Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Grounded Coplanar Waveguide (GCPW)

Updated 17 January 2026
  • GCPW is a planar transmission line featuring a central conductor flanked by ground planes, enabling both symmetric and odd-mode detection.
  • It integrates a slot-line bridge that captures odd-mode currents, providing a novel contrast mechanism in near-field scanning microscopy.
  • The design ensures accurate impedance control and supports high-resolution spatial measurements through advanced NSMM techniques.

A grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW) is a planar transmission line structure characterized by a central conductive strip flanked by two conductive ground planes on the same substrate, with a focus on controlled ground potentials and symmetry. The geometry, excitation, and signal pickup mechanisms of GCPW enable it to serve as an advanced sensing element in near-field scanning microwave microscopy (NSMM), particularly when combined with transmission-line resonator (TLR) techniques for high sensitivity and resolution. Integration of a slot-line bridge enables measurement of ground potentials imbalance, introducing a novel contrast mechanism for distinguishing symmetries and inhomogeneities in scanned samples (Gladilovich et al., 2024).

1. Structure and Geometric Considerations

The canonical GCPW for NSMM applications is fabricated on a dielectric substrate, specifically Rogers TMM10 (relative permittivity εr9.8\varepsilon_r \approx 9.8, loss tangent tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.002), with a thickness h=500h = 500 μm and copper cladding thickness t=17t = 17 μm. The GCPW assembly consists of several distinct regions:

  • Central Conductor: Width WW is dimensioned via TXLine software to yield Z050Z_0 \approx 50 Ω.
  • Gaps: Symmetric gaps ss are placed on each side of the central conductor.
  • Ground Planes: Two ground planes (GW+2sG \gg W + 2s) provide stable reference potentials.
  • Quarter-Wave Feed: Coupling occurs via a capacitive slot to a coplanar feed line, also designed for 50 Ω operation.
  • Slot-Line Bridge: A narrow slot line etched between the ground planes picks up odd-mode currents caused by ground potential imbalance, transitioning to a microstrip on the substrate's backside, connected to the S21S_{21} port.
  • Open-End Region: The distal end of the half-wave resonator is left open, allowing direct near-field interaction with the sample.

This architecture enables both direct near-field probing and mode-selective signal measurement, as documented in the schematic and photographs (Fig. 1 (a–c) (Gladilovich et al., 2024)).

2. Ground Potentials Imbalance: Field Distributions and Physical Origin

In a perfectly symmetric CPW, excitation supports only the even quasi-TEM mode, maintaining equal rf potentials on both ground planes Vg1(x)=Vg2(x)V_{g_1}(x) = V_{g_2}(x), so tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0020. Perturbation occurs when a sample is positioned within the near field at the open end:

  • Resonant Frequency Shift: Changes in boundary condition due to sample presence yield shifts sensed in the reflection coefficient (tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0021).
  • Capacitance Asymmetry: If the sample is misaligned with respect to the central conductor, the capacitance between the center and ground plane 1 (tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0022) diverges from that to ground plane 2 (tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0023). The resulting antisymmetric voltage profile excites the odd (slot) mode, satisfying tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0024.

The imbalance magnitude at the open end is captured as: tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0025 where tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0026 is the balanced resonator voltage. Odd-mode electromagnetic field lines are concentrated across the slot between ground planes; net odd-mode current is detected by the slot-line bridge. This configuration is validated by modeling and experimental data (Gladilovich et al., 2024).

3. Analytical Framework and Core Equations

3.1 Characteristic Impedances

Closed-form expressions for even and odd mode characteristic impedances in symmetric CPW are: tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0027 where tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0028, tanδ0.002\tan \delta \approx 0.0029, and h=500h = 5000 denotes the complete elliptic integral of the first kind; h=500h = 5001 and h=500h = 5002 are effective permittivities for respective modes.

3.2 Coupled Line Model

The half-wave resonator is modeled as a distributed line (h=500h = 5003 in the CPW medium), supporting both modes. Sample-induced perturbations alter per-unit-length shunt capacitance: h=500h = 5004 with

h=500h = 5005

Signal transmission from the excitation port (even mode) into the odd-mode pickup (h=500h = 5006) is derived via cascading coupled lines, following standard coupled-line theory.

3.3 Permittivity Estimation via Imbalance

Modification of local permittivity h=500h = 5007 by the sample generates: h=500h = 5008 Consequently,

h=500h = 5009

where t=17t = 170 is the coupling constant, t=17t = 171 is the propagation constant. Amplitude and phase are interpreted as: t=17t = 172 Phase sign reflects which capacitance (t=17t = 173 or t=17t = 174) dominates.

4. NSMM Measurement Strategy and Calibration Protocols

The experimental NSMM setup operates as follows:

  1. Excitation: Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) applies probe via the quarter-wave feed (Port 1).
  2. Resonator Reflection: The CPW half-wave resonator interacts with the sample, with t=17t = 175 measured at Port 1 for even-mode response.
  3. Odd-Mode Pickup: The slot-line bridge intercepts odd-mode current between ground planes, directed to VNA Port 2 for measuring t=17t = 176.

Spatial scanning is achieved with XYZ piezo-stages (1 μm resolution), under computer control. In-situ electronic calibration (ECal) of coaxial feeds ensures accuracy. The resonant frequency is fixed near 6.9–7.0 GHz, set by the CPW geometry (Gladilovich et al., 2024).

5. Electromagnetic Simulation and Empirical Assessment

AWR Design Environment, using TXLine for initial dimensioning and a full-wave 3-D solver (Method of Moments / Finite Element Analysis, adaptive mesh t=17t = 17710–20 elements per guided wavelength), underpins both modeling and empirical design.

Test conditions include:

  • Sample: 500 × 250 μm square recess in copper plate, placed 100 μm beneath the CPW open end.
  • Scanning Positions: Lateral positions A, B (centered), and C (shifted ±100 μm).

Key observations:

  • t=17t = 178 amplitude shift: t=17t = 1797 dB at resonance (best resolved at symmetric position B).
  • WW0 amplitude contrast: WW110 dB between B and A/C for a WW2 dBm excitation.
  • WW3 phase difference: WW4 between positions A and C, indicating reversal of odd-mode polarity.
  • Spatial discrimination limited by open-end aperture (WW5100 μm).

6. Experimental Thin-Film Scanning Performance

6.1 Copper-Recess Three-Position Test

Sample: Rogers TMM10 with 1000 μm slot. GCPW is scanned across three positions (A, B, C); WW6 and WW7 measured:

  • WW8: Amplitude/phase overlap for positions A/C, unable to distinguish left/right displacement.
  • WW9: Amplitude shows some asymmetry (attributable to fabrication/alignment variations); experimental Z050Z_0 \approx 500 phase differs by Z050Z_0 \approx 50160° between A and C, confirming odd-mode pickup capability.

6.2 Granular Aluminum–Sapphire Line Scan

Sample: Two Z050Z_0 \approx 502 nm thick granular aluminum (grAl) stripes (1000 μm long, Z050Z_0 \approx 503 kΩ/□) on sapphire.

  • Line scan in X with Z050Z_0 \approx 504 μm steps; Z lift-off Z050Z_0 \approx 505 μm; Z050Z_0 \approx 506 GHz.
  • Z050Z_0 \approx 507 amplitude reveals two clear dips; extracted stripe widths from half-width measurements:
    • First stripe: Z050Z_0 \approx 508 μm (Z050Z_0 \approx 509 % of actual, ss0 μm).
    • Second stripe: ss1 μm (ss2 %).
  • ss3: amplitude barely resolves the stripes (width error ss4 %).

7. Advantages and Constraints in NSMM Applications

Advantages:

  • Enables dual contrast mechanisms: odd-mode (ss5) in addition to traditional resonant frequency/|ss6| shift.
  • Facilitates discrimination of bilateral symmetry in inhomogeneities via ss7 phase sign.
  • Quantitative measurement of low-contrast structures with sub-percent precision (e.g., ss8 % accuracy in grAl test).

Limitations:

  • Odd-mode ss9 signal is weak (GW+2sG \gg W + 2s0 to GW+2sG \gg W + 2s1 dB); might require low-noise amplification.
  • Contingent upon precise mechanical alignment; parallelism between open-end and sample must be maintained to GW+2sG \gg W + 2s2 μm.
  • Intrinsic spatial resolution governed by open-end aperture size (GW+2sG \gg W + 2s3 μm)), unless tip is localized/sharpened further.
  • Equivalent-circuit model necessitates treatment of coupled even/odd lines, complicating calibration.

In summary, the integration of a slot-line bridge into a standard CPW half-wave resonator grants direct sensitivity to the odd mode, excited exclusively by asymmetric sample perturbations. The resulting ground potentials imbalance signal (GW+2sG \gg W + 2s4), operating as a distinct contrast channel, extends the capabilities of NSMM for high-accuracy measurement and symmetry discrimination (Gladilovich et al., 2024).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Grounded Coplanar Waveguide (GCPW).