Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Irreducible Semilinear Representations

Updated 9 November 2025
  • Irreducible semilinear representations are modules over skew group algebras that cannot be non-trivially decomposed, with groups acting via field automorphisms.
  • They exhibit striking rigidity in settings such as the infinite symmetric group, enforcing that only one-dimensional irreducibles exist under faithful actions.
  • Extensions through invariant subfields, such as cross-ratio fields, provide exceptional nontrivial cases linked to cohomology and analogs of Hilbert’s Theorem 90.

An irreducible semilinear representation is a finite- or infinite-dimensional module over a skew group algebra, constructed from a group GG acting by field automorphisms on a field KK, which cannot be decomposed non-trivially under this structure. These representations generalize the concept of linear representations by incorporating the possibility of GG acting nontrivially on the scalars. The paper of irreducible semilinear representations has revealed precise and striking rigidity phenomena, especially for large permutation groups such as the infinite symmetric group SS_\infty and automorphism groups of infinite vector spaces over finite fields. The main results characterize these irreducibles, their dimensions, and their connection to cohomology and classical theorems such as Hilbert's Theorem 90.

1. Definition and Structural Foundations

Let GG be a topological group acting by field automorphisms on a field KK, written as GAut(K)G \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}(K). A KK-semilinear representation of GG is a KK-vector space VV with a group homomorphism ρ:GAutZ(V)\rho: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Aut}_{\mathbb{Z}}(V) such that for all gGg \in G, λK\lambda \in K, vVv \in V,

ρ(g)(λv)=g(λ)ρ(g)(v)\rho(g)(\lambda v) = g(\lambda)\, \rho(g)(v)

Equivalently, VV becomes a left module over the skew group ring KGK\langle G \rangle, generated by KK and GG with multiplication

(a[g])(b[h])=ag(b)[gh](a [g]) \cdot (b [h]) = a\, g(b)\, [gh]

The representation is termed smooth if for every vVv \in V, the stabilizer subgroup StabG(v)\mathrm{Stab}_G(v) is open in GG (i.e., VV is discrete as a GG-set). A non-degenerate semilinear representation has every gGg \in G acting invertibly on VV. The representation is trivial if the canonical map VGKGKVV^G \otimes_{K^G} K \rightarrow V is an isomorphism, i.e., VV is a direct sum of copies of KK with GG acting only via its action on KK (Rovinsky, 2014).

2. Cohomological Perspective and Hilbert’s Theorem 90 Analog

For precompact GG (every open subgroup has finite index) and KK with a faithful smooth GG-action, a generalization of Hilbert's Theorem 90 holds: \emph{Every smooth KK-semilinear GG-representation is trivial} (Rovinsky, 2014). This leads to the identification of the category of smooth KK-semilinear GG-representations with vector spaces over the fixed field k=KGk=K^G. Cohomologically, this yields

H1(G,K×)=0andH1(G,GLr(K))={1}H^1(G, K^\times) = 0 \qquad \text{and} \qquad H^1(G,GL_r(K))=\{1\}

Thus, the only possible (semilinear) GG-structures on KrK^r are the trivial ones, and all such modules split into direct sums of KK (Rovinsky, 2014).

When GG is not precompact (notably for SS_\infty and similar groups), smooth semilinear KK-modules of finite length still decompose into direct sums of KK, but the proof requires a limiting argument using exhaustion by finite subgroups (Rovinsky, 2014).

3. Classification of Irreducible Smooth Semilinear Representations

Suppose GG is a permutation group such as SS_\infty acting faithfully on K=k(Y)K=k(Y), the field of rational functions in {xyyY}\{x_y\mid y\in Y\}, with YY countable infinite and GG acting by coordinate permutation. The main classification theorem states:

Theorem: If VV is a smooth irreducible non-degenerate KK-semilinear representation of GG of finite length, then

  • VKV\cong K as a KK-vector space (i.e., VV is one-dimensional over KK);
  • GG acts trivially on the KK-basis, so the GG-action is entirely through KK's field automorphisms;
  • no finite-dimensional irreducible smooth KK-semilinear representation of higher dimension exists.

This result excludes the existence of higher-dimensional irreducibles whenever GG acts faithfully on KK with all open subgroups having infinite index, as in the infinite symmetric group or the automorphism group of an infinite-dimensional vector space over a finite field (Rovinsky, 2014, Rovinsky, 2022).

In cohomological terms, the isomorphism classes of KK-semilinear GG-structures on KrK^r are parameterized by H1(G,GLr(K))H^1(G, GL_r(K)), which vanishes in this setting (Rovinsky, 2014).

4. Cross-Ratio Fields and Beyond: Exceptional Irreducibility

In scenarios where the base field kk is extended appropriately, nontrivial irreducible smooth semilinear representations emerge. Specifically, by passing from kk to the cross-ratio subfield Kak(S)K_a \subset k(S) generated by invariants of the form

r(t,u;v,w)=(tu)(vw)(tv)(uw)r(t,u;v,w) = \frac{(t-u)(v-w)}{(t-v)(u-w)}

for distinct t,u,v,wSt,u,v,w \in S, one obtains a G=Sym(S)G=\operatorname{Sym}(S)–stable field. Over KaK_a, finite-dimensional smooth semilinear representations correspond to rational representations of PGL2,k\mathrm{PGL}_{2,k}:

VV~=Homk(x) ⁣(V,k(S))V \longmapsto \widetilde{V} = \operatorname{Hom}_{k(x)}\!\bigl(V,\,k(S)\bigr)

This yields a precise correspondence (Theorem 5.23 in (Rovinsky, 2022)), allowing the construction of nontrivial higher-dimensional irreducibles mirroring the algebraic representation theory of PGL2,k\mathrm{PGL}_{2,k}. In this context, multiplicities, dimensions, and classifying invariants are entirely determined by the structure of PGL2\mathrm{PGL}_2-modules and the combinatorics of field invariants (Rovinsky, 2022).

5. Semilinear Representation Theory for Finite Galois Extensions

When L/KL/K is a finite Galois extension and GG acts on LL, with K=LGK=L^G, the structure of finite-dimensional semilinear representations is governed by the linear representation theory of H=ker(GGal(L/K))H=\ker(G\to \operatorname{Gal}(L/K)). The classification follows from two results (Taylor, 6 Nov 2025):

  • Uniqueness of Extension: V,WV,W in RepL(G)\operatorname{Rep}_L^\ltimes(G) are isomorphic if and only if their restrictions to HH are isomorphic as LL-linear HH-modules. Furthermore, Hom\operatorname{Hom}-spaces base-change from KK to LL.
  • Classification: Irreducible LL-semilinear GG-modules correspond bijectively to Galois orbits of irreducible LL-linear HH-modules, with multiplicities described by a "semilinear Schur index" mKL(W)m_K^L(W).

This framework recovers the classical case (trivial GG-action on LL), realizes explicit character theory for semilinear representations, and ties arithmetic questions (e.g., solvability of certain equations) to the extension problem for irreducible modules (Taylor, 6 Nov 2025).

6. Category-Theoretic and Structural Properties

The category SmK(G)Sm_K(G) of smooth KK-semilinear representations is:

  • Semisimple if and only if GG is precompact (i.e., for k(S)k(S), every module splits into direct sums of k(S)k(S) itself) (Rovinsky, 2022).
  • Locally noetherian: any finitely generated smooth K(G)K(G)-module is noetherian (Corollary 4.15, (Rovinsky, 2022)).
  • Splitting of morphisms: any morphism between finitely generated objects splits locally after restricting to an open subgroup.

In the presence of a cogenerator field such as k(S)k(S), every smooth semilinear module embeds into a product of copies of k(S)k(S) (Theorem 5.7, (Rovinsky, 2022)). For invariant subfields like KaK_a, the category is no longer semisimple but has a well-controlled Gabriel spectrum and injective hulls formed from permutation modules coinduced from finite stabilizers.

7. Examples and Counterexamples

Finite group GG acting on KK: Classical Hilbert 90 applies. Every irreducible is $1$-dimensional with trivial semilinear structure (Rovinsky, 2014).

SS_\infty or automorphism groups with faithful actions: Only $1$-dimensional smooth irreducible KK-semilinear representations exist; higher-dimensional irreducibles do not arise (Rovinsky, 2014, Rovinsky, 2022).

Cross-ratio fields: By enlarging the base to KaK_a, higher-dimensional irreducibles become possible and correspond to representations of PGL2,k\mathrm{PGL}_{2,k} (Rovinsky, 2022).

Action not faithful/trivial: If GG acts trivially on KK, then permutation modules K[G/U]K[G/U] possess genuine irreducibles of dimension equal to the number of double cosets U\G/UU\backslash G / U, which disappear for faithful actions and infinite index stabilizers (Rovinsky, 2014).

Schur index phenomena: In finite Galois cases, arithmetic properties (Pell equations, presence of roots of unity, etc.) govern when irreducible HH-modules extend to semilinear GG-modules, as detected by the semilinear Schur index mKL(W)m_K^L(W) (Taylor, 6 Nov 2025).


In summary, the theory of irreducible semilinear representations for permutation groups and related settings reveals a spectrum from rigidity—with only KK itself as irreducible in highly symmetric faithful situations—to rich structures indexed by Galois orbits and algebraic invariants in the presence of suitable field extensions and invariant subfields. The underlying mechanism is the deep relationship between group cohomology, field invariants, and module-theoretic induction-restriction, unified by both classical and new analogs of Hilbert's Theorem 90 (Rovinsky, 2014, Rovinsky, 2022, Taylor, 6 Nov 2025).

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Irreducible Semilinear Representations.