Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

LCS Non-Squeezing Theorem

Updated 21 November 2025
  • Lcs non-squeezing theorem is a rigidity result in locally conformally symplectic geometry that generalizes Gromov's theorem by using a non-degenerate 2-form with a non-exact Lee form.
  • It employs deformation theory, Gromov–Witten invariants, and generating function techniques to derive integer-valued capacities and characterize embedding obstructions.
  • The theorem bridges symplectic and contact geometries, highlighting practical embedding constraints and open problems in non-exact lcs deformations.

A locally conformally symplectic (lcs) non-squeezing theorem is a rigidity phenomenon generalizing the famous Gromov non-squeezing theorem from symplectic to locally conformally symplectic geometry. In contrast to symplectic manifolds, which admit a global closed non-degenerate 2-form, an lcs manifold admits a non-degenerate 2-form ω\omega satisfying dω=ηωd\omega = \eta\wedge\omega for some closed 1-form η\eta (the Lee form). This subtle weakening leads to new obstructions and technical differences both in the definition of capacities and in the structure of possible embeddings and isotopies. The lcs non-squeezing problem seeks to characterize which lcs (or symplectic) embeddings are possible between standard “balls” and “cylinders” in lcs manifolds, and how such phenomena interpolate between symplectic and contact geometries through the presence of the Lee form.

1. Locally Conformally Symplectic Structures and Embeddings

A lcs manifold M2nM^{2n} is a smooth manifold equipped with a nondegenerate 2-form ω\omega and a closed 1-form η\eta with dω=ηωd\omega = \eta\wedge\omega. Locally, ω\omega can be written as efUωUe^{f_U}\omega_U where ωU\omega_U is symplectic and fUC(U)f_U\in C^\infty(U). The pair (η,ω)(\eta, \omega) is defined up to the equivalence (η,ω)=(η+df,efω)(\eta',\omega') = (\eta + df, e^{f}\omega).

A smooth embedding ϕ:MM\phi: M \to M' between lcs manifolds (M,ω,η)(M, \omega, \eta) and (M,ω,η)(M', \omega', \eta') is an lcs embedding if there exists a positive function ff such that ϕω=fω\phi^*\omega' = f\omega and ϕη=η+d(lnf)\phi^*\eta' = \eta + d(\ln f) (Savelyev, 2022, Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025). When the Lee form is exact, lcs structures reduce globally to conformally symplectic, recovering the symplectic case.

2. Statement of the lcs Non-Squeezing Theorems

2.1. Deformation-Theoretic Non-Squeezing in lcs Manifolds

For the model M=S2×T2n2M = S^2 \times T^{2n-2} with the product symplectic form ω0\omega_0, the standard ball BRR2nB_R \subset \mathbb{R}^{2n} is considered. The lcs non-squeezing theorem (Savelyev, 2022) states:

Let R>r>0R>r>0. There exists ϵ>0\epsilon>0 such that for any continuous path {ωt}t[0,1]\{\omega_t\}_{t\in[0,1]} of lcs forms on MM with ω0=ω0\omega_0 = \omega_0 and

maxtd0(ωt,ω0)<ϵ\max_t d_0(\omega_t,\omega_0)<\epsilon

(in a suitable C0C^0-topology), there does not exist a smooth embedding ϕ:BRM\phi: B_R \to M such that ϕω1=ωst\phi^*\omega_1 = \omega_{\mathrm{st}} and, where relevant, ϕ\phi_* is leaf-preserving on certain hypersurfaces. This prohibits symplectic embedding of standard balls of radius RR into (U,ω1)(U, \omega_1), where U=MiΣiS2×R2n2U = M \setminus \bigcup_i \Sigma_i \cong S^2\times\mathbb{R}^{2n-2}, for any small lcs deformation. In the limit ωtω0\omega_t\equiv\omega_0, this recovers the classical Gromov non-squeezing.

2.2. Integer-Valued Non-Squeezing and lcs Capacity

For certain lcs spaces such as M=S1×R2n×S1M = S^1 \times \mathbb{R}^{2n} \times S^1 with (η,ω)=(dθ,ddθα0)(\eta,\omega)=(-d\theta, d_{-d\theta}\alpha_0), the lcs non-squeezing theorem manifests via an integer-valued capacity (Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025):

For any kN0k\in\mathbb{N}_0 and radii R1,R2>0R_1, R_2 >0 with

πR22kπR12,\pi R_2^2 \leq k \leq \pi R_1^2,

there does not exist a compactly supported lcs Hamiltonian diffeomorphism φ\varphi such that

φ(S1×B2n(R1)×S1)S1×B2n(R2)×S1.\varphi(\overline{S^1 \times B^{2n}(R_1) \times S^1}) \subset S^1 \times B^{2n}(R_2) \times S^1.

Equivalently, in terms of the lcs capacity c()c(\cdot),

c(S1×B2n(R1)×S1)=πR12>kπR22=c(S1×B2n(R2)×S1).c(S^1\times B^{2n}(R_1)\times S^1) = \lceil \pi R_1^2\rceil > k \geq \lceil \pi R_2^2\rceil = c(S^1\times B^{2n}(R_2)\times S^1).

3. Proof Strategies and Technical Framework

3.1. Deformation and Gromov–Witten Methods

The deformation-theoretic approach exploits C0C^0-smallness of the lcs perturbation, the construction of almost complex structures preserving relevant foliations, positivity of intersections, and Gromov–Witten invariants. On the universal cover, each lcs form is written as ftωtsympf_t\omega_t^{\mathrm{symp}} with ωtsymp\omega_t^{\mathrm{symp}} closed. Mutual closeness yields uniform bounds, which facilitate compactness via Gromov–Witten theory and prevent holomorphic curves from “escaping to infinity” (Savelyev, 2022).

3.2. Spectral Selector and Generating Function Approach

For domains modeled on S1×R2n×S1S^1\times\mathbb{R}^{2n}\times S^1, lcs Hamiltonian dynamics are encoded by spectral selectors associated to generating functions quadratic at infinity for Lagrangian submanifolds in twisted cotangent bundles. For φHamc(M)\varphi\in\mathrm{Ham}^c(M), the selectors

+(φ), (φ)\ell_+(\varphi),\ \ell_-(\varphi)

arise as action selectors via the generating function, supporting an integer-valued lcs capacity and bi-invariant metric. The proof uses monotonicity, triangle inequalities, displacement estimates, and careful calculation of the integer capacity for standard balls (Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025).

4. Relationship with Symplectic and Contact Non-Squeezing

The classical Gromov non-squeezing theorem asserts that no Hamiltonian symplectic embedding can squeeze B2n(R1)B^{2n}(R_1) into the cylinder Z2n(R2)=B2(R2)×R2n2Z^{2n}(R_2) = B^2(R_2) \times \mathbb{R}^{2n-2} unless πR12πR22\pi R_1^2 \leq \pi R_2^2. In the contact setting, Eliashberg–Kim–Polterovich (EKP) non-squeezing for R2n×S1\mathbb{R}^{2n}\times S^1 implies similar constraints, but with integer-valued capacities due to periodicity of the Reeb flow: a "quantum gap" exists at integer thresholds.

The lcs non-squeezing theorems interpolate these properties. Like in the contact case, the Lee flow gives rise to periodicity and integer capacities, and like in the symplectic case, rigid partial orders and generating function invariants are central. The forbidden region for ball embeddings occurs at integer values of πR2\pi R^2 (Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025).

5. Corollaries, Special Cases, and Examples

For n=1n=1, M=S1×R2×S1M=S^1\times\mathbb{R}^2\times S^1, the standard lcs ball is S1×B2(R)×S1S^1\times B^2(R)\times S^1. When πR2<1\pi R^2<1, embedding into arbitrarily small lcs cylinders is permitted; for 1πR22πR121\leq \pi R_2^2\leq \pi R_1^2, non-squeezing rigidity holds as in the EKP case (Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025). In the globally conformal symplectic case (exact Lee form), the theorems reduce to conformally invariant versions of Gromov’s result.

A conjectural lcs analogue of contact non-squeezing proposes that for R1R \geq 1 there is no compactly supported Hamiltonian lcs map that squeezes BR×S1×S1\overline{B_R} \times S^1 \times S^1 into BR×S1×S1B_R \times S^1 \times S^1, generalizing EKP non-squeezing to the lcs context (Savelyev, 2022).

6. Open Problems and Future Directions

Key open questions include: the classification of non-exact lcs deformations (beyond exact or conformal cases), the extension of deformation non-squeezing to broader classes of symplectic manifolds with nontrivial H1H^1, the removal of technical restrictions like leaf-preservation, and the formulation of a full lcs Gromov–Witten theory supporting virtual cycles and non-squeezing without intersection-theoretic assumptions (Savelyev, 2022). The existence of essential Lee chords and translated points in Liouville lcs manifolds, and precise analogues of the Lagrangian and Legendrian Arnold conjectures, remain active research areas (Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025).

7. Comparisons and Summary Table

A summary of the non-squeezing phenomena across the symplectic, contact, and lcs settings:

Setting Capacity Thresholds Embedding Obstruction
Symplectic (R2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}) cViterbo(B(R))=πR2c_{\rm Viterbo}(B(R)) = \pi R^2 πR12>πR22\pi R_1^2 > \pi R_2^2 No symplectic embedding of B2n(R1)B^{2n}(R_1) into Z2n(R2)Z^{2n}(R_2)
Contact (R2n×S1\mathbb{R}^{2n}\times S^1) cEKP(B(R)×S1)=πR2c_{\rm EKP}(B(R)\times S^1)=\lceil\pi R^2\rceil πR121πR22\pi R_1^2 \ge 1 \ge \pi R_2^2 No contact isotopy squeezing for integer threshold
lcs (S1×R2n×S1S^1 \times \mathbb{R}^{2n} \times S^1) c(S1×B(R)×S1)=πR2c(S^1\times B(R)\times S^1)=\lceil\pi R^2\rceil Integer kk, πR22kπR12\pi R_2^2 \le k \le \pi R_1^2 No compactly supported lcs Hamiltonian isotopy squeezing at integer gap

The lcs non-squeezing theorem thus represents a natural and rigorous generalization, interpolating geometric rigidity between the strictly symplectic and contact regimes, and is underpinned by new invariants, capacities, and deformation principles (Savelyev, 2022, Bertelson et al., 20 Nov 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)
Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Lcs Non-Squeezing Theorem.