Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Gauduchon Cone in Complex Geometry

Updated 24 May 2026
  • Gauduchon cone is an open convex cone in H^(n-1,n-1)_A(X,ℝ) defined by the Aeppli classes of Gauduchon metrics on compact complex manifolds.
  • It is dual to the pseudo-effective Bott–Chern cone, establishing a critical bridge between positive currents and the analytic theory of Hermitian metrics.
  • The Gauduchon cone plays a pivotal role in deformation theory, bimeromorphic invariance, and constructing canonical metrics within non-Kähler geometry.

The Gauduchon cone is a central object in non-Kähler complex geometry, parameterizing Aeppli cohomology classes of bidegree (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1) on a compact complex nn-manifold that admit positive, ˉ\partial\bar\partial-closed representatives; that is, representatives arising from Gauduchon metrics. The study of the Gauduchon cone and its variants provides a cohomological framework for understanding Hermitian metrics lying between the Kähler and general Hermitian settings. It also plays a crucial role in deformation theory, bimeromorphic geometry, and the analytic theory of canonical metrics.

1. Definitions and Basic Structures

Let XX be a compact complex manifold of dimension nn. The Aeppli cohomology group of bidegree (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1) is

HAn1,n1(X,R)=ker(ˉ ⁣:Cn1,n1(X)Cn,n(X))()+(ˉ).H^{n-1,n-1}_A(X,\R) = \frac{\ker\bigl(\partial\bar\partial\colon C^\infty_{n-1,n-1}(X)\to C^\infty_{n,n}(X)\bigr)} {\Im(\partial) + \Im(\bar\partial)}.

A Hermitian metric ω>0\omega>0 is Gauduchon if

ˉ(ωn1)=0,\partial\bar\partial\bigl(\omega^{n-1}\bigr) = 0,

so the power ωn1\omega^{n-1} determines a well-defined Aeppli class nn0. The Gauduchon cone is then defined by

nn1

Geometrically, nn2 is the image in cohomology of all real, positive, nn3-closed nn4-forms arising from Gauduchon metrics (Popovici, 2013, Popovici et al., 2014, Ornea et al., 2024).

2. Convexity, Openness, and Duality Properties

The Gauduchon cone nn5 is an open convex cone in the real vector space nn6. Convexity follows since any positive linear combination of Gauduchon nn7-forms remains positive and nn8-closed; openness follows from the openness of positivity in the relevant topology (Popovici, 2013, Ornea et al., 2024).

There is a canonical, nondegenerate duality pairing

nn9

where ˉ\partial\bar\partial0 is the Bott–Chern cohomology group. Under this pairing, the pseudo-effective cone of Bott–Chern classes of positive closed ˉ\partial\bar\partial1-currents,

ˉ\partial\bar\partial2

has as its dual the Gauduchon cone: ˉ\partial\bar\partial3 (Popovici, 2013, Ornea et al., 2024). The Bott–Chern Kähler cone, consisting of ˉ\partial\bar\partial4 with ˉ\partial\bar\partial5 and ˉ\partial\bar\partial6, embeds in the dual cone. These dualities tie the Gauduchon cone structurally to both positive current theory and the geometry of special Hermitian classes.

3. Deformation, Bimeromorphic, and Semicontinuity Aspects

The Gauduchon cone behaves in a controlled, lower-semicontinuous fashion under holomorphic deformations. If ˉ\partial\bar\partial7 is a proper holomorphic submersion and the central fibre ˉ\partial\bar\partial8 satisfies the ˉ\partial\bar\partial9-lemma, the Aeppli groups vary smoothly and

XX0

where XX1 is the canonical identification of Aeppli groups (Popovici, 2013, Popovici et al., 2014). The cone can only "shrink" in the limit. Closely related, the property of being "sGG" (manifolds where every Gauduchon metric is strongly Gauduchon) is stable under small deformations, but not necessarily closed in the parameter.

Moreover, the Gauduchon cone enjoys bimeromorphic invariance in multiple guises. In particular, it is stable under proper modifications and bimeromorphic maps—such as blowups—preserving the codimension conditions on exceptional loci (Popovici et al., 2014). Analogous statements hold for the Lee–Gauduchon cone in high-degree de Rham cohomology (Ornea et al., 2024).

4. The Small Gauduchon Cone and sGG Manifolds

A compact complex manifold XX2 is called sGG if every Gauduchon metric is strongly Gauduchon, i.e., the Gauduchon and strongly Gauduchon cones coincide: XX3 where

XX4

and the strongly Gauduchon condition is

XX5

Several numerical characterizations of sGG manifolds are available (Popovici et al., 2014):

  • XX6
  • XX7
  • The injectivity and surjectivity of canonical maps between de Rham, Dolbeault, and Aeppli cohomology

Prominent examples include the Iwasawa manifold and its small deformations, which are sGG yet not XX8-manifolds. The sGG property is bimeromorphically invariant but may not be preserved in the limit of a family.

Property Criterion / Example Reference
XX9 sGG manifolds; see Iwasawa manifold (Popovici et al., 2014)
nn0 Each Gauduchon nn1 strongly Gauduchon (Popovici et al., 2014)
nn2 sGG classification for nilmanifolds (Popovici et al., 2014)

5. The Gauduchon Cone in Locally Conformally Kähler and Other Settings

For a locally conformally Kähler (LCK) manifold nn3 with nn4, every conformal class of Hermitian metrics contains a unique Gauduchon metric (Ornea et al., 2024). The Gauduchon cone nn5 remains an open convex cone in nn6. It plays an essential role in the duality with pseudo-effective Bott–Chern classes and with the “Lee cone” in nn7. For various classes of LCK manifolds (Vaisman, Oeljeklaus–Toma, Kato), the Gauduchon cone lies strictly in the interior of the dual to the cone generated by nn8, which is pseudo-effective. This precludes the existence of balanced metrics on such manifolds—pairing with a balanced metric would force vanishing, but strict positivity instead holds (Ornea et al., 2024).

A related object, the Lee–Gauduchon cone in top-degree de Rham cohomology, arises from the class nn9, for which strong convexity and bimeromorphic invariance hold. In particular, balanced manifolds always have a trivial Lee–Gauduchon cone (Ornea et al., 2024).

6. Analytical and Metric-Theoretic Aspects

The Gauduchon cone is closely linked to canonical metrics and PDE theory. Popovici (Popovici, 2013) proposes a Monge–Ampère–type equation in bidegree (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)0 prescribing volume forms for metrics representing a given Gauduchon class. In the Kähler case, this specializes to the balanced Monge–Ampère equation. Uniqueness (with positivity normalization) is established for solutions within an Aeppli class; existence in the non-Kähler setting remains open. This analytic perspective enables the construction of canonical Gauduchon metrics attached to given classes and underpins applications to moduli of Calabi–Yau (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)1-manifolds.

Generalized Gauduchon cones for (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)2-Gauduchon metrics, parameterized by sign conditions of associated (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)3 functionals, have been introduced. The classical ((n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)4) Gauduchon cone is dual to the balanced cone (Fu et al., 2010).

7. Examples and Applications

Fundamental Examples

  • Balanced manifolds: The balanced cone of (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)5st powers of balanced Hermitian forms sits inside the Gauduchon cone.
  • Surfaces: On compact complex surfaces, the Gauduchon, Kähler, and balanced cones coincide due to the result of Lamari.
  • Nilmanifolds: The Iwasawa manifold exemplifies an sGG manifold not admitting a (n1,n1)(n-1,n-1)6-structure.

Applications

A plausible implication is that a more complete understanding of the Gauduchon cone, its analytic and topological structure, and its interplay with other geometric cones, is integral for advancing the theory of non-Kähler metrics, canonical representatives in cohomology, and the birational classification of complex manifolds.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Gauduchon Cone.