Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Information Gain (InfoGain)

Updated 22 June 2025

Information gain is a fundamental concept bridging information theory, statistics, quantum information, machine learning, and decision theory. It quantifies the reduction in uncertainty—mathematically captured via entropy or divergence measures—resulting from observations, measurements, or decisions. In contemporary research, precise definitions and operational characterizations of information gain have led to important advances in quantum measurement, inference, system identification, computational frameworks, and practical compression or recovery protocols.

1. Formal Definitions of Information Gain in Quantum and Classical Settings

In both classical and quantum contexts, information gain measures how much an observer learns about an unknown parameter or system due to a measurement or action. In quantum measurement, several rigorous definitions have been developed:

  • Groenewold's Information Gain: For a quantum instrument {Nx}\{\mathcal{N}^x\} acting on state ρA\rho_A,

IG({Nx},ρA)=H(ρA)xpX(x)H(ρAx),I_{G}(\{\mathcal{N}^{x}\}, \rho_{A}) = H(\rho_{A}) - \sum_x p_X(x) H(\rho_{A^{\prime x}}),

where H()H(\cdot) is the von Neumann entropy, pX(x)p_X(x) the probability of outcome xx, and ρAx\rho_{A^{\prime x}} the post-measurement state for outcome xx.

  • Mutual Information Perspective: Recognizing limitations in Groenewold's definition, particularly for non-efficient measurements, a widely adopted operational definition is the mutual information between a purifying reference RR and the measurement outcome XX:

I(R;X)σ,I(R; X)_\sigma,

where σRX\sigma_{RX} is built from the joint action of the measurement on a purification of the initial state. This quantity is always non-negative and directly corresponds to the minimal classical communication required to simulate the measurement outcome.

In classical experimental design and Bayesian inference, information gain is typically formalized as the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between posterior and prior: DKL(P(θD)π(θ))=log2(P(θD)π(θ))P(θD)dθ,D_{\mathrm{KL}}(P(\theta|D) \| \pi(\theta)) = \int \log_2 \left( \frac{P(\theta|D)}{\pi(\theta)} \right) P(\theta|D) d\theta, measuring the average number of bits by which data DD shrink the plausible region for θ\theta.

2. Information Gain, Reversibility, and Recovery Maps

A central result in quantum information theory is the link between small information gain and the approximate reversibility of quantum processes:

  • For efficient measurements, an operationally precise inequality relates the conditional entropy H(XR)σH(X|R)_\sigma to the quantum relative entropy between the initial state ρA\rho_A and its recovery after measurement and reversal:

H(XR)σD(ρA(RN)(ρA)),H(X|R)_\sigma \geq D(\rho_A \| (\mathcal{R} \circ \mathcal{N})(\rho_A)),

with R\mathcal{R} a recovery channel. When H(XR)σH(X|R)_\sigma is small (i.e., the reference RR and outcome XX are nearly perfectly correlated), the measurement can be largely undone by R\mathcal{R}. This relation quantitatively establishes that small disturbance (as measured by information gain) entails high-fidelity recovery.

  • In more general settings, such as those with quantum side information (QSI), bounds involve conditional mutual information I(R;XB)ωI(R; X|B)_\omega and suit operational tasks where another party holds entangled quantum information.

These recovery results tie the concept of entropy change and information gain directly to the possibility of reversing quantum measurements, a cornerstone result with implications for error correction, thermodynamics, and quantum channel capacities.

3. Operational Ramifications: Measurement Compression and Communication

The mutual information definition of information gain has direct operational significance:

  • Measurement Compression: Information gain quantitatively sets the minimal rate of classical communication required to simulate a quantum measurement procedure. When I(R;X)σI(R; X)_\sigma is small, the outcome of the measurement is almost fully determined by local information (or the reference system), and only negligible communication is required to simulate the measurement.
    • Without QSI: The optimal rate is I(R;X)σI(R; X)_\sigma.
    • With QSI: The optimal rate is I(R;XB)ωI(R; X | B)_\omega.

Thus, information gain acts as the information-theoretic rate function, governing the costs of simulating, transmitting, or compressing the results of quantum (and by analogy, classical) experiments.

4. Information Gain–Disturbance Trade-offs and Quantum Foundations

Information gain does not merely represent utility; it is fundamentally tied to disturbance in quantum systems:

  • One-Sided Information–Disturbance Trade-off: In quantum measurement, a small information gain implies a small disturbance. Through explicit construction, recovery maps can restore the post-measurement state to its pre-measurement state to very high fidelity if the gain is small.
  • These results strengthen the conceptual and operational association between measurement, information, and disturbance, underlying the reversibility of nearly non-informative quantum operations.

From a foundational perspective, these results support the view that constraints on entropy and information gain are intimately tied to the possibility of reversing quantum processes, and thus to the mathematical foundations of quantum theory itself.

5. Measurement Compression, Information Gain, and Mutual Information Table

Scenario Information Gain Recovery Bound
No QSI I(R;X)σI(R; X)_{\sigma} I(R;X)σ2log[xpX(x)F(UAAx(ϕRAρx),ϕRAρ)]I(R; X)_{\sigma} \geq -2 \log \left[ \sum_x p_X(x) \sqrt{F}(\mathcal{U}^x_{A'\rightarrow A}(\phi_{RA'}^{\rho_x}), \phi_{RA}^{\rho}) \right]
With QSI I(R;XB)ωI(R; X|B)_{\omega} I(R;XB)ω2dtp(t)log[xpX(x)F(ωRBx,RBx,t/2(ωRB))]I(R; X|B)_{\omega} \geq -2 \int dt\, p(t) \log \left[ \sum_x p_X(x) \sqrt{F}(\omega_{RB}^x, \mathcal{R}^{x,t/2}_B(\omega_{RB})) \right]

F(,)F(\cdot,\cdot) is fidelity, U\mathcal{U} and R\mathcal{R} are recovery channels. Equality (i.e., perfect reversibility) holds if and only if information gain is zero.

6. Broader Implications and Future Directions

The unification of the information gain concept with entropy inequalities, recoverability, and operational measurement simulation deepens the theoretical framework of quantum information, with several avenues for ongoing research:

  • Quantum Network and Protocol Design: Methods leveraging small information gain for low-communication measurement simulation are directly applicable to distributed quantum tasks and networked protocols.
  • Resource-Efficient Quantum Computing: Reversible operations governed by low information gain minimize the cost of error correction and recovery.
  • Foundations of Quantum Thermodynamics: The links between entropy change, information gain, and the reversibility of open system dynamics inform quantum analogs of the second law and fluctuation theorems.

These concepts bridge the operational and foundational domains, clarifying when and how quantum information can be accessed, conveyed, and preserved.


The modern understanding of information gain situates it as a central quantity for quantifying learning, recoverability, and resource requirements in diverse settings, particularly quantum measurement and communication theory. The rigorous mathematical connections to mutual information, entropy change, and reversibility anchor its theoretical and operational significance in contemporary research.