Generative Flexible Latent Structure Regression

• GFLSR is a regression framework that recursively constructs latent variables for probabilistic modeling, unifying classical dimension-reduction methods.
• It employs sequential deflation of predictors and responses to extract interpretable loadings and robust latent scores with proven convergence.
• The model’s bootstrap procedure enables precise uncertainty quantification, yielding reliable confidence intervals for model parameters in real-world applications.

Generative Flexible Latent Structure Regression (GFLSR) characterizes a comprehensive class of statistical models and algorithms designed to provide a principled generative approach to regression and prediction by leveraging flexible, recursively constructed latent variable structures that subsume and formalize classical latent variable dimension-reduction methods. The GFLSR framework enables explicit probabilistic modeling, parameter inference, and uncertainty quantification for methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS), Principal Components Regression (PCR), Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA), and related techniques, which have historically been used primarily as algorithmic procedures rather than formal models (Grazian et al., 6 Aug 2025).

1. Model Structure and Recursive Generative Framework

GFLSR defines observed data pairs $(X, Y)$ as generated from a sequence of latent variables through recursively structured linear combinations and deflations. The modeling process is formalized as follows:

• Predictors: The observed matrix $X_0$ is decomposed as

$X_0 = \sum_{h=1}^H w_h \xi_h + X_H,$

where $w_h$ are weight vectors (loadings) and $\xi_h$ are latent $X$-scores, while $X_H$ denotes the residual.

• Response: The $Y$-variable is modeled as

$Y_0 = f_H(\xi_1, \ldots, \xi_H; \Theta_H) + Y_H,$

with $f_H$ a possibly nonlinear function (e.g., general additive model) parameterized by $\Theta_H$, and $Y_H$ the residual.

Each latent variable pair $(\xi_h, \omega_h)^\top$ is generated as a function of a shared latent random variable $U_h \sim$ Unif$[0,1]$ through suitable transformations $\Psi_h$,

$$(\xi_h, \omega_h)^\top = (s_{1h} \Psi_h(U_h),\, s_{2h} \Psi_h(U_h) + \epsilon_h),$$

where $s_{1h}, s_{2h}$ are scalars, and $\epsilon_h$ is zero-mean noise.

The generative process proceeds recursively, with sequential extraction and deflation of latent structure:

$X_{h-1} = w_h \xi_h + X_h.$

At each iteration, latent variables $\xi_h$ are constructed, the corresponding contribution is subtracted, and the process repeats on residuals.

2. Unified Representation of Classical Methods

The GFLSR framework encompasses a family of classical linear continuous latent variable methods as special cases, depending on the choice of extraction criteria, constraints, and parameterization:

Method	Dependence Measure $D$	Linear-Combination Constraint	$f_H$	Specialization in GFLSR
Principal Components Analysis (PCA)	Variance	Orthonormal	None	Unsupervised; $Y$ ignored; $f_H$ absent
PCR	Variance + Linear Reg.	Orthonormal	Linear	$f_H$ linear in $\xi_1,\ldots,\xi_H$
Partial Least Squares (PLS)	Covariance/Correlation	Orthonormal	Linear	$D$ is covariance; $f_H$ linear
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)	Covariance	Not forced orthonormal	Linear	Both $X$ and $Y$ sides decomposed

By selecting appropriate $D$, $f_H$, and constraints on $w_h$, GFLSR models reduce to these well-known procedures. Generative-PLS arises as a specialization where $\Psi_{h1} = \Psi_{h2}$, $f_H$ is linear, and the model strictly matches the PLS algebraic structure.

3. Parameter Estimation and Asymptotic Properties

A distinctive contribution of the GFLSR model is the derivation of rigorous theoretical results for the consistent estimation of model parameters and latent variables:

• Consistency of Loadings: The empirical estimators $\hat{u}_h$ (empirical loadings) satisfy

$$\mathbb{E}[\| \hat{u}_h - w_h\|_r] \to 0 \quad (n \to \infty)$$

for any $r$-th moment, showing convergence to their population values.

• Latent Score Reconstruction: The difference between estimated latent scores $\hat{\xi}_h$ (computed via empirical linear combinations) and their true underlying values converges in mean squared error:

$$\frac{1}{n} \mathbb{E}[\|\hat{\xi}_h - \xi_h\|^2] \to w_h^\top \Sigma_x^\bullet w_h,$$

where $\Sigma_x^\bullet$ is the noise covariance in the $X$ deflation residual. Analogous results hold for the response-side latent variables.

• Deflation and SVD: The process of extracting latent variables and loadings via maximization of covariance (subject to orthogonality and deflation) is connected to singular value decomposition of deflated covariance matrices, providing strong algebraic foundations for parameter estimation.

These results ensure that, under the generative model, the GFLSR estimators are statistically well-behaved and provide reliable recovery of latent directions as data size increases.

4. Bootstrap Procedure for Uncertainty Quantification

GFLSR enables formal statistical inference, including confidence intervals for model parameters and prediction intervals for future data. The novel bootstrap algorithm proposed for GFLSR operates as follows:

1. Fit the GFLSR model to data, record estimated loadings, latent variables, and compute residuals $X_H$, $Y_H$.
2. Group residuals to preserve noise structure, then resample these residual blocks rather than original data pairs to address dependence induced by deflation.
3. For each bootstrap sample, retrain the GFLSR, obtain bootstrapped estimates for all quantities of interest.
4. Use the empirical bootstrap distributions to form confidence and prediction intervals.

This approach accounts for the recursive latent-decomposition structure and heteroscedastic error that can arise under multistep deflation. Simulation studies demonstrate that the resulting intervals for model parameters and predictions often achieve better calibration and are typically narrower than Bayesian PLS intervals under standard conditions.

5. Comparison to Traditional and Probabilistic Methods

GFLSR, as a fully generative model, addresses inherent limitations of previous algorithmic and probabilistic latent structure methods:

• Algorithmic Methods (e.g., classical PLS): Lack a formal probabilistic model, are often not identifiable (subject to rotation), and do not provide principled tools for parameter inference or uncertainty quantification. GFLSR provides an explicit generative and inferential structure that resolves these issues.
• Probabilistic Latent Variable Models: Some prior probabilistic PLS methods (e.g., PPLS) assume diagonal or restricted noise covariances and can become biased or inconsistent in the presence of general covariance structure. GFLSR’s explicit generative recursion maintains consistency and robustness across broader error models.

Notably, the framework clarifies identifiability problems (such as arbitrary rotation of components) and the structural relationships between supervised and unsupervised dimension-reduction methods, unifying them under a generative interpretation.

6. Empirical Evaluation and Real Data Applications

GFLSR’s capabilities are empirically demonstrated through both synthetic and real-world studies:

• Simulation Studies:
  • Validate parameter recovery, convergence properties, and robustness to noise scaling and error covariance structure.
  • Demonstrate that estimated loadings converge to population values and quantify mean squared error in latent variable reconstruction as predicted by theory.
• Real-World Example (NIR Spectroscopy/Corn Dataset):
  • GFLSR is applied to high-dimensional spectral data with multiple responses (moisture, oil, protein, starch).
  • The model is used to analyze spectral regions influential for each response, with loading vectors’ confidence intervals estimated via the bootstrap method.
  • Visualization of loadings and uncertainty intervals aids interpretation and target selection in chemometric analysis.

These results support the conclusion that GFLSR not only matches traditional methods in predictive accuracy but also provides tools for formal inference and principled uncertainty statements.

7. Extensions and Inferential Foundations

By establishing a recursive, generative, and inferentially tractable framework, GFLSR opens avenues for:

• Extending to nonlinear or generalized additive models (via flexible choice of $f_H$).
• Infinite-dimensional generalizations and nonparametric extensions.
• Systematic model comparison based on inferential criteria (e.g., likelihood-based information, goodness-of-fit).
• Enhanced residual analysis and model diagnostics, facilitated by the explicit structure of deflation and latent variable extraction.

A plausible implication is that GFLSR’s explicit model structure, inferential guarantees, and flexible recursion may serve as a unifying foundation for both existing and future linear and nonlinear continuous latent variable models across multiple application domains.

---

In sum, Generative Flexible Latent Structure Regression (GFLSR) brings algorithmic dimension-reduction techniques into the domain of formal statistical modeling by providing an explicit generative mechanism, enabling principled estimator convergence, inferential uncertainty quantification, and broader applicability to real-world inference and prediction (Grazian et al., 6 Aug 2025).