HI Absorption Zeeman Measurements

• HI Absorption Zeeman Measurements are techniques that exploit the Zeeman effect in the 21-cm HI line to infer the line-of-sight magnetic field in various cosmic regions.
• They integrate high-resolution radio imaging, spectral decomposition, and filament analysis to quantify magnetic field strength, achieving detections like 9.1 ± 1.9 μG in notable cases.
• These measurements provide multi-phase insights by correlating absorption profiles with HI emission structure, enhancing our understanding of ISM dynamics and AGN feedback.

HI Absorption Zeeman Measurements provide a direct probe of the line-of-sight magnetic field in cold neutral hydrogen within the interstellar medium (ISM) and active galactic environments. This technique employs the Zeeman effect—splitting of the HI 21-cm hyperfine line by magnetic fields—as observed in absorption against bright radio continua. In contemporary practice, HI absorption Zeeman measurements are integrated with high-resolution radio imaging, spectral decomposition, and filamentary HI emission analysis to infer both the field strength and geometry across diverse Galactic and extragalactic regions.

1. Fundamental Principles of HI Absorption Zeeman Measurements

HI absorption Zeeman measurements exploit the splitting of the 21-cm line ($\nu_0 = 1420.405$ MHz) in the presence of a magnetic field, resulting in a detectable signature in the circular polarization (Stokes $V$) spectrum. The frequency shift is given by

$\Delta \nu = \frac{Z}{2} B_{LOS}$

with $Z = 2.8\,\mathrm{Hz}\,\mu\mathrm{G}^{-1}$ as the Zeeman splitting constant. Under conditions where the field-induced splitting is much smaller than the thermal linewidth, the Stokes $V$ spectrum can be modeled as proportional to the velocity derivative of Stokes $I$, scaled by $B_{LOS}$. This approach enables direct inference of the line-of-sight magnetic field from absorption data.

Column densities and optical depths are quantified using formulas such as: $$N(\mathrm{HI}) = 1.835 \times 10^{18}\, \frac{T_s \int \tau(v)\, dv}{f_c} \text{ cm}^{-2}$$ where $T_s$ is the spin temperature and $f_c$ is the covering factor. Absorption spectra are commonly decomposed into Gaussian components, with Zeeman fitting applied to each spectrally distinct feature.

2. Measurement Methodologies and Observational Advances

Recent studies employ the Arecibo Telescope, FAST, and multi-wavelength archives such as the Millennium Survey for Zeeman absorption measurements (Nowotka et al., 27 Aug 2025). Spectral fitting techniques rooted in Heiles & Troland 2003, 2004 allow deconvolution of HI optical depth profiles and accurate extraction of Zeeman signals from Stokes $V$. Narrow-channel emission maps from GALFA-HI are analyzed with the Rolling Hough Transform (RHT) to systematically quantify filament orientation statistics, thereby connecting magnetic field measurements with emission morphology.

A notable advance is the 4$\sigma$ Zeeman detection towards 3C 409, yielding $B_\mathrm{LOS}=9.1 \pm 1.9\,\mu$G, with FAST data in agreement with legacy Arecibo results (Nowotka et al., 27 Aug 2025). These results affirm the coherence of magnetic fields on parsec scales in cold HI and benefit from increased sensitivity and stability in modern spectral-line radio telescope pipelines.

3. Correlation with Filamentary HI Emission Structure

Joint analyses now routinely compare $|B_{LOS}|$ inferred from Zeeman absorption with statistics of HI filament orientation derived from emission maps. The circular variance of HI filament angles,

$$\mathrm{Var}(\theta_\mathrm{HI}) = 1 - \sqrt{C(v)^2 + S(v)^2}$$

is used as a metric for the degree of alignment or disorder in emission filaments. Empirical studies find a weak but statistically significant positive correlation (Spearman $r = 0.3$, $p=0.01$) between $|B_{LOS}|$ and filament disorder (Nowotka et al., 27 Aug 2025). Higher $|B_{LOS}|$ is associated with increased orientation variance, possibly reflecting larger line-of-sight field components or environments with enhanced total field strength or density.

4. Environmental Context and Three-Dimensional Field Geometry

HI absorption Zeeman measurements, particularly when cross-referenced with dust emission, 3D dust mapping, OH absorption, and CO emission, provide multi-phase insight into the ISM. The technique probes magnetic fields that are coherent over scales of 100–500 pc, frequently sampling gas in local structures such as the Local Bubble wall. Systematic differences in $B_{LOS}$ are attributed to environmental factors affecting both the magnitude and orientation of the magnetic field. Interpretations consider both inclination effects—plane-of-sky versus line-of-sight geometry—and true field strength variations among clouds.

Regions with lower $|B_{LOS}|$ often display well-aligned HI filaments (tangential field geometry), while regions with higher $|B_{LOS}|$ present greater filament orientation dispersion (more significant LOS field contribution or enhanced turbulent conditions).

5. Technical and Physical Limitations

Multiple biases challenge the fidelity of HI absorption Zeeman measurements, including:

• Chemical bias: HI absorption primarily probes the atomic component; significant mass may reside in undetected molecular form (Hu et al., 2023).
• Spatial bias: Zeeman signals sample small regions ($\sim 10$ pc), while dynamic and magnetic conditions may vary on larger scales.
• Projection effects: Traditional Zeeman-inferred mass-to-flux ratios ($\mu$) may appear sub-critical in HI and super-critical in OH, though simulations reveal that gravitational energy dominates regardless of chemical phase (Hu et al., 2023). The apparent transition is attributed to sampling bias rather than a true dynamical regime shift.

Formally, mass-to-flux ratio is given by: $$\mu = \frac{(M/\Phi_B)}{(M/\Phi_B)_\mathrm{crit}},\quad (M/\Phi_B)_\mathrm{crit} = \frac{1}{3\pi\sqrt{G}}$$ but excluding molecular mass leads to artificially low $\mu$ estimates in HI-only measurements.

6. Calibration, Experimental Systematics, and Instrumental Effects

Quantitative extraction of magnetic fields requires careful calibration. Rate equation-based models have been developed to calibrate absorption imaging under strong magnetic fields, accounting for Zeeman level crossings, hyperfine structure disruption, off-resonant coupling, and repumping efficiency (Liu et al., 2023). The correction factor ($\beta$) for imaging efficiency is defined as: $$\beta = \frac{(dN_l/d\tau)_{B\neq 0}}{(dN_l/d\tau)_{B=0}}$$ and is sensitive to magnetic field, laser polarization, and population dynamics. In practice, small impurities in laser polarization can significantly affect measurement accuracy—with sensitivity down to $\sim 0.02\%$ impurity—offering a benchmark for systematics analysis in Zeeman experiments.

7. Broader Implications, AGN Feedback, and Future Directions

HI absorption Zeeman measurements are fundamental to understanding the magnetic field structure in both the diffuse ISM and active galactic nuclei (AGN) environments. In extragalactic systems, absorption profiles reveal kinematic signatures of outflows, rapid gas motions, and interaction with radio jets, consistent with AGN-driven feedback models [(Morganti, 9 Dec 2024); (Salter et al., 2010)]. The development of blind HI surveys, large-scale spectral mapping, and integration of filament orientation metrics are expanding the reach and resolution of Zeeman-based magnetic field studies.

A plausible implication is that combined Zeeman absorption and HI filament analyses enable reconstruction of the three-dimensional magnetic field structure in the ISM and may differentiate effects due to field inclination, strength, and environmental density. Future work will leverage high-sensitivity surveys (e.g., MeerKAT’s MALS, FAST) to improve statistics, spatial coverage, and physical modeling, thereby refining estimates of the magnetic role in star formation and galactic feedback.

---

Table: Key Quantitative and Methodological Elements

Quantity/Equation	Definition/Role	Reference
$\Delta \nu = (Z/2) B_{LOS}$	Zeeman splitting in the 21-cm line	(Nowotka et al., 27 Aug 2025)
$$N(\mathrm{HI}) = 1.835\times10^{18} \frac{T_s \int \tau(v) dv}{f_c}$$	HI column density from absorption	(Salter et al., 2010)
$\mu = \frac{(M/\Phi_B)}{(M/\Phi_B)_{\rm crit}}$	Mass-to-flux ratio (criticality)	(Hu et al., 2023)
Circular Variance $\mathrm{Var}(\theta_\mathrm{HI})$	HI filament alignment/disorder	(Nowotka et al., 27 Aug 2025)
Imaging efficiency $\beta$	Calibration for Zeeman imaging	(Liu et al., 2023)

---

HI Absorption Zeeman Measurements constitute a mature yet rapidly evolving discipline, integrating spectroscopic, imaging, and statistical approaches to probe magnetic field properties in cold neutral gas. Ongoing advances in instrumentation and analysis are enhancing reliability, spatial coverage, and interpretive power, with significant implications for galactic dynamics, star formation, and feedback processes across cosmic environments.