Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

($α,β$)-Harmonic Functions: Theory & Estimates

Updated 11 December 2025
  • ($α,β$)-harmonic functions are C² functions on the unit disk satisfying a weighted Laplace-type equation that generalizes classical harmonic maps.
  • They admit an absolutely convergent expansion using hypergeometric functions and yield sharp coefficient estimates via a generalized Heinz’s inequality.
  • The theory connects boundary behavior, growth distortion, and univalence, extending classical results for harmonic and analytic mappings.

An (α,β)(\alpha, \beta)-harmonic function is a C2C^2 function u:DCu:\mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{C} on the unit disk D\mathbb{D} that satisfies a weighted Laplace-type equation Lα,βu=0L_{\alpha,\beta}u=0, where Lα,βL_{\alpha,\beta} is parametrized by real numbers α,β{1,2,3,}\alpha, \beta\notin \{-1,-2,-3,\dots\} with α+β>1\alpha + \beta > -1. This generalizes classical harmonic and α\alpha-harmonic functions by incorporating two real parameters, introducing additional flexibility and encompassing a broader class of mappings. Recent work establishes foundational properties of this class, including coefficient estimates, sharp inequalities, boundary behavior, and structural theorems, thus linking and generalizing classical extremal results for univalent sense-preserving harmonic maps of the disk (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

1. Definition and Series Expansion

Given parameters α,βR{1,2,}\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots\} with α+β>1\alpha + \beta> -1, the (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-harmonic operator is defined as: Lα,β=(1z2)((1z2)zzˉ+αzz+βzˉzˉαβ),L_{\alpha,\beta} = (1-|z|^2)\left( (1-|z|^2)\partial_z\partial_{\bar z} + \alpha z \partial_z + \beta \bar z \partial_{\bar z} - \alpha \beta \right), where zDz \in \mathbb{D} and derivatives are with respect to complex coordinates.

A function uu is (α,β)(\alpha, \beta)-harmonic if Lα,βu=0L_{\alpha, \beta}u=0 in D\mathbb{D}. The normalization considered is that uu is sense-preserving (uz>uzˉ|u_z| > |u_{\bar z}| everywhere), univalent, and maps D\mathbb{D} onto itself.

The general solution admits an absolutely convergent expansion: u(z)=k=0ckF(α,kβ;k+1;z2)zk+k=1ckF(β,kα;k+1;z2)zˉk,u(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} c_k F(-\alpha, k-\beta; k+1; |z|^2) z^k + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} c_{-k} F(-\beta, k-\alpha; k+1; |z|^2) \bar{z}^k, where F(a,b;c;)F(a,b;c;\cdot) denotes the Gauss hypergeometric function, and the convergence is ensured by lim supkck1/k1\limsup_{|k|\to\infty}|c_k|^{1/|k|} \leq 1 (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

2. Sharp Coefficient Estimates: Heinz's Inequality

Heinz’s inequality is a classical result for univalent, sense-preserving harmonic self-maps of D\mathbb{D}, providing a sharp lower bound involving leading coefficients. For (α,β)(\alpha, \beta)-harmonic mappings, the generalized theorem asserts:

Let u(z)u(z) be as above. Then the following sharp bound holds (Theorem 2.2): (Γ(1+α+β)Γ(1+α)Γ(1+β))2(c12(1+α)2+33πc02+c12(1+β)2)274π2\boxed{ \left( \frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha+\beta)}{\Gamma(1+\alpha)\Gamma(1+\beta)} \right)^2 \left( \frac{|c_{1}|^2}{(1+\alpha)^2} + \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{\pi} |c_0|^2 + \frac{|c_{-1}|^2}{(1+\beta)^2} \right) \geq \frac{27}{4\pi^2} } As α,β0\alpha,\beta\to 0, this recovers the classical extremal case for harmonic self-maps, confirming the constant 274π2\frac{27}{4\pi^2} is asymptotically sharp. Extremal equality is approached precisely in the classical case; no new extremals appear for general (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

3. Proof Mechanisms and Boundary Behavior

The sharp coefficient inequality is obtained by adapting Hall’s approach for harmonic mappings to the (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) context. Essential elements are:

  • Poisson-Integral Representation:

u(z)=12π02πPα,β(zeit)u(eit)dt,u(z) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} P_{\alpha, \beta}(ze^{-it}) u(e^{it})\,dt,

with Pα,βP_{\alpha, \beta} an explicit hypergeometric kernel. As r1r\to 1^-, the boundary function admits a Fourier-type expansion with coefficients determined by Γ\Gamma-function ratios and the ckc_k.

  • Application of Hall’s Argument Principle Estimate:

By focusing on the three leading Fourier terms, one relates boundary winding to coefficient structure, with univalence and the sense-preserving condition imposing the lower bound.

  • Use of Hypergeometric Limit Formula:

The limit F(a,b;c;1)F(a,b;c;1) is evaluated using

F(a,b;c;1)=Γ(c)Γ(cab)Γ(ca)Γ(cb),F(a,b;c;1)=\frac{\Gamma(c)\Gamma(c-a-b)}{\Gamma(c-a)\Gamma(c-b)},

ensuring the correct normalization for boundary terms (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

4. Special Cases and Corollaries

The general theory specializes to several important situations:

Case Parameter Constraint Consequence
Real-kernel α=β>1\alpha = \beta > -1 Recovers Heinz-type inequality of Long–Wang for α\alpha-harmonic mappings.
Typically-real All ckRc_k \in \mathbb{R} For k2k\geq 2: Γ(1+α)ckΓ(k+1+α)Γ(1+β)ckΓ(k+1+β)1Γ(k)11+αc11+β\left|\frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha) c_k}{\Gamma(k+1+\alpha)} - \frac{\Gamma(1+\beta) c_{-k}}{\Gamma(k+1+\beta)}\right| \leq \frac{1}{\Gamma(k)}\left|\frac{1}{1+\alpha} - \frac{c_{-1}}{1+\beta}\right|
Harmonic-starlike uS(α,β)0u\in \mathcal{S}_{(\alpha,\beta)}^0 For k2k\geq2: ck(2k+1)(k+1)Γ(k+1+α)6k!Γ(2+α)|c_k| \leq \frac{(2k+1)(k+1)\Gamma(k+1+\alpha)}{6 k!\Gamma(2+\alpha)}, ck(2k1)(k1)Γ(k+1+β)6(1+α)k!Γ(1+β)|c_{-k}| \leq \frac{(2k-1)(k-1)\Gamma(k+1+\beta)}{6(1+\alpha)k! \Gamma(1+\beta)}

Each of these results follows by combining the main coefficient machinery with classical extremal function estimates (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

5. Growth, Distortion, and Area Properties

(α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-harmonic functions inherit and generalize many classical theorems for harmonic (and analytic) univalent maps, including:

  • Radó’s Theorem and Koebe-type Covering Theorems: Adapted to the context of the weighted Laplace operator Lα,βL_{\alpha,\beta}, guaranteeing boundary regularity and covering properties for the image domains.
  • Area Theorem: The distortion and growth of uu are controlled in terms of its boundary function’s LpL^p norm, connecting internal properties to the behavior on D|\partial\mathbb{D}|.
  • Coefficient Bound and Growth Estimate: For the subclass of (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-harmonic starlike functions S(α,β)0\mathcal{S}_{(\alpha,\beta)}^0, all higher coefficients admit sharp explicit upper bounds as described above, interpolating between extremality and regularity in the function class (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

6. Connections to Classical Harmonic and Analytic Theory

The (α,β)(\alpha,\beta)-harmonic family subsumes the classical case (α=β=0\alpha = \beta = 0), automatically reproducing known results for harmonic mappings such as extremality of the harmonic Koebe function for Heinz’s inequality. The limiting behavior as α,β0\alpha,\beta\to 0 continuously interpolates these coefficient bounds and sharp constants, with no novel extremals arising for α+β>1\alpha + \beta > -1.

Further, the method clarifies relationships between weighted boundary expansions (involving hypergeometric kernels) and classical Fourier analysis for univalent functions, while the coefficient growth condition ensures analogues of Carathéodory’s and Bieberbach’s theorems continue to govern the analytic structure in the generalized setting (Qiao et al., 4 Dec 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to ($α,β$)-Harmonic Functions.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube