Log Probability Guided Query Construction

• Log Probability Guided Query Construction is a framework that constructs and refines queries using log probabilities derived from log-linear models, Bayesian inference, and neural scoring.
• It employs techniques such as local grounding, personalized PageRank, and probability density estimation to achieve scalable, efficient, and statistically justified query processing.
• The methodology is applied across various domains including knowledge bases, big data management, language modeling, and preference alignment, enhancing semantic plausibility and system reliability.

Log probability guided query construction refers to a class of methodologies across probabilistic logic programming, generative modeling, and query optimization, in which queries—or their outputs—are constructed, selected, or filtered according to the log probabilities assigned by underlying models. These approaches leverage the mathematical properties of log-linear distributions, Bayesian inference, and probabilistic neural or semantic scoring functions to ensure queries are both statistically justified and aligned with intended semantics or observable outcomes such as user engagement, completeness, or plausibility.

1. Foundations: Loglinear Models and Probabilistic Reasoning

Loglinear models define probability distributions over structured objects by exponentiating linear combinations of feature functions. In probabilistic reasoning with Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs), as established by (Cussens, 2013), the probability $p(w)$ for an element %%%%1%%%% (often a proof or query derivation) is defined by:

$$p(w) = Z^{-1} \exp\left\{ \sum_i \lambda_i f_i(w) \right\}$$

where $\lambda_i$ are model weights and $f_i(w)$ are feature counts, such as occurrences of rules or subgoals in logic program proofs. For each atomic query, the probability assigned is obtained by marginalizing over all derivations. This mechanism enables queries to be guided by the cumulative log-probabilities associated with their derivations, integrating logical semantics with quantitative uncertainty.

SLPs conserve the logical structure (one-to-one mapping between logical and random variables), so every logical variable corresponds to a random variable. The proof probability in SLPs adopts a multiplicative structure over clause labels, which, under logarithm, reduces to a linear sum in log-probabilities, directly enabling log probability guided query strategies.

2. Log Probability Guidance in Large-scale Inference and Learning

ProPPR (Wang et al., 2014) advances log probability guided query construction in the context of large, noisy knowledge bases. Instead of grounding queries globally to large propositional networks, ProPPR utilizes a local grounding algorithm that constructs a subgraph of the proof space according to personalized PageRank random walks. Edge weights are computed via log-linear functions:

$f(w, \Phi) = \exp (w \cdot \Phi)$

Log probabilities sum along proof paths, biasing the exploration toward high-probability, short derivations. The PageRank-Nibble-Prove algorithm bounds the size of the locally grounded graph independently of database size, yielding scalable and efficient query processing. For learning, loss terms such as $-\log p_{v_0}[u_+] - \log(1 - p_{v_0}[u_-])$ guide weight updates to maximize the log-probability margin between correct and incorrect answers. Thus, both inference and learning explicitly use log probability as the principal score to guide the selection and construction of queries.

3. Log Probability Guided Query Processing for Data Management

Modern query optimization for big data can sacrifice strict completeness for performance by probabilistically guiding query construction. Probery (Song et al., 2019) introduces the notion of Probability of Query Completeness (PC), representing the confidence that a result set is fully complete:

$PC = \int_{a-1}^{a} h(x)dx = H(a) - H(a-1)$

where $h(x)$ is a probability density for data placement, and $H(a)$ its cumulative. Queries are constructed to meet or exceed specified PC thresholds by scanning only blocks with sufficient probability of contributing relevant data, as computed by models such as:

$g(x) = 1 - (1 - f(x))^\alpha$

where $f(x)$ models the density of record placement and $\alpha$ is the block record count. Experimental results demonstrate that setting lower PC targets (e.g., 0.8 instead of 1.0) doubles query performance with minimal loss of completeness guarantee, and empirical PC always exceeds specified thresholds. This is a direct instantiation of log probability guided query construction: queries are assembled or processed by dynamically weighting block inclusion based on explicit probability models derived from log-linear data placement and existence.

4. Bayesian Sampling and Log Probability Driven Proposals

Graphical log-linear marginal models present Bayesian inference challenges owing to curved exponential family structures where likelihoods cannot be expressed analytically in terms of log-linear parameters. The probability-based independence sampler (PBIS) of (Ntzoufras et al., 2018) guides the query construction—i.e., parameter proposals in MCMC—by working in the probability parameter space, then transforming to log-linear interactions via:

$\lambda = C \cdot \log (M \cdot P)$

Efficient proposals are sampled via conjugate Dirichlet distributions from augmented DAG representations, maintaining compatibility of marginals. Acceptance probabilities in Metropolis-Hastings steps explicitly involve the Jacobian of the transformation and log-probabilities of both the prior and likelihood, ensuring only probabilistically valid queries (parameter sets) are constructed and accepted. Simulation studies and real data benchmarks confirm that log probability guided proposal strategies yield higher sampling efficiency and lower estimator variance.

5. Semantic Plausibility Evaluation and Generation via LogProb

In neural LLMing, log probabilities over token sequences provide a robust means of guiding query or utterance generation. (Kauf et al., 21 Mar 2024) establishes that log probability scores (LL) are highly correlated with semantic plausibility:

$$LL(s) = \sum_i \log P(w_i | w_{1}, \ldots, w_{i-1})$$

Comparisons of LL scores between plausible and implausible sentence pairs reliably mirror human judgments. Contextual modulation of log probability, such as

$$P(\text{target} | \text{context}) > P(\text{target})$$

yields metrics for context-dependent plausibility. Instruction-tuned models do not consistently improve LL-guided plausibility evaluations, and zero-shot prompt-based approaches are less robust than LL scoring. Direct evaluation and generation of queries via log probability guidance thereby offers superior stability and alignment with human semantic sensibility compared to prompt engineering alone.

6. Log Probability-based Confidence Filtering in Query Generation

ProbGate (Kim et al., 25 Apr 2024) applies log probability guided query construction in the context of medical Text2SQL. For each generated query, log probabilities for tokens are examined post-generation. The system excludes reserved SQL grammar tokens, then computes the mean log probability of the bottom $t$ tokens to assess output confidence:

$$P_{\text{avg}} = \frac{1}{t} \sum_{i=1}^{t} l_{(i)}$$

If $P_{\text{avg}}$ falls below a dataset-calibrated threshold, the query is filtered out as likely unanswerable. Subsequent grammatical error filtering offers a two-stage defense against erroneous outputs. Experimental results demonstrate substantial increases in Reliability Scores, especially when high-safety requirements are paramount, as in EHR-backed clinical systems.

7. Alignment Frameworks Using Log Probability Ratios for Preference Optimization

Recent frameworks for generative query recommendation unify log probability guided query construction with reinforcement learning and preference alignment (Min et al., 14 Apr 2025, Yin et al., 15 Aug 2025). In these, candidate queries are generated by LLMs and ranked or trained according to composite reward signals—the most central being log probability ratios between chosen and rejected samples. For Direct Preference Optimization (DPO):

$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{DPO}(\theta)} = -\mathbb{E}_{(x, y_w, y_l)}\left[\log \sigma\left(\beta\left(\log\frac{\pi_\theta(y_w | x)}{\pi_{\text{ref}}(y_w | x)} - \log\frac{\pi_\theta(y_l | x)}{\pi_{\text{ref}}(y_l | x)}\right)\right)\right]$$

Auxiliary rewards may include user click-through rates (CTR), Gaussian preference models (GaRM):

$$p(s_w > s_l; h) \approx \text{sigmoid}\left(\frac{\mu_w - \mu_l}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{\pi}{8} (\sigma_w^2 + \sigma_l^2)}}\right)$$

and out-of-distribution regularization via logged perplexity. The frameworks demonstrate substantial gains in online engagement when log probability guided alignment is employed, confirming the utility of log-probability as both a fine-grained confidence metric and a supervisory signal for user-centric query construction.

---

Table: Log Probability Guidance Mechanisms

Framework	Guidance Mechanism	Query/Application Type
SLPs, loglinear logic (Cussens, 2013)	Marginalization over proof log-probs	First-order proof derivation
ProPPR (Wang et al., 2014)	Summed log-probs over derivation paths	Large-scale KB inference
Probery (Song et al., 2019)	Block selection via placement likelihood	Big data scan, completeness guarantee
PBIS, PAA (Ntzoufras et al., 2018)	Proposal distribution guided by log-prob transformation	Bayesian MCMC, graphical models
LLM LL Scoring (Kauf et al., 21 Mar 2024)	Token-level log-prob aggregation	Semantic plausibility evaluation
ProbGate (Kim et al., 25 Apr 2024)	Bottom-k token log-prob thresholding	SQL query safety filtering
GQR/DPO (Min et al., 14 Apr 2025)	Log-prob ratio for preference alignment	LLM query recommendation
GaRM+RL (Yin et al., 15 Aug 2025)	Distributional reward regularization	Conversational query suggestion

---

Summary

Log probability guided query construction constitutes a mathematically grounded framework applicable across probabilistic logic systems, query optimization in big data platforms, neural LLM evaluation, and user-centric preference alignment for generative search and recommendation. The central principle is to either construct, select, or filter queries according to their associated log probabilities—computed via log-linear models, Bayesian transformations, or neural scoring—thereby integrating statistical confidence, semantic plausibility, and user feedback into the query generation and evaluation pipeline. These methodologies establish both theoretical rigor and practical efficacy, leading to scalable, interpretable, and robust query systems widely adopted across knowledge representation, database management, and conversational AI.