Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Generalized Minimal Excludants in Partition Theory

Updated 13 July 2026
  • Generalized minimal excludants are partition statistics that generalize the classic mex by modifying the definition of the first missing object using frequency thresholds, consecutive gaps, and residue restrictions.
  • They yield new combinatorial identities and bijections connecting colored partitions, generalized Frobenius partitions, and q-series, enriching classical partition theory.
  • Applications include analyses of parity phenomena, asymptotic moment behavior, and combinatorial proofs of truncated theta identities in various partition frameworks.

Generalized minimal excludants are partition statistics obtained by varying the classical minimal excludant, namely the smallest positive integer absent from a partition. In recent work, this variation has been carried out along several axes: absence can be replaced by multiplicity below a threshold, by a missing block of consecutive integers, by restriction to a fixed residue class, by passage to bipartitions, or by the distinction between overlined and non-overlined parts in overpartitions. The resulting statistics are tied to colored partition functions, generalized Frobenius partitions, truncated Jacobi identities, Ramanujan qq-series, and asymptotic moment problems (Bhoria et al., 2022, Chern et al., 19 Jul 2025, Aricheta et al., 2023, Chen et al., 18 Jun 2026).

1. Classical mex and the partition-theoretic framework

For a partition TT, the minimal excludant is

mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.

Grabner–Knopfmacher studied this statistic under the name smallest gap, Fraenkel–Peled introduced mex in combinatorial game theory / set theory as the least missing positive integer, and Andrews–Newman adopted mex for partitions and rediscovered the smallest-gap statistic of Grabner–Knopfmacher (Kaur et al., 2021).

If P(n)P(n) denotes the set of partitions of nn, then

σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).

A central identity is

σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),

where D2(n)D_2(n) is the number of partitions of nn into distinct parts using two colors. Ballantine and Merca gave a purely combinatorial proof of this result, using Ferrers diagrams, staircase partitions, and a bijection adapted from Sylvester’s bijection for Jacobi’s triple product identity. The same paper records

σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),

and the parity statement

TT0

for some nonnegative integer TT1 (Ballantine et al., 2019).

This classical framework supplies the template for essentially all later generalizations: one defines a “first missing” object, forms total sums or moments over partitions of TT2, and then seeks colored-partition interpretations, TT3-series identities, or asymptotic formulas.

2. Frequency thresholds and missing chains

One major direction replaces “absent” by “present with frequency TT4.” Ballantine and Merca define the least TT5-gap of a partition TT6 as the smallest positive integer that does not appear at least TT7 times as a part of TT8, and write TT9 for the sum of these least mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.0-gaps over all partitions of mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.1 (Ballantine et al., 2019). In a later asymptotic formulation, the statistic is written

mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.2

so that

mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.3

The same paper introduces the congruence-class refinement

mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.4

and studies moments of both mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.5 and mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.6 (Chern et al., 19 Jul 2025).

A second direction replaces a single missing integer by a missing block of consecutive integers. The mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.7-chain mex of a partition mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.8 is defined by

mex(T)=min{k1:  kT}.\operatorname{mex}(T)=\min\{k\ge 1:\; k\notin T\}.9

so the statistic records the first gap block of length P(n)P(n)0. When P(n)P(n)1, it is exactly the classical mex. The paper introducing this statistic proves that the number of partitions of P(n)P(n)2 with exactly P(n)P(n)3 multiples of P(n)P(n)4 equals the number of partitions whose largest P(n)P(n)5-repeating part is P(n)P(n)6, and also equals the number of partitions with P(n)P(n)7 parts greater than the P(n)P(n)8-chain mex. It also derives the generating function

P(n)P(n)9

where nn0 is the sum of nn1-chain mex over all partitions of nn2 (Bhoria et al., 2022).

Bhoria, Eyyunni, and collaborators later gave combinatorial proofs of the corresponding nn3-chain identities and introduced the complementary nn4-chain maximal excludant. Their proofs use Glaisher’s bijection, conjugation, Ferrers-diagram cuts, and transfer operators nn5 and nn6, showing that the chain-based generalization fits naturally into the Euler–Glaisher–Franklin ecosystem (Bhoria et al., 2023).

3. Congruence classes and truncated theta phenomena

A third direction restricts the candidate excludants to a fixed arithmetic progression. In the notation used for truncated Jacobi identities,

nn7

is the smallest positive integer congruent to nn8 that is not a part of nn9. Thus σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).0 is the smallest odd positive integer absent from σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).1. This generalized mex is the central combinatorial device in a partition-theoretic interpretation of bilateral truncated Jacobi triple product identities (Chen et al., 23 Jun 2026).

In that setting one considers pairs of partitions

σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).2

together with refined counts determined by congruence conditions on σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).3 and σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).4. The main theorem expresses truncated alternating sums of σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).5 as explicit sums of two mex-refined counting functions. The paper presents this as a modular/congruence-class analogue of the Andrews–Merca truncated theorem and as a combinatorial explanation for the nonnegativity of coefficients in these truncated theta products (Chen et al., 23 Jun 2026).

The frequency-threshold version also has a residue-class refinement. For nonnegative integer σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).6,

σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).7

and

σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).8

Their generating functions are given explicitly, and the asymptotic theory shows that for fixed modulus σmex(n)=λP(n)mex(λ).\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{\lambda\in P(n)}\mathrm{mex}(\lambda).9, the choice of residue class σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),0 does not matter in the leading term: σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),1 This is the precise sense in which the congruence-class moments are asymptotically “equal” (Chern et al., 19 Jul 2025).

4. Colored partitions, distinct parts, and bipartitions

Generalized minimal excludants repeatedly admit colored-partition interpretations. In the classical case, Andrews–Newman’s identity relates σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),2 to 2-colored distinct partitions, and a later refinement splits the total according to the parity of the mex. If σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),3 and σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),4 denote 2-colored distinct partitions of σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),5 with an odd or even number of parts, then

σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),6

and

σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),7

The same paper develops σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),8-th moments of mex and signed moment refinements in terms of triangular-number transforms of σmex(n)=D2(n),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=D_2(n),9 (Bhoria et al., 2021).

For partitions into distinct parts, the sum

D2(n)D_2(n)0

has generating function

D2(n)D_2(n)1

where D2(n)D_2(n)2 is Ramanujan’s function. The same paper also studies odd minimal excludant and maximal excludant analogues over distinct partitions, and identifies Uncu’s series with the generating function counting distinct partitions whose mex is odd (Kaur et al., 2021).

A more recent extension passes from partitions to bipartitions. For a bipartition D2(n)D_2(n)3, Lin and Liu define

D2(n)D_2(n)4

the smallest positive integer that does not appear simultaneously in both components. Writing

D2(n)D_2(n)5

and

D2(n)D_2(n)6

the 2026 paper on two-colored generalized Frobenius partitions proves

D2(n)D_2(n)7

The proof is entirely combinatorial and proceeds by bijections built from staircase partitions and staircase insertion maps (Chen et al., 18 Jun 2026).

Generalized mex statistics also appear in two-color partitions in which even parts may occur only in blue. In that setting

D2(n)D_2(n)8

is the smallest positive integer congruent to D2(n)D_2(n)9 that does not occur in nn0, and Andrews–El Bachraoui’s identities

nn1

receive explicit combinatorial proofs via bijections built from the ordinary odd minimal excludant nn2 and the generalized blue-part mex (Dandan et al., 27 Jun 2026).

5. Overpartition generalizations

Overpartitions support several inequivalent mex notions. Aricheta and Donato define the minimal excludant of an overpartition nn3, denoted nn4, to be the smallest positive integer that is not a part of the non-overlined parts of nn5. The corresponding sum

nn6

satisfies

nn7

where nn8 counts partitions of nn9 into distinct parts using three colors. The same paper generalizes to least σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),0-gaps σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),1, defined as the smallest part of the non-overlined parts of σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),2 appearing fewer than σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),3 times, and derives a generating function for σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),4 (Aricheta et al., 2023).

A different viewpoint treats an integer as present in an overpartition if it appears in either overlined or non-overlined form. This yields four new mex-type statistics: σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),5, σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),6, σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),7, and σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),8. The ordered variants use the total order

σmex(n)=k0p ⁣(nk(k+1)2),\sigma\,\mathrm{mex}(n)=\sum_{k\ge 0} p\!\left(n-\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right),9

so that TT00 is the smallest overlined positive integer that is not a part of TT01. Their generating functions are expressed through Ramanujan’s TT02, TT03, the fifth-order mock theta functions TT04 and TT05, and corresponding arithmetic sums are realized as sum-of-tails and TT06-harmonic constructions (Dhar et al., 2024).

Another 2025 paper isolates two additional overpartition mex notions: the mex of the overlined parts and the mex of both overlined and non-overlined parts. If TT07 denotes the sum of the mex of the overlined parts over all overpartitions of TT08, then

TT09

If TT10 denotes the analogous sum for the mex of all parts, then

TT11

The first is governed by Ramanujan’s TT12; the second has a basic hypergeometric representation (Donato, 6 Jul 2025).

The chain paradigm also extends to overpartitions. The TT13-chain minimal excludant size of an overpartition TT14,

TT15

is the smallest positive integer TT16 such that there are no parts of size TT17 in TT18. The key structural theorem states that, under conjugation of overpartitions, TT19 is controlled by the largest TT20-repeating size. This yields explicit generating functions for

TT21

and for the complementary maximal statistic TT22 (Chen et al., 22 Jan 2025).

6. Asymptotics, parity, and arithmetic distribution

Generalized minimal excludants have a substantial asymptotic theory. For the frequency-threshold and residue-class statistics, the moment generating functions are analyzed through asymptotics of weighted partial theta functions and Ingham’s Tauberian theorem. The resulting first-order asymptotics show that the leading term depends on TT23, TT24, and TT25, but not on the residue class TT26; consequently the moments are asymptotically equidistributed across congruence classes for fixed modulus (Chern et al., 19 Jul 2025).

Parity phenomena are equally prominent. For the classical sum TT27, odd values occur exactly when

TT28

for some nonnegative integer TT29 (Ballantine et al., 2019). For the non-overlined overpartition mex,

TT30

for some TT31, so TT32 is odd exactly at triangular numbers and therefore even for almost all TT33. The same paper proves that if

TT34

then for any fixed TT35,

TT36

(Aricheta et al., 2023).

For other overpartition mex variants, the parity behavior changes. The sum of the mex of the overlined parts is almost always even, whereas the sum of the mex of both overlined and non-overlined parts is always even for every positive integer TT37 (Donato, 6 Jul 2025). On restricted partition classes, asymptotic formulas also remain available: for instance, the sum of mex over partitions into distinct parts is treated by a combination of bivariate generating functions, Ramanujan’s function TT38, and Ingham’s Tauberian theorem (Kaur et al., 2021).

Taken together, these results show that generalized minimal excludants form a coherent but highly nonuniform family. The unifying principle is the replacement of the first missing positive integer by a more structured first missing object; the resulting theories differ in whether the missing object is a single part, a gap block, a frequency defect, a residue-class representative, a bipartition obstruction, or an overpartition component. This suggests a common partition-theoretic program in which excludant statistics are organized by the ambient combinatorial category and by the notion of absence imposed on that category.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Generalized Minimal Excludants.