Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Inertial Weil–Deligne Types in Elliptic Curves

Updated 11 December 2025
  • Inertial Weil–Deligne types are invariants derived from restricting 2-dimensional local Galois representations, capturing both the Weil group action and a nilpotent monodromy operator.
  • They are explicitly classified into principal series, Steinberg, and supercuspidal types, each corresponding to distinct elliptic curve reduction types and conductor exponents.
  • This classification underpins local-global compatibility in the Langlands program and supports precise computations in elliptic curve arithmetic and deformation theory.

An inertial Weil–Deligne type is a character-theoretic invariant associated to the restriction of a local Galois representation, arising from the \ell-adic cohomology of an elliptic curve over a local field, to the inertia subgroup. For an elliptic curve EE over F=QF = \mathbb{Q}_\ell or F=Qp2F = \mathbb{Q}_{p^2}, the attached 2-dimensional Weil–Deligne representation (r,N)(r, N) encodes both the action of the Weil group WFW_F and the monodromy operator NN, with the inertial type being the isomorphism class of the pair (rIF,N)(r|_{I_F}, N). The classification of all inertial Weil–Deligne types arising in this context is both explicit and exhaustive; it is central in the study of local-global compatibility in the Langlands program, the analysis of deformation rings, and the moduli of elliptic curves.

1. Definition and Structure of Inertial Weil–Deligne Types

Given a finite extension FF of Qp\mathbb{Q}_p, the absolute Galois group GF=Gal(F/F)G_F = \operatorname{Gal}(\overline{F}/F) has the Weil group WFW_F as a dense subgroup, with inertia IFWFI_F \subset W_F as the kernel of the natural projection to the Galois group of the residue field. Let EE be an elliptic curve over FF, and fix p\ell \ne p a prime. The \ell-adic Tate module TET_\ell E gives rise to a continuous 2-dimensional representation r:WFGL2(C)r : W_F \to \operatorname{GL}_2(\mathbb{C}) with open kernel; it comes equipped with a nilpotent monodromy operator NN of order at most $2$, satisfying the relation r(g)Nr(g)1=gNr(g) N r(g)^{-1} = |g| N for the norm character |\cdot|.

The pair (r,N)(r, N) is a Weil–Deligne representation; its inertial type is (rIF,N)(r|_{I_F}, N) up to equivalence. When N=0N = 0, the type is called unipotent. The conductor exponent of EE is determined by this inertial type and, in the context of elliptic curves, is always less than or equal to $2$ except in certain wild cases for =2\ell = 2 or $3$.

2. Classification of 2-Dimensional Inertial Types

Every such inertial Weil–Deligne type arising from E/FE/F falls into one of the following categories:

  1. Principal Series: (r,N)(r, N) is a direct sum χ1χ2\chi_1 \oplus \chi_2, N=0N=0, with χ1,χ2\chi_1, \chi_2 quasicharacters of WFW_F, χ1/χ2±1\chi_1/\chi_2 \neq |\cdot|^{\pm 1}. Restricting to inertia, τ=χ1IFχ2IF\tau = \chi_1|_{I_F} \oplus \chi_2|_{I_F}.
  2. Special (Steinberg): r=χSt2r = \chi \otimes \operatorname{St}_2, N0N \neq 0 of rank $1$. On inertia, $\tau = (\chi|_{I_F}) \otimes (\mathbbm{1} \oplus \mathbbm{1})$, NN is the standard 2×22\times2 nilpotent Jordan block.
  3. Supercuspidal: N=0N=0, rr irreducible:
    • Non-exceptional: r=IndWKWFψr = \operatorname{Ind}_{W_K}^{W_F}\psi for K/FK/F quadratic, and ψ\psi a quasicharacter of WKW_K not factoring through the norm.
    • Exceptional (for p=2p=2): Projective image A4A_4 or S4S_4, constructed from specific cubic-quadratic extensions; these types only occur for certain wild ramification invariants.

This partition is exhaustive; each inertial type uniquely determines a reduction type for EE via the Kodaira–Néron classification (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).

3. Explicit Correspondence with Kodaira–Néron Reduction Types

The reduction type of EE dictates the inertial type:

  • Good Reduction: Inertia acts trivially, N=0N=0—the trivial type.
  • Split or Non-split Multiplicative Reduction: τ\tau is Steinberg type, N0N \neq 0; if over a ramified quadratic extension, a quadratic twist appears.
  • Additive but Potentially Multiplicative: Special type with quadratic twist by the discriminant of the relevant quadratic extension.
  • Additive but Potentially Good Reduction: N=0N=0, rIFr|_{I_F} finite image of order eE=[L:Fur]e_E = [L : F^{\operatorname{ur}}], with the precise family determined by divisibility relations: eE(p1)e_E\mid(p-1) indicates principal series, while eE(p+1)e_E\mid(p+1) gives non-exceptional supercuspidal, and eE=24e_E=24 (for p=2p=2) gives exceptional supercuspidal (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).

4. Concrete Parameterizations and the Influence of Residue Characteristic

The explicit parameterization depends on pp and FF:

  • For p5p \geq 5: Additive potentially good reduction only allows orders e{3,4,6}e \in \{3,4,6\} in the inertia quotient; principal series appear if e(p1)e\mid(p-1), supercuspidals if e(p+1)e\mid(p+1).
  • For p=3p=3: Possible inertia orders are $3,4,6,12$; both principal series and (ramified or unramified) supercuspidal types occur, as well as their twists. Each is explicitly constructed via characters on inertia of prescribed order and conductor, and listed in (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).
  • For p=2p=2 or F=Q4F = \mathbb{Q}_4: Wild ramification allows inertia orders up to $24$. Both principal series and non-exceptional supercuspidal types are realized by induction from quadratic extensions or their explicit characters. Exceptional (primitive) types appear only for e=8e=8 and e=24e=24; these have projective image Q8Q_8 or SL2(F3)\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{F}_3). Parameterizations use explicit data on unramified and ramified quadratic (and, for exceptional types, cubic) extensions.

Types, orders, conductors, and parameterizations are tabulated in full in (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).

5. The Case of Unramified Quadratic Base Field

For F=Qp2F = \mathbb{Q}_{p^2}, the classification mirrors the Qp\mathbb{Q}_p case with refinements due to the larger unramified base:

  • Principal Series: Types PS(1,1,e)\operatorname{PS}(1,1,e), parameterized by characters of IFI_F of precise order dividing q±1q\pm1, where q=p2q=p^2.
  • Steinberg: As above, for potentially multiplicative reduction.
  • Unramified and Ramified Supercuspidal: Induced from quadratic extensions (unramified or ramified); parameterization involves explicit choice of θ\theta with prescribed order and restriction to inertia.
  • Exceptional Types (p=2p=2): Triply-imprimitive supercuspidals, built from a minimal cubic K/FK/F and a character on a quadratic M/KM/K of prescribed conductor.

The semistability defect ee remains the key invariant; possible values and the resulting type are tabulated (see (Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025), Tables 1–10).

6. Summary Table of Inertial Types by Reduction Type

Reduction Type Inertial Type Conductor Exponent
Good reduction Trivial 0
Multiplicative (split/non-split) St(1)\operatorname{St}(1) or St(εK)\operatorname{St}(\varepsilon_K) 1 or 2
Additive, potentially multiplicative St(1)εd\operatorname{St}(1)\otimes\varepsilon_d 2, 4, or 6 (wild)
Additive, potentially good Principal Series or (Supercuspidal, Exceptional) 2, possibly higher

All such types are realized by explicit curves of matching Kodaira–Néron reduction, and are fully classified in (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).

7. Applications and Explicit Computations

The explicit description and classification of inertial Weil–Deligne types underlies multiple arithmetic applications:

  • The determination of local factors, conductors, and root numbers in LL-functions attached to elliptic curves (Dembélé et al., 2022).
  • Local-global compatibility for modular and automorphic Galois representations.
  • Exhaustiveness checks and explicit curves for each inertial type and conductor exponent, including explicit modular forms and tables for characteristic $2$ and $3$ wild ramification (Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).
  • Algorithmic and computational verification using explicit local field extensions, as tabulated in supplementary computational materials.

The methodology combines local class field theory, explicit determination of the image of Galois on torsion points, and verification against Tate's algorithm (Dembélé et al., 2022, Castro-Moreno et al., 4 Dec 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Inertial Weil-Deligne Types.