Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Lepton Non-Universality in B Decays

Updated 6 December 2025
  • Lepton non-universality is defined by deviations in the R(D) and R(D*) ratios, where experimental values exceed SM predictions by 2.3σ and 2.7σ, indicating possible new physics.
  • The analysis uses effective Hamiltonian frameworks and operator decompositions (e.g., C_{V1}, C_{S1}, C_T) to model potential contributions from new heavy particles.
  • Advances from Belle II, LHCb upgrades, and lattice QCD improvements are pivotal for refining measurements and reducing uncertainties in B decay anomalies.

Lepton non-universality (LNU) in BB meson decays refers to observed deviations from the Standard Model (SM) principle that all charged leptons couple universally to the electroweak sector, with differences in decay rates arising solely from their masses and kinematic effects. Recent precision measurements in semileptonic BB decays, particularly those involving tau leptons, have produced anomalies—especially in the ratios R(D)R(D) and R(D)R(D^*)—that challenge the SM’s assumption and have prompted extensive theoretical and experimental study of possible new physics in the flavor sector (Lüth, 2018).

1. Theoretical Basis and Standard Model Predictions

In the SM, all charged-lepton flavors couple identically to the WW boson. The only sources of non-universality are the lepton masses, which affect phase-space and helicity amplitudes in processes such as BˉD()νˉ\bar{B} \to D^{(*)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell for =e,μ,τ\ell = e, \mu, \tau. The SM thus predicts the lepton flavor ratios

R(D)=B(BˉDτνˉτ)B(BˉDνˉ),R(D)=B(BˉDτνˉτ)B(BˉDνˉ),R(D) = \frac{\mathcal{B}(\bar{B} \to D \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau)}{\mathcal{B}(\bar{B} \to D \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell)}\,, \quad R(D^*) = \frac{\mathcal{B}(\bar{B} \to D^* \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau)}{\mathcal{B}(\bar{B} \to D^* \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell)}\,,

are determined up to small uncertainties, with state-of-the-art predictions R(D)SM=0.299±0.003R(D)_{\rm SM} = 0.299 \pm 0.003 and R(D)SM=0.258±0.005R(D^*)_{\rm SM} = 0.258 \pm 0.005 (Lüth, 2018).

SM predictions for light-lepton universality are even tighter due to negligible me,mμm_e, m_\mu—for example, RKSM=1.0003±0.0001R_K^{\rm SM} = 1.0003 \pm 0.0001 in B+K++B^+ \to K^+ \ell^+ \ell^- decays with q2q^2 in [1,6]GeV2[1, 6]\,\mathrm{GeV}^2 (Lüth, 2018).

2. Experimental Status and Anomalies

Combined measurements by the BABAR, Belle, and LHCb collaborations yield

R(D)exp=0.407±0.046,R(D)exp=0.306±0.015,R(D)_{\rm exp} = 0.407 \pm 0.046,\quad R(D^*)_{\rm exp} = 0.306 \pm 0.015,

with R(Dexp)R(D_{\rm exp}) and R(Dexp)R(D^*_{\rm exp}) exceeding the SM by 2.3σ2.3\,\sigma and 2.7σ2.7\,\sigma, respectively. The total significance of the combined deviation is 4.0σ\sim4.0\,\sigma (Lüth, 2018). Key experimental inputs include different tagging and τ\tau decay modes across the major flavor factories.

This LNU anomaly is not isolated: several ratios in rare bs+b \to s \ell^+ \ell^- decays, such as RKR_K and RKR_{K^*}, have been measured as significantly below unity, challenging the SM's tightly constrained predictions (Lüth, 2018, 1804.02011).

3. Model-Independent Framework and Operator Analysis

To parameterize possible new physics underlying LNU, the low-energy effective Hamiltonian for bcτνb \to c \tau \nu transitions is written as

Heff=4GFVcb2[(1+CV1)OV1+CV2OV2+CS1OS1+CS2OS2+CTOT]+h.c.,\mathcal{H}_{\rm eff} = \frac{4 G_F V_{cb}}{\sqrt{2}} \Big[ (1+C_{V_1}) \mathcal{O}_{V_1} + C_{V_2} \mathcal{O}_{V_2} + C_{S_1} \mathcal{O}_{S_1} + C_{S_2} \mathcal{O}_{S_2} + C_T \mathcal{O}_T \Big] + \text{h.c.},

with operators

OV1=(cˉγμPLb)(τˉγμPLν),OS1=(cˉPLb)(τˉPLν),OT=(cˉσμνPLb)(τˉσμνPLν),\mathcal{O}_{V_1} = (\bar{c} \gamma^\mu P_L b)(\bar{\tau} \gamma_\mu P_L \nu),\quad \mathcal{O}_{S_1} = (\bar{c} P_L b)(\bar{\tau} P_L \nu), \quad \mathcal{O}_T = (\bar{c} \sigma^{\mu\nu} P_L b)(\bar{\tau} \sigma_{\mu\nu} P_L \nu),

and analogous right-handed structures (Lüth, 2018). In the SM, only CV1=0C_{V_1} = 0 (the unity in front), all other CiC_i vanish.

Extensions to the effective Lagrangian allow new heavy particles to modify CV1C_{V_1}, CS1C_{S_1}, CTC_{T}, etc., generally resulting in enhanced R(D())R(D^{(*)}) relative to the SM.

4. Phenomenological Implications and Constraints on New Physics

A variety of mediators have been proposed to explain semitauonic anomalies:

  • Charged Higgs (HH^-) in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models (2HDM): Type II 2HDM yielding significant scalar contributions is disfavored by joint R(D())R(D^{(*)}) fits and direct LHC searches (which give mH±800m_{H^\pm} \gtrsim 800 GeV for tanβ=O(1)\tan\beta = \mathcal{O}(1)). Less constrained Type III 2HDM with flavor-off-diagonal couplings can accommodate data for some parameter ranges (Lüth, 2018).
  • Leptoquarks (LQ): Scalar S1S_1 or vector U1U_1 leptoquark models allow tree-level bcτνb \to c \tau \nu couplings fit to excesses in R(D())R(D^{(*)}), provided the LQ mass is in the TeV range and couplings to first and second generations are suppressed. Direct LHC constraints are evaded in this setup (Lüth, 2018).

An effective Hamiltonian parameterization relates constraints on LNU to the Wilson coefficients of these operators, which can be extracted from joint fits to all bcτνb \to c \tau \nu and bsb \to s \ell \ell observables. For instance, the Type II 2HDM is excluded, while more general models remain viable (Lüth, 2018).

5. Experimental and Theoretical Future Prospects

Experimental Outlook

  • Belle II aims to collect 50ab1\sim50\,\mathrm{ab}^{-1} of e+ee^+ e^- data, a factor of 40 larger than Belle, enabling precision measurements of R(D)R(D), R(D)R(D^*), R(D)R(D^{**}), the q2q^2 spectra, τ\tau polarization, and angular observables.
  • LHCb Upgrades (Run 3 and Run 4) target a BB-meson yield increased by factors of $3$–$5$, permitting improved measurements of R(D)R(D^*) in new τ\tau modes, first R(D)R(D) results at hadron colliders, and complementary channels (BsDsτνB_s\to D_s\tau\nu, ΛbΛcτν\Lambda_b\to\Lambda_c\tau\nu, BcJ/ψτνB_c\to J/\psi\,\tau\nu, BτνˉB^-\to\tau^-\bar\nu) (Lüth, 2018).

Theoretical Developments

  • Lattice QCD—offers prospects for more precise form-factor calculations for BD()B\to D^{(*)} at nonzero recoil, which are critical to reducing hadronic uncertainties.
  • Inclusive Theory—improvements in modeling charm resonances DD^{**} and higher-order QCD corrections will aid the interpretation of backgrounds.
  • Global Fits—will enable integrated effective Hamiltonian analyses that use all available bcτνb \to c \tau \nu and bsb \to s \ell \ell datasets, including angular and polarization observables and exploration of correlations with other FCNC anomalies (e.g., RKR_K, RKR_{K^*}) (Lüth, 2018).

6. Summary and Outlook

The world averages

R(D)exp=0.407±0.046,R(D)exp=0.306±0.015R(D)_{\rm exp} = 0.407 \pm 0.046, \quad R(D^*)_{\rm exp} = 0.306 \pm 0.015

compared to

R(D)SM=0.299±0.003,R(D)SM=0.258±0.005R(D)_{\rm SM} = 0.299 \pm 0.003, \quad R(D^*)_{\rm SM} = 0.258 \pm 0.005

establish a joint 4σ4\,\sigma deviation in semitauonic BB decays, independently established by BABAR, Belle, and LHCb (Lüth, 2018). Given the double-ratio structure of R(D())R(D^{(*)}), experimental and lattice-theory uncertainties are sufficiently under control that, if confirmed with the higher statistics of Belle II and LHCb upgrades and augmented by differential and polarization measurements, these results would constitute compelling evidence for physics beyond the SM, with major implications for the electroweak and flavor structure of new physics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Lepton Non-Universality in B Decays.