a single outflow snapshot but as a resolved feedback sequence linking compact-starburst launch physics, shock-powered ionization, multiphase mass exchange, CGM cooling, and dust transport over M1011.1MM_* \approx 10^{11.1}\,M_\odot68 yr.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Makani Galaxy.