Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Gauge-Higgs Model (GHM)

Updated 12 November 2025
  • Gauge-Higgs Model (GHM) is a framework that reinterprets the Higgs field as an emergent phenomenon from extra-dimensional gauge dynamics and composite operators.
  • It employs both lattice and continuum formulations—using extra-dimensional Wilson lines and mean-field theory—to demonstrate nonperturbative spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  • The model features distinct phases (confined, layered, deconfined) that provide insights into electroweak symmetry breaking without relying on elementary scalar potentials.

The Gauge-Higgs Model (GHM) refers to a broad class of quantum field theory frameworks in which the Higgs field and its associated symmetry-breaking mechanism are reinterpreted as emergent phenomena from extra-dimensional gauge dynamics or, in related approaches, as composite or gauge-invariant functionals of fundamental gauge and matter fields. These models provide conceptually sharp alternatives to the conventional picture of elementary Higgs scalars, yielding calculable and sometimes nonperturbatively stable mechanisms of spontaneous symmetry breaking without reliance on elementary scalar fields, ad hoc symmetry-breaking potentials, or explicit vacuum expectation values. GHM is most prominently realized in Gauge-Higgs Unification (GHU) scenarios, both in higher-dimensional field theories and on the lattice, but also encompasses gauge-invariant reformulations of the Higgs mechanism, composite Higgs constructions, and gravitational analogs.

1. Foundational Principles and Formulations

The GHM framework is characterized by embedding the would-be Higgs sector into a gauge-theoretic structure, with the order parameter for symmetry breaking (e.g., the Higgs doublet in four dimensions) arising as:

  • An extra-dimensional component of a higher-dimensional gauge field (e.g., A5A_5 in 5D GHU).
  • A nonlocal Wilson line (Aharonov–Bohm phase) around a compact extra dimension, acting as a dynamical, gauge-invariant order parameter for symmetry breaking ("Hosotani mechanism") (Hosotani, 2012).
  • A composite, gauge-invariant combination of gauge and matter fields without reference to a gauge-fixed scalar vacuum expectation value (Kondo, 2016).

Lattice Realization:

The minimal lattice GHM is typically a pure 5D SU(2)SU(2) gauge theory compactified on S1/Z2S^1/\mathbb{Z}_2, with orbifold boundary conditions reducing the gauge symmetry on four-dimensional boundaries to U(1)U(1) and generating a boundary-localized complex scalar identified as the Higgs field (Irges et al., 2012).

Continuum and Mean-Field Approaches:

In the continuum, the zero mode of A5A_5 (or analogous components) is the physical Higgs, with the low-energy potential determined by quantum corrections to the Wilson line phase, yielding an effective potential Veff(θH)V_{\rm eff}(\theta_H). Nonperturbative lattice mean-field expansions analytically verify the emergence of nontrivial minima (SSB) in VeffV_{\rm eff} not present in perturbation theory, highlighting the crucial role of cutoff and strong-coupling effects (Irges et al., 2012, Hosotani, 2012, Chang et al., 2012).

2. Mean-Field Theory and Lattice Formulation

A prototypical 5D SU(2) lattice GHM is defined by an anisotropic Wilson-type action: S=β2n[1γμ<ν(112TrUμν(n))+γμ(112TrUμ5(n))],S = \frac{\beta}{2} \sum_{n} \Bigg[ \frac{1}{\gamma} \sum_{\mu<\nu} \left(1-\frac12 \mathrm{Tr} U_{\mu\nu}(n) \right) + \gamma \sum_{\mu} \left(1-\frac12 \mathrm{Tr} U_{\mu5}(n) \right) \Bigg], where β=4/g52\beta = 4/g_5^2 is the 5D coupling, and γ\gamma controls anisotropy between the "physical" and extra dimensions.

Orbifold Boundary Conditions:

A Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 reflection in the fifth dimension assigns parities to AMAA_M^A such that on the n5=0,N5n_5=0,N_5 boundaries, only the U(1)U(1) subgroup generated by σ3\sigma^3 survives, and the line (Polyakov loop) in the fifth direction,

P5(n)=n5=0N51U5(n,n5),P_5(n_\parallel) = \prod_{n_5=0}^{N_5-1} U_5(n_\parallel, n_5),

maps its off-diagonal components directly onto a complex scalar (the boundary Higgs Φ(n)\Phi(n_\parallel)) (Irges et al., 2012).

Lattice Mean-Field Expansion:

In the mean-field (MF) approach, link variables are replaced by unconstrained complex matrices vM(n)v_M(n), with translational invariance imposed in four dimensions and n5n_5 (orbifold) dependence retained. Fluctuations are integrated to quadratic order, yielding an explicit one-loop MF effective potential for the Wilson line phase ϕ\phi, which displays nontrivial minima away from $0$ or π\pi.

3. Nonperturbative Symmetry Breaking and Effective Potential

Hosotani Mechanism and Lattice vs. Continuum:

While naive perturbation theory at infinite cutoff yields a flat Veff(θH)V_{\rm eff}(\theta_H) with unbroken U(1)U(1), the nonperturbative mean-field potential exhibits a genuine minimum at ϕ0,π\phi \neq 0, \pi, dynamically generating a mass for the boundary U(1)U(1) gauge boson and the composite Higgs. This is a realization of the nonperturbative Hosotani (Wilson line) mechanism.

Physical Masses:

The ZZ-boson mass mZm_Z is extracted from the large-rr potential (Yukawa form) on the boundary: V(r)αremZr,V(r) \simeq -\frac{\alpha}{r} e^{-m_Z r}, and the Higgs mass mHm_H from the fall-off of the Polyakov-line correlator along the fifth dimension. The order parameter

ρHZ=mHmZ\rho_{HZ} = \frac{m_H}{m_Z}

distinguishes the symmetric (ρHZ\rho_{HZ} \to \infty) and SSB (ρHZ\rho_{HZ} finite) phases.

Normalization and Gauge Coupling:

Effective 4D gauge coupling is determined by

g42=g522πR,g_4^2 = \frac{g_5^2}{2 \pi R},

with R=a5(N5+1)/πR = a_5(N_5+1)/\pi the physical size of the extra dimension.

4. Phase Structure and Dimensionality

The lattice GHM exhibits three principal phases in mean-field analysis (Irges et al., 2012):

  • Confined: vˉ0(n5)=vˉ0(n5+12)=0\bar v_0(n_5)=\bar v_0(n_5+\tfrac12)=0
  • Layered: vˉ0(n5)0\bar v_0(n_5)\neq0, vˉ0(n5+12)=0\bar v_0(n_5+\tfrac12)=0
  • Deconfined (Higgs): vˉ0(n5),vˉ0(n5+12)0\bar v_0(n_5), \bar v_0(n_5+\tfrac12) \neq 0

Only in the deconfined/Higgs phase does the boundary static potential display a 4D Yukawa (massive gauge boson) behavior. Near phase transitions—especially for strong anisotropies—the spectrum dimensionally reduces to a 4D gauge–Higgs system exhibiting lines of constant physics along which observables remain fixed as the lattice spacing and couplings are tuned (1212.5514).

5. Relation to Gauge-Invariant Higgs Mechanisms and Continuum Implications

Gauge-Invariant Formulations:

Recent developments in GHM include gauge-invariant operator constructions that do not reference explicit symmetry breaking via nonzero ϕ\langle\phi\rangle, but instead express the Higgs mechanism through composite massive vector fields built from gauge and matter sectors. For SU(2)SU(2),

Wμ=ig[ϕ^,Dμ[A]ϕ^],\mathscr{W}_\mu = -\frac{i}{g} [\hat{\bm\phi}, \mathscr{D}_\mu[\mathscr{A}]\,\hat{\bm\phi}],

with mass term 12MW2WμWμ\frac12 M_W^2 \mathscr{W}^\mu \mathscr{W}_\mu emerging directly from the kinetic term after radial fixing (Kondo, 2016). This construction is manifestly compatible with Elitzur's theorem and provides a unified perspective on confinement-Higgs complementarity.

Cutoff and Nonperturbative Effects:

Lattice GHM studies demonstrate that inclusion of cut-off-scale operators uncaptured by perturbative effective field theory analysis can induce stabilization of the Wilson line phase and enable nontrivial dynamical symmetry breaking solely from gauge dynamics (Irges et al., 2012).

6. Model Generalizations and Phenomenological Extensions

Higher Dimensions and GUTs:

GHU models generalize to higher-dimensional gauge groups (e.g., SO(5)×U(1)XSO(5)\times U(1)_X or SO(11)SO(11) in Randall–Sundrum warped backgrounds), producing realistic 2HDM scenarios or GUT embeddings where the Higgs sector derives from gauge structure and orbifold/boundary conditions (Chang et al., 2012, Furui et al., 2016).

Beyond Lattice: Quantum Simulations and Statistical Models:

Extensions of the GHM framework appear in studies of quantum simulation with cold atoms, mapping Bose–Hubbard models to lattice gauge–Higgs Hamiltonians, and in rigorous studies of lower-dimensional statistical systems (e.g., 3D Ising gauge–Higgs) where GHM order parameters encapsulate confinement–deconfinement and Higgs transitions (Kuno et al., 2016, Grady, 2021).

Phenomenological Features:

Key GHM predictions include radiatively generated and UV-insensitive Higgs and vector boson masses, emergence of extra-dimensional-induced phase structure, and possible collider-detectable KK towers or ZZ' states with distinctive mass ratios, all encapsulated within a finite number of physical observables.

7. Conceptual and Mathematical Significance

The Gauge-Higgs Model architecture provides a technically robust mechanism for spontaneous symmetry breaking, dynamically generated Higgs potentials, and Higgs mass stabilization without direct ad hoc scalar potentials or fine-tuning. The nonperturbative phenomena captured by lattice GHM formulations, and the gauge-invariant operator algebra, position GHM as both a foundational tool in theoretical particle physics and a testbed for concepts in quantum field theory, statistical mechanics, and quantum simulation. It bridges continuum, lattice, and experimental perspectives, highlighting the universality and predictive power of gauge symmetry-based mechanisms underlying electroweak symmetry breaking and beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Gauge-Higgs Model (GHM).