Kick Technique Recognition

• Kick technique recognition is an automated process that identifies, classifies, and analyzes kicking actions in sports using AI, computer vision, and sensor data.
• It employs advanced methods such as video pose estimation and sensor-based data processing with deep learning and machine learning architectures for real-time and offline applications.
• The field improves athletic officiating and training by integrating impact detection, scoring logic, and ensemble strategies to reliably quantify and validate kick performance.

Kick technique recognition is the field concerned with the automated identification, classification, and analysis of kicking actions in sports using computation—particularly AI, computer vision, and sensor-based methodologies. Originating in response to the high stakes of athletic officiating, tactical analysis, and training, contemporary approaches span from video pose estimation to sensor fusion, encompassing both real-time and offline contexts. The discipline addresses challenges such as human subjectivity, latency, and the categorical complexity of kicks across domains including combat sports, soccer, and beyond.

1. Acquisition Modalities and Data Preprocessing

Acquisition strategies for kick recognition can be divided between vision-based and sensor-based modalities.

Vision-based approaches deploy high-speed cameras (≥60 fps, 1080p+) capturing wide-angle and athlete-centric views. Each video frame $I_t$ undergoes systematic preprocessing—including histogram equalization, Gaussian/Wiener deblurring, and intensity normalization—to produce uniformly enhanced frames: $$I'_t = \phi(I_t) = \mathrm{normalize}\bigl(\mathrm{deblur}(\mathrm{hist\_eq}(I_t))\bigr)$$ These operations mitigate lighting and motion artifacts, ensuring the downstream pose estimation network receives high-quality input (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025).

Sensor-based approaches augment existing scoring hardware with additional instrumentation: pressure/piezoelectric force sensors, inertial measurement units (IMUs) on limbs and torso, and magnetic/RFID proximity sensors. Wearable microcontroller units collate and timestamp all streams at 100–1000 Hz, followed by calibration (e.g., gravity compensation and force-channel normalization via Madgwick filters) and event-triggered windowing (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

2. Pose Extraction and Feature Construction

Pose estimation in vision pipelines employs models such as OpenPose or YOLOv8-Pose to produce 2D joint keypoints per frame: $P_t = \{ (x_i, y_i, C_i) \}_{i=1}^K$ where $(x_i, y_i)$ indicates joint $i$'s pixel coordinates and $C_i$ its detection confidence. The learning objective minimizes heatmap mean-squared error (MSE) against annotated ground-truths: $$\mathcal{L}_{\text{heatmap}} = \sum_{i=1}^K \|\widehat{H}_i - H_i^*\|_2^2$$

Sensor fusion pipelines segment raw sensor streams into fixed windows around detected kick events. Feature vectors $f \in \mathbb{R}^D$ aggregate time-domain statistics (e.g., mean, variance, peaks, durations), frequency-domain attributes (FFT energies, centroids, bandwidth), and specialized kinematic features (angular velocity peaks, hip rotation $\Delta \theta$, foot part triggering). Principal component analysis (PCA) can be employed offline for redundancy reduction while ensuring interpretability (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

3. Classification Architectures and Algorithms

Video-based action classification most commonly leverages deep learning architectures. Pose keypoints or raw frames are encoded using spatial CNN backbones (extracting per-frame feature embeddings $\psi(P_t)$), followed by sequence modeling via LSTM or Transformer architectures: $$X = [\psi(P_{t-n+1}), ..., \psi(P_t)] \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$$ These embeddings are passed to a classifier (e.g., fully connected head) producing categorical posteriors, optimized via cross-entropy loss: $$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{cls}} = -\sum_{i=1}^K y_i \log \hat{y}_i$$ Attention mechanisms—both temporal (self-attention across frame embeddings) and spatial (pose-guided activation maps)—further enhance discrimination, especially in multi-modal setups that fuse visual and pose streams (Ranasinghe et al., 30 Sep 2025).

Sensor-based classification frequently employs machine learning with explicit feature engineering. Multi-class support vector machines (SVMs) with radial basis function (RBF) kernels are trained in one-vs-rest fashion, with decision scores averaged in ensemble variants for improved robustness: $$D_c(f) = \sum_{i=1}^N \alpha_{i,c} y_{i,c} K(f_i, f) + b_c$$ Class assignment is $\operatorname{argmax}_c D_c(f)$. Bagging ensembles of SVMs further elevate accuracy and boundary reliability, particularly for rare or ambiguous techniques (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

4. Impact Verification and Scoring

Validation that a recognized kick is both technically correct and legally valid (impact detection) is essential. In vision-based systems:

• Contact detection is based on abrupt deceleration of the kicking foot and intersection-over-union (IoU) overlap with a target region (e.g., head or torso): $$a_i = \frac{v_i^{(t-1)} - v_i^{(t)}}{\Delta t} > a_{\mathrm{thresh}},\quad \mathrm{IoU}(\text{foot\_bbox}, \text{head\_bbox}) > 0.3$$ Where $a_{\mathrm{thresh}} \approx 100\; \mathrm{m/s}^2$ (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025).
• Scoring logic uses derived kinematic properties; for instance, a torso rotational angle $\phi > 90^\circ$ denotes a turning kick (assigned 5 points), otherwise classified as a standard kick (3 points). Optional force estimation via $F \approx m a_i$ is used adjunctively (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025).

Sensor-based systems match impact signals (force, IMU signatures, magnet triggers) to technique- and location-specific templates, enabling a fine-grained scoring rubric (e.g., tornado kicks to the head rewarded more highly than front-leg side kicks to the body). Techniques are disambiguated using sensor features such as yaw displacement ($\Delta \theta$), vertical acceleration, and foot part encoding (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

5. Performance Evaluation and Empirical Results

Performance metrics in contemporary studies encompass classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrices, and real-time inference latency.

System	Setting	Accuracy	Inference Latency
FST.ai	Taekwondo, video-based	~95%	~60 ms/event
Sensor Fusion	Taekwondo, sensor-based	96.8–99.2%	10–50 ms/event
SlowFast (Soccer)	Free-kick direction	69.1% (L/R)	N/A
Dual branch CNN+LSTM	Penalty direction	89.4% (L/M/R)	22 ms/event

Ablation studies show substantial performance boosts with ensemble methods and fusion of visual with pose streams (e.g., visual-only vs. pose-guided models demonstrate 7–14% accuracy differential in penalty direction prediction) (Ranasinghe et al., 30 Sep 2025, Mistri, 13 Dec 2025). Human-in-the-loop confirmation reduces false positives and supports system retraining (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025).

6. Datasets, Annotation Protocols, and Metadata Utilization

Robust kick recognition requires curated and precisely annotated datasets:

• Video datasets: Historical match footage is filtered (viewpoint constraints, frame rate ≥60 fps), annotated by expert referees for keypoints, action/technique labels, impact instant, and ground-truth scores. Inter-annotator agreement metrics (Cohen’s κ > 0.85) ensure label reliability (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025).
• Sensor datasets: Each kick instance is segmented, windowed, and labeled with kick type, location, impact, and foot component data. Test splits typically involve several hundred to thousand labeled kicks from diverse athlete populations (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).
• Contextual metadata (e.g., pitch side, footedness) is encoded and fused with action embeddings for improved classification, producing modest but repeatable performance gains in soccer settings (Torón-Artiles et al., 2023).

7. Generalization, Adaptation, and Future Directions

Modular system architectures facilitate cross-sport adaptation. The decoupling of pose estimation, action classification, and impact validation enables rapid retraining on sport-specific data (2–5 hours of annotation for convergence in new domains) (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025). Extension to other sports is demonstrated for applications such as punch recognition in boxing (IMU gloves), ball strike analysis in soccer or rugby (shoe/ball sensors), and form grading in Taolu Wushu (full-body IMUs) (Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

Proposed future enhancements include deep neural sequence learning directly from sensor time series, ensemble or adaptive thresholding, crowd-sourced dataset expansion—particularly for rare or subtle techniques—and broader adoption of explainable AI mechanisms for officiating transparency (Shariatmadar et al., 19 Jul 2025, Mistri, 13 Dec 2025).

---

Kick technique recognition thus encompasses a mature and rapidly expanding domain, leveraging advances in computer vision, sensor fusion, and statistical learning. Its rigorous methodological paradigm, coupled with comprehensive evaluation on high-fidelity datasets, provides replicable baselines for both research and real-world deployment across multiple sports.