Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Higher Kazhdan Projections

Updated 6 July 2026
  • Higher Kazhdan projections are higher-dimensional analogs of the classical Kazhdan projection, defined via spectral gaps in combinatorial Laplacians associated with group cohomology.
  • They are constructed as projections in matrix algebras over group C*-algebras or Roe algebras, with traces that recover ℓ₂-Betti numbers and yield nontrivial K-theory classes.
  • The theory connects spectral methods, Baum–Connes assembly maps, and coarse geometric frameworks, providing explicit formulas and invariants for computational and structural analysis.

Searching arXiv for the cited papers to ground the article in current records. I’m going to look up the relevant arXiv entries on higher Kazhdan projections and related work. Higher Kazhdan projections are higher-dimensional analogs of the classical Kazhdan projection, realized as projections in matrix algebras over group CC^*-algebras and Roe algebras. They are constructed from combinatorial Laplacians associated to cohomology with coefficients in unitary representations, and in favorable cases they define nontrivial KK-theory classes whose traces recover 2\ell_2-Betti numbers. Their introduction provides a direct link between spectral gaps in group cohomology, harmonic cochains, assembly maps of Baum–Connes type, and coarse-geometric phenomena such as box spaces and uniform Roe algebras (Li et al., 2020).

1. Classical origin and higher-degree definition

The classical Kazhdan projection arises from degree-$0$ cohomology. For a finitely generated group GG with finite symmetric generating set SS, one forms the degree-$0$ difference matrix

d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},

and the corresponding Laplacian

A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).

For any unitary representation π\pi, the kernel of KK0 is the space of invariant vectors. A theorem of Akemann–Walter identifies Kazhdan’s Property (T) with the existence of an idempotent KK1 whose image in every unitary representation is the orthogonal projection onto KK2; equivalently, KK3 is the spectral projection of KK4 at KK5, given by

KK6

under a uniform spectral gap condition at KK7 (Li et al., 2020).

Higher Kazhdan projections replace degree KK8 by arbitrary degree KK9. Fix an Eilenberg–Mac Lane model 2\ell_20 with finite 2\ell_21-skeleton, and let 2\ell_22 denote the number of 2\ell_23-simplices of 2\ell_24. For a unitary representation 2\ell_25,

2\ell_26

and the coboundary operators are represented by matrices

2\ell_27

The 2\ell_28-th combinatorial Laplacian is then

2\ell_29

For $0$0, the kernel of $0$1 is canonically identified with the harmonic $0$2-cochains, equivalently with the reduced cohomology $0$3. A projection

$0$4

is called a higher Kazhdan projection in degree $0$5 if $0$6 is the orthogonal projection onto $0$7 for every $0$8 (Li et al., 2020).

This construction generalizes the degree-$0$9 Kazhdan idempotent without reducing higher-degree cohomology to invariant vectors. In addition, one may define partial projections onto cocycles and cycles separately, by applying the same construction to the summands GG0 and GG1 (Li et al., 2020).

2. Spectral-gap mechanism and operator-algebraic realization

The existence theorem is entirely spectral. If the Laplacian GG2 has a uniform gap at GG3 in GG4,

GG5

then continuous functional calculus yields the spectral projection

GG6

which exists in GG7 and is the unique higher Kazhdan projection in degree GG8. The same argument gives the partial projections associated to the two summands of GG9 (Li et al., 2020).

The same spectral-gap/functional-calculus paradigm also appears in Roe algebras. For a discrete bounded-geometry metric space SS0, the Roe algebra SS1 is obtained by completing finite-propagation locally compact operators on SS2. If SS3 acts properly and cocompactly on SS4, one has an equivariant Roe algebra SS5, and an appropriate degree-SS6 Laplacian with a gap again produces a Kazhdan projection. The higher theory extends this operator-algebraic viewpoint from invariant vectors to higher harmonic cochains (Li et al., 2020).

A useful way to situate the construction is to compare it with Banach-algebraic Kazhdan projections. For Banach families of representations, de la Salle and Liao characterize the existence of a Kazhdan projection by a local contraction condition on generator displacement, and analyze central versus non-central projections, including non-central examples from hyperbolic groups. They also formulate a program toward “higher” cohomological projections, but explicitly note that no general theory of higher-cohomological projections is yet in the literature (Salle, 2016). This suggests that the Hilbert-space theory of higher Kazhdan projections is presently the most developed operator-algebraic realization of such higher cohomological idempotents.

3. SS7-theory, SS8-Betti numbers, and Baum–Connes obstructions

When SS9 is the left-regular representation, the relevant algebra is $0$0. If $0$1 has a spectral gap in $0$2, then the higher Kazhdan projection

$0$3

pairs with the canonical trace $0$4 to compute the $0$5-Betti number: $0$6 Consequently,

$0$7

Thus higher Kazhdan projections furnish concrete $0$8-classes whose trace detects higher $0$9-cohomology (Li et al., 2020).

This trace formula has an immediate Baum–Connes consequence. Let

d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},0

be the maximal assembly map, and let

d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},1

be the reduction map. Lück’s theorem implies that if d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},2 is surjective, then the composition d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},3 takes values in the subring d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},4 generated by inverses of orders of finite subgroups. Therefore, for d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},5 of type d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},6, if d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},7 has a spectral gap in d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},8 and d0=[1s]sS,d_0=[\,1-s\,]_{s\in S},9 is onto, then

A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).0

and in particular A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).1 when A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).2 is torsion-free. Equivalently, if A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).3, then A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).4 is not surjective (Li et al., 2020).

The A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).5-theoretic role of higher Kazhdan projections is therefore twofold. First, they encode harmonic cohomology classes as projections in operator algebras. Second, their traces constrain assembly maps by converting surjectivity questions into arithmetic restrictions on A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).6-Betti numbers. The paper also remarks that if A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).7 were A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).8-amenable, then the map A0=d0d0=sS(1s)(1s1).A_0=d_0d_0^*=\sum_{s\in S}(1-s)(1-s^{-1}).9 would be an isomorphism; hence a nonzero higher Kazhdan class in π\pi0 that vanishes after reduction would obstruct π\pi1-amenability (Li et al., 2020).

4. Coarse-geometric version and box spaces

The higher theory has a coarse counterpart for box spaces. Let π\pi2 be exact and residually finite, with decreasing finite-index normal subgroups π\pi3, and form the box space

π\pi4

with the disjoint union metric making levels diverge. For a fixed finite π\pi5, the cochain-Laplacian π\pi6 has a gap in π\pi7 if and only if the corresponding finite-quotient Laplacians on the π\pi8 have a uniform gap in the uniform Roe algebra π\pi9. The resulting spectral projector is denoted

KK00

If KK01 for infinitely many KK02, then the class

KK03

is nonzero; its image under the box-trace map records KK04 infinitely often (Li et al., 2020).

Under surjectivity of the coarse Baum–Connes assembly map

KK05

the higher projection forces a strong stabilization phenomenon: KK06 for all but finitely many KK07. Equivalently,

KK08

not only converges, but actually stabilizes exactly after finitely many indices. This strengthens Lück’s approximation theorem and yields a strategy for constructing counterexamples to the coarse Baum–Connes conjecture by seeking groups for which the normalized Betti numbers converge slowly but non-stably (Li et al., 2020).

The Roe-algebra perspective also connects higher Kazhdan projections to ghost operators. In KK09, the kernel of the lifting map used in the nonvanishing result is exactly the ideal of ghosts. This suggests new candidates for noncompact ghost projections in situations where KK10 but the higher projection remains nontrivial “at infinity” (Li et al., 2020).

5. Explicit calculations and formulas for KK11-classes

Subsequent work makes the higher Kazhdan classes concrete in several families of groups. For non-amenable finitely generated virtually free groups acting properly and cocompactly on a tree KK12, Pooya, Ren, and Wang show that the combinatorial Euler class of Emerson–Meyer is the preimage of the higher Kazhdan class under the Baum–Connes assembly map, and that when only KK13 is nonzero,

KK14

where

KK15

is the averaging projection of the finite stabilizer. In the virtually free case, only KK16 occurs, and

KK17

(Pooya et al., 27 Jul 2025).

Pooya and Wang compute explicit higher Kazhdan classes for free products and Cartesian products. For

KK18

the first higher Kazhdan class is

KK19

For

KK20

with KK21 copies of KK22 and KK23 finite,

KK24

These formulas are obtained from explicit resolutions in the free-product case and from a Künneth-type decomposition of cochains and Laplacians in the product case (Pooya et al., 2024).

Ren extends the free-product formula to the amalgamated product

KK25

Writing

KK26

the unique nonzero higher Kazhdan class satisfies

KK27

When KK28, this reduces to the free-product formula (Ren, 8 Jul 2025).

Group Nonzero higher projection KK29-class
KK30 KK31 KK32
KK33 KK34 KK35
KK36 KK37 KK38

These formulas show that, in several low-dimensional situations, higher Kazhdan projections can be represented in KK39-theory by finite alternating sums of averaging idempotents attached to finite subgroups or stabilizers. A plausible implication is that this makes the otherwise spectral definition accessible to explicit computation in classes of virtually free groups.

6. Delocalized traces, examples, and open directions

Higher Kazhdan projections also define delocalized KK40-Betti numbers. For a conjugacy class KK41, the delocalized trace

KK42

induces a map on KK43, and one sets

KK44

In the virtually free setting, pairing the alternating-sum formula with delocalized traces yields nonvanishing rationals whenever KK45 fixes at least one vertex orbit but no edge orbit (Pooya et al., 27 Jul 2025).

The 2024 computations give the first non-vanishing examples for infinite groups. For KK46,

KK47

and for KK48,

KK49

Ren’s amalgamated-product formula produces, for

KK50

the values

KK51

with all others vanishing (Pooya et al., 2024, Ren, 8 Jul 2025).

The original theory already provided examples and structural questions. For free groups KK52 with KK53, the standard KK54-cochain Laplacian has a gap, KK55, and KK56 is nonzero. Kähler hyperbolic groups have gaps in all degrees and nontrivial middle-degree KK57-cohomology, so higher projections exist in all degrees. For lattices in KK58, Garland-type vanishing and spectral-gap arguments yield partial Kazhdan projections in KK59 (Li et al., 2020).

A recurrent misconception is that higher Kazhdan projections are already characterized by a known higher analog of Property (T). The available results do not establish this. Li, Nowak, and Pooya explicitly ask whether there is a purely spectral-gap-type characterization—a “Property KK60”—equivalent to the existence of a higher Kazhdan projection KK61 in KK62 or KK63 (Li et al., 2020). In parallel, the Banach-space framework of de la Salle and Liao suggests local and ultraproduct methods for higher cohomological idempotents, but it also records that no general theory of higher-cohomological projections is yet in the literature (Salle, 2016). The present state of the subject therefore combines a robust Hilbert-space theory, a growing body of explicit KK64-theory computations, and a still-open problem of intrinsic higher rigidity characterizations.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Higher Kazhdan Projections.