Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Hermitian-Poisson Metrics Overview

Updated 6 July 2026
  • Hermitian-Poisson metrics are Hermitian metrics on complex vector bundles over Gauduchon manifolds where a curvature trace yields a scalar endomorphism, distinct from classical Hermitian-Einstein metrics.
  • They arise in both non-compact and dimension-reduction settings, linking projectively flat bundles to non-abelian Hodge theory and providing insights into stability and gauge theoretic applications.
  • Analytic tools such as heat flow, continuity methods, and L2 estimates are employed to establish existence, uniqueness, and semisimplicity criteria in these non-Kähler frameworks.

Searching arXiv for the cited papers and closely related work on Hermitian-Poisson / Poisson metrics. arXiv search query: "Hermitian-Poisson metrics projectively flat non-compact Gauduchon manifolds" Looking up arXiv metadata for the main paper via the arXiv API. −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H94 −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H95 Hermitian-Poisson metrics are Hermitian metrics on flat or projectively flat complex vector bundles for which an appropriate curvature trace is a scalar endomorphism. In the non-Kähler extension of non-abelian Hodge theory, tailored to projectively flat complex vector bundles over Gauduchon manifolds, the defining equation is expressed in terms of the “complex curvature” GH=(DH′′)2G_H=(D_H'')^2 and its contraction −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025). On non-compact curves, the same terminology is used for metrics satisfying an affine divergence equation K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I, where K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H); in that setting the equation is a deformation of Simpson’s harmonic metric equation and arises by dimension reduction of the Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation from K3 surfaces in the large complex structure limit (Collins et al., 2014).

1. Definitions and geometric setting

On a complex Hermitian manifold (X,ω)(X,\omega) of complex dimension nn, the metric is Gauduchon if

∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.

The non-compact framework considered for Hermitian-Poisson metrics assumes that ω\omega is Gauduchon and satisfies additional analytic hypotheses, including finite volume and the existence of an exhaustion function with bounded −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

Let (E,D)(E,D) be a complex vector bundle of rank −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H0 over −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H1 equipped with a complex connection −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H2. For any Hermitian metric −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H3 on −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H4, there is a unique decomposition

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H5

where −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H6 is unitary and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H7 is self-adjoint with respect to −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H8. Writing the −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H9 and K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I0 parts of K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I1 as K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I2 and K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I3, one defines

K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I4

and the associated complex curvature

K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I5

The contraction operator K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I6 is then used to form the Poisson trace K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I7 (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

A connection K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I8 is projectively flat if its curvature is a scalar multiple of the identity: K(H)=c IK(H)=c\,I9 for some real K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)0-form K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)1. In terms of the decomposition K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)2, this implies

K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)3

together with the component relations listed in the projectively flat system (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

In the curve case, the same geometric pattern is expressed differently. Given a flat bundle K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)4 over a punctured Riemann surface, a Hermitian metric K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)5 determines a splitting

K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)6

where K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)7 is metric-unitary and K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)8 is an K(H)=− ⋆ ∇ ⋆ Ψ(H)K(H)=-\,\star\,\nabla\,\star\,\Psi(H)9-self-adjoint endomorphism-valued (X,ω)(X,\omega)0-form. The dual connection is

(X,ω)(X,\omega)1

In a flat frame,

(X,ω)(X,\omega)2

The corresponding endomorphism

(X,ω)(X,\omega)3

is the affine “trace of curvature” entering the curve-level Poisson metric equation (Collins et al., 2014).

2. Hermitian-Poisson equations and their relation to Hermitian-Einstein theory

Following Pan–Zhang–Zhang and the convention adopted in the Gauduchon-manifold setting, a Hermitian metric (X,ω)(X,\omega)4 on (X,ω)(X,\omega)5 is called a Hermitian-Poisson metric if

(X,ω)(X,\omega)6

for some real constant (X,ω)(X,\omega)7. Equivalently, the (X,ω)(X,\omega)8-contraction of (X,ω)(X,\omega)9 against nn0 is a scalar endomorphism of nn1 (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

For projectively flat bundles, the role of nn2 is essential. The Hermitian-Poisson condition constrains the trace of the complex curvature nn3 rather than the full Chern curvature nn4. This is the principal distinction from the Hermitian-Einstein condition

nn5

In the Kähler case, Donaldson’s functional and Simpson’s heat flow provide variational control for Hermitian-Einstein metrics and Higgs bundles. In Gauduchon, non-Kähler settings, Donaldson’s functional is unavailable, and the analysis is reorganized around nn6, its Poisson trace, and analytic substitutes for the missing variational structure (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

On non-compact curves, “Poisson metric” and “Hermitian–Poisson metric” are synonymous. The defining equation is

nn7

On curves this coincides with

nn8

When nn9, the equation becomes Simpson’s harmonic metric equation, so the Poisson equation is a deformation by a constant Poisson term (Collins et al., 2014).

The curve equation also admits a local affine form: ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.0 This is obtained by dimension reduction of the Hermitian–Yang–Mills trace equation on a holomorphic bundle over ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.1, and in the large complex structure limit of an elliptic K3 surface the same reduction yields the Poisson PDE on the base curve. In that sense, the Poisson metric equation is described as the affine analogue of the Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation under SYZ-type dimension reduction (Collins et al., 2014).

A common misconception is to identify Hermitian-Poisson metrics with Hermitian-Einstein metrics. The two notions coincide neither analytically nor geometrically in general. In the Gauduchon-manifold setting, the equation is built from ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.2, while in the affine curve setting it is built from the divergence of ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.3. This suggests that “Poisson” refers not to a single universal curvature tensor but to a family of scalar-trace conditions adapted to flat or projectively flat data outside the standard Kähler framework.

3. Existence correspondences and semisimplicity criteria

The principal non-compact correspondence for projectively flat bundles over Gauduchon manifolds is an existence-and-semisimplicity theorem under explicit analytic assumptions (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025). Let ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.4 be a non-compact Gauduchon manifold satisfying:

  • finite volume ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.5;
  • existence of an exhaustion function ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.6 with bounded ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.7;
  • an assumption controlling sup norms from integrated inequalities;
  • ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.8;
  • a background Hermitian metric ∂∂ˉ(ωn−1)=0.\partial\bar\partial(\omega^{n-1})=0.9 with ω\omega0.

Under these hypotheses, if ω\omega1 is simple and projectively flat, there exists a Hermitian metric ω\omega2 such that ω\omega3 and ω\omega4 are mutually bounded,

ω\omega5

and

ω\omega6

Moreover, if ω\omega7, then ω\omega8 (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

The converse statement requires additional geometry. If ω\omega9 is balanced and −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi0 admits a Hermitian-Poisson metric −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi1 with −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi2, then −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi3 is semi-simple. Here “simple” means that −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi4 admits no proper −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi5-invariant subbundle, while “semi-simple” means a direct sum of simple −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi6-invariant subbundles. Thus, under the balanced condition and −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi7 control, existence of a Hermitian-Poisson metric characterizes semi-simplicity (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

The curve case gives an analogous but differently formulated correspondence. Let −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi8 be a punctured compact Riemann surface endowed with a smooth Kähler metric −1Λω∂∂ˉϕ\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega\partial\bar\partial\phi9 of finite volume. For a flat vector bundle with regular singularities and a parabolic structure (E,D)(E,D)0, the main theorem states that the bundle admits a conformally strongly tamed Poisson metric if and only if it is slope polystable. If (E,D)(E,D)1 for some (E,D)(E,D)2, then the metric is strongly tamed. Any such metric is unique up to multiplication by a positive constant (Collins et al., 2014).

The stability mechanism on curves is encoded by a Chern–Weil formula. If (E,D)(E,D)3 is a flat subbundle with orthogonal projection (E,D)(E,D)4 and second fundamental form (E,D)(E,D)5, then

(E,D)(E,D)6

If (E,D)(E,D)7 is Poisson, this yields (E,D)(E,D)8, with equality if and only if (E,D)(E,D)9, so existence of a Poisson metric implies slope polystability (Collins et al., 2014).

4. Analytic framework: heat flow, continuity method, and substitute functionals

The non-compact Gauduchon theory combines heat flow techniques and continuity methods. For −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H00, the perturbed equation is

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H01

Its associated heat flow is

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H02

Writing −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H03 and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H04, the flow satisfies

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H05

These monotonicity relations imply uniform bounds by the maximum principle (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

A second fundamental tool is Donaldson’s distance

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H06

For two solutions with the same initial data,

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H07

which implies uniqueness and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H08 convergence. The flow also yields the estimate

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H09

and local −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H10 bounds for −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H11 on compact subsets (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

Because Donaldson’s functional is not available in the Gauduchon setting, the paper replaces it by a central integral identity. If −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H12, then

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H13

where

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H14

and

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H15

This identity is crucial for global −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H16 and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H17 estimates, and for the passage −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H18 to an actual Hermitian-Poisson metric (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

A related Bochner-type identity is

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H19

and it drives the evolution of −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H20. On non-compact manifolds, the analysis is localized to exhausting domains −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H21, with Dirichlet boundary condition −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H22, and then passed to the limit using uniform −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H23 and local −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H24 estimates (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

The curve theory uses a parallel, though not identical, analytic scheme. On compact submanifolds −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H25 with boundary, one solves Donaldson’s heat flow

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H26

with prescribed boundary value −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H27. The curvature satisfies −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H28, decays exponentially, and the flow converges to a stationary solution −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H29 with −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H30. If −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H31 were unbounded, one constructs a weak −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H32-projection onto a proper flat subbundle, contradicting stability (Collins et al., 2014).

5. Parabolic structures, asymptotics, and local models on non-compact curves

On a punctured Riemann surface −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H33, the curve theory incorporates regular singularities and parabolic structures. Near each puncture, after a suitable meromorphic gauge, a regular singular flat connection has local form

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H34

or equivalently in polar coordinates,

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H35

A parabolic structure assigns real weights −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H36 to the indecomposable summands −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H37 in the local decomposition −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H38 (Collins et al., 2014).

The parabolic degree is

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H39

and the parabolic slope is −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H40. One says −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H41 is slope stable if −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H42 for every proper flat subbundle −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H43, semistable if −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H44, and polystable if it is a direct sum of stable flat subbundles of the same slope (Collins et al., 2014).

The asymptotic side of the theory is encoded by tame and strongly tame metrics. A metric −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H45 is tamed by −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H46 if it satisfies integrability of −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H47 and radial asymptotics of −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H48 on local invariant flat subbundles: −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H49 For strong tameness, one adds precise norm growth of flat sections and a fuller asymptotic expansion of −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H50, including suppressed nilpotent terms of size −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H51 in the angular component (Collins et al., 2014).

The local model solutions are explicit. If near a puncture

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H52

with −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H53 a single Jordan block of size −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H54, then the diagonal metric

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H55

solves −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H56 and is strongly tame (Collins et al., 2014).

These local models are glued and then conformally corrected by solving

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H57

to obtain a strongly conformally tame metric solving −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H58 near each puncture. If −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H59 for some −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H60, the metric is strongly tame without further conformal correction (Collins et al., 2014).

The constant −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H61 is determined by the parabolic degree. For any tame metric −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H62,

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H63

and therefore a Poisson metric satisfies

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H64

This normalization matches the affine constant appearing in the dimension-reduced Hermitian–Yang–Mills equation (Collins et al., 2014).

6. Splitting phenomena, examples, non-examples, and open directions

A major structural consequence of the Gauduchon-manifold theory is that Hermitian-Poisson metrics detect semi-simplicity. One mechanism uses normalized logarithms −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H65, spectral analysis in the style of Simpson, and step functions −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H66 applied to the limit −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H67. This yields self-adjoint −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H68 projections −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H69 satisfying

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H70

Each −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H71 projects onto a −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H72-invariant subbundle. In the balanced case, a block decomposition

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H73

together with the Hermitian-Poisson equation implies

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H74

so the bundle splits orthogonally into a direct sum of −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H75-invariant subbundles (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

Several examples and non-examples are recorded. For the trivial bundle −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H76 with −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H77 unitary and projectively flat, the Hermitian-Poisson equation reduces to −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H78, and a constant metric with −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H79 satisfies the equation with −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H80. If −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H81 is flat, then projectively flatness holds trivially, and under the stated assumptions one obtains Hermitian-Poisson metrics with normalization determined by −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H82 and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H83. Semi-simple direct sums of simple projectively flat factors admit Hermitian-Poisson metrics by solving on each factor, subject to the normalization and trace constraints (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

In the curve setting, illustrative cases include a rank-two trivial bundle over −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H84 with connection

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H85

for which the only invariant subbundle is −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H86, and strongly tame metrics with logarithmic growth such as

−1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H87

near a puncture (Collins et al., 2014).

The main non-examples are analytic rather than algebraic. If the non-compact Gauduchon manifold fails the hypotheses of finite volume, controlled exhaustion, the −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H88 condition −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H89, or the integrated inequality encoded in Assumption 3, then the analytic machinery may fail. Likewise, without balanced −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H90 and −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H91 control on −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H92, the converse implication from existence of a Hermitian-Poisson metric to semi-simplicity may not hold (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025).

The current literature also identifies several open directions. These include removing the balanced hypothesis in the converse, weakening the −1ΛωGH\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_\omega G_H93 assumptions, developing moduli-theoretic interpretations for Hermitian-Poisson metrics in non-Kähler settings analogous to Kobayashi–Hitchin correspondences, exploring relations with harmonic bundles on quasi-projective manifolds, and extending the affine/Hessian methods of the curve theory to higher-dimensional affine manifolds and more general non-compact settings (Geng et al., 15 Jul 2025, Collins et al., 2014). A plausible implication is that Hermitian-Poisson metrics supply a flexible replacement for Hermitian-Einstein metrics precisely in settings where projective flatness persists but standard Kähler tools do not.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Hermitian-Poisson Metrics.