Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gross–Zagier Log-Algebraicity Conjecture

Updated 8 July 2026
  • Gross–Zagier log‐algebraicity conjecture is a statement that normalized values of higher automorphic Green’s functions at CM points equal rational multiples of logarithms of algebraic numbers.
  • The conjecture interrelates weakly holomorphic modular forms, Hecke translates, and regularized theta lifts to connect analytic behaviors with algebraic properties.
  • Recent advances utilizing orthogonal Shimura varieties and deformed theta integrals provide a breakthrough, reinforcing the link between automorphic objects and motivic regulators.

The Gross–Zagier log-algebraicity conjecture is the assertion that suitably normalized values of higher automorphic Green’s functions on products of modular curves at pairs of CM points are rational multiples of logarithms of algebraic numbers. In a standard formulation, one starts from a weakly holomorphic modular form ff and the associated Hecke combination Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2); for CM points z1,z2z_1,z_2 of discriminants d1,d2d_1,d_2, the conjecture predicts an identity of the shape

(d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,

with κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times and α\alpha algebraic in the compositum of the relevant ring class fields, together with a natural Galois equivariance statement (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025). Originating in work of Gross–Zagier and Gross–Kohnen–Zagier, the conjecture now forms part of a broader structure linking regularized theta lifts, Borcherds products, CM cycles, motivic regulators, and single-valued periods of mixed modular motives (Brown et al., 6 Aug 2025).

1. Classical formulation

Let Γ\Gamma be a congruence subgroup and X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}. For k1k\ge 1, the higher Green’s function of weight Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)0 on Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)1 is

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)2

where Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)3 is the image of Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)4 in Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)5, and

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)6

If Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)7 has Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)8, then Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)9, and the Hecke translate is

z1,z2z_1,z_20

For a weakly holomorphic modular form

z1,z2z_1,z_21

of weight z1,z2z_1,z_22 with integral principal part, one defines

z1,z2z_1,z_23

Gross–Zagier and Gross–Kohnen–Zagier originally formulated the conjecture in terms of relations among Fourier coefficients of modular forms of weight z1,z2z_1,z_24; the weakly holomorphic modular form formulation is equivalent to that description (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025).

For CM points z1,z2z_1,z_25 of discriminants z1,z2z_1,z_26, with z1,z2z_1,z_27 the corresponding ring class fields and z1,z2z_1,z_28, the conjecture states that, when one of z1,z2z_1,z_29 is fundamental if d1,d2d_1,d_20 is even, there exist

d1,d2d_1,d_21

depending only on d1,d2d_1,d_22, such that

d1,d2d_1,d_23

If

d1,d2d_1,d_24

then for d1,d2d_1,d_25,

d1,d2d_1,d_26

In this formulation, “log-algebraicity” means precisely that the Green’s value is a rational multiple of the logarithm of the absolute value of an algebraic number (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025).

A closely related diagonal version concerns renormalized Green’s functions. In a cusp-form-free case, Gross–Zagier’s renormalized algebraicity conjecture asserts

d1,d2d_1,d_27

for CM d1,d2d_1,d_28; this is the diagonal “self-energy” analogue of the off-diagonal CM-value conjecture (Zhou, 2013).

2. Analytic development and proof

Before the full pointwise theorem, several partial results established the expected algebraicity pattern in special settings. For even d1,d2d_1,d_29, an averaged theorem on the CM cycle (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,0 proved that there exist (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,1 and (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,2, where (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,3, such that

(d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,4

together with an explicit ideal factorization formula for the fractional ideal generated by (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,5 (Li, 2018). In a different direction, the weight-(d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,6 renormalized self-energy on (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,7 was computed exactly: (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,8 which verifies the corresponding renormalized Gross–Zagier algebraicity conjecture and shows directly that the value is the logarithm of a modular unit (Zhou, 2013).

The first full pointwise breakthrough at level (d1d2)(k1)/2Gkf(z1,z2)=1κlogα,(d_1d_2)^{(k-1)/2}G_k^f(z_1,z_2)=\frac{1}{\kappa}\log|\alpha|,9 was Li’s theorem. For κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times0, κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times1 with integral Fourier coefficients, and CM points κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times2 of discriminants κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times3, Li proved that

κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times4

with κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times5 in the compositum of the corresponding ring class fields and with Galois equivariance

κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times6

The same work placed the classical product-of-modular-curves problem into the framework of orthogonal Shimura varieties and regularized theta lifts (Li, 2021).

The κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times7 case was then completed analytically by the theory of deformations of theta integrals. In that approach, the classical product κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times8 is treated as an orthogonal Shimura variety of signature κQ×\kappa\in \mathbb Q^\times9, and principal higher Green functions are realized as regularized theta lifts. The new ingredient is an analogue of the incoherent Eisenstein series over a real quadratic field, constructed as the Doi–Naganuma theta lift of a deformed theta integral on hyperbolic space. This new Hilbert modular object controls the antisymmetric CM combination not seen by the usual incoherent Eisenstein series, and its Fourier coefficients are logarithms of algebraic numbers with explicit valuation formulas. In signature α\alpha0, the resulting parity simplification yields the pointwise formula predicted by Gross–Zagier (Bruinier et al., 2022).

Recent work records the overall status succinctly: the conjecture has been settled in the case of congruence subgroups of the form α\alpha1 by analytic methods (Brown et al., 6 Aug 2025).

3. Orthogonal and theta-lift reformulations

A decisive conceptual step is the reinterpretation of higher Green functions as regularized theta lifts on orthogonal Shimura varieties. Let α\alpha2 be a rational quadratic space of signature α\alpha3, α\alpha4 the corresponding orthogonal Shimura variety, and α\alpha5 a harmonic Maass form of weight α\alpha6. The associated higher Green function is

α\alpha7

When α\alpha8 with determinant form, the associated Shimura variety is α\alpha9, and the classical higher Green functions are recovered from the orthogonal theta lift. In the level-Γ\Gamma0 normalization used by Li,

Γ\Gamma1

so the conjecture on products of modular curves is a special case of an orthogonal CM-value problem (Li, 2021).

This orthogonal reformulation also clarifies the role of CM cycles. If Γ\Gamma2 is a binary CM quadratic space over a totally real field Γ\Gamma3, an embedding Γ\Gamma4 defines a CM Γ\Gamma5-cycle Γ\Gamma6. The higher Green value at a CM point becomes a regularized theta-lift value on such a CM cycle. In the biquadratic CM case, the averaged CM value theorem takes the form

Γ\Gamma7

and in signature Γ\Gamma8 one parity disappears, leaving a single logarithm and recovering the original Gross–Zagier statement (Bruinier et al., 2022).

The orthogonal framework also supplies the mechanism behind the new proof for Γ\Gamma9. The classical incoherent Eisenstein series accounts for the symmetric combination

X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}0

but not for the antisymmetric combination

X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}1

The deformed-theta construction fills that gap. A plausible implication is that the log-algebraicity phenomenon is inseparable from the interaction between coherent and incoherent automorphic objects, rather than from Green functions alone.

4. Motivic cycles and regulator formulas

A distinct line of work gives a geometric explanation for why logarithms of algebraic numbers should appear. The basic setting is the universal family of products of elliptic curves over a modular curve, or equivalently the associated Kummer X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}2 family. For a surface X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}3,

X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}4

and a class is represented by

X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}5

with X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}6. Nodal rational curves on Kummer surfaces yield explicit classes of this type after blowing up the node and adjoining the exceptional divisor; this is the basic engine behind the construction of higher Chow cycles (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025).

In the modular-curve situation, one studies classes X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}7 on the generic fiber of the universal abelian surface whose boundary is a sum of CM cycles: X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}8 If X=H/ΓX=\overline{\mathfrak H/\Gamma}9 is a CM point outside the support of the boundary, then the real regulator satisfies

k1k\ge 10

and one has the algebraicity identity

k1k\ge 11

Because the intersection points are algebraic and the k1k\ge 12 are algebraic functions, the right-hand side is the logarithm of an algebraic number (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025).

This mechanism was already visible in earlier work on algebraic cycles and values of Green’s functions. There, explicit indecomposable classes were constructed in

k1k\ge 13

for universal abelian surfaces and their Kummer k1k\ge 14 surfaces, and their regulators were shown to produce linear combinations of weight-k1k\ge 15 higher Green’s functions at CM points that are logarithms of algebraic numbers. That work formulated a conjectural correspondence between weakly holomorphic modular forms and motivic classes whose regulators recover Borcherds lifts and Green functions (Sreekantan, 2022).

The more recent construction on products of elliptic curves strengthens this picture. It constructs infinitely many indecomposable classes on Kummer k1k\ge 16 surfaces attached to odd-degree isogenies, proves a boundary formula

k1k\ge 17

up to decomposable boundary terms, and deduces that

k1k\ge 18

has infinite rank (Sreekantan, 7 Feb 2025). These results do not by themselves re-prove the full conjecture, but they furnish a geometric explanation for the logarithmic-algebraic output.

5. Single-valued periods and mixed modular motives

A further reformulation identifies higher Green functions with single-valued periods. For any k1k\ge 19, one has a matrix-valued higher Green function Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)00, and for even Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)01 its central entry recovers the classical scalar Green function: Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)02 The entire matrix is realized as a block of the single-valued period matrix of

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)03

where Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)04 for the universal elliptic curve over the modular curve stack (Brown et al., 6 Aug 2025).

For CM points Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)05 and a Hecke correspondence Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)06 annihilating the cusp-form contribution, one extracts a rank-two extension

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)07

The Gross–Zagier conjecture becomes the assertion that this extension is Kummer. If

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)08

for some algebraic Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)09, then the off-diagonal single-valued period equals a rational multiple of Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)10, and one obtains

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)11

equivalently

Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)12

In this framework, the appearance of logarithms of algebraic numbers is a direct consequence of the single-valued period matrix of a Kummer extension (Brown et al., 6 Aug 2025).

The same work constructs genuine motives from moduli stacks of pointed elliptic curves. In level Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)13, the relevant cusp-form motive of weight Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)14 is realized by the motive of Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)15. Since that motive is mixed Tate, its Betti realization is conservative; because there are no level-Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)16 cusp forms of weight Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)17, the cusp-form motive vanishes. This yields a completely geometric proof of the Gross–Zagier conjecture in level Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)18, weight Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)19 (Brown et al., 6 Aug 2025).

This suggests a broad generalization: matrix-valued higher Green functions at non-CM points should correspond not to Kummer extensions and logarithms of algebraic numbers, but to more general mixed modular motives whose single-valued periods are expected to encode special values of Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)20-functions.

6. Terminology, adjacent theories, and scope

The expression “Gross–Zagier conjecture” is genuinely ambiguous. In the context of higher Green functions, it denotes the log-algebraicity statement just described. A different conjecture of Gross and Zagier, proved in a separate arithmetic setting, concerns divisibility of Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)21 by the product of the Manin constant, Tamagawa factors, and Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)22 in analytic rank Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)23; that conjecture is unrelated to higher Green functions and does not concern logarithms of algebraic numbers (Byeon et al., 2015).

There are also adjacent Gross–Zagier theories in which the basic output is a height rather than a logarithm of an algebraic number. The Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)24-adic Iwasawa-theoretic Gross–Zagier theorem identifies the cyclotomic linear term of a two-variable Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)25-adic Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)26-function with Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)27-adic height pairings of norm-compatible Heegner points, not with a direct logarithm formula (Howard, 2012). Explicit Gross–Zagier formulas for cube-sum elliptic curves and for twisted CM points on Shimura curves similarly express period-normalized central derivatives as Néron–Tate heights of algebraic CM points or twisted CM divisors [(Cai et al., 2014); (Howard, 2012); (Yin, 2 Jul 2026)]. In higher-dimensional Shimura varieties, the Arithmetic Gan–Gross–Prasad framework replaces Heegner points by arithmetic diagonal cycles and canonical heights by Beilinson–Bloch or Gillet–Soulé pairings, with central derivatives of normalized Gkf(z1,z2)G_k^f(z_1,z_2)28-functions on the analytic side (Zhang, 2024).

These neighboring theories are not instances of the Gross–Zagier log-algebraicity conjecture, but they show that the conjecture belongs to a larger Gross–Zagier paradigm in which special values or derivatives of automorphic objects are controlled by arithmetic invariants of algebraic cycles. A plausible implication is that the logarithm-of-algebraic-number phenomenon for higher Green functions is one visible boundary case of a broader regulator-and-period formalism.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Gross-Zagier Log-Algebraicity Conjecture.