Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 112 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Kac–Paljutkin Hopf Algebra

Updated 13 October 2025
  • The Kac–Paljutkin Hopf algebra is an 8-dimensional semisimple Hopf algebra that is both noncommutative and noncocommutative, serving as a cornerstone in quantum symmetry research.
  • Its representation category, equivalent to a Tambara–Yamagami category, exhibits fusion rules that highlight unique non-group theoretical behaviors.
  • It demonstrates categorical rigidity against cocycle deformations and fosters generalizations that deepen insights into quantum topology and invariant theory.

The Kac–Paljutkin Hopf algebra occupies a foundational position as the first finite-dimensional example exhibiting both noncommutativity and noncocommutativity. Its algebraic, categorical, and representation-theoretic properties have profoundly shaped the paper of non-group-type semisimple Hopf algebras, quantum symmetries, and the interplay between algebraic and categorical invariants. The Kac–Paljutkin algebra is now understood within a broader landscape of generalizations, deformation phenomena, Galois-theoretical rigidity, and connections to fusion categories, quantum topology, and tensor categorical invariants.

1. Algebraic Structure and Presentation

The original Kac–Paljutkin algebra, denoted H8H_8, is the unique (up to isomorphism) 8-dimensional semisimple Hopf algebra that is neither commutative nor cocommutative, classically presented by Kac and Paljutkin in the 1960s. It is defined over a field k\mathbb{k} (char k=0\mathbb{k}=0).

Generators and Relations. The algebra is generated by xx, yy, zz subject to

x2=y2=1,xy=yx,z2=12(1+x+yxy),zx=yz,zy=xz.x^2 = y^2 = 1, \quad xy = yx, \quad z^2 = \frac{1}{2}(1 + x + y - xy), \quad zx = yz, \quad zy = xz.

The coalgebra structure is

Δ(x)=xx,Δ(y)=yy,Δ(z)=J(zz),ε(x)=ε(y)=ε(z)=1,S(z)=z.\Delta(x) = x \otimes x,\quad \Delta(y) = y \otimes y, \quad \Delta(z) = J(z \otimes z), \quad \varepsilon(x) = \varepsilon(y) = \varepsilon(z) = 1, \quad S(z) = z.

Here, JJ is a twist element (see (Pansera, 2017)), and the noncocommutativity is encoded in the comultiplication for zz.

Bicrossed Product and Group-Theoretical Construction. H8H_8 admits a bicrossed product description H8kF#σkTH_8 \cong kF\#_{\sigma}kT with FZ2×Z2F \cong \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2, TZ2T \cong \mathbb{Z}_2, and a nontrivial matched pair (nontrivial action of TT on FF), together with a 3-cocycle in the abelian extension (see (Castaño et al., 2016)).

Basis and Representation Theory. The algebra’s basis consists of the four group-like elements {1,x,y,xy}\{1,x,y,xy\} and four additional elements (built from zz and its products with x,y,xyx, y, xy), reflecting its structure as a semisimple, non-pointed Hopf algebra.

2. Representation Category and Fusion Rules

The finite-dimensional representation category of H8H_8 encapsulates fusion behavior beyond group and pointed Hopf algebras. It consists of four one-dimensional irreducible representations and one irreducible representation of dimension two, with fusion rules corresponding to the Tambara–Yamagami category of the Klein 4-group K4=Z2×Z2K_4 = \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2 (see (Kitagawa, 2019, Goswami et al., 9 Oct 2025)).

Tambara–Yamagami Structure. The corepresentation category Rep(H8)\operatorname{Rep}(H_8) is tensor equivalent to the Tambara–Yamagami category TY(K4,χ,τ)\mathcal{TY}(K_4,\chi,\tau):

  • Simple objects: K4{ρ}K_4 \cup \{\rho\},
  • Fusion: sρρρss \otimes \rho \cong \rho \cong \rho \otimes s for sK4s\in K_4; ρρsK4s\rho \otimes \rho \cong \bigoplus_{s\in K_4} s,
  • Associativity data determined by the symmetric bicharacter χ\chi and a parameter τ\tau (e.g., τ=12\tau = \frac{1}{2} for H8H_8).

Significance. This fusion category, characterized by non-invertible objects and non-group-theoretical fusion, is critical in demonstrating that H8H_8 is not equivalent, as a tensor category, to the representation category of any group algebra or its dual.

3. Categorical Rigidity, (Co)Cocycle Deformations, and Morita Invariants

A distinctive feature of H8H_8 is the categorical rigidity with respect to cocycle deformations, Galois objects, and Morita equivalence (Castaño et al., 2016, Wakui, 2018, Goswami et al., 9 Oct 2025).

3.1 Galois Objects and Cocycle Deformations

  • Galois Objects: All right H8H_8-Galois objects are trivial; the only fiber functor on the corresponding group-theoretical fusion category arises from the trivial subgroup ((Castaño et al., 2016), Thm. 2.2).
  • Cocycle Deformations: There are no nontrivial 2-cocycle deformations, i.e., any cocycle twist yields a Hopf algebra isomorphic to H8H_8. Formally, for all cocycles ω\omega, H8ωH8H_8^{\omega}\cong H_8.
  • Implication: The representation category is categorically rigid—cocycle deformation cannot connect H8H_8 to any other (non-isomorphic) semisimple Hopf algebra, nor can it yield new monoidal equivalences.

3.2 Categorical Morita Equivalence

  • Classification: H8H_8 defines its own categorical Morita equivalence class; its Drinfeld center is not braided equivalent to that of any group algebra or dual, nor to those of the semisimple Hopf algebras A(c,g)A_{(c,g)} of other dimensions ((Castaño et al., 2016), Appendix B).
  • Significance: This demarcates H8H_8 and its analogues as isolated points in the landscape of semisimple Hopf algebras under all known Morita-type equivalence relations.

3.3 Braided Morita Equivalence

  • Classification: Braided Hopf algebra structures on H8H_8 fall into exactly six braided Morita equivalence classes, distinguished by polynomial invariants and coribbon elements ((Wakui, 2018), Theorem 5.3).
  • Invariants: The key invariants are Drinfeld elements, polynomial invariants PA,R(d)(x)P_{A,R}^{(d)}(x) (Equation 2.2), and coribbon structure CRib(A,σ)\operatorname{CRib}(A,\sigma).
  • Automorphisms: Aut(H8)Z2Z2\operatorname{Aut}(H_8)\cong\mathbb{Z}_2 \oplus \mathbb{Z}_2 acts on this space of braidings, permuting equivalence classes.

4. Generalizations: Higher-Dimensional Kac–Paljutkin-Type Hopf Algebras

Significant work has been devoted to generalizing H8H_8 to higher dimensions (see (Chen et al., 2018, Lomp, 1 May 2025, Bottegoni et al., 3 Dec 2024)).

  • Family H2n2H_{2n^2}: Introduced as semisimple Hopf algebras of dimension 2n22n^2 (Pansera); H8H_8 is the case n=2n=2. The extension to Hn,mH_{n,m} of dimension nmm!n^m m! has been recently constructed (Lomp, 1 May 2025).
    • Algebraic realization: Hn,m=K[Zn]m#γΣmH_{n,m}=\mathbb{K}[\mathbb{Z}_n]^{\otimes m}\#_{\gamma}\Sigma_m, as crossed products with a symmetric group, via explicit cocycle twisting by elements JJ built from central idempotents.
    • Irreducible Representations: Families of mm-dimensional irreducible, inner-faithful representations are constructed.
  • Grothendieck Ring: For H2n2H_{2n^2}, all irreducibles are classified and the representation ring is described by generators and relations, generalizing the Kac–Paljutkin case (Chen et al., 2018).
  • Infinitesimal R-Matrices and Rigidity: For n3n\ge3, H2n2H_{2n^2} admits only the trivial infinitesimal R\mathcal{R}-matrix, precluding interesting formal quasitriangular deformations (Bottegoni et al., 3 Dec 2024).

5. Module Categories, Partial Comodules, and Nichols Algebras

H8H_8 links representation theory and the classification of module and comodule categories.

5.1 Simple Yetter–Drinfeld Modules and Nichols Algebras

  • Classification: All simple Yetter–Drinfeld modules over H8H_8 are classified: eight 1-dimensional and fourteen 2-dimensional simple modules (Shi, 2016).
  • Nichols Algebras: The only finite-dimensional Nichols algebras are diagonal (Cartan) types: A1A_1, A2A_2, A2×A2A_2 \times A_2, A1××A1A_1 \times \cdots\times A_1, and A1×r×A2A_1^{\times r}\times A_2.
  • Gelfand–Kirillov Dimension: Used to distinguish finite- from infinite-dimensional Nichols algebras, with a key additivity property under decompositions.

5.2 New Finite-Dimensional Hopf Algebras

By lifting Nichols algebras (bosonization), five new families of finite-dimensional Hopf algebras over H8H_8 are constructed (Shi, 2016); these advance the classification of non-pointed semisimple Hopf algebras outside the group algebra paradigm.

5.3 Simple Partial Comodules

All finite-dimensional simple partial H8H_8-comodules are described using subcentral idempotents in right coideal subalgebras; the partial comodules are classified by this data, with precise simplicity and isomorphism conditions (Batista et al., 2023).

6. Interactions with Quantum Symmetry, Categorification, and Quantum Subgroups

6.1 Quantum Subgroup of SU1(2)SU_{-1}(2)

H8H_8 realized as a quantum subgroup via a quotient of C(SU1(2))C(SU_{-1}(2)) (Kitagawa, 2019):

  • Graded Twisting: C(SU1(2))C(SU(2))t,αC(SU_{-1}(2))\cong C(SU(2))^{t,\alpha}, with H8H_8 arising from restriction to a subgroup VSU(2)V\subset SU(2),
  • Fusion Category: The corepresentation (or module) category equates to a Tambara–Yamagami category for K4K_4.

6.2 Symmetry and Entanglement in Field Theory

In 1+1d conformal field theory, the boundary tube algebra (arising in boundary conditions with noninvertible fusion symmetry) in the critical double Ising model is H8H_8 (Choi et al., 4 Sep 2024):

  • Symmetry-Resolved Entanglement Entropy: Quantum dimensions and symmetry inherent in H8H_8 control subleading corrections in regimes dominated by noninvertible (“fusion category”) symmetry.

6.3 Bicrossed Products, Matched Pair Actions, and Yang–Baxter Operators

H8H_8 admits matched pair actions, both arising from coquasitriangular structures and distinguished types, yielding six matched pairs in total (Xiao et al., 23 Jan 2025). Exactly two matched pairs induce involutive Yang–Baxter operators, exemplifying set-theoretical solutions to the Yang–Baxter equation in non-pointed, noncommutative settings.

6.4 Invariant 2-Cohomology and Drinfeld Twists

The second invariant cohomology (in both the unitary and invertible settings) for the dual Kac–Paljutkin algebra is trivial (Goswami et al., 9 Oct 2025):

  • Categorical Implication: All monoidal autoequivalences of the corepresentation category naturally isomorphic to the identity functor are cohomologically trivial; H8H_8 admits no nontrivial (invariant) Drinfeld twists.

7. Hochschild Cohomology, Smash Products, and PBW Deformations

Smash products involving H8H_8 (and its generalizations H2n2H_{2n^2}) reveal new structural and homological phenomena:

  • Hochschild Cohomology: For any AA and semisimple Hopf algebra HH (including H8H_8),

HH(A#H)H(A,A#H)H,{\bf HH}^\bullet(A\# H) \cong {\bf H}^\bullet(A, A\# H)^H,

with explicit chain maps identifying cup product structures (Liu et al., 4 Feb 2025).

  • PBW Deformations: All PBW-deformations of AH2n2A\sharp H_{2n^2} and its Koszul dual are classified, contingent on the module algebra structure of AA and its dual. When considering braided smash products (using Drinfeld twist braidings), new PBW-deformations of the corresponding braided tensor product algebra arise, emphasizing the rich deformation theory in the presence of non-group Hopf symmetry (Gao et al., 29 Aug 2024).

Through detailed structural, cohomological, and categorical analysis, the Kac–Paljutkin algebra and its generalizations serve as a central testing ground for non-group-type phenomena in Hopf algebras, fusion categories, quantum symmetries, and categorical invariants. This ongoing research continues to illuminate the rigidity, representational richness, and implications for invariant theory, quantum geometry, and categorical representation theory.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Kac-Paljutkin Hopf Algebra.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube