4WISD: Independent Steering & Driving

• 4WISD is a vehicular system architecture where each wheel has independent steering and drive, offering exceptional maneuverability and redundancy.
• It employs advanced kinematic decoupling with model predictive and deep reinforcement learning controls to ensure precise path tracking and robust navigation.
• The technology is applied in autonomous vehicles, mobile robotics, and industrial platforms, demonstrating improved stability and performance in experimental trials.

Four-Wheel Independent Steering and Driving (4WISD) refers to robotic and vehicular platforms in which each wheel unit provides both independent steering and independent drive actuation. This architecture delivers unmatched maneuverability, redundancy, and functional flexibility, enabling precise path tracking, advanced trajectory control, coordinated drift or rotation, and robust navigation in dynamic or cluttered environments. 4WISD has broad applicability in autonomous ground vehicles, mobile robotics, electric vehicles, and industrial mobile platforms, with increasing research attention on model-based control, hierarchical optimization, deep reinforcement learning, and sensor integration.

1. Core Principles and System Architecture

4WISD platforms enable independent control over both the steering angle and driving torque of each wheel. This decoupling leads to a high number of controllable degrees of freedom, surpassing traditional Ackermann or skid-steer mechanisms. System architectures typically employ either:

• Four opportunistically placed drive modules (e.g., (Shi et al., 2019, Gonzalez et al., 2020))
• Specialized in-wheel motors and bespoke steering actuators per wheel
• X-by-wire frameworks allowing independent control of steering, driving, and braking (Chen et al., 2023)

The primary kinematic challenge is the redundancy: the coordination of steering and propulsion must preserve nonholonomic constraints, stability, and mechanical feasibility, and avoid inter-wheel slip, especially during complex maneuvers or configuration changes.

A representative 4WISD robot (e.g., hTetro (Shi et al., 2019)) uses self-reconfigurable four-differential drive units, where steering assignments ensure all wheel axes converge at a movable instantaneous center of rotation (ICR), calculated mathematically via body-frame transformations:

$$\begin{bmatrix} X_e^* \ Y_e^* \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \cos\theta^* & -\sin\theta^* \ \sin\theta^* & \cos\theta^* \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} X_d^* - X^* \ Y_d^* - Y^* \end{bmatrix}$$

Each wheel’s steering angle $\beta_{i,d}$ and drive velocity $v_{id}$ are mapped from trajectory and orientation error through explicit equations that ensure all wheel planes are concurrent at the virtual ICR while enforcing velocity and motor limits.

2. Path Tracking and Redundancy Resolution

Advanced path tracking in 4WISD systems relies on mathematical decoupling of translation and rotation. Controllers map desired trajectory and orientation into an ICR, splitting motion into straight-line travel and induced rotation (Shi et al., 2019).

• The path tracking controller may employ error-driven feedback in both Cartesian error and orientation error, using adaptive gains and proportional laws for angular velocity correction.
• Individual wheel steering is assigned so that all velocity vectors are concurrent at the calculated ICR, accommodating self-reconfigurable morphologies and complex trajectories.

Model predictive control (MPC) and curvature-based controllers are widely used for reference path tracking (Chen et al., 2023, Lim et al., 2023). MPC explicitly incorporates system constraints (steering angle bounds, slip limits, actuator bandwidth) and future trajectories, while hybrid architectures combine direct yaw-moment control (DYC) and deep learning–based estimators for enhanced safety in dynamically changing environments.

3. Traction, Tire Force Allocation, and Actuator Coordination

Accurate traction and force allocation are critical for exploiting the dynamic advantages of 4WISD. Algorithms have shifted from optimizing slip ratios and force references on a per-wheel basis to system-level approaches:

• Center-point motion feedback control transforms global motion commands into per-wheel velocity references, automatically allocating traction without explicit force optimization (Vošahlík et al., 2023).
• Advanced control allocation methods consider real-time vertical load, actuator dynamics (modeled as first-order inertial systems with time constants per actuation type), tire force limits, and wheel steering precision (Lu et al., 19 Mar 2024).
• Attainable tire force volumes are calculated using convex polygonal approximations, real-time slip ratio, and slip angle constraints, rather than simplistic friction circle models.

Redundancy is resolved locally via nested control loops (outer for velocity tracking, middle for local acceleration, inner for slip regulation), typically implemented as hierarchical PID or similar linear controllers.

4. Extended Maneuverability: Steering Modes and Drifting Control

4WISD supports a diverse array of maneuvers, including zero-turn (in-place rotation), lateral motion (sideways shifting), symmetric turning, and autonomous drifting:

• Steering parameterization condenses multi-wheel control into two variables (forward velocity $v_x$ and angular velocity $\omega$), facilitating the design of symmetric, zero-turn, and lateral modes (Baby et al., 25 Dec 2024).
• Hierarchical controllers for autonomous drifting track desired tire forces along both body axes, then convert them to steering angles and motor torques via inverse tire models, often leveraging Newton–Raphson–based iterative solvers for nonlinearly saturated tires (Xiao et al., 23 May 2025).
• NMPC frameworks integrate front/rear steering and direct yaw moment actuation to replicate race-level drifting, surpassing the limits imposed by conventional stability controllers (Tavolo et al., 4 Jun 2024).

Simulation results consistently show improved path tracking error, greater slip-angle authority, and enhanced stability across challenging maneuvers (zig-zags, diagonal moves, high-curvature turns).

5. Hierarchical and Learning-Augmented Control Frameworks

Modern 4WISD control architectures often employ multi-layer decision-making:

• High-level policies, trained via deep reinforcement learning (DRL), issue global motion commands (e.g., $(v_x, v_y, \omega_z)$) based on sensor inputs (LiDAR, cameras), goal states, and environment models (Baby et al., 25 Dec 2024, Bari et al., 6 Jun 2025, Wang et al., 22 Aug 2025).
• Low-level fuzzy logic controllers map these commands to wheel-precise steering angles and torques, enforcing kinematic feasibility and preventing strain or slippage (Wang et al., 22 Aug 2025).
• Hybrid approaches outperform purely DRL or rule-based methods in training efficiency and reliability, particularly in dynamic or industrial environments.

Reward functions combine progress, safety, and stability terms, ensuring efficient path following while penalizing risky or erratic actions. The layered inference system reduces erratic behaviors seen in pure end-to-end reinforcement learning and facilitates scalable adaptation to new platforms.

6. Sensing, Perception, and Cloud-Based Systems

Some 4WISD–enabling frameworks relocate perception to infrastructure sensor networks (ISNs), leveraging global localization and planning with cloud computation (Yang et al., 29 Oct 2024):

• Cloud-based MPC and APF controllers use real-time location and obstacle maps, delegating planning and tracking to servers with low-latency communications (5G, Wi-Fi).
• The increased degrees of freedom (per-wheel steering and drive) magnify the model complexity and constraint count, but also increase maneuverability and safety by permitting non-holonomic behaviors beyond the capabilities of onboard-only sensing.
• System integration requires stringent synchronization across perception, planning, and execution, with linearization errors managed by frequent state updates and robust control law designs.

7. Experimental Results and Performance Analysis

Across multiple platforms and research projects, experimental and simulation outcomes underline the strengths and residual challenges of 4WISD:

Vehicle/Platform	Control Strategy	Key Results
hTetro (modular robot)	ICR-based path tracking	RMS errors: 0.108 m (X, 'O' shape), 0.129 m ('S', 'Z')
AGRO	Ground/aerial PD stabilization	402 ms attitude recovery in freefall; 1g impact reduction
FDWEV	APF + CC/MPC-based tracking	≤0.3 m tracking errors at 30 km/h; MPC superior in dynamics
4WISD EV	Tire force + actuator-aware alloc.	Yaw rate and trajectory error reduced to 0.06 m
Agricultural robot	DRL-based, steering param.	83.57% navigation success rate; time halved vs. PD
A4WD Racecar	PPO RL, end-to-end steering/torque	25% higher combined g-force; adaptive torque vectoring
Drifting controller	Hierarchical MPC + inverse tire	RMS lateral error to –0.31 m; steady drift at 35° sideslip

A plausible implication is that platforms employing simultaneous independent wheel steering and driving—when coupled with adaptive and hierarchical control architectures—achieve superior performance in challenging, unpredictable scenarios at the limits of vehicle dynamics.

8. Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions

Despite pervasive improvements, 4WISD research faces several challenges:

• Computational complexity for real-time MPC and NMPC variants grows rapidly with increased actuator count and degrees of freedom (Tavolo et al., 4 Jun 2024).
• Discontinuities and singularities during abrupt orientation changes or trajectory steps require robust feedback and error-constrained control, as well as adaptive gain scheduling (Shi et al., 2019).
• Sensor non-linearities and noise affect performance, particularly for estimators (e.g., LSTM-based tire force prediction vs. EKF (Lim et al., 2023)).
• Mechanical limitations (max wheel velocities, steering rates, bump steer correction) must be handled by constraint-based allocation and feedforward strategies (Lu et al., 19 Mar 2024).
• Sim-to-real transfer for DRL-based algorithms demands high-fidelity models and domain randomization to accommodate environment variability (Baby et al., 25 Dec 2024, Bari et al., 6 Jun 2025).

Future research may revolve around real-time implementation and optimization of hierarchical learning-based controllers, improved sensor fusion with infrastructure-based localization, and advanced allocation strategies that combine dynamic, actuator-aware tire force constraints with integrated trajectory generation.

---

Four-Wheel Independent Steering and Driving embodies the leading edge of robotic and vehicular motion control, integrating kinematic redundancy resolution, traction allocation, learning-based planning, and robust low-level enforcement to achieve high stability, maneuverability, and adaptability across a wide range of operating conditions.