High-Resolution Transmission Spectroscopy

• High-resolution transmission spectroscopy (HRTS) is a technique that measures the wavelength-dependent decrease in stellar light during exoplanet transits to reveal atmospheric composition and structure.
• It utilizes spectral resolving powers of R≳10⁵ to extract velocity-resolved diagnostics such as wind speeds, Doppler shifts, and rotational signatures.
• Integrating 3-D atmospheric models with HRTS data enables the accurate interpretation of line asymmetries and spatial variations, overcoming limitations of conventional 1-D analyses.

High-resolution transmission spectroscopy (HRTS) is an observational technique that probes exoplanet atmospheres by measuring stellar light filtered through the planetary limb at spectral resolving powers typically R ≳ 10⁵. HRTS delivers velocity-resolved information on atomic and molecular species, wind and rotation signatures, and altitude-dependent atmospheric structure. By resolving individual spectral lines—often broadened and shifted by atmospheric dynamics—HRTS distinguishes physical regimes inaccessible to low-resolution methods and directly tests three-dimensional models of exoplanet meteorology.

1. Principles of High-Resolution Transmission Spectroscopy

HRTS measures the wavelength-dependent decrease in stellar intensity during an exoplanet transit at a resolving power high enough to probe individual absorption line cores. The observed quantity is the transmission spectrum, typically derived as the ratio of in-transit to out-of-transit (stellar-only) flux: $$\tilde{\mathcal{R}}(\lambda) = \frac{\tilde{f}_{\rm in}(\lambda, t_{\rm in})}{\tilde{F}_{\rm out}(\lambda)} - 1$$ where normalizations remove instrumental and stellar continuum.

Absorption signatures originate from atmospheric species (Na, K, CO, H₂O, etc.) at low pressures—often in the $\sim$1 μbar to 10⁻¹¹ bar regime—manifesting as deep, narrow line cores atop the broader planetary continuum. Because the lines are resolved, detailed line shape (core vs. wings), centroid shifts, and broadening parameters provide access to temperature, pressure, velocity, and abundance profiles as a function of altitude (Langeveld et al., 2021, Hoeijmakers et al., 2020, Langeveld et al., 2022, Rafi et al., 1 Jul 2024).

2. Modeling: 3-D Atmospheric Dynamics and Spectral Synthesis

Accurate HRTS interpretation necessitates three-dimensional atmospheric modeling that naturally incorporates terminator temperature gradients, wind profiles, and rotation. The forward model must couple a 3-D general circulation model (GCM) to a line-by-line radiative transfer calculation with local velocity-dependent opacities. For each location on the limb (latitude θ, longitude φ, altitude z), the model computes: $$v_{\text{los}} = -[u \sin{\theta}\cos{\phi} + v \cos{\theta}\sin{\phi} + (R_p + z)\Omega_p \sin{\theta}\cos{\phi}]$$ where $u$ and $v$ are wind components and $\Omega_p$ is rotational angular velocity (Kempton et al., 2014).

This determines the Doppler shift and broadening applied to each spectral line as a function of local physical conditions. The total transmission spectrum integrates these effects along the observer’s line of sight over the planetary limb.

Key distinctions between 1-D and 3-D modeling include:

• 1-D models cannot reproduce line asymmetries, Doppler shifts from winds, or the reduction in peak absorption from rotational/wind broadening.
• 3-D models naturally predict phenomena such as net blueshifts from substellar-to-anti-stellar (SSAS) winds and spatially variable line depths/broadening (Kempton et al., 2014, Khalafinejad et al., 2021).

3. Observational Diagnostics: Dynamical Effects in HRTS

HRTS is uniquely sensitive to velocity-resolved diagnostics. For hot giant planets, models predict:

• Net spectral blueshifts of up to $\sim$3 km s⁻¹ corresponding to strong day-to-night atmospheric winds (SSAS flows), especially at high insolation (Kempton et al., 2014, Langeveld et al., 2022).
• Rotational broadening of absorption features reflecting tidally locked planetary rotation, which increases for shorter orbital periods.
• Reduction of absorption line peak strengths—broadening flattens the line core, causing 1-D models to overestimate line depths by factors of several for strongly irradiated targets (Kempton et al., 2014).
• Asymmetries and temporal evolution in cross-correlation signals, which can be phase-resolved to explore longitudinal differences in terminator clouds and chemistry (Savel et al., 2023).

Empirical measurements typically involve fitting Gaussian profiles or using cross-correlation techniques with model templates to detect and quantify line positions, contrast, and FWHM, after shifting spectra into the planetary rest frame. Net velocity offsets are interpreted as signatures of SSAS winds or more complex dynamical modes, with measured blueshifts in Na absorption lines of a few km/s confirmed for multiple hot Jupiters (Langeveld et al., 2022, Langeveld et al., 2021).

4. Technical Aspects and Limitations

HRTS exploits advanced echelle spectrographs (e.g., HARPS, ESPRESSO, CARMENES, GRACES, EXPRES) operating at R ≳ 10⁵ and (for new facilities) stabilized against sub-m/s drifts. Observing and data analysis workflows address several challenges:

• Instrumental line spread functions (LSF), telluric absorption, continuum normalization, and time-variable noise must be modeled and removed—often using tools like molecfit, SYSREM, or PCA-based detrending (Langeveld et al., 2021, Cheverall et al., 2023, Klein et al., 2023).
• The method is robust to thick clouds/hazes at low resolutions; because high-altitude spectral line cores remain optically thick, HRTS can detect atmospheric species above opaque cloud decks (Gandhi et al., 2020).
• One-dimensional or spatially averaged models are inadequate for high-resolution spectra. They cannot capture the lateral variations or wind-induced asymmetries present in the data (Kempton et al., 2014).
• Differential analysis (dividing in-transit by out-of-transit spectra, or spatially by comparison stars, as in multi-object HRTS) helps reduce systematic normalization errors and improves atmospheric retrieval accuracy (Bestha et al., 23 Sep 2025).

5. Interpretation of High-Resolution Data and Model Validation

Comparisons of synthetic HRTS spectra to observed data use several strategies:

• Cross-correlation with model templates to detect species; resolved signals yield velocity shifts and line widths, providing constraints on dynamical and thermal structure.
• Multi-wavelength, multi-instrument analyses (combining high-res ground-based and low-res space-based spectra) allow continuum/baseline calibration, break degeneracies between composition, cloud/haze properties, and pressure reference levels (Pino et al., 2017, Khalafinejad et al., 2021).
• Measurements of D2/D1 sodium line ratios, atmospheric heights, and blueshifts are compared to GCM outputs to test predicted wind speeds and vertical mixing (Langeveld et al., 2022).
• Joint retrieval frameworks (e.g., hybrid retrievals and rigorous Bayesian modeling) are increasingly used to extract robust posterior distributions for temperature, abundances, cloud top pressure, and even dynamical parameters including wind and rotation velocities (Pino et al., 2017, Klein et al., 2023).

Future instruments with R ≫ 10⁵ and high-throughput will directly resolve Doppler components in even more atomic/molecular species and push feasible targets to smaller, cooler, and more weakly irradiated exoplanets, expanding the observable parameter space for atmospheric meteorology and chemistry.

6. Limitations of 1-Dimensional Models and the Need for 3-D Approaches

HRTS at high resolution exposes key failures of conventional 1-D atmospheric models:

• 1-D profiles omit the physical structure and motion across the limb, producing inaccurate predictions of line shifts, widths, and asymmetries.
• In hot Jupiters, wind-driven velocity fields and rotation create observable spectral effects, such as blue shifts and reduced line contrasts, that 1-D models simply miss (Kempton et al., 2014).
• The day-night heat transport, chemistry gradients, and localized wind patterns drive significant departures from 1-D behavior, requiring 3-D modeling for both physical realism and unbiased parameter inference (Kempton et al., 2014, Savel et al., 2023).

Understanding degeneracies and retrieval biases in high-resolution spectra is only possible when fully 3-D radiative transfer—including all Doppler effects and temperature structures—underpins the forward model.

7. Prospects for Future Validation and Atmospheric Characterization

The emergence of next-generation, high-resolution spectrographs (e.g., on 30–40 m telescopes, ultra-stabilized optical/NIR instruments) will allow direct testing and refinement of 3-D atmospheric models. Such facilities will:

• Provide the spectral resolution and SNR needed to resolve small Doppler shifts, assess line asymmetries, and measure variations across numerous transitions.
• Enable stringent tests of model-predicted SSAS wind scaling with incident flux and the effect of thermospheric heating and rotation on line shapes for an expanded target population (Kempton et al., 2014, Langeveld et al., 2022).
• Leveraging high-cadence phase-resolved observations, allow direct detection of spatial and temporal variations, including limb asymmetries and time-resolved wind patterns (Hoeijmakers et al., 2020, Savel et al., 2023).
• Enable the systematic use of robust statistical retrieval pipelines and cross-instrument data fusion (e.g., multi-object HRTS and joint HRTS/LRTS retrievals).

As observational capabilities advance, HRTS is poised to play a central role in the empirical validation of complex 3-D dynamical models, directly constraining processes such as circulation efficiency, wind speed, atmospheric heating, and even the distribution of clouds/hazes in exoplanet atmospheres.

Table: Model Differences in HRTS Interpretation

Aspect	1-D Model Outcome	3-D/HRTS Model Outcome
Line shifts	None	Net blueshift up to ~3 km/s from winds
Line strength	Higher (overestimated)	Reduced by Doppler/rotational broadening
Line shape/asymmetry	Absent	Present, varies with limb dynamics
Spatial information	Absent (global mean)	Included (lat-long-alt variations)

This highlights the necessity of multidimensional models for HRTS data analysis and intercomparison.

---

HRTS has established itself as a key diagnostic for the physical and chemical characterization of exoplanet atmospheres, revealing spatially and temporally resolved information on winds, temperature profiles, and species abundance that can only be accessed through velocity-resolved, high-resolution observations anchored in advanced 3-D modeling frameworks (Kempton et al., 2014, Langeveld et al., 2022, Savel et al., 2023, Khalafinejad et al., 2021, Klein et al., 2023).