Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Interpolation Macdonald Polynomials

Updated 14 July 2026
  • Interpolation Macdonald polynomials are inhomogeneous analogues of Macdonald polynomials defined by precise interpolation and vanishing conditions on q,t-grids, with the leading term replicating the ordinary Macdonald form.
  • They are constructed through diverse methodologies including combinatorial tableau expansions, Hecke algebra actions, and recursive operators, ensuring stability and compatibility with symmetric function theory.
  • These polynomials unify various aspects of symmetric functions, linking operator theory, probabilistic models, and representation theory through explicit biorthogonality and commuting q-difference operators.

Interpolation Macdonald polynomials are inhomogeneous analogues of Macdonald polynomials in which orthogonality is replaced, at the level of definition, by interpolation and vanishing conditions on special q,tq,t-grids. In type AA, their top homogeneous components are the ordinary Macdonald polynomials, while lower-degree terms are fixed by prescribed zeros; finite-variable versions were studied by Knop, Okounkov, and Sahi and admit stable lifts to symmetric functions in infinitely many variables (Olshanski, 2017). Closely related theories exist for nonsymmetric polynomials indexed by compositions, for BCBC-type interpolation Laurent polynomials, and for more recent wreath variants (Baratta, 2012, Koornwinder, 2014, Romero et al., 3 May 2025). The literature uses several normalizations and notations—among them IμI_\mu, PλP_\lambda^*, Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}, EηE_\eta^*, and GαG_\alpha—but the common principle is that the interpolation object is inhomogeneous, is characterized by vanishing at a finite collection of spectral points, and has the ordinary Macdonald polynomial as its highest-degree part (Olshanski, 2017).

1. Defining characterization and normalizations

For a partition μ\mu of length at most NN, one type-AA0 finite-variable interpolation Macdonald polynomial is characterized by

AA1

together with

AA2

where

AA3

A crucial strengthening is the extra vanishing property

AA4

(Olshanski, 2017). In the shifted notation used elsewhere, the type-AA5 symmetric interpolation polynomial AA6 is the unique AA7-invariant, AA8-monic polynomial of degree AA9 such that

BCBC0

and it also satisfies the stronger condition

BCBC1

(Koornwinder, 2014).

The same pattern persists under other normalizations. Sahi’s interpolation Macdonald polynomials BCBC2 are the unique symmetric polynomials of degree BCBC3 whose top-degree homogeneous component is the ordinary Macdonald polynomial BCBC4 and which vanish at the interpolation points

BCBC5

for every partition BCBC6 with BCBC7 (Dołęga, 2016). In the 2024 notation BCBC8, one also distinguishes unital and monic normalizations; the unital normalization satisfies BCBC9, while the monic normalization is fixed by the top homogeneous term (Chen et al., 2024).

Nonsymmetric interpolation Macdonald polynomials are indexed by compositions rather than partitions. One family, IμI_\mu0, is inhomogeneous and is generated recursively from IμI_\mu1 (Baratta, 2012). Another family, IμI_\mu2, is characterized as the unique polynomial of degree IμI_\mu3 with leading monomial coefficient IμI_\mu4 and vanishing on all interpolation points of smaller or equal total degree except the point indexed by IμI_\mu5 itself (Sahi et al., 2019). In IμI_\mu6-type, Okounkov’s interpolation Macdonald polynomials are IμI_\mu7-invariant Laurent polynomials IμI_\mu8 characterized by

IμI_\mu9

with PλP_\lambda^*0 a generic parameter (Koornwinder, 2014).

2. Finite-variable theory, stability, and commuting operators

The finite-variable interpolation polynomials admit a stable passage to symmetric functions. A key property is the shifted stability

PλP_\lambda^*1

when PλP_\lambda^*2, and zero otherwise (Olshanski, 2017). This is not the ordinary specialization PλP_\lambda^*3; the stable theory is built from the shifted specialization PλP_\lambda^*4, and this distinction governs the projective limit construction (Cuenca, 2017). The resulting interpolation Macdonald symmetric functions PλP_\lambda^*5 form an inhomogeneous basis of the algebra of symmetric functions over PλP_\lambda^*6 (Cuenca, 2017).

The finite theory is diagonalized by commuting PλP_\lambda^*7-difference operators. Okounkov’s hierarchy

PλP_\lambda^*8

satisfies

PλP_\lambda^*9

so the coefficients Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}0 commute pairwise (Cuenca, 2017). After renormalization, one obtains operators Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}1 with the cleaner eigenrelation

Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}2

Because the eigenvalue equals Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}3 for Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}4, these operators are compatible with shifted stability and define a projective-limit operator Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}5 satisfying

Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}6

(Cuenca, 2017).

The explicit description of the coefficients in

Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}7

is one of the structural results of the operator theory. The operators Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}8 are expressed through Hall–Littlewood data and a new family of inhomogeneous Hall–Littlewood functions; moreover, those inhomogeneous Hall–Littlewood functions are identified as the Jλ(q,t)J_\lambda^{(q,t)}9 degeneration of interpolation Macdonald functions with inverted parameters (Cuenca, 2017). This places interpolation Macdonald theory in direct analogy with the ordinary Macdonald “operators at infinity” framework of Nazarov and Sklyanin, but in an inhomogeneous setting.

3. Combinatorial, Hecke-theoretic, and recursive constructions

A principal explicit formula in the symmetric theory is the Okounkov–Sahi tableau expansion

EηE_\eta^*0

where EηE_\eta^*1 denotes reverse semistandard tableaux of shape EηE_\eta^*2 with entries in EηE_\eta^*3 (Olshanski, 2017). In the shifted notation EηE_\eta^*4, analogous tableau formulas are available in both type EηE_\eta^*5 and EηE_\eta^*6, with the EηE_\eta^*7-type factors exhibiting the symmetry under EηE_\eta^*8 (Koornwinder, 2014).

Nonsymmetric interpolation polynomials admit a direct recursive generation mechanism. The family EηE_\eta^*9 is generated from GαG_\alpha0 by a Hecke-type switching operator

GαG_\alpha1

and a raising operator

GαG_\alpha2

with

GαG_\alpha3

(Baratta, 2012). The combinatorial input is a minimal operator sequence that constructs the indexing composition from GαG_\alpha4; the polynomial recursion follows the same sequence (Baratta, 2012).

The nonsymmetric theory also contains several equivalent versions. The three families GαG_\alpha5, GαG_\alpha6, and GαG_\alpha7 are related by explicit double affine Hecke algebra operators, and the normalized family satisfies the duality theorem

GαG_\alpha8

for GαG_\alpha9 (Sahi et al., 2019). The same paper derives binomial and dual-binomial formulas for these normalized polynomials, recovering symmetric duality by symmetrization (Sahi et al., 2019). In the μ\mu0 setting, nonsymmetric interpolation Laurent polynomials μ\mu1 are defined on a signed μ\mu2-grid, and the symmetric Okounkov polynomials arise by μ\mu3-symmetrization: μ\mu4 (Disveld et al., 2018).

A more recent combinatorial model replaces tableaux by signed multiline queues. For interpolation ASEP polynomials μ\mu5 and symmetric interpolation Macdonald polynomials μ\mu6, one has

μ\mu7

and, in the signed multiline queue model,

μ\mu8

(Dali et al., 2 Oct 2025). This gives a combinatorial formula in which the inhomogeneous corrections are encoded by signed rows, sign-sensitive weights, and modified pairing rules.

4. Biorthogonality, Cauchy kernels, and shifted-symmetric realizations

Ordinary Macdonald theory is governed by the scalar product μ\mu9 under which NN0 and NN1 are dual: NN2 Interpolation Macdonald functions are not orthogonal in this scalar product, but they do admit a biorthogonal dual basis. Specifically, one defines NN3 by

NN4

with NN5 living in a completion of the symmetric-function algebra and satisfying

NN6

(Olshanski, 2017).

The resulting Cauchy-type identity has exactly the classical Macdonald kernel: NN7 Thus the replacement

NN8

preserves the reproducing kernel while changing orthogonality into biorthogonality (Olshanski, 2017). A modified dual family NN9 is obtained by inverting variables and multiplying by AA00, so that the duals become formal power series and the Cauchy identity acquires a fully formal version (Olshanski, 2017).

The shifted-symmetric interpretation provides another bridge between interpolation theory and ordinary Macdonald polynomials. Shifted Macdonald polynomials AA01 are characterized by shifted symmetry, degree AA02, normalization at AA03, and vanishing on diagrams AA04 not containing AA05 (Dali et al., 2024). In the operator formalism built around the creation operator AA06, one has

AA07

which gives an explicit realization of the isomorphism between ordinary and shifted symmetric functions (Dali et al., 2024). The same framework defines Macdonald characters as

AA08

with AA09 forming a basis of shifted symmetric functions (Dali et al., 2024).

5. Degenerations, factorization, and positivity phenomena

Interpolation Macdonald polynomials admit several standard degenerations. In the Jack limit

AA10

the interpolation Macdonald functions degenerate to interpolation Jack polynomials: AA11 and the dual functions AA12 admit a parallel limit (Olshanski, 2017). In the AA13-type theory, the AA14 limit of Okounkov’s AA15-type interpolation Macdonald polynomials yields AA16-type interpolation Jack polynomials, including the explicit tableau formula

AA17

(Koornwinder, 2014). Other specializations discussed in the symmetric-function setting include AA18, giving AA19-Whittaker-type interpolation functions, AA20, giving Hall–Littlewood-type limits, and the AA21 degeneration to inhomogeneous Hall–Littlewood functions used in the operator-at-infinity theory (Olshanski, 2017, Cuenca, 2017).

The regime AA22 is also the setting of a strong factorization theorem. For partitions AA23, write AA24. Then the interpolation Macdonald polynomials satisfy

AA25

equivalently, their cumulants are AA26 (Dołęga, 2016). Passing to the top homogeneous component transfers the same small-cumulant property to ordinary Macdonald polynomials, which in turn yields integrality of multivariate AA27-Kostka numbers (Dołęga, 2016).

Interpolation coefficients themselves exhibit a positive combinatorics. In the 2024 treatment, the generalized binomial coefficients are the evaluations

AA28

and they satisfy weighted-sum formulas over chains of partitions, both in type AA29 and in type AA30 (Chen et al., 2024). The same work proves positivity and monotonicity: AA31 precisely when AA32, and if AA33 then AA34 (Chen et al., 2024). As applications, the paper derives inequalities for power sums, Jack polynomials, and their monomial, Schur, zonal, and elementary specializations (Chen et al., 2024).

6. Representation theory, probability, and higher-rank extensions

At the specialization AA35, interpolation Macdonald polynomials become a basis adapted to the center of the quantum group AA36. Under the Harish–Chandra isomorphism, central elements are determined by evaluations at the points

AA37

and the specialized interpolation polynomials AA38 are tailored to vanish unless AA39 (Beliakova et al., 2021). Transporting them through Harish–Chandra produces central elements AA40, while Okounkov’s inverse interpolation theorem yields a dual basis for the Hopf pairing. This is the mechanism behind cyclotomic expansions of AA41 Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants, universal knot invariants, and explicit Kirby colors for integral homology AA42-spheres (Beliakova et al., 2021).

A probabilistic interpretation appears at AA43. For a partition AA44, the interpolation AA45-Push TASEP is a Markov chain on the reorderings AA46, and its stationary distribution is

AA47

Thus the steady-state weight of a state AA48 is the interpolation ASEP polynomial AA49, and the partition function is the interpolation Macdonald polynomial AA50 (Dali et al., 13 Feb 2026). The proof uses signed multiline queues and the factorization

AA51

at AA52 (Dali et al., 13 Feb 2026).

The interpolation paradigm also extends beyond type AA53 and beyond ordinary symmetric functions. In the wreath setting for AA54, the interpolation polynomial AA55 is characterized by highest degree AA56, vanishing at colored spectral points AA57 for smaller partitions with the same core, and normalization AA58 (Romero et al., 3 May 2025). The explicit formula

AA59

shows that interpolation phenomena survive in a colored, core-sensitive setting controlled by quantum toroidal and shuffle algebra operators (Romero et al., 3 May 2025).

Taken together, these developments identify interpolation Macdonald polynomials as a unifying inhomogeneous layer inside Macdonald theory: they retain Macdonald leading terms, replace orthogonality by spectral vanishing, support dual Cauchy kernels and commuting operator hierarchies, and interact naturally with Hecke algebras, quantum groups, probabilistic models, and higher-rank generalizations (Olshanski, 2017).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Interpolation Macdonald Polynomials.