Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 113 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

k-Automorphism Group of A₍c,q₎

Updated 9 October 2025
  • The k-automorphism group of A₍c,q₎ is a well-defined algebraic structure that splits as a semidirect product of special automorphisms and a diagonal torus subgroup.
  • Special automorphisms, characterized by translations in y that fix the Makar-Limanov invariant, ensure a rigid and precise subgroup classification.
  • The torus subgroup, defined by specific scaling conditions on x and y, underpins the diagonal symmetries and aids in classifying isotropy groups for non–locally nilpotent derivations.

The kk-automorphism group of Ac,qA_{c,q}, where

Ac,q=k[x,y,z]/(c(x)zq(x,y)),A_{c,q} = k[x,y,z]/(c(x)z - q(x,y)),

with c(x)k[x]c(x) \in k[x] a polynomial of degree at least $2$ and q(x,y)k[x,y]q(x,y) \in k[x,y] a quasi-monic polynomial in yy of degree at least $2$, is a well-structured algebraic group. The most detailed description is given in (Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), which supplies both a canonical decomposition of this group and a classification of isotropy (stabilizer) subgroups for non–locally nilpotent derivations. The structure of Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) shares deep connections with classical invariants such as the Makar-Limanov invariant and encodes both “affine-type” automorphisms and a distinguished torus subgroup.

1. Structural Decomposition of Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q})

The automorphism group of Ac,qA_{c,q} admits a canonical splitting as an inner semidirect product

Autk(Ac,q)sautk(Ac,q)Gc,q,\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) \cong \mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) \rtimes \mathcal{G}_{c,q},

where:

  • sautk(Ac,q)\mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) is the subgroup of automorphisms that act trivially on the subalgebra k[xˉ]k[\bar{x}]; these automorphisms fix the Makar-Limanov invariant, which in this setting equals k[xˉ]k[\bar{x}] ((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), Lemma 2.2 and above).
  • Gc,q(k)2\mathcal{G}_{c,q} \subset (k^*)^2 is the diagonal torus subgroup defined by

Gc,q={(e,u)k×k:c(ex)=enc(x),    q(ex,uy)=udq(x,y)}\mathcal{G}_{c,q} = \left\{ (e, u) \in k^* \times k^* : c(e x) = e^n c(x),\;\; q(e x, u y) = u^d q(x, y) \right\}

where n=degcn = \deg c and d=degyqd = \deg_y q.

This is realized via the explicit morphism

φe,u:xex, yuy, zenudz,\begin{aligned} \varphi_{e,u} :\quad & x \mapsto e x, \ & y \mapsto u y, \ & z \mapsto e^{-n} u^d z, \end{aligned}

as verified directly on the defining relation c(x)zq(x,y)c(x)z - q(x,y) ((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), construction of φ\varphi).

2. Special Automorphisms and the Makar-Limanov Invariant

Elements τsautk(Ac,q)\tau\in\mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) satisfy τ(xˉ)=xˉ\tau(\bar{x}) = \bar{x} and typically take the form

τ(y)=y+h(x)\tau(y) = y + h(x)

for some h(x)k[x]h(x) \in k[x] determined by the relation c(x)z=q(x,y)c(x)z = q(x,y) and compatibility with Ac,qA_{c,q}'s defining ideal. Such automorphisms correspond to “translations in yy by functions of xx” that descend from the automorphism group of the Danielewski surface.

The importance of the Makar-Limanov invariant (here k[xˉ]k[\bar{x}]) is that it distinguishes sautk(Ac,q)\mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) as the normal subgroup fixing all variables in k[xˉ]k[\bar{x}] ((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), Section 2).

3. The Torus Subgroup Gc,q\mathcal{G}_{c,q}

The subgroup Gc,q\mathcal{G}_{c,q} captures “diagonal” symmetries, i.e., scaling actions on xx and yy (with a compensating scaling on zz). The defining conditions c(ex)=enc(x)c(e x) = e^n c(x) and q(ex,uy)=udq(x,y)q(e x, u y) = u^d q(x, y) ensure the automorphism descends to Ac,qA_{c,q}; i.e., these are the scalings compatible with the relation c(x)z=q(x,y)c(x)z = q(x,y). This group is always an algebraic subgroup of (k)2(k^*)^2, typically a torus or a subgroup thereof, its structure depending on cc and qq ((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), definition of Gc,q\mathcal{G}_{c,q}).

Such diagonal automorphisms form a subgroup isomorphic to (possibly a sub-torus of) (k)2(k^*)^2 and are embedded in Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) via the map φ\varphi described above.

4. The Main Splitting Theorem

The composition ψφ=idGc,q\psi \circ \varphi = \operatorname{id}_{\mathcal{G}_{c,q}} provides a right inverse, yielding a split short exact sequence

1sautk(Ac,q)Autk(Ac,q)Gc,q1,1 \longrightarrow \mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) \longrightarrow \operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) \longrightarrow \mathcal{G}_{c,q} \longrightarrow 1,

and thereby

Autk(Ac,q)sautk(Ac,q)Gc,q\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) \cong \mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) \rtimes \mathcal{G}_{c,q}

((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), Theorem 3.1). Thus, every automorphism decomposes uniquely as a special automorphism followed by a diagonal automorphism. This structure provides a complete description of Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) as an abstract group.

5. Isotropy Groups for Non–Locally Nilpotent Derivations

Given a kk–derivation δ\delta of Ac,qA_{c,q} which is not locally nilpotent, the isotropy group

Autk(Ac,q,δ)={σAutk(Ac,q)σδ=δσ}\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}, \delta) = \big\{ \sigma \in \operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) \mid \sigma \circ \delta = \delta \circ \sigma \big\}

is classified as a linear algebraic group of dimension at most $3$ ((Ahouita et al., 8 Oct 2025), Theorem 4.1).

Two structural possibilities for Autk(Ac,q,δ)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}, \delta) are established:

  • Either the isotropy is (up to isomorphism) a closed algebraic subgroup of Gc,q\mathcal{G}_{c,q} (i.e., only diagonal automorphisms commute with δ\delta), in which case it has dimension at most $2$,
  • Or Autk(Ac,q,δ)GaH\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}, \delta) \cong \mathbb{G}_a \rtimes H for some closed subgroup HGc,qH \leq \mathcal{G}_{c,q}, where Ga\mathbb{G}_a represents an additive group arising as a one-parameter subgroup of sautk(Ac,q)\mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}), resulting in overall dimension at most $3$.

In all cases, Autk(Ac,q,δ)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}, \delta) is “small”, reflecting rigidity of non–locally nilpotent derivations.

The decomposition and rigidity found for Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) share conceptual similarities with several frameworks:

  • In generalized Weyl algebras, affine automorphism groups (including toral and translation components) arise, with a quantum analogue of the Dixmier conjecture (every endomorphism of the simple localization is an automorphism) producing a similarly rigid automorphism group (Tang, 2016).
  • For quantum algebras and function fields such as kq(x,y)k_q(x,y), automorphism groups are often generated by “elementary” and “torus” automorphisms, with the fixed ring structure and division algebra rigidity offering further analogies (Fryer, 2013).
  • In the Weyl algebra context, stabilizer subgroups (Stafford subgroups) of right ideals exhibit strong self-normalizing properties, suggesting deep rigidity of the subgroup structure (Kouakou et al., 2011).

Each of these frameworks supports or is compatible with the decomposition and constraint properties established for Ac,qA_{c,q}.

7. Significance of the Canonical Semidirect Product and Applications

This explicit semidirect product structure provides a unified perspective for the paper of automorphism groups of Danielewski-type algebras. The separation of affine/“special” automorphisms from diagonal torus actions greatly simplifies questions of action on subvarieties, automorphic equivalence, and interplay with derivations. The constraints on isotropy groups for derivations provide a foundation for rigidity results, classification of group actions, and aids in understanding dynamical systems defined via algebraic flows on such varieties.

The results also facilitate the transfer of techniques from the theory of automorphism groups of surfaces, quantum coordinate algebras, and generalized Weyl algebras to the setting of Danielewski-type algebras and affine threefolds.


Summary Table: Structure of Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q})

Subgroup Definition/Action Structure
sautk(Ac,q)\mathrm{saut}_k(A_{c,q}) Fixes k[xˉ]k[\bar{x}], affine “special” automorphisms, e.g., yy+h(x)y \mapsto y + h(x) Normal subgroup
Gc,q\mathcal{G}_{c,q} (e,u)(e,u) with c(ex)=enc(x)c(e x) = e^n c(x), q(ex,uy)=udq(x,y)q(e x, u y) = u^d q(x,y) Subgroup of (k)2(k^*)^2
Autk(Ac,q)\operatorname{Aut}_k(A_{c,q}) Entire automorphism group, all kk-algebra automorphisms of Ac,qA_{c,q} Semidirect product sautkGc,q\mathrm{saut}_k \rtimes \mathcal{G}_{c,q}

This organizational scheme succinctly encodes the automorphism group’s structure and significance in the context of affine algebraic geometry and invariant theory.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to $k$-Automorphism Group of $A_{c,q}$.