Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Inelastic Majorana Dark Matter Model

Updated 9 December 2025
  • The inelastic Majorana dark matter model describes a Dirac fermion receiving a small Majorana mass, resulting in two nearly degenerate states that interact via a light dark photon.
  • It employs a detailed Lagrangian framework with kinetic mixing and Yukawa interactions to generate keV-scale mass splittings that explain the XENON1T electron-recoil signal and achieve the observed relic abundance.
  • The model’s phenomenology is constrained by direct-detection thresholds and astrophysical requirements, with velocity-dependent self-interactions from dark photon exchange addressing small-scale structure issues.

The inelastic Majorana dark matter (iDM) model is a framework in which a fermionic dark sector, initially realized as a Dirac fermion, acquires a small Majorana mass splitting. This results in two nearly degenerate Majorana mass eigenstates. The dynamics are typically governed by interactions with light vector mediators—often referred to as dark photons—with communication to the Standard Model (SM) via kinetic mixing. These models have garnered significant interest for their ability to simultaneously address cosmological structure anomalies, explain laboratory excesses such as the XENON1T electron-recoil signal, and evade stringent direct-detection and collider constraints through kinematic thresholds and suppressed couplings.

1. Theoretical Construction and Field Content

The canonical Lagrangian for electroweak-scale iDM includes a Dirac fermion χ\chi charged under a hidden U(1)XU(1)_X symmetry, acquiring both a Dirac mass mχm_\chi and a small Majorana mass δ/2\delta/2 via a Yukawa interaction with a dark Higgs. After spontaneous symmetry breaking and diagonalization, the physical spectrum consists of two Majorana fields χ1\chi_1 and χ2\chi_2: mχ1=mχδ/2,mχ2=mχ+δ/2,δmχ2mχ1.m_{\chi_1} = m_\chi - \delta/2 \,,\qquad m_{\chi_2} = m_\chi + \delta/2\,,\qquad \delta \equiv m_{\chi_2} - m_{\chi_1} \,. The dark vector boson ZZ' (the dark photon), with mass mZmχm_{Z'} \ll m_\chi, mediates both self-interactions and inelastic transitions. The gauge kinetic mixing is parameterized by ϵ1\epsilon \ll 1, coupling ZZ' to the SM photon. The dark-sector Lagrangian in the mass basis relevant for these processes is

LDS=12χ1(i ⁣̸ ⁣mχ1)χ1+12χ2(i ⁣̸ ⁣mχ2)χ214ZμνZμν+ϵ2ZμνFμνigXZμχ2γμχ1.\mathcal{L}_{\rm DS} =\frac12\,\overline{\chi_1}(i\!\not\!\partial-m_{\chi_1})\chi_1 + \frac12\,\overline{\chi_2}(i\!\not\!\partial-m_{\chi_2})\chi_2 - \frac14\,Z'_{\mu\nu}Z'^{\mu\nu} +\frac{\epsilon}{2}\,Z'_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} - i\,g_X\,Z'_\mu\,\overline{\chi_2}\gamma^\mu \chi_1 \,.

Here, gXg_X is the U(1)XU(1)_X gauge coupling, and αXgX2/(4π)\alpha_X \equiv g_X^2/(4\pi) (Baek, 2021).

2. Origin and Phenomenological Role of Mass Splitting

The mass splitting δ\delta arises from a UV-complete Dirac-Majorana seesaw structure, with the explicit breaking of the U(1)XU(1)_X symmetry via a small Majorana mass term for χ\chi. Diagonalization yields the two Majorana states χ1,χ2\chi_1, \chi_2 with mχ2mχ1=δm_{\chi_2} - m_{\chi_1} = \delta. This splitting is a crucial parameter:

  • For the XENON1T anomaly, δ2.8 keV\delta \simeq 2.8~\mathrm{keV} yields the correct deposited electron recoil energy.
  • For direct-detection constraints, δ\delta determines the kinematic threshold for elastic and inelastic scattering processes and can forbid nucleon up-scatters at standard halo velocities (Baek, 2021).

3. Dark Matter Self-Interactions and Structure Formation

In the presence of a very light mediator (mZmχm_{Z'} \ll m_\chi), t-channel ZZ' exchange produces a velocity-dependent self-interaction cross-section: σself4παX2mχ2mZ4[1+O(v2)].\sigma_{\rm self} \approx \frac{4\pi\,\alpha_X^2\,m_\chi^2}{m_{Z'}^4}[1+\mathcal{O}(v^2)]\,. Non-perturbatively, the cross-section must be computed by solving the Schrödinger equation with a Yukawa potential. The model can realize σ/mχ1 cm2/g\sigma/m_\chi \sim 1~\mathrm{cm}^2/\mathrm{g} at dwarf-galaxy velocities (v30 km/sv \sim 30~\mathrm{km/s}), with automatic suppression at cluster scales (v1000 km/sv \sim 1000~\mathrm{km/s}), thereby addressing core–cusp and too–big–to–fail problems (Baek, 2021, Alvarez et al., 2019).

4. Inelastic Transitions, Direct Detection, and Laboratory Signatures

The process χ1χ1χ2χ2\chi_1\chi_1 \to \chi_2\chi_2 proceeds via the dark photon and has a threshold velocity: vmin=2δm1.v_{\min} = \sqrt{\frac{2\delta}{m_1}}\,. For δkeV\delta \sim \mathrm{keV} and mχ100 GeVm_\chi \sim 100~\mathrm{GeV}, only the high-velocity tail of the halo can up-scatter. The prompt decay χ2χ1Z\chi_2 \to \chi_1 Z' releases a ZZ' with energy δ\sim \delta, leading to observable signatures:

  • Inelastic up-scatter followed by ZZ' absorption in xenon produces a mono-energetic electron-recoil spectrum. The absorption cross-section for a nonrelativistic ZZ' is σPE(EZ)=ϵ2σγ(EZ)\sigma_{\mathrm{PE}}(E_{Z'}) = \epsilon^2\,\sigma_\gamma(E_{Z'}), where σγ(E)\sigma_\gamma(E) is the SM photo-electric cross section (Baek, 2021).
  • The XENON1T electron-recoil excess at 2.8 keV2.8~\mathrm{keV} is explained by δ=2.8 keV\delta = 2.8~\mathrm{keV}, ϵ1010\epsilon \sim 10^{-10}, and σinel1014 pb\sigma_{\rm inel} \sim 10^{-14}~\text{pb}, reproducing the event rate (Baek, 2021, Dutta et al., 2021).

Direct detection via nucleon recoils is suppressed. Elastic χ1\chi_1–nucleus scattering requires momentum transfer sufficient to bridge δ\delta, which is kinematically forbidden for typical WIMP velocities at keV-scale mass splittings, and the rate is further suppressed by ϵ2\epsilon^2 (Baek, 2021).

5. Relic Density and Thermal History

The dominant freeze-out annihilation channel is χ1χ1ZZ\chi_1\chi_1 \to Z'Z': σvχiχiZZπαX2mχ2,\langle\sigma v\rangle_{\chi_i\chi_i\to Z'Z'} \simeq \frac{\pi\alpha_X^2}{m_\chi^2}\,, with αX3×103\alpha_X \sim 3 \times 10^{-3} for mχ100 GeVm_\chi \sim 100~\mathrm{GeV} yielding the observed DM relic abundance ΩDMh20.12\Omega_{\rm DM}h^2 \simeq 0.12 (Baek, 2021). Hybrid freeze-in/freeze-out scenarios are also possible in light mediator regimes with additional singlet injection (Dutta et al., 2021).

6. Combined Phenomenological Constraints and Experimental Probes

A concise table illustrates the dependence of the key observables and constraints:

Observable/Constraint Model Parameter(s) Value/Threshold
Small-scale structure σself/mχ\sigma_{\rm self}/m_\chi 1 cm2/g\sim 1~\mathrm{cm}^2/\mathrm{g} at v30 km/sv\sim30~\mathrm{km/s}
XENON1T electron recoil δ\delta, ϵ\epsilon, σinel\sigma_{\rm inel} 2.8 keV2.8~\mathrm{keV}, 101010^{-10}, 1014 pb10^{-14}~\mathrm{pb}
Relic abundance αX\alpha_X 3×103\sim 3\times 10^{-3}
Direct detection (nucleon) δ\delta Kinematically forbidden (keV gap)
Cluster bound σ/mχ\sigma/m_\chi 0.5 cm2/g\lesssim 0.5~\mathrm{cm}^2/\mathrm{g} at v1000 km/sv\sim1000~\mathrm{km/s}

The model's five parameters (mχ,δ,mZ,αX,ϵ)(m_\chi,\delta,m_{Z'},\alpha_X,\epsilon) are tightly constrained yet consistent with all known data. Expanded frameworks with alternative mediators (scalar portals), different freeze-out mechanisms, or nonminimal gauge sectors (e.g., U(1)LμLτU(1)_{L_\mu-L_\tau}) can accommodate similar phenomenology and may address ancillary anomalies such as (g2)μ(g-2)_\mu (Yang, 5 Dec 2025, Voronchikhin et al., 7 May 2025, Garcia, 4 Nov 2024).

Further parameter space is being scrutinized by next-generation direct-detection (e.g., DARWIN), fixed-target, and collider experiments (NA64, Belle II), particularly for sub-GeV dark matter and light mediators (Garcia et al., 13 May 2024, Voronchikhin et al., 7 May 2025). Astrophysical probes provide additional constraints based on density-core stability and core-collapse timescales in dwarfs; for low mχm_\chi the mass splitting must exceed the up-scatter threshold to suppress halo dissipation (Alvarez et al., 2019).

7. Summary and Outlook

The inelastic Majorana dark matter paradigm connects small-scale structure solutions, laboratory anomalies, and cosmological abundance through a simple extension of the minimal hidden U(1)U(1) sector. A characteristic feature is the presence of a keV–MeV mass splitting, light mediators (often with mZ103m_{Z'} \lesssim 10^{-3}10110^{-1}~eV), and kinetic mixing parameter ϵ1010\epsilon \sim 10^{-10}10810^{-8}, producing suppressed yet detectable signatures in deep-underground and accelerator-based experiments, while satisfying the relic density and evading ultrahigh-sensitivity direct-detection bounds (Baek, 2021, Dutta et al., 2021, Alvarez et al., 2019). Future searches will further test these models, with critical sensitivity in the electron-recoil channel, the sub-GeV DM regime, and halo structure observations.

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Inelastic Majorana Dark Matter Model.