Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Gamma-Jacobson Radicals in n-ary Γ-Semirings

Updated 19 November 2025
  • Gamma-Jacobson radicals are a generalized form of the Jacobson radical for n-ary Γ-semirings, incorporating noncommutative and higher-arity structures.
  • They leverage modular maximal ideals and positional conditions to introduce novel definitions of n-ary primeness and semiprimality.
  • This framework enables spectral topology analyses and Wedderburn–Artin-type decompositions, advancing representation theory in complex semiring structures.

Gamma-Jacobson radicals generalize the classical Jacobson radical to the setting of noncommutative and nn-ary Γ\Gamma-semirings. The development of Gamma-Jacobson radicals is motivated by the need for a unified radical theory accommodating both higher arity and noncommutative phenomena, including positional (left/right/two-sided) structure and modular maximality constraints. These radicals allow for the characterization of semisimplicity, primitivity, and the intersection-theoretic core of Γ\Gamma-semirings, both in the classical and higher-arity noncommutative cases (Gokavarapu et al., 18 Nov 2025).

1. nn-ary Γ\Gamma-Semirings and Modularity Foundations

An nn-ary Γ\Gamma-semiring is defined as a quadruple

(T,+;Γ,μ)(T, +; \Gamma, \mu)

where (T,+)(T, +) is a commutative additive semigroup with identity $0$, Γ\Gamma is an additive semigroup, and the nn-ary product

μ:Tn×Γn1T,(x1,α1,x2,,αn1,xn)x1 ⁣α1x2 ⁣α2 ⁣αn1xn\mu: T^n \times \Gamma^{n-1} \longrightarrow T, \quad (x_1, \alpha_1, x_2, \dots, \alpha_{n-1}, x_n) \mapsto x_1{}_{\!\alpha_1}x_2{}_{\!\alpha_2}\cdots {}_{\!\alpha_{n-1}}x_n

satisfies additivity and zero-absorption in each slot, along with full nn-ary associativity under the action of Γ\Gamma. In this setting, modular maximal ideals are those two-sided ideals admitting a quasi-unit relative to the nn-ary product structure—these play a pivotal role in the construction of the Gamma-Jacobson radical.

2. Ideals and (n, m)-type Structures

The foundational extensions of ideal theory to higher arity and noncommutativity lead to the concepts of left, right, and two-sided ideals. For n=3n=3, left ideals satisfy closure under products with the second input in the ideal, while right and two-sided ideals use analogously indexed conditions. In the general nn-ary case, an (n,S)(n, S)-ideal is a subsemigroup II such that for any nonempty S{1,,n}S \subset \{1, \ldots, n\}, the nn-ary product is closed in II when all inputs indexed by SS are in II.

A further refinement establishes (n,m)(n, m)-type ideals: for mnm \leq n, II is an (n,m)(n, m)-ideal if for any x1,,xnx_1,\ldots,x_n, the number of entries from II at least mm implies closure under μ\mu. The minimal such mm is the arity-threshold τ(I)\tau(I). A decomposition theorem clarifies that every (n,m)(n, m)-ideal can be viewed as the intersection of all (n,S)(n, S)-ideals with S=m|S|=m.

3. nn-ary Primality, Semiprimality, and Radical Closures

Primeness and semiprimality are nn-ary generalizations, defined as follows:

  • nn-ary primality: A proper (n,1)(n,1)-ideal PP is nn-ary prime if μ(x1,α1,,αn1,xn)P\mu(x_1, \alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_{n-1}, x_n)\in P implies that some xiPx_i\in P.
  • nn-ary semiprimality: A two-sided ideal QQ is nn-ary semiprime if for all aTa\in T and αΓn1\vec\alpha\in \Gamma^{n-1}, Δn(a;α)Q\Delta_n(a;\vec\alpha) \in Q (where Δn(a;α):=μ(a,α1,a,α2,,αn1,a)\Delta_n(a;\vec\alpha):=\mu(a,\alpha_1,a,\alpha_2,\dots,\alpha_{n-1},a)) implies aQa\in Q.

The nn-ary prime radical of II is

$\sqrt[n,\Gamma]{I} = \bigcap_{P \supseteq I,\ P\ \text{%%%%54%%%%-ary prime}} P$

with an alternative, diagonal characterization: In,Γ={aT:αΓn1 with Δn(a;α)I}\sqrt[n,\Gamma]{I} = \left\{ a\in T: \exists\,\vec{\alpha}\in\Gamma^{n-1}\ \text{with }\Delta_n(a;\vec{\alpha})\in I \right\} This operator is a closure, and QQ is nn-ary semiprime if and only if Q=Qn,ΓQ = \sqrt[n,\Gamma]{Q}.

4. The Gamma-Jacobson Radical: Construction and Properties

For any nn-ary Γ\Gamma-semiring TT, the Gamma-Jacobson radical is defined as

JΓ(n)(T)=MMnMJ_\Gamma^{(n)}(T) = \bigcap_{M \in \mathcal{M}_n} M

where Mn\mathcal{M}_n is the family of all modular maximal two-sided ideals—that is, those admitting a quasi-unit.

Fundamental properties:

  • JΓ(n)(T)J_\Gamma^{(n)}(T) is always nn-ary semiprime.
  • JΓ(n)(T)=0J_\Gamma^{(n)}(T) = 0 if and only if TT is nn-ary Γ\Gamma-semisimple.
  • If every modular maximal ideal is nn-ary prime, then JΓ(n)(T)J_\Gamma^{(n)}(T) coincides with the intersection of all maximal ideals.

A plausible implication is that this framework presents an extension of semisimplicity, primitivity, and radical theory simultaneously for commutative, noncommutative, and higher-arity semirings.

5. Zariski-Type Spectral Topologies and Triadic Spectral Geometry

The radical theory is unified via spectral topologies: for each positional direction η{L,R,2}\eta\in\{L,R,2\} (left, right, two-sided), $\Spec_\eta(T)$ is the set of η\eta-prime ideals. Closed sets are defined by

$V_\eta(A) = \{P \in \Spec_\eta(T)\mid A \subseteq P\}$

with compact T0T_0-topology, and the radical of II is recovered as the intersection of primes containing II: IΓ,η=PVη(I)P\sqrt[\Gamma,\eta]{I} = \bigcap_{P\in V_\eta(I)} P A triadic spectral diagram emerges in the fully noncommutative setting: $\Spec_2(T) \rightarrow \Spec_L(T), \quad \Spec_2(T) \rightarrow \Spec_R(T)$ showing the two-sided spectrum as intermediary between left and right prime spectra.

6. Wedderburn–Artin-Type Decomposition and Representation Theory

Analogous to the classical Wedderburn–Artin theorem, if TT is finite or semiprimary and JΓ(n)(T)=0J_\Gamma^{(n)}(T)=0, then minimal primitive (thus prime) ideals {P1,,Ps}\{P_1,\ldots,P_s\} exist with

Ti=1sT/PiT \cong \prod_{i=1}^s T/P_i

Each T/PiT/P_i is a primitive Γ\Gamma-semiring acting faithfully on a simple module MiM_i, and the decomposition is unique up to permutation. Minimal primitive ideals are pairwise comaximal, reflecting robust representation-theoretic simplicity and allowing a tight connection between the radical and module-theoretic simplicity in noncommutative/high-arity settings.

7. Illustrative Examples and Invariants

Several example constructions clarify the landscape:

Example Main Data (paraphrased) Radical Consequences
Matrix semiring T=M2(N0)T=M_2(\mathbb N_0), Γ={1}\Gamma = \{1\}, a1b1c=a+b+ca_1\,b_1\,c=a+b+c entrywise Row-zero = left ideal; col-zero = right; their intersection = two-sided
Three-element system T={0,a,b}T = \{0, a, b\}, a+a=ba + a = b, Γ={α}\Gamma = \{\alpha\}, ternary product as in data Distinct left/right prime radicals, JΓ(T)=0J_\Gamma(T)=0
Pinning construction Given central idempotent ee, "pin" n3n-3 slots to ee to reduce arity Ideals/radicals compatible under arity-reduction
Threshold invariant For nn-ary II, arity-threshold τ(I)\tau(I) measures coordinate closure τ(I){1,,n}{}\tau(I) \in \{1,\ldots, n\}\cup\{\infty\}

The examples highlight the distinctions between positional and threshold properties and demonstrate the invariance and compatibility of radical theory under arity changes and noncommutativity.

Gamma-Jacobson radicals thus unify and generalize central decomposition and primitivity results, embedding classical, noncommutative, and higher-arity radical structures within a consolidated spectral and module-theoretic framework (Gokavarapu et al., 18 Nov 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Gamma-Jacobson Radicals.