Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fourier LCU for Non-Unitary Decompositions

Updated 1 February 2026
  • The paper introduces Fourier-LCU, a framework that decomposes non-unitary operators into linear combinations of unitaries using periodic extension and Fourier sine series for exponential error convergence.
  • It converts sine series into complex-exponential forms to map operator terms onto pairs of unitaries, facilitating a block-encoding method with double-logarithmic subnormalization scaling.
  • The approach employs convex optimization for coefficient regularization, achieving a Pareto-optimal trade-off between error tolerance and resource efficiency in quantum algorithm implementations.

A Fourier Linear Combination of Unitaries (Fourier-LCU) is a general analytic method for decomposing arbitrary non-unitary operators into accurate, exponentially convergent linear combinations of unitary operators. This is accomplished via smooth periodic extension and Fourier sine series techniques, yielding a block-encoding whose subnormalization parameter exhibits double-logarithmic scaling in the target error. The framework leverages convex optimization to regularize the coefficients for specific error budgets, tracing out a Pareto front for subnormalization-versus-error. These advances constitute a versatile approach for non-unitary quantum algorithms and circuits (Brearley et al., 25 Jan 2026).

1. Periodic Extension and Fourier Sine Series Construction

To represent an operator via a LCU, the core technical step is constructing a periodic extension of the identity function f(τ)=τf(\tau) = \tau within a given interval. Fixing τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta] for some η>1\eta > 1, one extends f(τ)f(\tau) to [π,π][−\pi, \pi] as a 2π2\pi-periodic, odd, and infinitely differentiable function. This ensures analyticity and supports exponential Fourier coefficient decay.

The extension yields a truncated mm-term sine series approximation:

f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)

The optimal coefficients aka_k are determined by a continuous least-squares problem over [π/η,π/η][−\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]:

τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]0

The resulting normal equations are τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]1, with

τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]2

Since τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]3, the coefficients τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]4 exhibit exponential decay in τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]5, ensuring rapid convergence.

2. Complex-Exponential Formulation and Unitary Mapping

The sine series can be rewritten using the Euler identity:

τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]6

Substitution yields:

τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]7

where τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]8, τ[π/η,π/η]\tau \in [-\pi/\eta, \pi/\eta]9, and η>1\eta > 10. Consequently, each sine term maps to a pair of unitaries with complex weights, forming the desired LCU structure.

3. Application to Arbitrary Non-Unitary Operators

Let η>1\eta > 11 be a general (potentially non-unitary) operator. Decompose η>1\eta > 12 into Hermitian and anti-Hermitian components:

η>1\eta > 13

The LCU approximation proceeds by:

  • Choosing η>1\eta > 14 so that η>1\eta > 15;
  • Approximating η>1\eta > 16 and η>1\eta > 17 by sine series as above;
  • Rewriting each sine term in unitary difference form.

The full LCU for η>1\eta > 18 to exponential error η>1\eta > 19 is:

f(τ)f(\tau)0

Each f(τ)f(\tau)1 is one of f(τ)f(\tau)2 with real weights f(τ)f(\tau)3 given by f(τ)f(\tau)4 (up to phase).

4. Block-Encoding and Subnormalization Scaling

Employing standard LCU block-encoding [Childs–Wiebe 2012], one introduces f(τ)f(\tau)5 ancillas, prepares amplitude state f(τ)f(\tau)6, applies controlled-f(τ)f(\tau)7 gates, and uncomputes via f(τ)f(\tau)8:

f(τ)f(\tau)9

with subnormalization parameter

[π,π][−\pi, \pi]0

Since [π,π][−\pi, \pi]1 decay exponentially and empirically [π,π][−\pi, \pi]2, the total normalization satisfies:

[π,π][−\pi, \pi]3

This double-logarithmic scaling in [π,π][−\pi, \pi]4 is a substantial improvement over previous polynomial relationships between subnormalization and error.

5. Coefficient Regularization and Pareto Front Optimization

Because the sine dictionary is overcomplete for [π,π][−\pi, \pi]5, there exist infinitely many coefficient sets yielding nearly identical [π,π][−\pi, \pi]6 error yet different [π,π][−\pi, \pi]7 summations (impacting [π,π][−\pi, \pi]8). Regularization is performed via convex optimization, exploiting the trade-off:

[π,π][−\pi, \pi]9

for 2π2\pi0 and dictionary matrix 2π2\pi1. At fixed error budget 2π2\pi2, the 2π2\pi3-minimization is:

2π2\pi4

Standard convex solvers or homotopy/LASSO-type path tracking yield the unique Pareto front 2π2\pi5. It is proven that 2π2\pi6 and 2π2\pi7 are nonincreasing in 2π2\pi8 and converge to a finite limit as 2π2\pi9. Numerically, “sweeping” mm0 down to zero identifies the lowest possible mm1 at target mm2.

6. Implementation Procedures and Practical Implications

The Fourier-LCU methodology is summarized by the following stepwise procedure:

  1. Construct an analytic mm3-periodic, odd extension of mm4 on mm5.
  2. Compute the exponentially convergent truncated sine series via least squares.
  3. Convert each mm6 into LCUs of mm7 for mm8; assemble mm9 via weighted sums.
  4. Realize the decomposition as an f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)0 block-encoding, utilizing f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)1 scaling as f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)2.
  5. Optionally, re-optimize coefficients with f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)3-regularized least squares to minimize f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)4 at fixed f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)5, thereby mapping out the Pareto front. All essential equations for f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)6, f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)7, f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)8, and f(τ)k=1maksin(kτ)f(\tau) \approx \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_k \sin(k \tau)9 as well as the regularization trade-offs are explicitly stated; optimized aka_k0 values for various aka_k1 are tabulated in Table B of the corresponding source (Brearley et al., 25 Jan 2026).

A plausible implication is that non-unitary quantum algorithms leveraging Fourier-LCU can reach error targets at far lower resource cost than via polynomial-scaling frameworks, and coefficient regularization can yield trainable sparsity for practical block-encodings.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Fourier Linear Combinations of Unitaries.