Holographic Screens: Theory & Applications

• Holographic screens are two-dimensional surfaces that encode information about higher-dimensional spaces, linking emergent gravity with thermodynamic principles.
• They bridge theoretical physics and quantum information, using area laws and entropic relations to connect spacetime geometry with underlying data.
• In optical engineering, holographic screens enable high-resolution, phase-controlled wavefront manipulation for immersive 3D displays and advanced visualization.

A holographic screen is a physically or mathematically defined surface that encodes, processes, or reveals information about a higher-dimensional or inaccessible region, with applications ranging from gravitational thermodynamics and cosmology to wavefront engineering for immersive optical displays. The term encompasses both theoretical constructs—central to the holographic principle in gravitational physics—and practical devices such as white-light diffractive screens and high-resolution metasurfaces. Research on holographic screens explores their role in encoding gravitational degrees of freedom, mediating emergent phenomena via thermodynamic relations, or serving as technical components in three-dimensional visualization systems.

1. Theoretical Frameworks: Holographic Screens in Fundamental Physics

Holographic screens in gravitational theory are codimension-one hypersurfaces—often selected by the requirement of constant Newtonian potential or vanishing null expansion—used to generalize event horizons in spacetimes with or without black holes. They provide natural settings for the holographic principle, which posits that the information content of a volume can be fully encoded on its boundary. In the entropic force framework, gravity emerges from entropy gradients on such screens, with each "bit" carrying information proportional to the area element of the surface, and thermodynamic quantities such as temperature and energy defined analogously to black hole horizons (Chen et al., 2010, Jiang et al., 2012, Bousso et al., 2016).

A central thermodynamic relation on a holographic screen enclosing a static, spherically symmetric system is

$dM = T\,dA + \sum_i \Phi_i\,dQ_i,$

where $M$ is mass, $T$ is the analog of Unruh temperature, $A$ is the screen area, $\Phi_i$ and $Q_i$ are generalized potentials and their respective conserved charges. The entropy-area relationship $S=A/4$ is recovered, not only at horizons but also on generic screens, supporting the emergent gravity scenario (Chen et al., 2010, Jiang et al., 2012). This formalism leads to an integrated first law, compatible with Komar mass and the equipartition principle.

Generalizations—such as defining the screen via $e^{2\phi}=c$ (with $\phi$ the Newton potential)—allow a deep correspondence with specific components of Einstein's equations (Jiang et al., 2012). Observer-dependence and non-relativistic causal structure characterize the foliations of these surfaces, where maximal leaves encode quantum or coarse-grained classical information (Bousso et al., 2016, Moosa, 2017).

2. Holographic Screens and Quantum Information: Entropy, Entanglement, and Complexity

Holographic screens underpin proposals for gravitationally-defined entanglement entropy in general spacetimes, notably those extending beyond the AdS/CFT boundary. An operational prescription involves anchoring extremal (codimension-2) surfaces to subregions of the leaves of the screen; their area determines entanglement entropy: $S(A) = \frac{\mathrm{Area}(\mathrm{ext}(A))}{4},$ with $\mathrm{ext}(A)$ the minimal-area surface homologous to region $A$ in the leaf, contained within its causal domain (Sanches et al., 2016). Maximin constructions demonstrate that this prescription satisfies strong subadditivity and other entropy inequalities, linking geometric and quantum informational properties even in cosmological settings where no asymptotic boundary exists.

Recent developments show that the entanglement structure between antipodal holographic screens on de Sitter horizons gives rise to spacetime connectivity (e.g., as an entangled, wormhole-like "bridge"), and quantum extremal surfaces (QES) in the bulk control which regions each screen can encode. This reconstruction is sensitive to screen location; integrating out degrees of freedom by moving screens inward severs access to certain bulk regions (Franken, 21 Mar 2024, Rondeau, 27 Mar 2024).

Computational complexity also finds a geometric dual in holographic screens. The rate of growth of bridge volume (in Einstein–Rosen bridges, ERBs) is related to the quantum circuit complexity of dual systems, formalized as $C \sim S t$ (with $S$ entropy and $t$ time), and modeled heuristically by spin systems (e.g., Ising lattices) representing screen "pixels" (Javarone, 2023).

3. Dynamical and Thermodynamic Properties

Holographic screens display rich dynamical and thermodynamic behaviors. Their evolution, specified through local geometric quantities and tangential constraints, can be cast in a covariant Newton–Cartan structure (Moosa, 2017). The thermodynamics/geometry correspondence is manifest: the integrated first law on screens is equivalent to certain Einstein equations, and their phase structure is governed by singularities (discontinuities in heat capacities) associated with parameters such as the Newton potential, charge, or electrostatic potential (Jiang et al., 2012).

Multiple types of phase transitions are present:

• For $Q=0$, only screens with $0 \leq c < 1$ exhibit transitions.
• For constant electrostatic potential, the constraint $0 \leq c + 16\tilde{\Gamma}^2\Phi^2 < 1$ determines admissibility.
• For constant $Q$, the number and presence of transitions depend on $Q$ and $c$.

Second-order phase transitions are verified via satisfaction of Ehrenfest equations and a unit Prigogine–Defay ratio at the transition (Jiang et al., 2012).

Area laws unify the apparent horizon and event horizon: a broad family of generalized screens, not necessarily marginally trapped, possess strictly monotonically increasing area along a suitable flow (Nomura et al., 2018). The "outer entropy," defined via maximal HRT (Hubeny–Rangamani–Takayanagi) surfaces associated to the screen's outer wedge, generalizes the entropic interpretation of event horizon geometry.

4. Spectral, Quantum, and Cosmological Implications

Spectral properties of bits on the screen, particularly their vibrational (phononic) modes, modify both thermal energy distribution and emergent gravitational dynamics. For low temperatures (or small free-fall acceleration), only a restricted spectrum of transverse (one-dimensional) vibrations is permitted, leading to a Debye-like modification of equipartition: $E = (1/2) T N \mathcal{D}(T_D/T),$ with $\mathcal{D}$ the 1D Debye function and $T_D$ a temperature scale set by cosmology (Kiselev et al., 2010). The net effect is a modified force law,

$a^2 = \frac{G M a_0}{r^2},\quad a_0 = 2\pi T_0,$

generating a Milgrom–MOND regime with empirical agreement for galaxy rotation curves, and realizing the Tully–Fisher relation $v_0^4 = G M a_0$. The interplay between microscopic (screen, Planck-scale) and macroscopic (cosmological, de Sitter) parameters links microstates of screens to large-scale phenomena.

Discrete quantization of screen area and entropy emerges in ultraviolet self-complete gravity: the minimal screen corresponds to a Planck-scale extremal black hole, storing a single byte of information, and the entropy–area relation receives logarithmic corrections at large scales (Nicolini et al., 2012).

5. Geometric Realizations and Information Encoding

The information-theoretic role of holographic screens is exemplified in the calculation of Shannon information for probabilistic transitions across a screen. For a massive particle, the information content is a function of the de Broglie phase difference: $I = 2\pi \Delta\varphi,$ with $\Delta\varphi = ks$ and $k$ the wave number, $s$ the separation. For a spherical screen, the minimal information needed to encode mass, charge, angular momentum, or radiation is at least four bits per "cell" (Putten, 2013). Minimal (event-horizon-like) screens at maximal information density recover familiar black hole metrics (Reissner–Nordström, extremal Kerr).

Cosmologically, the total number of future computations possible in the visible universe, as bounded by the holographic screen at the cosmological horizon, is finite (approximately $10^{121}$), offering a sharply delimited, information-theoretic interpretation of universal evolution (Putten, 2013).

6. Optical and Technical Realizations

Holographic screens have significant technological instantiations as diffractive or phase-encoding surfaces for visual display and imaging. White-light holographic screens are constructed by interfering spherical waves, with focal length and diffraction efficiency determined by beam geometry and quadratic modeling of the interference pattern: $$z_i = \left( \frac{1}{z_r} \pm \frac{1}{z_o} + \frac{1}{F} \right)^{-1},\qquad \sin\theta_i - \sin\theta_d = m\lambda v.$$ Screens as large as 1370 cm² with uniform $\sim$17% diffraction efficiency offer wide viewing fields and robust color response, with two major types: horizontally-dispersive (HDHS, yielding lateral parallax) and vertically-dispersive (VDHS, for stereoscopy without glasses) (Lunazzi et al., 2010).

Recent advances utilize Huygens metasurfaces (arrays of subwavelength nanodisks) enabling full $2\pi$ phase control and high spatial resolution for near-eye displays. Such metasurfaces, fabricated on 300 mm wafers, enable the presentation of immersive 3D content with continuous accommodation and parallax cues, fundamentally resolving the vergence–accommodation conflict (Song et al., 2020).

Advanced speckle suppression and color gamut expansion are realized by polychromatic illumination frameworks such as HoloChrome, using ultrafast, wavelength-tunable lasers and dual-SLM setups. By multiplexing many wavelengths and decoupling speckle via spatial separation, HoloChrome achieves significant improvements in speckle noise reduction and color rendition, as quantified by multi-dB gains in PSNR and increases in perceptual color space coverage (Schiffers et al., 31 Oct 2024).

Screen Class	Domain	Characteristic Properties
Gravitational (theoretical)	Gravity/cosmology	Area laws, information encoding, entropy, observer dependence, emergent spacetime
Diffractive/experimental (optical)	Wavefront engineering	Phase encoding, parallax, 3D cues, high-efficiency diffraction, large-scale fabrication
Metasurface/Huygens (nano-optics)	Display technology	Subwavelength pixels, full $2\pi$ phase, continuous focus and parallax, mass manufacturing

7. Sequestration, Geometry, and Constraints

Recent work proves that in spacetimes containing a boundary-homologous minimal extremal surface (an HRT surface), any holographic screen must be sequestered to a single causal wedge of the HRT surface (future, past, inner, or outer wedge). This constraint exploits the topology of screen cross-sections and uses the e-Hopf theorem to guarantee the existence of special alignment points between normal vectors, enabling area-lowering deformations and, ultimately, forbidding screen crossings of null congruences from the extremal surface (Chatwin-Davies et al., 2023). This result informs both the geometric placement and entropic interpretation of general holographic screens, especially in relation to semiclassical and quantum extremal surfaces.

---

Holographic screens provide a unifying organizing principle across quantum gravity, cosmology, and information theory, as well as a concrete substrate for optical engineering and the development of next-generation visualization technologies. Their area laws, observer dependence, geometrical constraints, and technological implementations exemplify how two-dimensional surfaces fundamentally shape both the structure of spacetime and the delivery of information in the physical world.