Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Lê Modules: Linking Singularity & Module Theory

Updated 4 January 2026
  • Lê Modules are algebraic structures that capture local topological invariants of analytic hypersurfaces and generalize module theory through lattice-ordered semigroups.
  • They refine classical vanishing cycle techniques by providing explicit cohomological resolutions and Betti number bounds, thus offering precise topological insights.
  • Lê Modules facilitate generalized primary decomposition in commutative algebra, ensuring unique factorization and robust structural theorems.

Lê modules are algebraic structures arising both in singularity theory, where they encapsulate local topological invariants of analytic hypersurfaces with one-dimensional singular sets, and in module theory over commutative rings, where they generalize modules to the setting of lattice-ordered semigroups with distributivity and completeness properties. In singularity theory, the Lê module formalism refines classical vanishing cycle methods, yielding explicit cohomological resolutions and Betti number bounds for Milnor fibers, while in algebra it mediates generalized primary decomposition and uniqueness properties analogous to those in classical module theory.

1. Geometric Origins: Lê Numbers and Cycles

Given a reduced analytic function f:(U,0)(C,0)f: (U,0) \to (\mathbb{C},0) on a small open neighborhood UCn+1U \subset \mathbb{C}^{n+1}, suppose the critical locus Σf\Sigma f has dimension one at $0$. For a generic choice of z0z_0 among local coordinates (z0,...,zn)(z_0, ..., z_n), the condition dim0Σ(fV(z0))=0\dim_{0} \Sigma(f|_{V(z_0)}) = 0 ensures proper intersection of each irreducible component CC of Σf\Sigma f with the hyperplane V(z0)V(z_0). The analytic 1-cycle V(f/z1,...,f/zn)\displaystyle V(\partial f/\partial z_1, ..., \partial f/\partial z_n) near $0$ decomposes as Γf,z1+Λf,z1\Gamma^1_{f,z} + \Lambda^1_{f,z}, where Γf,z1\Gamma^1_{f,z} (relative polar curve) has components not contained in Σf\Sigma f, and Λf,z1\Lambda^1_{f,z} (1-dimensional Lê cycle) collects those contained in Σf\Sigma f.

The Lê-numbers at $0$, which are intersection multiplicities,

λ0=(Γf,z1V(f/z0))0,λ1=(Λf,z1V(z0))0,\lambda^0 = (\Gamma^1_{f,z} \cdot V(\partial f/\partial z_0))_0, \qquad \lambda^1 = (\Lambda^1_{f,z} \cdot V(z_0))_0,

provide crucial local invariants. If Σf=Ci\Sigma f = \bigcup C_i with μi\mu_i^\circ the Milnor number of the slice fV(z0)f|_{V(z_0)} at a nearby smooth point of CiC_i, then

Λf,z1=μiCi,λ1=(CiV(z0))0μi.\Lambda^1_{f,z} = \sum \mu_i^\circ \cdot C_i, \qquad \lambda^1 = \sum (C_i \cdot V(z_0))_0 \cdot \mu_i^\circ.

This encoding links geometric intersection phenomena to local topological data (Massey, 28 Dec 2025).

2. Sheaf-Theoretic Construction and Definition of Lê Modules

Fix a principal ideal domain RR, e.g., Z\mathbb{Z} or a field. The ambient space UU carries the shifted constant sheaf complex RU[n+1]R_U[n+1], perverse on UU. The shifted vanishing cycle complex

P:=ϕf[1]RU[n+1]\mathcal{P} := \phi_f[-1] R_U[n+1]

is again perverse. Applying the nearby and vanishing cycle functors in z0z_0 yields, after shifting, ψz0[1]P\psi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P} and ϕz0[1]P\phi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P}, each supported only at $0$. The canonical morphism

canz0:ψz0[1]Pϕz0[1]P\operatorname{can}_{z_0}: \psi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P} \longrightarrow \phi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P}

induces RR-module identities in degree zero: H0(ψz0[1]P)0Rλ1,H0(ϕz0[1]P)0Rλ0,H^0(\psi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P})_0 \cong R^{\lambda^1}, \quad H^0(\phi_{z_0}[-1]\mathcal{P})_0 \cong R^{\lambda^0}, and a differential

:Rλ1Rλ0\partial: R^{\lambda^1} \to R^{\lambda^0}

on these free modules. These objects are termed the Lê modules (Massey, 28 Dec 2025).

3. The Lê-Module Exact Sequence and Monodromy

The perverse sheaf construction yields a short exact sequence

0kerRλ1Rλ0coker0,0 \to \ker \partial \to R^{\lambda^1} \xrightarrow{\partial} R^{\lambda^0} \to \operatorname{coker} \partial \to 0,

where

kerH~n1(Ff,0;R),cokerH~n(Ff,0;R),\ker\partial \cong \widetilde{H}^{n-1}(F_{f,0}; R), \quad \operatorname{coker} \partial \cong \widetilde{H}^{n}(F_{f,0}; R),

with Ff,0F_{f,0} the Milnor fiber at $0$. The Milnor monodromy induces automorphisms α1\alpha_1 on Rλ1R^{\lambda^1} and α0\alpha_0 on Rλ0R^{\lambda^0}, commuting with \partial, i.e., α1=α0\partial\circ\alpha_1 = \alpha_0\circ\partial. The eigenvalues of αj\alpha_j are all roots of unity, with characteristic polynomials admitting cyclotomic factorization.

Through A'Campo's trace formula, the traces satisfy: trα0=(1)n(1+mult0Σf),trα1=(1)nmult0Σf,\operatorname{tr}\, \alpha_0 = (-1)^n(-1 + \operatorname{mult}_0|\Sigma f|), \quad \operatorname{tr}\, \alpha_1 = (-1)^n \operatorname{mult}_0|\Sigma f|, where mult0Σf\operatorname{mult}_0|\Sigma f| is the sum of multiplicities of the reduced critical curve at $0$. The resulting inequality

mult0Σfλ0+1\operatorname{mult}_0|\Sigma f| \leq \lambda^0 + 1

provides an explicit bound on the number of local branches of Σf\Sigma f (Massey, 28 Dec 2025).

4. Betti Number Bounds via Lê Modules

For R=ZR = \mathbb{Z}, reduced Milnor-fiber cohomology is

H~n1(Ff,0;Z)Zb~n1,H~n(Ff,0;Z)Zb~nT,\widetilde{H}^{n-1}(F_{f,0}; \mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}^{\tilde{b}_{n-1}}, \quad \widetilde{H}^{n}(F_{f,0}; \mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}^{\tilde{b}_n} \oplus T,

with TT a torsion group, and for prime pp let τp\tau_p be the number of pp-power cyclic summands in TT. By the universal coefficient theorem,

H~(Ff,0;Z/p)(Z/p)b~+τp.\widetilde{H}^*(F_{f,0}; \mathbb{Z}/p) \cong (\mathbb{Z}/p)^{\tilde{b}_* + \tau_p}.

The sharp Betti-bound theorem distinguishes the isolated singularity case (λ0=0\lambda^0=0, Σf\Sigma f smooth at $0$), for which

H~n1(Ff,0;Z)Zμ,H~n(Ff,0;Z)=0,\widetilde{H}^{n-1}(F_{f,0};\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}^{\mu},\qquad \widetilde{H}^n(F_{f,0}; \mathbb{Z})=0,

from cases where λ00\lambda^0 \ne 0, and for all pp: b~n1+τp<λ1,b~n+τp<λ0.\tilde{b}_{n-1} + \tau_p < \lambda^1, \qquad \tilde{b}_n + \tau_p < \lambda^0. This provides universal bounds for ranks and torsion in Milnor fiber cohomology in terms of intersection-theoretic Lê numbers (Massey, 28 Dec 2025).

5. Example: Isolated Line Singularity

For f(z0,z1,z2)=z22z13z0z12f(z_0, z_1, z_2) = z_2^2 - z_1^3 - z_0 z_1^2, the critical set Σf\Sigma f is the z0z_0-axis, smooth at $0$, and the plane slice z22z13z_2^2 - z_1^3 has Milnor number μ=1\mu^\circ = 1. Thus, Λf,z1=1C\Lambda^1_{f,z} = 1 \cdot C (where CC is the axis), so λ1=1\lambda^1 = 1; Γf,z1\Gamma^1_{f,z} \neq \emptyset so λ01\lambda^0 \geq 1. Explicit calculation yields λ0=2\lambda^0 = 2. The differential :RR2\partial: R \to R^2 is injective, so ker=0\ker \partial = 0, cokerR\operatorname{coker} \partial \cong R, and the Milnor fiber has the homotopy type of a bouquet of nn-spheres, with

H~n1(F;R)=0,H~n(F;R)Rλ01.\widetilde{H}^{n-1}(F; R) = 0, \qquad \widetilde{H}^n(F; R) \cong R^{\lambda^0 - 1}.

This agrees with general bouquet theorems for line singularities and demonstrates sharp realization of the Betti-bound (Massey, 28 Dec 2025).

6. Lê Modules in Lattice-Ordered Module Theory

An RR–le-module (M,+,,e)(M, +, \le, e), as developed in the context of commutative algebra, is a lattice-ordered semigroup enriched with an RR-action satisfying five compatibility axioms:

  • (M1) r(m1+m2)=rm1+rm2r(m_1 + m_2) = r m_1 + r m_2,
  • (M2) (r1+r2)mr1m+r2m(r_1 + r_2)m \leq r_1 m + r_2 m,
  • (M3) (r1r2)m=r1(r2m)(r_1 r_2) m = r_1 (r_2 m),
  • (M4) 1Rm=m1_R m = m, 0Rm=0M0_R m = 0_M, r0M=0Mr 0_M = 0_M,
  • (M5) r(iImi)=iI(rmi)r(\bigwedge_{i \in I} m_i) = \bigwedge_{i \in I} (r m_i).

Submodule elements nMn \in M are those with n+nnn + n \leq n and rnnr n \leq n for all rRr \in R; these are idempotent and satisfy 0Mne0_M \leq n \leq e. Classical examples include the complete lattice of submodules of a module NN, and the lattice of ideals of RR itself (Bhuniya et al., 2018).

7. Primary Decomposition and Uniqueness in Laskerian le-Modules

A submodule element qeq \neq e is called primary if for all aRa \in R, xMx \in M,

axq    xq or aneq for some nN.a x \leq q \implies x \leq q \ \text{or}\ a^n e \leq q \ \text{for some} \ n \in \mathbb{N}.

If Rad(q)=P\operatorname{Rad}(q) = P (the radical of the ideal (q:e)(q:e)), then qq is PP-primary. Similarly, a prime submodule element pp satisfies rnp    r(p:e)r n \leq p \implies r \in (p:e) or npn \leq p.

A Laskerian le-module is one in which every submodule element admits a reduced primary decomposition into a meet of primary elements with distinct radicals. Associated primes and isolated components are determined canonically. Uniqueness theorems assert that the set of associated primes is independent of the decomposition, and the meet of isolated components associated to a subset of primes is canonical (i.e., independent of the reduced decomposition). Minimal components are unique, and the primeness of the radical is equivalent to having a unique isolated prime divisor.

The explicit characterization of annihilators states that for submodule element nn and rRr \in R,

(n:r)=n    rP for every associated prime P of n.(n:r) = n \iff r \notin P \ \text{for every associated prime} \ P \ \text{of} \ n.

This recovers and generalizes classical primary decomposition theory in module settings (Bhuniya et al., 2018).


A plausible implication is that Lê modules serve as a unifying formalism connecting topological invariants of singularities and the algebraic structure of subobjects in module theory, with their exact sequences, Betti-number bounds, and decomposition theorems providing robust tools for both singularity theory and commutative algebra. Open questions persist concerning the existence of torsion phenomena and the realization of certain Lê-number pairs, as well as deeper connections to perverse sheaf theory and vanishing cycle techniques in modern singularity analysis (Massey, 28 Dec 2025, Bhuniya et al., 2018).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Lê Modules.