Generator-Centric Systems

• Generator-centric systems are architectures where a central generator model orchestrates modular integration and co-optimization across subsystems.
• They employ explicit models and code generators to manage control, capacity, and dispatch, ensuring transparency and scalability in design.
• Applications span energy systems, cyber-physical software, and hybrid integrations, offering plug-and-play enhancements and efficient scenario analysis.

A generator-centric system is any software, algorithmic, or modeling architecture that places a "generator"—an explicit model, solver, or code-producing engine—at the core of system composition, optimization, or instruction. This paradigm brings modularity, transparency, and tractable integration of heterogeneous resources or behaviors around the generator, which functions as the locus for system-level analysis, co-design, or control. Generator-centricity spans domains from energy systems, where plant and storage optimization are coupled via explicit generator models, to cyber-physical software engineering, where code generation and architecture binding are orchestrated through reusable, platform-independent generator modules.

1. Foundational Principles of Generator-Centric Architectures

Generator-centric systems formalize a separation between core system logic (the generator) and ancillary or environment-dependent modules (including storage, actuators, or platform bindings). In energy systems, the generator is typically a physical plant (e.g., gas turbine, wind farm, nuclear reactor), with ancillary storage or process systems attached as augmentations for co-optimization (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024). In software engineering, generator-centricity is instantiated via meta-model-driven code generators, each transforming abstract models into executable artifacts while maintaining explicit interface contracts (Ringert et al., 2014, Ringert et al., 2015).

The defining features include:

• Centralized generator model: The generator exposes an explicit interface for control variables, sizing, and dispatch, while other domains (storage, auxiliary functions) are integrated as coupled subsystems.
• Modular integration: Storage domains or code libraries are attached via separate modules with well-defined linking mechanisms (e.g., connectors, binding DSLs).
• Co-design and co-optimization: Both sizing (capacity) and operational control (dispatch) are treated as joint optimization tasks around the generator core.

A key implication is the ability to abstract over platform, technology, or operational context, enabling rapid scenario testing, plug-and-play upgrades, and global system analysis.

2. Mathematical Formulation and Solvers in Generator-Centric Design

Generator-centric systems are typically formalized as structured optimization or transformation problems, wherein the generator’s outputs, states, or side-effects serve as the primary variables.

Energy Systems Co-Design

In networked energy system modeling with integrated storage, the objective is to maximize Net Present Value (NPV) subject to generators’ and storage subsystems’ dynamics and constraints. The system is represented by:

$$\max_{\Sigma,u(\cdot),x(\cdot)}\; \text{NPV} \;=\; -\,C_{\rm cap}(\Sigma) \;+\;\int_{t_0}^{t_f} \frac{v_{\rm profit}(u(t),x(t),\Sigma,t)}{D(t)} \;dt$$

subject to generator ramp dynamics, storage energy balances, and capacity, ramp-rate, and energy flow constraints—all affine in the variables—making the problem convex and solvable via direct transcription to a large linear program. State and control decision variables are indexed to the generator and multiple storage domains, and constraints link their time-dependent operation (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024).

Software/Hardware System Generation

In cyber-physical software, the generator-centric meta-model is supplied by a transformation pipeline:

• Input: platform-independent architecture (components, connectors, ports).
• Generator: code generator functions $G: M \to C$ with explicit interfaces for required languages, constraints, and dependencies.
• Output: platform-specific source artifacts, using binding transformations that resolve abstract components to implementation classes via dedicated code libraries (Ringert et al., 2014, Ringert et al., 2015).

Formal interfaces for generators ($I(G)$) encode constraints, artifact dependencies, and topologically ordered execution for robust composition.

3. Practical Instantiations Across Domains

Energy Systems: Capacity and Dispatch Optimization

The generator-centric capacity-and-dispatch framework introduced in (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024) co-optimizes plant sizing and dispatch, supporting combinations such as:

• NGCC with thermal storage and CCS
• Wind farm with battery energy storage
• Nuclear with high-temperature steam electrolysis for H₂

The framework’s convexity (all equations affine; no bilinear product of capacity and dispatch variables) enables efficient global optimization at scale. Case studies demonstrate that such generator-centricity allows modular addition of storage, carbon capture, or hydrogen production with clear economic and operational insight.

Software Architectures: Multi-Platform Code Generation

In model-driven engineering, systems such as MontiArcAutomaton realize generator-centric architectures by separating platform-agnostic component-and-connector meta-models from platform-specific implementations bound at generation time (Ringert et al., 2014, Ringert et al., 2015). The pipeline:

• Parses high-level architecture into an AST.
• Applies a binding transformation, tying abstract component instances to code libraries for the target platform.
• Invokes orchestrated code generators, each producing only the artifacts declared by its interface, ensuring modularity and composability.

This approach enables deferred platform commitment, reuse of the same logical model across diverse runtimes, and plug-and-play integration of new domains or target platforms.

4. Advantages and Performance Characteristics

Generator-centric systems yield technical benefits:

• Scalability: Convex, linear structure in energy systems permits solution of 30-year, hour-resolution problems in minutes; model order can remain fixed despite growing generator count by aggregating across a common generator-centric reference (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024, Spinelli et al., 2023).
• Modularity and reusability: Decoupling generator logic from extension modules permits reuse of architectures and rapid integration of new features or platforms (Ringert et al., 2014).
• Traceability and transparency: Explicit generator-centric models make system behavior analyzable and controllable, aiding both optimization and policy analysis.
• Plug-and-play operation: In hierarchical coordinated ensembles, activating or deactivating generation/storage units only alters allocation matrices, requiring no global controller redesign (Spinelli et al., 2020, Spinelli et al., 2023).

Observationally, breakdowns in energy flows and revenue shares are readily trackable, guiding R&D as well as investment decisions.

5. Extensions and Generalizations

Generator-centric paradigms generalize to:

• Hybrid energy systems: Inclusion of new storage domains, ancillary services, or market-driven functionalities by extending the generator-centric mathematical core while preserving convexity and modularity.
• Cyber-physical systems with complex coordination: Hierarchical scheduling and robust tube-MPC for dynamic ensembles with plug-and-play, enabled by per-generator encapsulation and reference shaping (Spinelli et al., 2020, Spinelli et al., 2023).
• Code generator orchestration: Modular integration of heterogeneous behavior or factory generators in robotics and embedded systems, predicated on formal contract-based composition and context validation (Ringert et al., 2015).

A plausible implication is that any domain admitting a central "generator"—be it physical, logical, or computational—can be structured for optimal extensibility, compositional validation, and efficient scenario screening via generator-centric design.

6. Limitations and Prospective Developments

Practical limitations arise:

• Context-window and complexity overload: In user-facing generator-centric retrieval-augmented architectures, such as those using LLMs, prompt and context length can overflow, and multi-agent enrichment introduces latency and cost (Zerhoudi et al., 12 Jul 2024).
• Non-convexity when modeling nonlinear or discrete phenomena: Some generator/storage combinations introduce bilinearities or non-convexities, requiring relaxation or approximation for practical solution in the generator-centric paradigm (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024).
• Data hunger in learning-based generator selection: Deep generator subset selection requires extensive labeled data for accurate dispatch and congestion avoidance, especially as system size grows (Bhattacharya et al., 2017).

Emerging directions include automatic summarization of extension module outputs, use of specialized agents for greater personalization or efficiency, and formal methods for generator interface evolution.

---

Key Papers Referenced:

• "A general framework for supporting economic feasibility of generator and storage energy systems through capacity and dispatch optimization" (Azad et al., 22 Apr 2024)
• "Multi-Platform Generative Development of Component & Connector Systems using Model and Code Libraries" (Ringert et al., 2014)
• "Code Generator Composition for Model-Driven Engineering of Robotics Component & Connector Systems" (Ringert et al., 2015)
• "Intelligent Subset Selection of Power Generators for Economic Dispatch" (Bhattacharya et al., 2017)
• "A Hierarchical Architecture for the Coordination of an Ensemble of Steam Generators" (Spinelli et al., 2020)
• "A Hierarchical Architecture for Optimal Unit Commitment and Control of an Ensemble of Steam Generators" (Spinelli et al., 2023)
• "PersonaRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with User-Centric Agents" (Zerhoudi et al., 12 Jul 2024)