GPT-4 Agent: Architecture and Applications

• GPT-4-based agents are autonomous systems that leverage large language models for decision making, planning, and tool integration across virtual and embodied environments.
• They employ multi-stage, modular architectures that separate perception, reasoning, feedback, and memory to enable iterative execution and error correction.
• Evaluation metrics include network coverage, execution success rates, and cost-effectiveness, demonstrating scalability and robust performance in diverse applications.

A GPT-4-based agent is an autonomous or interactive system in which applications of the GPT-4 LLM, accessed via a programmatic API, serve as the principal component for decision making, planning, perception, reasoning, or tool integration. Such agents may operate in purely virtual domains (e.g., information retrieval, planning), embodied settings (robotics), multi-agent environments, or as specialized scientific or engineering assistants. The following sections formalize the core principles, architectural foundations, implementation methodologies, evaluation regimes, representative domains, and generalization mechanisms of GPT-4-based agents.

1. Formal Foundations and Agent Specification

GPT-4-based agents are fundamentally instantiated as orchestrations of one or more calls to the GPT-4 LLM (or derivatives such as GPT-4o or GPT-4V), driven by prompt engineering, structured planning formalisms, and, in some cases, auxiliary neural, symbolic, or retrieval-augmented modules. The agent's interaction with an environment is typically formalized as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) or classical STRIPS-style planning sequence.

In dynamic planning, the environment is abstracted by a set of boolean predicates ("statuses"):

$S = \{s_1, s_2, \dots, s_{|S|}\}$

with the current state at time $t$ as $\sigma_t \subseteq S$. Individual agents are specified as STRIPS-like operators:

$$a = (\mathrm{Cond}(a),\, \mathrm{Add}(a),\, \mathrm{Del}(a))$$

where preconditions, add effects, and delete effects are explicit subsets of $S$ (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).

Multi-agent formulations, such as PEER (Wang et al., 2024), assign specialized roles (e.g., Plan, Execute, Express, Review) to distinct GPT-4-driven subagents that decompose, retrieve, synthesize, and assess answers in a closed-loop pipeline.

2. Multi-Stage and Modular Architectures

GPT-4-based agents are generally realized via layered or pipelined architectures, with explicit modular separation between perception, reasoning/planning, actuation, feedback, and memory components.

• Single-agent planning loops: Agents receive environment state (e.g., a linguistic summary or structured status set), parse user intention/goals, and sequentially output action plans or low-level commands by invoking the LLM with tightly controlled prompts (O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025).
• Networked multi-agent systems: Networks of GPT-4-generated agents are created automatically by recursively querying the model to enumerate all statuses, generate STRIPS-compatible operators for each status, and assemble the induced dependency graph. Edges are formed when one agent produces a fact required as a precondition by another (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Tool-integrated frameworks: Hybrid systems (e.g., Infant Agent (Lei et al., 2024)) separate the "brain" (GPT-4-based high-level reasoning, task decomposition, evaluation) from the "hands" (open-source model agent for executing tool APIs, managing file I/O, code execution) and maintain persistent, structured memory to enable cost-efficient, multi-step problem solving.

Typical data-flow architectures use builder modules to construct prompts by dynamically aggregating environmental feedback, previous dialogue history, retrieved domain knowledge (via RAG or embedding-based retrieval), and user requests (Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025, Lei et al., 2024).

3. Prompt Engineering and Planning Pipelines

Robust GPT-4-based agent behavior is strongly mediated by the design of prompt templates, output parsing protocols, and the application of few-shot or chain-of-thought paradigms.

• Status and agent enumeration: In dynamic planning, GPT-4o is invoked with structured object- and condition-based prompts to enumerate atomic predicates and to generate minimal STRIPS-like operator JSONs for each status $s$ (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Task decomposition: Multi-agent PEER-like frameworks use prompts to extract 3-5 sub-questions from a domain-specific query, guiding the Plan agent (Wang et al., 2024).
• Contextual mapping and correction: Robotic or embodied agents (e.g., Dobby (Stark et al., 2023)) encode dialogue context and a library of executables into the prompt, leveraging GPT-4's function-calling or plan-generation capabilities. The output is mapped to domain actions, reordered as needed for precondition satisfaction, and validated via embedding similarity or custom correction subroutines.
• Iterative execution loops: Agents frequently adopt error-detection and correction workflows by monitoring execution logs (e.g., solver runs in CFD (Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025) or SWE-bench test cases (Lei et al., 2024)), appending error snippets to the prompt, and looping the correction sequence until convergence or maximal attempts.

The output of GPT-4 is consistently parsed using JSON templates, explicit grammar structures, or regex rules to allow safe downstream execution and arbitration in behavior trees or planning graphs (O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025, Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).

4. Evaluation Methodologies and Empirical Results

GPT-4-based agents are subject to stringent quantitative and qualitative evaluation protocols to assess coverage, generality, and efficacy.

• Network coverage: Automatically generated agent networks (dynamic planners) are benchmarked against human-constructed counterparts using overlap in agent and status sets, with coverage rates such as $C_{\mathrm{agents}} \approx 72.4\%$ and $C_{\mathrm{status}} \approx 69.3\%$ (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Execution success rates: Planning convergence is measured as the percentage of trajectories reaching the goal within a fixed number of trials or iterations (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025, O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025).
• Real-world task domains: Applications include robotics (humanoids (O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025), quadrupeds (Mei et al., 2024), service robots (Stark et al., 2023)), scientific reasoning (MOF discovery (Zheng et al., 2023)), data science automation (Guo et al., 2024), and software engineering (SWE-bench (Lei et al., 2024)).
• Cost-effectiveness and scalability: Frameworks implementing logic-driven orchestration and external tool integration (Infant Agent) report up to 80% reduction in GPT-4 input/output tokens and large reductions in API usage, with corresponding exponential improvement in task completion rates over baseline LLM-only systems (Lei et al., 2024).
• Comparative bench-marking: GPT-4-based multi-agent systems (PEER) achieve approximately 95% of GPT-4's performance with significant cost and privacy advantages when the "Express" stage is migrated to a fine-tuned, local LLM (Wang et al., 2024).

5. Generalization, Domain Adaptation, and Extension Mechanisms

GPT-4-based agents are engineered for high generality and extensibility via several technical mechanisms:

• On-demand agent generation and network expansion: The recursive status-agent-network pipeline allows automatic expansion to new domains or goals by invoking GPT-4o in situ when new statuses/goals emerge in the environment (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) modules: Embedding-based retrieval is utilized for rapid domain adaptation, contextualizing GPT-4 outputs with nearest-neighbor documents, code templates, or knowledge bases (Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025, Wang et al., 2024).
• Semantic merging and clustering: Network size and redundancy are controlled by gigaprompted clustering and merging of predicate or agent nodes, preserving graph connectivity while limiting intractable growth (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Domain ontologies and plug-in components: Transfer to new platforms (e.g., different CFD solvers (Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025)) or task ontologies is facilitated by swapping only the domain-specific case indices, config writers, and error parsers, with core orchestration logic remaining invariant.
• Hierarchical management and division of reasoning/execution: Modular separation of reasoning (LLM-driven NextStep, task scheduling, self-reflection) from execution (tool API invocation) yields both robustness and cost efficiency, exemplified in logic-driven systems such as Infant Agent (Lei et al., 2024).

6. Limitations, Challenges, and Prospective Directions

While GPT-4-based agents exhibit high adaptability and generalization, several persistent challenges constrain their deployment:

• Network over-expansion: Excessively large, unconstrained agent/status graphs result in plan convergence failures, as demonstrated by 0% success on unwieldy distance-6 networks (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025).
• Prompt sensitivity and deterministic execution: Experiments show considerable volatility in agent performance due to minor prompt or grammar variants, especially in embodied and real-time robotics (O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025).
• Verification and safety: While GPT-4 is capable of generating executable plans, formal verification—particularly in safety-critical domains—remains unsolved. Hard pre-emption by safety providers and restrictive output grammars are currently standard practice (O'Brien et al., 30 Mar 2025).
• Domain knowledge hallucination and token budget restrictions: Hallucinated facts and limited context windows sometimes reduce reliability; synthetic memory compression and code-diff summarization techniques are adopted to mitigate these effects (Lei et al., 2024).
• Future work: Orthogonal research threads include hierarchical status clustering, online network expansion via real-time LLM calls, embedding explicit verification or model-checking, richer multi-modal input support, and formal integration of continuous state spaces into agent reasoning and planning cycles (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025, Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025).

---

In summary, GPT-4-based agents systematize the application of LLMs to dynamic planning, multi-agent orchestration, perception, complex tool use, and persistent memory management. Architectures leverage explicit planning formalisms, closed-loop interaction cycles, prompt-programmed coordination, and evaluation regimes that accommodate the challenges of scale, generality, and real-time environmental feedback. Their practical impact is evident across autonomous robotics, scientific research workflows, and multi-stage question-answering, with further extensibility anticipated through domain-specific adaptation and continuous improvement in cost, safety, and efficiency (Abe et al., 2 Apr 2025, Pandey et al., 10 Jan 2025, Lei et al., 2024, Wang et al., 2024, Stark et al., 2023).